The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual Privilege
By Bryan Fischer - May 15, 2019
We’ve all heard about “white privilege” until we’re sick to death of the phrase. Virtually every social problem in America is blamed on w****s who supposedly have privilege and power based purely on skin color.
This is getting to be a tougher sell, when we realize that white applicants to Ivy League-type schools are disfavored and must score several hundred points higher than minority students on the SAT just to have a shot. Where is the white privilege in that, especially when this blatant r****m is vociferously defended by all the so-called civil rights champions among us?
Democrats have been signaling since 2011 that they are not even trying to keep w****s in their party. They’re ditching w****s in favor of a coalition of minority groups, and intend to rely on identity politics from now until the end of time. Where is the white privilege in that? W****s are underprivileged and underserved in academia, in Democrat politics, and in America in general.
I would submit the real problem today, in our culture and in our politics, is not in fact white privilege but homosexual privilege. Despite their constant claims to martyrdom and victimhood, homosexuals have an entire array of privileges and powers that are based exclusively on their private sexual preferences, and they are privileges and powers that normal people do not possess. Homosexuals must be catered to by wedding vendors and be catered to in housing and employment, or those who refuse to cater to them will be demonized, vilified, and sued until they’re broke or out of business.
Today homosexuals belong to the most pampered, protected, favored, privileged demographic in all of America.
This may explain some of the dynamics in Pete Buttigieg’s run for the presidency. His resume is quite similar to Cory Booker’s, but Buttigieg is soaring in the polls while Booker is mired near the bottom. Folks are scratching their heads trying to figure out why.
Politico puts it this way:
“The two p**********l contenders boast some of the same credentials. So why is Mayor Pete getting all the attention?”
Buttigieg in recent weeks has been the subject of fawning and even gushing profiles in Time magazine, New York Magazine, Vogue, and Politico, and his so-called “husband,” Chasten, was featured in a lengthy story in the Washington Post.
Booker’s supporters “seethe” (to use Politico’s word) over Buttigieg mania and attribute his rising profile to “the epitome of privilege” that Buttigieg possesses because of his race. They think “the Buttigieg bump would be impossible if he wasn’t a white man.”
This analysis is quite wrong. The “Buttigieg bump” would be impossible if he wasn’t a flamboyant homosexual. The blunt t***h is that if Buttigieg wasn’t gay, nobody would even know who he is.
Politico admits as much when it quotes a state legislator who believes Buttigieg’s rise “is more about the historic nature of his campaign than anything else.”
“He would become the first openly gay person to become president of the United States. That’s big, especially in this era,” the lawmaker went on.
Booker, a former mayor of Newark, is one of only three b***k A******ns in the U.S. Senate, played football at Stanford, heroically rescued a neighbor from her burning home, and is now dating actress Rosario Dawson – perhaps in an effort to tamp down the long-rumored suspicion that he is a closeted homosexual. If so, he may come to regret that decision after seeing what Buttigieg’s no-holds-barred embrace of gayhood has meant to his e*******l prospects.
Homosexuality was once rightly known as “the love that dare not speak its name.” Those days are long gone. Now it is not a career-k**ler but a resume enhancer. Due to the decaying morals of the Republic, we have now made it possible for a man to boldly sin his way right into the White House.
bahmer wrote:
The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual Privilege
By Bryan Fischer - May 15, 2019
We’ve all heard about “white privilege” until we’re sick to death of the phrase. Virtually every social problem in America is blamed on w****s who supposedly have privilege and power based purely on skin color.
This is getting to be a tougher sell, when we realize that white applicants to Ivy League-type schools are disfavored and must score several hundred points higher than minority students on the SAT just to have a shot. Where is the white privilege in that, especially when this blatant r****m is vociferously defended by all the so-called civil rights champions among us?
Democrats have been signaling since 2011 that they are not even trying to keep w****s in their party. They’re ditching w****s in favor of a coalition of minority groups, and intend to rely on identity politics from now until the end of time. Where is the white privilege in that? W****s are underprivileged and underserved in academia, in Democrat politics, and in America in general.
