One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Planned Parenthood - Progressive R****m
Jun 16, 2019 07:36:34   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
PLANNED PARENTHOOD

PROGRESSIVE R****M



When Nancy Pelosi won The Margaret Sanger Award from Planned Parenthood (PP) there was nary a peep in the mainstream media about the origins of PP & the views of its main founder, Margaret Sanger. If anything, there was the usual gushing of admiration. But even the most cursory look at the programs of PP or Sanger is an exploration in r****m that would make a Ku Klux Klanner blush with p***e. PP & Sanger despised just about everyone.

A glance at the list of previous recipients of the Award is instructive. There’s Phil Donahue who was always one of the country’s best weather vanes when it came to topics on his program; he was rarely other than fashionably progressive. Then there’s Anthony Romero, the executive director of the equally odious American Civil Liberties Union. There’s also the famous Dr. Ruth (Westheimer) whose contribution to the mores of sexual restraint rivals that of Hugh Hefner. The list goes on.

Dear old Margaret despised most of the people in the world and felt that only about 13% were fit to procreate. On the bottom rung of her ladder of the fit were the aborigines of Australia, the b****s of Africa and their descendants. From Australia and Africa, things went up, roughly north & northwest, through east Asia and southern Europe to the most fit, the w****s of northwestern Europe. (If that sounds like the Aryans of Adolf Hitler, stay tuned).

She recommended that the unfit be segregated from the fit to prevent cross breeding. Heaven forbid that undesirables contaminate the gene pool of those she approved.

Also among her unfit were Hispanics, Catholics, Irish, anyone with a venereal disease, the r****ded, the insane and those born with deformities. She sent a letter of congratulations to Adolf Hitler for his infanticide program, his solution for defective children. And speaking of solutions, the hierarchy of the German National Socialists, AKA the N**is, used her Birth Control Review for their Final Solution for Jews, gypsies and others.

Her contributions included a Negro Project. Its stated goal was to eliminate the Negro race.

Knowing the importance that their ministers and religion played in the lives of America’s b****s, she planned to recruit black ministers to endorse birth control for them but it was a ruse. She wrote to a physician in Milton, Massachusetts, “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.” At a Ku Klux Klan rally in New Jersey she called b****s “weeds” and “reckless breeders.”

Among PP’s programs to improve the human race was the sterilization of the unfit. It was quite successful and surreptitious.

A black woman in North Carolina just recently discovered that she had been, unknowingly and involuntarily, sterilized in 1968 after she’d had a baby out of wedlock. She had two strikes against her, the illegitimate child and being black. North Carolina was arranging compensation for her and others. There are undoubtedly many other victims in other states that implemented the recommendations of her Birth Control Review. I’ve never heard or read these things covered in the mainstream media.

Some may say that it can’t be that bad & they are correct. It’s much worse and the proof is available to everyone with a simple web search for “Planned Parenthood” or “Margaret Sanger.”

Trent Lott’s career came to a screeching halt for far less than what Margaret Sanger said and advocated and Pelosi should know Sanger’s history but either doesn’t or doesn’t care. That she accepted the award is a slap in the face of all Catholics, Hispanics, b****s, aborigines, unwed parents, minorities and everyone she regarded as unfit.

But this entails far more than simply PP and Margaret Sanger. You will never hear a progressive admit that Margaret Sanger was both a r****t and a progressive, even though she is considered one of the most influential progressives of the twentieth century. The Nation magazine, one of the most important progressive publications in the country, lists her at #7. Her policies and those of PP are progressivism at its ultimate. They all justified their policies as necessary to reach Shangri la.

In western tradition, our Judaeo Christian heritage accepts mankind’s imperfectability but urges us to seek guidance through the prophets and God. Progressivism is belief in the improvement and perfection of mankind through government and government imposes its will only through violence or the threat of it.

