Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas

F**ebook Has a Process to Label You a “H**e Agent” for Behavior Online AND Offline — Just Like the ChiCom Social Credit Scoring System

Crazy edit intro ""I may have touched on this before but as usual the resident troll's here think anything thats not covered by CNN/MSLSD is conspiracy theory. I've been tellin folks to get away from google n' f**ebook since 2003, I used to have a storefront across the alley from a covert goolag office location and I thought it was bad back then, Boy was I mistaken""

In 2018 Google helped the Chinese C*******ts develop a social credit scoring system. The scoring system, first announced in 2014, rates China’s one billion citizens based on their behavior and associations. Already, nine million people with low scores have been blocked from buying tickets for domestic flights and trains.
As horrible as this sounds the Silicon Valley tech giants are already using a similar system here in the United States.
And Facebook is using offline behavior to factor into their scoring system.

On Thursday Breitbart’s Allum Bokhari revealed that Facebook is using a similar social credit scoring system on Americans.

This is no surprise to those who have noticed the growing intolerance by big tech to conservative thought leaders and publishers. Facebook monitors the offline behavior of its users to determine if they should be categorized as a “H**e Agent,” according to a document provided exclusively to Breitbart News by a source within the social media giant.

The document, titled “H**e Agent Policy Review” outlines a series of “signals” that Facebook uses to determine if someone ought to be categorized as a “h**e agent” and banned from the platform.

Those signals include a wide range of on- and off-platform behavior. If you praise the wrong individual, interview them, or appear at events alongside them, Facebook may categorize you as a “h**e agent.”

Facebook may also categorize you as a h**e agent if you self-identify with or advocate for a “Designated H**eful Ideology,” if you associate with a “Designated H**e Entity” (one of the examples cited by Facebook as a “h**e entity” includes Islam critic Tommy Robinson), or if you have “tattoos of h**e symbols or h**e slogans.” (The document cites no examples of these, but the media and “anti-r****m” advocacy groups increasingly label innocuous items as “h**e symbols,” including a cartoon frog and the “OK” hand sign.)

Facebook will also categorize you as a h**e agent for possession of “h**e paraphernalia,” although the document provides no examples of what falls into this category.

The document also says Facebook will categorize you as a h**e agent for “statements made in private but later made public.” Of course, Facebook holds vast amounts of information on what you say in public and in private — and as we saw with the Daily Beast doxing story, the platform will publicize private information on their users to assist the media in hitjobs on regular American citizens.

More Here > https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/06/13/exclusive-facebooks-process-to-label-you-a-h**e-agent-revealed/

Kevyn

Just don’t be a N**i and you have nothing to worry about.

Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

This is what it has come to for approximately half of Facebook's participants, whose willing membership on Facebook has given that company the wealth and political influence they now possess.

All those with conservative, common sense and/or Christian proclivities are to be labeled "h**e" agents, and because "h**e" is an emotion, not a person, company or organized entity of any kind, that makes no sense at all, on the face of it.

Facebook is functioning as a spy agency, judging the behavior of their "customers" 24/7, even when not signed into them, and subsequently labeling them for life.

That is a complete violation of privacy, and there was a time when they could have been taken to court and permanently shut down for such behavior, but apparently today's society and legal system has moved far beyond that concept.

Personally, I never joined Facebook, have never sent a "Tweet" on Twitter, never use Google as the search engine on any of my browsers, and haven't watched over a dozen Youtube presentations in total, and then, only under duress.

None of those social enterprises are required for life in the 21st century, despite the rumors to the contrary.

A personal life kept private is still alive and well for anyone who values that concept.