I would submit the real problem today, in our culture and in our politics, is not in fact white privilege but homosexual privilege. Despite their constant claims to martyrdom and victimhood, homosexuals have an entire array of privileges and powers that are based exclusively on their private sexual preferences, and they are privileges and powers that normal people do not possess. Homosexuals must be catered to by wedding vendors and be catered to in housing and employment, or those who refuse to cater to them will be demonized, vilified, and sued until they’re broke or out of business.
Today homosexuals belong to the most pampered, protected, favored, privileged demographic in all of America.
This may explain some of the dynamics in Pete Buttigieg’s run for the presidency. His resume is quite similar to Cory Booker’s, but Buttigieg is soaring in the polls while Booker is mired near the bottom. Folks are scratching their heads trying to figure out why.
Politico puts it this way:
“The two p**********l contenders boast some of the same credentials. So why is Mayor Pete getting all the attention?”
Buttigieg in recent weeks has been the subject of fawning and even gushing profiles in Time magazine, New York Magazine, Vogue, and Politico, and his so-called “husband,” Chasten, was featured in a lengthy story in the Washington Post.
Booker’s supporters “seethe” (to use Politico’s word) over Buttigieg mania and attribute his rising profile to “the epitome of privilege” that Buttigieg possesses because of his race. They think “the Buttigieg bump would be impossible if he wasn’t a white man.”
This analysis is quite wrong. The “Buttigieg bump” would be impossible if he wasn’t a flamboyant homosexual. The blunt t***h is that if Buttigieg wasn’t gay, nobody would even know who he is.
Politico admits as much when it quotes a state legislator who believes Buttigieg’s rise “is more about the historic nature of his campaign than anything else.”
“He would become the first openly gay person to become president of the United States. That’s big, especially in this era,” the lawmaker went on.
Booker, a former mayor of Newark, is one of only three b***k A******ns in the U.S. Senate, played football at Stanford, heroically rescued a neighbor from her burning home, and is now dating actress Rosario Dawson – perhaps in an effort to tamp down the long-rumored suspicion that he is a closeted homosexual. If so, he may come to regret that decision after seeing what Buttigieg’s no-holds-barred embrace of gayhood has meant to his e*******l prospects.
Homosexuality was once rightly known as “the love that dare not speak its name.” Those days are long gone. Now it is not a career-k**ler but a resume enhancer. Due to the decaying morals of the Republic, we have now made it possible for a man to boldly sin his way right into the White House.
The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual... (
show quote)
When they can't keep up or cut the mustard it's not their fault it's yours.
They have of the mind "if we can't keep up, we need to get rid of the competition."
If the world never had W****s just for one minute think where the world would be now.
In the dark ages.
bahmer wrote:
The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual Privilege
By Bryan Fischer - May 15, 2019
We’ve all heard about “white privilege” until we’re sick to death of the phrase. Virtually every social problem in America is blamed on w****s who supposedly have privilege and power based purely on skin color.
This is getting to be a tougher sell, when we realize that white applicants to Ivy League-type schools are disfavored and must score several hundred points higher than minority students on the SAT just to have a shot. Where is the white privilege in that, especially when this blatant r****m is vociferously defended by all the so-called civil rights champions among us?
Democrats have been signaling since 2011 that they are not even trying to keep w****s in their party. They’re ditching w****s in favor of a coalition of minority groups, and intend to rely on identity politics from now until the end of time. Where is the white privilege in that? W****s are underprivileged and underserved in academia, in Democrat politics, and in America in general.
I would submit the real problem today, in our culture and in our politics, is not in fact white privilege but homosexual privilege. Despite their constant claims to martyrdom and victimhood, homosexuals have an entire array of privileges and powers that are based exclusively on their private sexual preferences, and they are privileges and powers that normal people do not possess. Homosexuals must be catered to by wedding vendors and be catered to in housing and employment, or those who refuse to cater to them will be demonized, vilified, and sued until they’re broke or out of business.
Today homosexuals belong to the most pampered, protected, favored, privileged demographic in all of America.
This may explain some of the dynamics in Pete Buttigieg’s run for the presidency. His resume is quite similar to Cory Booker’s, but Buttigieg is soaring in the polls while Booker is mired near the bottom. Folks are scratching their heads trying to figure out why.