Progressivism flies in the face of human experience. It is at war with mankind’s nature and to bring its programs into effect, it must resort to violence against resistors. In extreme cases, it results in the barbarities of Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Josef Stalin, Mao Zedong, Fidel Castro, etc. Lest this seem too alarming, everyone should realize that each of those monsters was admired by his progressive contemporaries but today’s progressives will never admit it.

Judaism and Christianity draw from completely different assumptions and are the antithesis of progressivism; progressives are far less religious than others. You must make a choice to worship man or God.

And when you wish to establish your Brave New World or New World Order, it is best to destroy the old. Our oldest tradition is Judaism, and Catholicism is the oldest Christian tradition. That is why they are the most frequent and earliest targets of progressivism.

But progressives are the anointed and know they are entitled to run our lives because we can’t be trusted to do it ourselves. That justifies their excesses.

Reply
Jun 16, 2019 09:26:39   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD

PROGRESSIVE R****M



When Nancy Pelosi won The Margaret Sanger Award from Planned Parenthood (PP) there was nary a peep in the mainstream media about the origins of PP & the views of its main founder, Margaret Sanger. If anything, there was the usual gushing of admiration. But even the most cursory look at the programs of PP or Sanger is an exploration in r****m that would make a Ku Klux Klanner blush with p***e. PP & Sanger despised just about everyone.

A glance at the list of previous recipients of the Award is instructive. There’s Phil Donahue who was always one of the country’s best weather vanes when it came to topics on his program; he was rarely other than fashionably progressive. Then there’s Anthony Romero, the executive director of the equally odious American Civil Liberties Union. There’s also the famous Dr. Ruth (Westheimer) whose contribution to the mores of sexual restraint rivals that of Hugh Hefner. The list goes on.

Dear old Margaret despised most of the people in the world and felt that only about 13% were fit to procreate. On the bottom rung of her ladder of the fit were the aborigines of Australia, the b****s of Africa and their descendants. From Australia and Africa, things went up, roughly north & northwest, through east Asia and southern Europe to the most fit, the w****s of northwestern Europe. (If that sounds like the Aryans of Adolf Hitler, stay tuned).

She recommended that the unfit be segregated from the fit to prevent cross breeding. Heaven forbid that undesirables contaminate the gene pool of those she approved.

Also among her unfit were Hispanics, Catholics, Irish, anyone with a venereal disease, the r****ded, the insane and those born with deformities. She sent a letter of congratulations to Adolf Hitler for his infanticide program, his solution for defective children. And speaking of solutions, the hierarchy of the German National Socialists, AKA the N**is, used her Birth Control Review for their Final Solution for Jews, gypsies and others.

Her contributions included a Negro Project. Its stated goal was to eliminate the Negro race.

Knowing the importance that their ministers and religion played in the lives of America’s b****s, she planned to recruit black ministers to endorse birth control for them but it was a ruse. She wrote to a physician in Milton, Massachusetts, “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.” At a Ku Klux Klan rally in New Jersey she called b****s “weeds” and “reckless breeders.”

Among PP’s programs to improve the human race was the sterilization of the unfit. It was quite successful and surreptitious.

A black woman in North Carolina just recently discovered that she had been, unknowingly and involuntarily, sterilized in 1968 after she’d had a baby out of wedlock. She had two strikes against her, the illegitimate child and being black. North Carolina was arranging compensation for her and others. There are undoubtedly many other victims in other states that implemented the recommendations of her Birth Control Review. I’ve never heard or read these things covered in the mainstream media.

Some may say that it can’t be that bad & they are correct. It’s much worse and the proof is available to everyone with a simple web search for “Planned Parenthood” or “Margaret Sanger.”

Trent Lott’s career came to a screeching halt for far less than what Margaret Sanger said and advocated and Pelosi should know Sanger’s history but either doesn’t or doesn’t care. That she accepted the award is a slap in the face of all Catholics, Hispanics, b****s, aborigines, unwed parents, minorities and everyone she regarded as unfit.

