One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
If Trump Is So About T***sparency He Can Start With The Mueller Report
Page <<first <prev 5 of 9 next> last>>
May 27, 2019 11:07:09   #
EmilyD
 
Morgan wrote:
Allowed by law according to the discretion of Trump and Barr, how very convenient... just like any corrupt dictator. Trump is a typical hoodlum, he habitually hides and lies making sure there is no trail to him. Gangsta 101.


Allowed by law: Rule 6 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which was passed by Democrats when Ken Starr released private information of Grand Jury testimony to the public when he finished his investigation of Bill Clinton. This is a law pushed into existence by the DEMOCRATS. The Mueller team consisted mostly of Democrats...the only Republican on the team was Mueller.

Therefore, Dems don't believe the outcome of an investigation conducted by their OWN people, and therefore demand that the Attorney General of the United States break their OWN law or be held in contempt so they can conduct a "re-do" of their OWN investigation. Is that about right?

Rule 6 (especially 6(e)(2)): https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6

Reply
May 27, 2019 12:17:40   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Barack Hussein Obama? Not a Muslim?
Bullnadler. Barack Hussein Obama was raised in the madrassas of Jakarta and is certainly a Muslim at heart if not in private practice.
What is the most beautiful sound Bathhouse Barry ever heard?
Why it's the muzzein, the Islamic call to prayer.
The gay, Kenyan born marxist is a Muslim.


Do all you trump supporters agree with his nutjob? He's had a steady diet of h**e radio and faux news, it would seem.

Reply
May 27, 2019 12:29:07   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Do all you trump supporters agree with his nutjob? He's had a steady diet of h**e radio and faux news, it would seem.


He didn't say enough.
Did the best he could to destroy our country.
And continues nonstop.
If you cannot detect this h**e, could be you are the nutjob.
His h**e is evident in his actions, refuses to salute our nation's f**g.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2019 12:51:24   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
America 1 wrote:
He didn't say enough.
Did the best he could to destroy our country.
And continues nonstop.
If you cannot detect this h**e, could be you are the nutjob.
His h**e is evident in his actions, refuses to salute our nation's f**g.


Would you say you "prefer white folks"?

Reply
May 27, 2019 13:04:42   #
Ricktloml
 
[quote=Radiance3]======================
President Trump is the most t***sparent of all presidents on record.

Here are the reasons why:
1. During the Mueller investigation of this greatest h**x in history planted against him, the Executive Office had provided 500 witnesses, all examined under oath for up to 30 or more hours.
2. The Executive Office had provided the Mueller investigation 1.5 million documents.
3. The 400 pages of the Mueller report after 2.5 years of lengthy scrutiny and examinations, Congress was legally provided 99% of the documents.
4. The 1% classified info given by the 19 Grand Juries' as required by law could not be displayed.
5. The DOJ Barr summarized the report based on the results of the Mueller reports. DOJ Barr provided Congress his final report based on the Mueller report.
6. The Mueller Report after the investigation, arrived on the following conclusions:
A. NO Russia Collusion
B. NO Obstructions of Justice.


AS A RESULT, CONGRESS DID NOT LIKE THE FINDINGS. They want conviction instead of the innocent president to give them ammunition to Impeach.
So, Congress demanded to -REINVISTIGATE to arrive at their desired results of Collusion and obstructions.


This legal maneuver is not possible under the court of law. Why? Congress is taking the whole judicial process which is not vested on them. Congress has only the OVERSITE POWER. Re-investigating the Mueller process under the Judicial System, is a relentless POLITICAL HARASSMENT against president Trump.

The Mueller investigations had all the elements used during the investigations.
Spent almost $ 40 million, for 2.5 years; provided 500 witnesses, 1.5 million documents, 1.6 thousand subpoenas, 41 FBI agents, 19 Grand Juries, mostly donors to Hillary Clinton.

7. Congress demands DOJ Barr the 100% of the Mueller Report. DOJ Barr followed the law. And if he provided Congress 100% of the law, DOJ Barr could violate the oath of office he had sworn under the Constitution.
8. Because Congress could not assert a 100% demands for the documents, Congress is now harassing DOJ, along with the president. Congress then issued subpoena on DOJ Barr, and Don Mcgahn, the former WH lawyer. Don Mcgahn had been examined already by Mueller for 30 hours during the Mueller investigation.
9. The Executive Branch has equal balance of power with Congress. Congress is behaving like making the executive Office as subordinate to them
10. The president has executive privileges that Congress could not undermine. As far as the Executive Office is concerned, it has followed all protocols and performed according to law.

11. Now despite of all the above, Congress decided to harass president Trump to do the following:
A. Demand that president Trump's accountant and lawyers release his IRS tax returns for 10 years.
B, Demand that president Trump release all his financial records on his prior business activities for 10 years.
.

[b]C. To obtain this, Congress referred the case to a local federal Judge appointed by Mr. Obama. The judge named Mehta of the federal district court in the DC, ordered the release of the Trump's records.
This again is WRONG:

The forceful demands on the president's records violated the following:
1. The president's constitutional rights of the Amendment IV of the constitution.
2. Violates the president's executive privileges as vested to him
3. The Mehta judge could NOT force release of the president's records, unless there is a glaring and probable cause presented that Trump had committed any violations of the law. This evidence must be provided first.
4. They could not squeeze the victim's body to obtain juices as a basis of their decision, because they h**e the victim.
5. Even if Mehta is a judge in federal court, he himself is another tool used by Obama and Congress to harassing the president and violating his constitutional rights.


