Radiance3

============
AF!,
Procedures used were correct? There were 600 times requests for added security for Ambassador Stevens none was done.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/01/26/600-requests-from-b******i-for-better-security-what-this-statistic-really-means/

The Armed Forces nearby in Italy, had the time to help him but they were asked to stand down.
https://www.dailyrepublic.com/all-dr-news/opinion/local-opinion-columnists/b******i-they-lied-men-died/

Obama and Hillary lied that the cause of the death was the Mohammad Video.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/10/26/obama_donald_trump_is_a_liar_let_me_run_through_this_just_to_jog_your_memory.html

Obama stood at the UN podium announced that the cause of the B******i attack was the Mohammad Video. He even apologized to the world due to the Mohammad video that is controversial to his Islam faith

The Ambassador Stevens was used to secretly facilitate t***sfer of weapon to Syria via Turkey without Congress approval.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/08/hillary-clinton-wikileaks-b******i-scandal-arm-syrian-rebels-al-qaeda-isis-libya-turkey/

Everything Obama and Hillary did was against our national security policy, and they were Treasonous. Those are the real treasons committed against our country.
.

Airforceone

No need to respond because it’s clear you did not and I mean did not read the Muellar report, you lack the basic understanding of what it’s intent was and his findings.

Your talking the Uranium One again and it’s not 20% and the uranium mined cannot be exported out of this country and it gets sold to US nuclear power plants, and Clinton had nothing to do with the approval process. That whole issue was nothing. So again you lack the basic understanding when a foreign country wants to buy an American company the process for approval is immense. So debating something which you have no understanding is a waste of time.

Again you have not read the Iran deal you lack a basic concept that was in the Iran deal so it’s difficult to debate someone on an issue such as Iran and you never read the agreement.

This the problem with Trump supporters they hear something on Fox news or read an article written by a conspiracy theorist that because your facts.

The Russians understand the right wing ignorants they know nothing matters but there r****t agenda. They will hack into our social media and as you can see you posted it on this site without one once of fact checking..

Let’s just ask a basic question on the Uranium one deal. How many agencies within the federal government were required to approve Uranium one and what restriction were put on the new owner. Simple enough you commented on the issue so you should have the answer.

Airforceone

Radiance3

AF1, The sale of Uranium One to Russia was treasonous.
1. It allowed Russia to manufacture nuclear weapon using the Uranium One bought by Russia from Canadian Rosotum which is situated in the United States.

The money had a quid -pro-quo relations with Hillary Clinton then Security of State, and therefore was a
treasonous act.

The deal in question involves the sale of a Canadian company, Uranium One, with mining interests in the U.S. to Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear energy agency. The sale occurred in stages, beginning in 2009 when Rosatom purchased a minority stake in Uranium One, and continued in 2010, when the Russian agency took ownership of a 51 percent share of the company. In 2013, a third t***saction gave Rosatom full ownership of Uranium One.

2. It was also a gross violation of the Emolument Clause.
Amendments 1-10 to the Constitution of the United States constitute what is known as the Bill of Rights on an American f**g.

The emoluments clause, also called the foreign emoluments clause, is a provision of the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 9, Paragraph 8) that generally prohibits federal officeholders from receiving any gift, payment, or other thing of value from a foreign state or its rulers, officers, or representatives.

3. The proceeds of the $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation where only 5% of the fund goes to charity. Her Foundation is a window dressing in the guise of self-enrichment business.

Seth

You should be a career politician, AF1.

You actually managed to use five entire paragraphs to say absolutely nothing of any substance, kind of like those bull**** form letters politicians like to send out from time to time that, like your post, are in no way, shape or form worth anyone's time.

Common_Sense_Matters

He can not help your lack of reading comprehension. True, spelling and grammatical errors made some of the points hard to understand but the points were clear enough.

Even though you chose NOT to include the first paragraph (or maybe it was the last or one of the ones part way through), the first paragraph points out that he doesn't believe maureenthannon bothered to read the Mueller report. The second paragraph deals with her (maureenthannon) complete lack of knowledge pertaining to the Uranium One deal. The third paragraph deals with the Iranian deal. The fourth paragraph deals with Trump supporters' ignorance and gullibility in that they believe all the lies, propaganda and conspiracy theories of the right far right wing propaganda machine churning out lies for the weak minded to buy into. The fifth paragraph explains how the Russians know of this weakness in alt-right thinking and how to properly exploit your flaws. The sixth paragraph can appear to be a redundancy as it goes back to a topic from paragraph two but not really, it merely asks a question based on the topic of paragraph two.

