crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

No One Is Safe In A Nation Where More Than 1,000 Unborn Babies Are Brutally Slaughtered Every Day

a******n_cold_blooded_murder.jpg
Special to ANP by Don Boys PH. D., former member of the Indiana House of Representatives

I’m a definite, determined, and dev**ed pro-choice fundamental Baptist! I believe a woman has a right, responsibility, and requirement to choose—a choice to keep her knees together or rear a child. That personal, practical, and profound choice would solve most of the a******n problems.

I told a young woman (who had 13 children all supported by taxpayers) on the Sally Jessy Raphael Show where we were both guests that she would be much better off if she had spent more time in the vertical position standing on her own two feet than in a horizontal position. She looked at me blankly not understanding what I said.

While it is commendable that she did not choose a******n (since that would eliminate her income), she obviously did not choose to keep her knees together.

Is it possible, dare I say it, that the young woman above did not know why a baby seemed to pop out every nine months or so? Sex, one of God’s greatest gifts to humanity, can be misused as in prostitution, p********a, perversion (same sex “marriage”) polygamy (multiple wives), polyandry (multiple husbands), and polyamory (simultaneous and mutual sexual relationships).

I began my first book, "Liberalism: A Rope of Sand", in 1979 with this shocking incident: Professor L. R. Agnew, of the UCLA School of Medicine posed this set of circumstances to his students: “Here is the family history. The father has syphilis, the mother has TB. They have already had four children. The first one is blind, the second one died. Third is deaf. The fourth has TB. The mother is pregnant with her fifth child. The parents are willing to have an a******n if you decide they should. What do you think?”

“Most of the students decided on a******n,” said Professor Agnew.

“Congratulations!” he told them. “You have just murdered Beethoven.” (ANP note with source: 4 of Beethoven's 6 siblings never reached adulthood and his father died from syphilis while his mother died from TB.)

beethoven.jpg

Pro-life people should be careful to make it clear that the fact the child turned out to be a master musician whose work is celebrated worldwide, makes no difference in the morality. If Beethoven had turned out to be a chimney sweep, it would have made no difference as to right and wrong. Of course, it would have impacted the world.

Radical l*****ts are frothing at the mouth over the decisions in Alabama, Georgia, Missouri, and Texas because of the a******n bills they have passed or are in the process of passing. It is getting dangerous to be an a******nist; jail time may be in their future. It should be since they are butchering helpless babies who can’t even cry out in their defense.

Humanity has become so jaded that they even affirm that a child should be aborted if he or she would not have a good quality of life. Some even think parents should have the right to k**l a child a few years after birth! Of course, only the barbarians among us approve, advise, and advocate such brutality.

The baby k**lers’ progressive violence runs along a continuum from k*****g the baby within a few weeks of conception to the heartbeat to right up to birth. Some after birth.

It was revealed in the murder trial of a******nist Kermit Gosnell that a late-term baby survived a botched a******n and was “swimming” in a toilet and “trying to get out.” An assistant k**ler then took the large baby out and “snipped the back of its neck while the mother was still in the room.” Then Cosnell, a bloody barbarian baby butcher, sarcastically said that the baby “was big enough that it could walk to the store or the bus stop.” I’d like to see Gosnell in his white coat walk up the 13 steps of a gallows—literally.

There was testimony that the a******nist had snipped the spinal cords of about 10 babies who survived the a******n procedure. He was sentenced to life without parole but the babies they had dug out of the clogged toilet are still dead.

In my opinion, everyone in this sorry, sordid, sinful mess is complicit to murder–not manslaughter, not accidental death, not wrongful death, but murder. And any society that permits such atrocities is vile, vicious, and violent–and in the toilet.

dems_murder_babies.gif

Two professors published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, a paper titled, “After-Birth A******n: Why Should the Baby Live?” It was a shocker defending and advocating infanticide but calling it after-birth a******n, is a distinction without a difference. According to the American Heritage Dictionary, infanticide is the act of k*****g an infant or the practice of k*****g newborn infants.

The professors declared, “Therefore we claim that k*****g a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where a******n would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”

Their vacuous arguments get worse by the paragraph. They say, “Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life.” The professors argue that personhood doesn’t begin until sometime after birth, so there must be some magic going through the birth canal.