Politico puts it this way:
“The two p**********l contenders boast some of the same credentials. So why is Mayor Pete getting all the attention?”
Buttigieg in recent weeks has been the subject of fawning and even gushing profiles in Time magazine, New York Magazine, Vogue, and Politico, and his so-called “husband,” Chasten, was featured in a lengthy story in the Washington Post.
Booker’s supporters “seethe” (to use Politico’s word) over Buttigieg mania and attribute his rising profile to “the epitome of privilege” that Buttigieg possesses because of his race. They think “the Buttigieg bump would be impossible if he wasn’t a white man.”
This analysis is quite wrong. The “Buttigieg bump” would be impossible if he wasn’t a flamboyant homosexual. The blunt t***h is that if Buttigieg wasn’t gay, nobody would even know who he is.
Politico admits as much when it quotes a state legislator who believes Buttigieg’s rise “is more about the historic nature of his campaign than anything else.”
“He would become the first openly gay person to become president of the United States. That’s big, especially in this era,” the lawmaker went on.
Booker, a former mayor of Newark, is one of only three b***k A******ns in the U.S. Senate, played football at Stanford, heroically rescued a neighbor from her burning home, and is now dating actress Rosario Dawson – perhaps in an effort to tamp down the long-rumored suspicion that he is a closeted homosexual. If so, he may come to regret that decision after seeing what Buttigieg’s no-holds-barred embrace of gayhood has meant to his e*******l prospects.
Homosexuality was once rightly known as “the love that dare not speak its name.” Those days are long gone. Now it is not a career-k**ler but a resume enhancer. Due to the decaying morals of the Republic, we have now made it possible for a man to boldly sin his way right into the White House.
The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual... (
show quote)
He is a combat veteran who speaks 7 languages and is incredibly popular in a red state, that likely gets him more coverage than anything else.
Kevyn wrote:
He is a combat veteran who speaks 7 languages and is incredibly popular in a red state, that likely gets him more coverage than anything else.
In other words, he fought for your right to visit all of the roadside park glory holes, and is much smarter than you. You should thank him for your late night snacks. You couldn't have that in other countries.
bahmer wrote:
The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual Privilege
By Bryan Fischer - May 15, 2019
We’ve all heard about “white privilege” until we’re sick to death of the phrase. Virtually every social problem in America is blamed on w****s who supposedly have privilege and power based purely on skin color.
This is getting to be a tougher sell, when we realize that white applicants to Ivy League-type schools are disfavored and must score several hundred points higher than minority students on the SAT just to have a shot. Where is the white privilege in that, especially when this blatant r****m is vociferously defended by all the so-called civil rights champions among us?
Democrats have been signaling since 2011 that they are not even trying to keep w****s in their party. They’re ditching w****s in favor of a coalition of minority groups, and intend to rely on identity politics from now until the end of time. Where is the white privilege in that? W****s are underprivileged and underserved in academia, in Democrat politics, and in America in general.
I would submit the real problem today, in our culture and in our politics, is not in fact white privilege but homosexual privilege. Despite their constant claims to martyrdom and victimhood, homosexuals have an entire array of privileges and powers that are based exclusively on their private sexual preferences, and they are privileges and powers that normal people do not possess. Homosexuals must be catered to by wedding vendors and be catered to in housing and employment, or those who refuse to cater to them will be demonized, vilified, and sued until they’re broke or out of business.
Today homosexuals belong to the most pampered, protected, favored, privileged demographic in all of America.
This may explain some of the dynamics in Pete Buttigieg’s run for the presidency. His resume is quite similar to Cory Booker’s, but Buttigieg is soaring in the polls while Booker is mired near the bottom. Folks are scratching their heads trying to figure out why.
Politico puts it this way:
“The two p**********l contenders boast some of the same credentials. So why is Mayor Pete getting all the attention?”
Buttigieg in recent weeks has been the subject of fawning and even gushing profiles in Time magazine, New York Magazine, Vogue, and Politico, and his so-called “husband,” Chasten, was featured in a lengthy story in the Washington Post.
Booker’s supporters “seethe” (to use Politico’s word) over Buttigieg mania and attribute his rising profile to “the epitome of privilege” that Buttigieg possesses because of his race. They think “the Buttigieg bump would be impossible if he wasn’t a white man.”
