No need to respond because it’s clear you did not and I mean did not read the Muellar report, you lack the basic understanding of what it’s intent was and his findings.

Your talking the Uranium One again and it’s not 20% and the uranium mined cannot be exported out of this country and it gets sold to US nuclear power plants, and Clinton had nothing to do with the approval process. That whole issue was nothing. So again you lack the basic understanding when a foreign country wants to buy an American company the process for approval is immense. So debating something which you have no understanding is a waste of time.

Again you have not read the Iran deal you lack a basic concept that was in the Iran deal so it’s difficult to debate someone on an issue such as Iran and you never read the agreement.

This the problem with Trump supporters they hear something on Fox news or read an article written by a conspiracy theorist that because your facts.

The Russians understand the right wing ignorants they know nothing matters but there r****t agenda. They will hack into our social media and as you can see you posted it on this site without one once of fact checking..

Let’s just ask a basic question on the Uranium one deal. How many agencies within the federal government were required to approve Uranium one and what restriction were put on the new owner. Simple enough you commented on the issue so you should have the answer.

Yes, according to the alt-right media, your assertion would be true, too bad they don't tell you the full t***h. One would THINK that being around for 64 years, one would gain the knowledge of 64 years of experience, too bad that isn't always the case. I suppose it all depends on the intellect of the person and whether or not they are comfortable living life with their head shoved firmly up their backside.

My recommendation is that you remove said head from it's dark place of residence and actually do some research and seek the t***h, it IS out there, in the real world, not in that dark and stinky hole. Neither party is perfect, but if we accept the good of each party and reject the bad, we will be the better off for it. That is why I choose not to fully back NONE of our current parties, NONE of them have ALL the right answers. You ARE aware that there are more than two parties currently, right? Currently there are four parties active.

No need to respond because it’s clear you did not and I mean did not read the Muellar report, you lack the basic understanding of what it’s intent was and his findings.

Your talking the Uranium One again and it’s not 20% and the uranium mined cannot be exported out of this country and it gets sold to US nuclear power plants, and Clinton had nothing to do with the approval process. That whole issue was nothing. So again you lack the basic understanding when a foreign country wants to buy an American company the process for approval is immense. So debating something which you have no understanding is a waste of time.

Again you have not read the Iran deal you lack a basic concept that was in the Iran deal so it’s difficult to debate someone on an issue such as Iran and you never read the agreement.

This the problem with Trump supporters they hear something on Fox news or read an article written by a conspiracy theorist that because your facts.

The Russians understand the right wing ignorants they know nothing matters but there r****t agenda. They will hack into our social media and as you can see you posted it on this site without one once of fact checking..

Let’s just ask a basic question on the Uranium one deal. How many agencies within the federal government were required to approve Uranium one and what restriction were put on the new owner. Simple enough you commented on the issue so you should have the answer.

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset with national security implications and Uranium One owned uranium mining operations in the United States, the acquisition of Uranium One by Rosatom was reviewed by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), a committee of nine government cabinet departments and agencies including the United States Department of State, which was then headed by Hillary Clinton. Clinton herself did not sit on CFIUS, but rather the State Department was represented by Jose Fernandez, the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs, who stated that Clinton was not involved in the Uranium One matter.

Hmm, one person is open to facts, prefers getting information from multiple sources and doesn't mind doing their research, another guy is OPPOSED to facts, only bothers getting his opinions fed to him through alt-right media and seemingly lacks the intelligence, the ambition or both to do any research. Which one has their head up their back side?

Remove your head from your hind side and view the facts, on the B******i attack alone 6/10 investigations were conducted by the Republicans themselves. I suppose that all the republicans that kept insisting on doing more investigations into B******i are all Obama henchmen, right? Enjoy that crow feast in your near future.

As you refuse to face facts, I feel that continuing to discuss this with you is useless. Unless you either accept Actual reality or can present new REAL facts/points/evidence to support your arguments, I will likely not bother responding further with you on this topic.

You obviously just talk out of your butt, anyway. I have done investigative work, for a living, including a few occasions where I was paid to backtrack someone else because the client wasn't satisfied with the previous investigation for wh**ever reason. On two occasions I found stuff my predecessor missed that led to different conclusions.

So instead of delivering uninformed, wishful thinking ignorance, you may want to wait and see like an intelligent person might do. I'm sure you must know at least one that you could ask.😁