But this entails far more than simply PP and Margaret Sanger. You will never hear a progressive admit that Margaret Sanger was both a r****t and a progressive, even though she is considered one of the most influential progressives of the twentieth century. The Nation magazine, one of the most important progressive publications in the country, lists her at #7. Her policies and those of PP are progressivism at its ultimate. They all justified their policies as necessary to reach Shangri la.

In western tradition, our Judaeo Christian heritage accepts mankind’s imperfectability but urges us to seek guidance through the prophets and God. Progressivism is belief in the improvement and perfection of mankind through government and government imposes its will only through violence or the threat of it.

Progressivism flies in the face of human experience. It is at war with mankind’s nature and to bring its programs into effect, it must resort to violence against resistors. In extreme cases, it results in the barbarities of Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Josef Stalin, Mao Zedong, Fidel Castro, etc. Lest this seem too alarming, everyone should realize that each of those monsters was admired by his progressive contemporaries but today’s progressives will never admit it.

Judaism and Christianity draw from completely different assumptions and are the antithesis of progressivism; progressives are far less religious than others. You must make a choice to worship man or God.

And when you wish to establish your Brave New World or New World Order, it is best to destroy the old. Our oldest tradition is Judaism, and Catholicism is the oldest Christian tradition. That is why they are the most frequent and earliest targets of progressivism.

But progressives are the anointed and know they are entitled to run our lives because we can’t be trusted to do it ourselves. That justifies their excesses.
PLANNED PARENTHOOD br br PROGRESSIVE R****M br b... (show quote)


T***h and facts. How rare.

Reply
Jun 16, 2019 09:37:01   #
bahmer
 
Peewee wrote:
T***h and facts. How rare.


Amen and Amen

Reply
 
 
Jun 16, 2019 09:47:25   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Peewee wrote:
T***h and facts. How rare.




I'm waiting for woodguru, PeterS, Kevyn or one of their kind to respond to this. What do you think the odds are? I have had the facts verified from multiple sources. They can not be refuted.

Reply
Jun 16, 2019 10:28:48   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
I'm waiting for woodguru, PeterS, Kevyn or one of their kind to respond to this. What do you think the odds are? I have had the facts verified from multiple sources. They can not be refuted.


Hum... to be or not to be PC (politically correct)... I don't care what that group thinks as they are wrong 99.9% of the time.

Reply
Jun 16, 2019 10:53:20   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Yeah, but they keep blowing off their absurdities based on very dubious 'facts' (Often it's some obscure posting that they've dredged out from some source. It's like the old telephone game. They distort it even more.)

Reply
Jun 16, 2019 15:33:46   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Peewee wrote:
Hum... to be or not to be PC (politically correct)... I don't care what that group thinks as they are wrong 99.9% of the time.



You see, they can't respond. There is no response. They can not dismiss the facts I have presented. One thing I do in all my writings is to try to make sure there are no factual errors. Rarely has anyone found one.
So they take easy way out; they don't bother responding. This shows you what they are.


I've done this before with them. Same result.



Reply
 
 
Jun 16, 2019 20:04:12   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
You see, they can't respond. There is no response. They can not dismiss the facts I have presented. One thing I do in all my writings is to try to make sure there are no factual errors. Rarely has anyone found one.
So they take easy way out; they don't bother responding. This shows you what they are.


I've done this before with them. Same result.


You see, they can't respond. There is no response... (show quote)


Keep it up then! The quieter they are the happier I am.

Reply
Jun 16, 2019 20:14:17   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Peewee wrote:
Keep it up then! The quieter they are the happier I am.


It's more than twelve hours & no response. They will only post their vitriol and unsubstantiated accusations.




Reply
Jun 17, 2019 21:11:18   #
teabag09
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
I'm waiting for woodguru, PeterS, Kevyn or one of their kind to respond to this. What do you think the odds are? I have had the facts verified from multiple sources. They can not be refuted.


My wife didn't believe me when years ago I told her who Margret Sanger really was all about. The internet changed that as well as other things. She just thought I was weird and biased. Of course she was a dim then, she's now just a tad left of me and I make Attila look like a piker. Mike

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.