There, does that clear things up for you? Perhaps you would care to answer his question in his final paragraph, or do I need to explain to you what the question is asking?

When you post in ignorance, you only show your own ignorance, not that which you perceive in others.

Seth

That only reflects the usual Democrat slant on events -- complete denial that Hillary the Walking Crime Wave® is a t*****r, that she profited mightily from Uranium One and was totally at fault for B******i -- which ignores anything, no matter how major, done wrong by any Democrat yet twists the tiniest, not even illegal or treasonous picayune on Trump's part into a heinous crime.

You folks are the biggest hypocrites in history.

However, with President Trump at the helm, steadily discharging officials who served under the Obama Umbrella of Corruption©, honest investigations will ensue and the t***h will be laid before the American people, the t***hs that would have remained buried had Hillary been elected.

Then you can all cry in your tofu, join hands and sing Kumbaya before crawling back into your safe spaces...

Common_Sense_Matters

Yes, I agree that if one were to believe all the conspiracy theories, lies and alt-right propaganda that you obviously believe, that Hillary would appear to be a "Walking Crime Wave® is a t*****r" and that Obama had an "Umbrella of Corruption©", but many people are smarter than that. Have you NEVER wondered what the t***h is like? It IS out there for you to find, if one only makes a minimal attempt to do so.

I guess I have one thing to be glad for about not being a liberal, I don't have to eat tofu as you assert that all liberals do eat tofu. Never been a fan of soy or singing religion based songs myself. I also haven't bothered building myself a "safe space" yet, nor have any intentions on doing so. Is that a space where you go to hide from reality? If so, what kind of amenities have you installed into yours?

Seth

Nope, no safe space. But I've been around for going on 64 years, long enough to know bull**** when I see it, and where today's Democrats are concerned, it's everywhere.

Common_Sense_Matters

Yes, according to the alt-right media, your assertion would be true, too bad they don't tell you the full t***h. One would THINK that being around for 64 years, one would gain the knowledge of 64 years of experience, too bad that isn't always the case. I suppose it all depends on the intellect of the person and whether or not they are comfortable living life with their head shoved firmly up their backside.

My recommendation is that you remove said head from it's dark place of residence and actually do some research and seek the t***h, it IS out there, in the real world, not in that dark and stinky hole. Neither party is perfect, but if we accept the good of each party and reject the bad, we will be the better off for it. That is why I choose not to fully back NONE of our current parties, NONE of them have ALL the right answers. You ARE aware that there are more than two parties currently, right? Currently there are four parties active.

Seth

Let's see how brilliant you still believe yourself to be in, say, two years after some non-Obama people have had the opportunities to complete investigations.

Right now, seeing as things are still in early stages, you shouldn't be too definitive as you might later end up looking like one of the many buffoons who were so positive Hillary was going to be the next president.

Seeing that this is the case, you may well be the one with his head buried deep in that dark place.

I only say this to save you some possible embarrassment at a later date.

Common_Sense_Matters

Since they will result in the same conclusions as all the others, I am not worried



You do know what they say of those that keep doing the same things and always expecting different results don't you? Probably not.



Hmm, one person is open to facts, prefers getting information from multiple sources and doesn't mind doing their research, another guy is OPPOSED to facts, only bothers getting his opinions fed to him through alt-right media and seemingly lacks the intelligence, the ambition or both to do any research. Which one has their head up their back side?

Remove your head from your hind side and view the facts, on the B******i attack alone 6/10 investigations were conducted by the Republicans themselves. I suppose that all the republicans that kept insisting on doing more investigations into B******i are all Obama henchmen, right? Enjoy that crow feast in your near future.

As you refuse to face facts, I feel that continuing to discuss this with you is useless. Unless you either accept Actual reality or can present new REAL facts/points/evidence to support your arguments, I will likely not bother responding further with you on this topic.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

They do the exact same thing to conservative posts. Neither side have a monopoly on virtue or stupidity.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

The email server wasn't illegal, just its' user to send classified messages. Reagan didn't try to play off the blame from a stupid video. Bombings at Tanzania and Kenya embassies were investigated. Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, and many more.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

Now you are being ridiculous. Equal branches keep the powers of faction and the ambitions of politicians wanting more power in check. I don't recall any conservative speaking against checks-and-balances.