The professors defend their position by saying, “[I]n order for a harm to occur, it is necessary that someone is in the condition of experiencing that harm. If a potential person, like a fetus and a newborn, does not become an actual person, like you and us, then there is neither an actual nor a future person who can be harmed, which means that there is no harm at all….In these cases, since non-persons have no moral rights to life, there are no reasons for banning after-birth a******ns.”

No one can defend such heartless slaughter but they try. In fact, some people tell us a******n is an “act of compassion” since an unnecessary and unwanted child will also grow up unloved. Well, I’d rather be “unwanted” and “unloved” than “unalive.”

a******n_murder.jpg

There are many motives for a woman deciding to k**l her unborn baby; one reason is the baby will be an inconvenience to her. After all, it is difficult to live an active social life with a baby h*****g on the hip. Or, being required to get a baby sitter each night. Plus, you know, all the months of sickness, awkwardness, etc., and the sleepless nights, colic, teething, feeding, etc. Babies are a lot of trouble.

Still others tell us a child should not be permitted to live if he or she (no other choice) will be disabled, disfigured, or debased. Of course, it would be nice if the baby had a choice in the decision. But only the woman has a choice. Not the baby. Not the father who is seldom involved in this discussion.

It seems a woman assumes that that life within her is hers alone; but the father has as many rights as the mother. The baby would not be there but for his cooperation. But then, the father is never considered by the hypocrites at Planned Parenthood or the screaming feminists. He, like the unborn baby, has no rights.

Women, in a word, have a right to control their own bodies and that word is “no.” They become “with child” because they refused to say the word and keep their knees together. The heartless mother, the nurses, and doctors will all stand at the Judgment one day as they finally realize that they tried to undo what God did. Psalm 127:3 tells us “Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord.”

In a nation where little children (born and unborn) are slaughtered, no one is safe. Fyodor Dostoevsky (author of Crime and Punishment, etc.) said, “If God is dead, then nothing is morally wrong.”

But God is not dead; I met and spoke with Him this morning; and those who k**l the innocent will also meet with Him!

Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives, who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for eight years. Boys’ book, Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! is available here. Follow Dr. Boys on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D. and TheGodH**ers, Twitter, and visit his blog.

woodguru

The only ones who have to worry are the unborn babies, nobody else has to worry.

"We" aren't worried about it, we is over 70% of the country. You can go to church and pray for those unsaved heathens murdering their unwanted "babies". That's what it means to be a christian, pray for sinners, don't try to see they are tried for murder.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

If it's human life, the perpetrators should be tried for something. That's what it means to end human life

woodguru

The hard right takes it to i***tic extremes when they want to include birth control. I have four brothers and sisters, trying to have the fifth my mom had three miscarriages. The extreme end wanting to punish a woman for an a******n would put a woman having a miscarriage through hell figuring out if she aborted it. My mom's were earlier type miscarriages.

Then one of my wife's employees has a daughter who had a baby with a super rare birth defect where it had no kidneys, it was poisoning the mother to where it was becoming life threatening. The prognosis of the baby living was next to zero, and those that live never live long, and under life support conditions. The extreme end of this has states wanting to force her to carry a baby against all medical advice.

Many many people abhor every aspect of a******ns, but they do not believe it is anyone's right to tell someone else what is right for them. The party of less government, more freedom is wanting way too much religiously oriented control, and not just a******ns either.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

I do not know a single person who wants to prohibit birth control & I am Catholic & active in pro-life activities.

I am sure most anti-a******n legislation would allow for such cases as the fetus without kidneys. For wh**ever it's worth, I am a physician and have never heard of a case of renal agenesis although I accept the plausibility. In the very rare cases where the mother's life is in danger Catholic dogma calls for sacrificing the mother. Again, I think there should be legal allowances for differences.

Let me pose this one to you. The arguments originally for legalization of a******n was because of the number of maternal deaths from illegal a******ns at the time. As best as I have been able to determine, the number was less than 500 annually. Do you SERIOUSLY think that there is maternal danger from pregnancy in the 1,000,000 or so a******ns that are done annually today?

You have to answer this question to retain credibility.