This analysis is quite wrong. The “Buttigieg bump” would be impossible if he wasn’t a flamboyant homosexual. The blunt t***h is that if Buttigieg wasn’t gay, nobody would even know who he is.
Politico admits as much when it quotes a state legislator who believes Buttigieg’s rise “is more about the historic nature of his campaign than anything else.”
“He would become the first openly gay person to become president of the United States. That’s big, especially in this era,” the lawmaker went on.
Booker, a former mayor of Newark, is one of only three b***k A******ns in the U.S. Senate, played football at Stanford, heroically rescued a neighbor from her burning home, and is now dating actress Rosario Dawson – perhaps in an effort to tamp down the long-rumored suspicion that he is a closeted homosexual. If so, he may come to regret that decision after seeing what Buttigieg’s no-holds-barred embrace of gayhood has meant to his e*******l prospects.
Homosexuality was once rightly known as “the love that dare not speak its name.” Those days are long gone. Now it is not a career-k**ler but a resume enhancer. Due to the decaying morals of the Republic, we have now made it possible for a man to boldly sin his way right into the White House.
The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual... (
show quote)
Damn straight, bahmer!!!! Bootygig is a joke. So the guy supposedly has all these bona fides, and all he or anyone sees is his "sexual preference". Ugh and YUCK
bahmer wrote:
The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual Privilege
By Bryan Fischer - May 15, 2019
We’ve all heard about “white privilege” until we’re sick to death of the phrase. Virtually every social problem in America is blamed on w****s who supposedly have privilege and power based purely on skin color.
This is getting to be a tougher sell, when we realize that white applicants to Ivy League-type schools are disfavored and must score several hundred points higher than minority students on the SAT just to have a shot. Where is the white privilege in that, especially when this blatant r****m is vociferously defended by all the so-called civil rights champions among us?
Democrats have been signaling since 2011 that they are not even trying to keep w****s in their party. They’re ditching w****s in favor of a coalition of minority groups, and intend to rely on identity politics from now until the end of time. Where is the white privilege in that? W****s are underprivileged and underserved in academia, in Democrat politics, and in America in general.
I would submit the real problem today, in our culture and in our politics, is not in fact white privilege but homosexual privilege. Despite their constant claims to martyrdom and victimhood, homosexuals have an entire array of privileges and powers that are based exclusively on their private sexual preferences, and they are privileges and powers that normal people do not possess. Homosexuals must be catered to by wedding vendors and be catered to in housing and employment, or those who refuse to cater to them will be demonized, vilified, and sued until they’re broke or out of business.
Today homosexuals belong to the most pampered, protected, favored, privileged demographic in all of America.
This may explain some of the dynamics in Pete Buttigieg’s run for the presidency. His resume is quite similar to Cory Booker’s, but Buttigieg is soaring in the polls while Booker is mired near the bottom. Folks are scratching their heads trying to figure out why.
Politico puts it this way:
“The two p**********l contenders boast some of the same credentials. So why is Mayor Pete getting all the attention?”
Buttigieg in recent weeks has been the subject of fawning and even gushing profiles in Time magazine, New York Magazine, Vogue, and Politico, and his so-called “husband,” Chasten, was featured in a lengthy story in the Washington Post.
Booker’s supporters “seethe” (to use Politico’s word) over Buttigieg mania and attribute his rising profile to “the epitome of privilege” that Buttigieg possesses because of his race. They think “the Buttigieg bump would be impossible if he wasn’t a white man.”
This analysis is quite wrong. The “Buttigieg bump” would be impossible if he wasn’t a flamboyant homosexual. The blunt t***h is that if Buttigieg wasn’t gay, nobody would even know who he is.
Politico admits as much when it quotes a state legislator who believes Buttigieg’s rise “is more about the historic nature of his campaign than anything else.”
“He would become the first openly gay person to become president of the United States. That’s big, especially in this era,” the lawmaker went on.
Booker, a former mayor of Newark, is one of only three b***k A******ns in the U.S. Senate, played football at Stanford, heroically rescued a neighbor from her burning home, and is now dating actress Rosario Dawson – perhaps in an effort to tamp down the long-rumored suspicion that he is a closeted homosexual. If so, he may come to regret that decision after seeing what Buttigieg’s no-holds-barred embrace of gayhood has meant to his e*******l prospects.