You could not arrest a victim, unless there is a probable cause (tangible or intangible) to present. It is a gross violation of Amendment IV of the constitution of any citizen of this country.

In order to finally settle this greatest h**x against the president, the SC must finalize the official judgement. No Mehta, no Congress could continue these political assaults against the president, or any president, or any citizen , under the US Constitution.[/quote]


It is astounding that these Trump h**ers would upend laws that protect all citizens because they are so poisoned by h**e.

Reply
May 27, 2019 14:40:59   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Would you say you "prefer white folks"?


No, would not.

Reply
May 27, 2019 15:09:30   #
Morgan
 
Ricktloml wrote:
It is astounding that these Trump h**ers would upend laws that protect all citizens because they are so poisoned by h**e.


If you want to hear h**e simply tune into Trump whenever he opens his mouth. Look at his typical campaigning already, for all to hear, or are you turning a deaf ear?

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2019 15:22:21   #
Mikeyavelli
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Do all you trump supporters agree with his nutjob? He's had a steady diet of h**e radio and faux news, it would seem.


All facts. Barack Hussein Obama, raised in the madrassas of Jakarta, listed on his birth certificate as a Muslim, and certainly acted like a Muslim during his tenure of spitting venom while coiled in the oval office.
I remain firm with all my research on Obama since he first slithered onto the scene in 2004.
America was duped, not me.

Reply
May 27, 2019 15:22:49   #
Morgan
 
EmilyD wrote:
Allowed by law: Rule 6 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which was passed by Democrats when Ken Starr released private information of Grand Jury testimony to the public when he finished his investigation of Bill Clinton. This is a law pushed into existence by the DEMOCRATS. The Mueller team consisted mostly of Democrats...the only Republican on the team was Mueller.

Therefore, Dems don't believe the outcome of an investigation conducted by their OWN people, and therefore demand that the Attorney General of the United States break their OWN law or be held in contempt so they can conduct a "re-do" of their OWN investigation. Is that about right?

Rule 6 (especially 6(e)(2)): https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6
Allowed by law: Rule 6 of Federal Rules of Crimina... (show quote)


That's fine, except for one minor detail, this report was not intended for a grand jury, but rather to a congressional court, to be reviewed by Congress in order to allow them to come to a conclusion on whether or not to proceed with impeachment hearings, so you're point is moot. Also, all representatives who take office are sworn in to uphold the sanctity of the law, their office and the confidentiality of the court proceedings which are enforceable and entrusted to them, therefore, they should be privy to read the report in its entirety without redactions/censorship.

Reply
May 27, 2019 15:24:34   #
Mikeyavelli
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Would you say you "prefer white folks"?


I do. I moved into a lily white city from a "diverse" city and I am much more comfortable and very happy. Diversity doesn't embrace back.

Reply
May 27, 2019 15:27:31   #
Morgan
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
I do. I moved into a lily white city from a "diverse" city and I am much more comfortable and very happy. Diversity doesn't embrace back.


Not if your rigid

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2019 15:37:42   #
Morgan
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
All facts. Barack Hussein Obama, raised in the madrassas of Jakarta, listed on his birth certificate as a Muslim, and certainly acted like a Muslim during his tenure of spitting venom while coiled in the oval office.
I remain firm with all my research on Obama since he first slithered onto the scene in 2004.
America was duped, not me.


If his father was Muslim what does that matter? Religion is a matter of belief and choice, Obama chose Christianity. FYI many families have parents of mixed religions, children learn a little of both and when they become independent adults they make their choice, imagine that mikey!

Reply
May 27, 2019 16:45:55   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Morgan wrote:
That's fine, except for one minor detail, this report was not intended for a grand jury, but rather to a congressional court, to be reviewed by Congress in order to allow them to come to a conclusion on whether or not to proceed with impeachment hearings, so you're point is moot. Also, all representatives who take office are sworn in to uphold the sanctity of the law, their office and the confidentiality of the court proceedings which are enforceable and entrusted to them, therefore, they should be privy to read the report in its entirety without redactions/censorship.
That's fine, except for one minor detail, this rep... (show quote)


Then you should ask your precious Democrats to change the law that they passed. They cannot read the unredacted report because of a law passed by a Democrat controlled Congress and signed by a Democrat president. How's that for irony?

Reply
May 27, 2019 16:47:41   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
I do. I moved into a lily white city from a "diverse" city and I am much more comfortable and very happy. Diversity doesn't embrace back.


Many times this is the case.

Reply
May 27, 2019 17:15:56   #
EmilyD
 
Morgan wrote:
That's fine, except for one minor detail, this report was not intended for a grand jury, but rather to a congressional court, to be reviewed by Congress in order to allow them to come to a conclusion on whether or not to proceed with impeachment hearings, so you're point is moot. Also, all representatives who take office are sworn in to uphold the sanctity of the law, their office and the confidentiality of the court proceedings which are enforceable and entrusted to them, therefore, they should be privy to read the report in its entirety without redactions/censorship.
That's fine, except for one minor detail, this rep... (show quote)

...And I guess you believe that not a single member of Congress will "leak" to the public what the law says the public should not have? If so, I have a bridge for sale for you...really cheap...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.