Seriously????....Dems are going to read Mueller's Report aloud tomorrow...
May 16, 2019 09:36:40 #
A coverup of WHAT? You seem to think Mueller is shy or the 12 or 13 democrat lawyers on the team are. Me thinks you've have lost it.
Yes, Hillery lost but she's welcome to try again.
Yes, Hillery lost but she's welcome to try again.
Kevyn wrote:
Nope, a f**e version with over a thousand redactions is all that is available online, the Democrats are simply bringing attention to the coverup.
May 16, 2019 09:37:21 #
debeda wrote:
Oh, how cute. They're gonna have chambers story time 
Lololo very good!! Lolol
May 16, 2019 09:43:59 #
Their Democrats so they take the cue from the party,(can't think for themselves) so the need it read to them.
lindajoy wrote:
You can download it from any number of site location if you want..
Thats what I did....The smaller print was a pain but you can enlarge it.. Having some 448 pages will take time but worth the read..
One claring error in muellers report starts out very early claiming the knowledge of Russia hacking our computers started in 2016, but as we know Bo knew in 2015 it was being done.~~
Thats what I did....The smaller print was a pain but you can enlarge it.. Having some 448 pages will take time but worth the read..
One claring error in muellers report starts out very early claiming the knowledge of Russia hacking our computers started in 2016, but as we know Bo knew in 2015 it was being done.~~
May 16, 2019 10:19:33 #
proud republican wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)
First they'll have to find a dumb demoncRAT that can read !!!!!!
May 16, 2019 16:49:25 #
May 16, 2019 16:54:38 #
proud republican wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)
It's obvious the right doesn't want to acknowledge there are actually crimes listed, wake up, the facts are going to prevail
May 16, 2019 17:12:03 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
woodguru wrote:
It's obvious the right doesn't want to acknowledge there are actually crimes listed, wake up, the facts are going to prevail
Hey Wood...Where have you been???
May 16, 2019 17:49:24 #
May 16, 2019 18:28:58 #
proud republican wrote:
.....And they are still reading it!!!! img src="h... (show quote)
Must be having trouble with the big words
May 16, 2019 18:32:43 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
debeda wrote:
Must be having trouble with the big words
Yes..Its quiet funny to see them changing places....What a waste of time!!!!
May 16, 2019 18:57:42 #
proud republican wrote:
Yes..Its quiet funny to see them changing places..... (show quote)
Seems that's all the dems are good for anymore. Wasting time. Oh, and money of course
May 16, 2019 18:59:26 #
lindajoy wrote:
Lololo very good!! Lolol
Good day young lady!! Havent been on much, busy busy, you know how it is. Hope life is awesome in your neck of the woods💖💖🎼🎶🎵🎶🎶🎵🎶
May 16, 2019 20:08:33 #
proud republican wrote:
Seriously????....Dems are going to read Mueller's Report aloud tomorrow...
All except the really big words, you know, the ones with five or six letters in them. They'll skip over those parts.
May 16, 2019 21:42:55 #
Kevyn wrote:
Nope, a f**e version with over a thousand redactions is all that is available online, the Democrats are simply bringing attention to the coverup.
Kevyn, Kevyn, Kevyn, the report can be downloaded on the Justice Department's website. And it is the full report. less than 9% is redacted. There is another version that was given to congress which is less than 2% redacted. With that said, the 2% that is redacted is grand jury information.
If you were put on trial with a grand jury, and this report was being used as evidence against you, would you want it released to the public? If it was you would never get a fair trial. As a result of releasing the full report, your constitutional rights will be violated and the Judge would have to declare a mistrial.
Do you want the case against Trump be declared a mistrial? If that happened then Trump could never be impeached.
However, Trump made everything available to congress. They had two years and millions of dollars to investigate. That investigation is over. And at the end of the day, the justice department with the advice of special counsel refused to indict. Therefore, there was no collusion, no obstruction on behalf of the Trump 2016 campaign.
Like I said many times, in 2016 there were many candidates running for president, it was not just Trump. If there was a misinformation campaign(which the Mueller report did prove), then who are the suspects--> everyone who ran for president.
Trump is officially ruled out, (if the investigation continues down this dead end, maybe the democrats will have enough evidence to charge Donald Trump with the assassination of John F. Kennedy.) Like other FBI agents said about Trump, "There is nothing there, there" How long will the democrats look for water in the desert?
Now, the Justice department should look into Joe Biden and the Obama administration. The incident did occur on their watch. Others to look into is the Hillary Campaign, the Bernie Sanders campaign, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Jeb Bush.
Now, reasonably speaking, I do not believe Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are part of the conspiracy and misinformation. Jeb Bush possibly but I doubt it. By looking at the numbers in the beginning of this next e******n, I don't even think Bernie Sanders was part of it. Matter of fact, Bernie may have been a victim of the misinformation campaign.
That leaves Biden and Clinton. If I was the FBI, CIA, I would look into the Biden and Clinton camps. Hey follow the evidence, don't follow the rumor.
May 16, 2019 23:00:51 #
debeda wrote:
Good day young lady!! Havent been on much, busy busy, you know how it is. Hope life is awesome in your neck of the woods💖💖🎼🎶🎵🎶🎶🎵🎶
I noticed... Glad to see you.. You had me a bit worried...❤️
Busy is good and I have been both work and playing in the gardens etc..❤️❤️🌹🌺
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.