One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
If trump were innocent
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 next>>
May 15, 2019 18:42:25   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
If trump were innocent he wouldn't be doing what hes now doing

| Reply
May 15, 2019 18:47:41   #
BigMike (a regular here)
 
If he was guilty Mewler would have said so.

| Reply
May 15, 2019 18:52:58   #
proud republican (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
If trump were innocent he wouldn't be doing what hes now doing


And what is he doing???

| Reply
May 15, 2019 18:54:42   #
BigMike (a regular here)
 
proud republican wrote:
And what is he doing???


Er...

| Reply
May 15, 2019 18:56:54   #
archie bunker (a regular here)
 
BigMike wrote:
If he was guilty Mewler would have said so.


Now wait a minute here. Muler only said there was no evidence of guilt. That doesn't mean he isn't guilty!
I've read that argument (if you can call it that) more times than I can count.

Personally, I think everyone who uses that argument is, either a serial baby rapist, or, a serial killer. There is no evidence to support my claims, but, at the same time, there is no evidence to refute them.

Lonewolf is a dog rapist.

| Reply
May 15, 2019 19:01:50   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
proud republican wrote:
And what is he doing???


obstructing justice

| Reply
May 15, 2019 19:03:05   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
Mueller said their was evidence of guilt

| Reply
May 15, 2019 19:09:18   #
archie bunker (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
obstructing justice


How so? Is he destroying documents, devices, and hard drives?

Sorry wolf, tables have turned, and he's gone to war. Good luck!

| Reply
May 15, 2019 19:18:09   #
Gatsby (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
obstructing justice


You have a very twisted idea of justice.

| Reply
May 15, 2019 19:36:59   #
Blade_Runner (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Mueller said their was evidence of guilt
If and when you come out of your political coma, maybe we can explain to you that a Special Counsel cannot, by law, pronounce anyone guilty or innocent of anything. All an SC can do is investigate and if sufficient evidence exists to charge someone for a crime, he must, by law, return an indictment that he must turn over to a grand jury or a federal court for prosecution. If the SC investigation fails to find sufficient evidence to file a formal charge, he must, by law, decline.

Since Mueller did not indict President Trump, and no indictments are forthcoming, it is reasonable to conclude he failed in his mission to overthrow a presidential election and disenfranchise 63 million American voters. So, what did Mueller really do? He wrote a case for impeachment for the HOR (which, BTW, he is not legally or constitutionally authorized to do).

If I were you, I'd be concerned about the investigation now underway into the origins of the Russia collusion investigation and Mueller's role in the greatest political scandal in American history.

| Reply
May 15, 2019 19:38:33   #
Liberty Tree (a regular here)
 
Gatsby wrote:
You have a very twisted idea of justice.


Just wishful thinking on his part. In a liberals mind if they want something to be true then it is true. An example is their practice of guilt by accusation. Facts are irrelevant.

| Reply
May 15, 2019 19:46:09   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
archie bunker wrote:
How so? Is he destroying documents, devices, and hard drives?

Sorry wolf, tables have turned, and he's gone to war. Good luck!


Rumors have it he's destroyed 5 boxes holding campaign documents

| Reply
May 15, 2019 19:49:32   #
archie bunker (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Rumors have it he's destroyed 5 boxes holding campaign documents


Rumor has it that you murdered your neighbor over a 1/2 lb of crack cocaine.

| Reply
May 15, 2019 19:52:02   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
archie bunker wrote:
Rumor has it that you murdered your neighbor over a 1/2 lb of crack cocaine.


Trump used to sell cocaine

| Reply
May 15, 2019 19:54:01   #
emarine (a regular here)
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
If and when you come out of your political coma, maybe we can explain to you that a Special Counsel cannot, by law, pronounce anyone guilty or innocent of anything. All an SC can do is investigate and if sufficient evidence exists to charge someone for a crime, he must, by law, return an indictment that he must turn over to a grand jury or a federal court for prosecution. If the SC investigation fails to find sufficient evidence to file a formal charge, he must, by law, decline.

Since Mueller did not indict President Trump, and no indictments are forthcoming, it is reasonable to conclude he failed in his mission to overthrow a presidential election and disenfranchise 63 million American voters. So, what did Mueller really do? He wrote a case for impeachment for the HOR (which, BTW, he is not legally or constitutionally authorized to do).

If I were you, I'd be concerned about the investigation now underway into the origins of the Russia collusion investigation and Mueller's role in the greatest political scandal in American history.
If and when you come out of your political coma, m... (show quote)




Did you mean oranges or origins... talk about a stable genius or is it TDS...

| Reply
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.