Solving the Issue of A******n
May 16, 2019 13:43:35 #
lindajoy wrote:
What a d********g comment to make to wolf!!! 
Thanks for your kindness.
It's water off of a ducks back to me................................. ma'am.
May 16, 2019 18:22:55 #
Wolf counselor wrote:
Thanks for your kindness.
It's water off of a ducks back to me................................. ma'am.
It's water off of a ducks back to me................................. ma'am.
Your Welcome, Wolf..No need for that behavior..
Please call me Linda...
May 16, 2019 19:07:44 #
Hug wrote:
WHY DO MANY OF THESE CONVERSATIONS HAVE TO TURN INTO PERSONAL INSULTS?
Every single one that WC visits.
May 16, 2019 19:10:51 #
PeterS wrote:
Nicely said and the loss of a testicle? How about both of them so there won't be any repeat offence...
Sounds a bit off to me, if the sex was consensual and only the girl chooses to have the a******n... How would you like to lose a nut because some girl chose to unilaterally decides to ditch a kid before it's born?
May 16, 2019 20:09:31 #
PaulPisces wrote:
Seems to me this would work in any state, not just the ones mentioned
Ha! You first.
May 17, 2019 00:39:20 #
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
For every woman who can't "keep her legs closed" there is a man who can't "keep it in his pants"...
Every unnecessary a******n should be accompanied by the loss of a testicle...
Guarantee you a******n rates will drop...
Every unnecessary a******n should be accompanied by the loss of a testicle...
Guarantee you a******n rates will drop...
As it stands men have no say in the a******n decision making. Yet should a woman decide to continue her pregnancy the man is required to support his offspring, (as he should be.) As medical science has advanced, the "glob of tissue" is no longer an accurate description. Deep down the a******n crowd know they are taking a life. When a pregnant woman dies in an automobile accident it is legally considered the loss of 2 lives. Pro-a******n people want to claim that the woman's desire to keep or reject her baby determines whether that baby deserves to live or not. NO ONE has the right to decide arbitrarily whether someone lives or dies without due process. Maybe babies should get to appeal THEIR death sentences for 5-15 years like the other condemned.
Rather rambling reply, sorry
May 17, 2019 02:15:55 #
Kevyn wrote:
Why would it matter to you? You just secretly swallow the seed.
I can’t believe you got away with that. Vulgar, stupid,unforgivable. Trash.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.