One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who knew the Russians k**led Seth Rich?
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
Jul 13, 2019 10:30:29   #
Mikeyavelli
 
permafrost wrote:
Gee, a great yard decoration if ever was one..


Better to have a working tank in your garage.

Reply
Jul 13, 2019 12:31:36   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Better to have a working tank in your garage.



Not a bad idea,, then I could drive it to the lake front at my neighbors and talk about dockage access..



Reply
Jul 13, 2019 12:42:34   #
JoyV
 
Seth wrote:
I get some other news dump alerts, possibly from MetroPCS, that include articles from various sites I visit or even subscribe to and a few from MSM sites like CNN that deal with the kind of political information some cookies monster has deduced would interest me.
Since I dumped Yahoo!, I haven't had any of their news appear, however.

Is it possible that your computer or device came with Yahoo! already installed, or that somewhere along the line you downloaded some Yahoo! product without realizing who it belonged to?

Being an analog man in a digital world, all I can do is guess... 😁
I get some other news dump alerts, possibly from M... (show quote)


I have been using google since I got this laptop. And I never gone to YahooNews. But it is possible some automatic upgrade did it. The sites I'm referring to aren't necessarily news sites. For instance when I start at the google home page to googled "white house", I get a yahoo search listing of sites they consider the top sites for my search term. If I then click on whitehouse.gov, after scrolling through enough pages to find it; it takes me to the correct page but the yahoo "Y" will be at the left in the URL box.

I can still get where I want to go, but I have to wade through a lot more pages of left wing sites in the yahoo search list than I did in the google search list to find any which aren't left wing. So it's just an annoyance.

Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2019 13:12:51   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
Mueller was an investigator, not a judge.

He made it clear that trump could be cleared..

If trump were not sitting in the white house he would be indicted..


Mueller did not say that.

Reply
Jul 13, 2019 13:15:38   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JoyV wrote:
Do you read what you post?

1) “I hope you can see your way to letting this go.” How is that pressuring Comey to end the probe on Flynn? Since when did "I hope" become synonymous with "I order"

2) Oh how horrible -- He wanted Sessions to do his job! Yup. Proof of guilt! And where did you get that he called Comey to tell him to push back publicly on the Trump/Russia collusion story? Even after Comey's firing and his giving testimony under oath against Trump, Comey never said that. Now maybe it was in his later book which was not written under oath.

3) Trump expressed dismay that Sessions recused himself to put a anti-Trumper at the head of the investigation. How is that obstruction? He said Mueller had a conflict of interest. Yup, he did. Now where did you get that his aides told him that the conflict of interest was groundless? When did his aides give testimony to such under oath?

4) So Trump thought the investigation was being done very unfairly and wanted his people to convey that? Many of us were of the same opinion that it was being conducted very unfairly with people publicly acknowledged to want Trump out as president. How does that obstruct the investigation?

5) Not to publicly disclose! Not give to the news! He did not say to keep it from the investigation. Sorry to have to inform you; but a special counsel investigation is not the same thing as a report by the media. As for the substance, since when is meeting with someone who might have something against a competitor candidate which might be helpful to the campaign; a crime! So since you think this is so bad, you must be apoplectic over the Steele opposition research which involved far more than meeting with people who might have dirt of an opposing candidate, but actually paying to dig up dirt.

6) So again he wanted Sessions to do the job he had been appointed to do and which he took a binding oath to do. That MUST be obstruction. After all, when does anyone expect a government official to actually do their job, and since when is an oath by a federal government official taken seriously?

7) What White House directive to remove Mueller. Please post it. In fact, if Trump wanted to fire Mueller he could have under the grounds Mueller had a conflict of interest. P**********l appointments come in two forms: those that require the approval of the Senate and those that do not. Aside from Cabinet secretaries and Supreme Court justices, whose nominations require the approval of the Senate, the President of the United States currently has the authority to appoint people to high-level positions within the federal government unilaterally. According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Special Counsel is appointed by the Attorney General, who is in the executive branch under the President. "Grounds for removal are limited to “misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies.” He had a serious conflict of interest!
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/5271
https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/attorney-generals-special-counsel-regulations/

8) Sympathetic messages--positive messages? This is now obstruction?

9) Public sympathetic messages changed to castigation after Cohen was caught in lies (not just that Trump said so but he kept contradicting himself under questioning and in court), so it is not simply Trump's opinion. Did he threaten Cohen? Did he offer him any sort of bribe?

10) And the biggy. Comey fired!!!! Please look at your calendar. Comey was fired BEFORE the investigation began or was even in the works. So how could it be an attempt to obstruct the investigation?
Do you read what you post? br br 1) “I hope yo... (show quote)


Nicely summarized. And very correct.

Reply
Jul 13, 2019 13:16:46   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
Gosh the tilt of the right wing is amazing.. not going over your 10 points, but will tell you that none of them are as you wish they were..


How are they wrong?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.