Homosexuality was once rightly known as “the love that dare not speak its name.” Those days are long gone. Now it is not a career-k**ler but a resume enhancer. Due to the decaying morals of the Republic, we have now made it possible for a man to boldly sin his way right into the White House.
The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual... (
show quote)
Hahahaha... We've seen this movie before. Only in the 50's, the bottom feeders were moaning about "uppity negroes" who think they're as good as us decent white folks.
bahmer wrote:
The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual Privilege
By Bryan Fischer - May 15, 2019
We’ve all heard about “white privilege” until we’re sick to death of the phrase. Virtually every social problem in America is blamed on w****s who supposedly have privilege and power based purely on skin color.
This is getting to be a tougher sell, when we realize that white applicants to Ivy League-type schools are disfavored and must score several hundred points higher than minority students on the SAT just to have a shot. Where is the white privilege in that, especially when this blatant r****m is vociferously defended by all the so-called civil rights champions among us?
Democrats have been signaling since 2011 that they are not even trying to keep w****s in their party. They’re ditching w****s in favor of a coalition of minority groups, and intend to rely on identity politics from now until the end of time. Where is the white privilege in that? W****s are underprivileged and underserved in academia, in Democrat politics, and in America in general.
I would submit the real problem today, in our culture and in our politics, is not in fact white privilege but homosexual privilege. Despite their constant claims to martyrdom and victimhood, homosexuals have an entire array of privileges and powers that are based exclusively on their private sexual preferences, and they are privileges and powers that normal people do not possess. Homosexuals must be catered to by wedding vendors and be catered to in housing and employment, or those who refuse to cater to them will be demonized, vilified, and sued until they’re broke or out of business.
Today homosexuals belong to the most pampered, protected, favored, privileged demographic in all of America.
This may explain some of the dynamics in Pete Buttigieg’s run for the presidency. His resume is quite similar to Cory Booker’s, but Buttigieg is soaring in the polls while Booker is mired near the bottom. Folks are scratching their heads trying to figure out why.
Politico puts it this way:
“The two p**********l contenders boast some of the same credentials. So why is Mayor Pete getting all the attention?”
Buttigieg in recent weeks has been the subject of fawning and even gushing profiles in Time magazine, New York Magazine, Vogue, and Politico, and his so-called “husband,” Chasten, was featured in a lengthy story in the Washington Post.
Booker’s supporters “seethe” (to use Politico’s word) over Buttigieg mania and attribute his rising profile to “the epitome of privilege” that Buttigieg possesses because of his race. They think “the Buttigieg bump would be impossible if he wasn’t a white man.”
This analysis is quite wrong. The “Buttigieg bump” would be impossible if he wasn’t a flamboyant homosexual. The blunt t***h is that if Buttigieg wasn’t gay, nobody would even know who he is.
Politico admits as much when it quotes a state legislator who believes Buttigieg’s rise “is more about the historic nature of his campaign than anything else.”
“He would become the first openly gay person to become president of the United States. That’s big, especially in this era,” the lawmaker went on.
Booker, a former mayor of Newark, is one of only three b***k A******ns in the U.S. Senate, played football at Stanford, heroically rescued a neighbor from her burning home, and is now dating actress Rosario Dawson – perhaps in an effort to tamp down the long-rumored suspicion that he is a closeted homosexual. If so, he may come to regret that decision after seeing what Buttigieg’s no-holds-barred embrace of gayhood has meant to his e*******l prospects.
Homosexuality was once rightly known as “the love that dare not speak its name.” Those days are long gone. Now it is not a career-k**ler but a resume enhancer. Due to the decaying morals of the Republic, we have now made it possible for a man to boldly sin his way right into the White House.
The Problem Isn’t White Privilege, It’s Homosexual... (
show quote)
Good point but only if people play along with this facade. Colorado recently wound up with a q***r governor; half of Denver and Boulder are ecstatic, the rest of the state is disgusted with the vile creep and his "wife". Hopefully, he will wind up being impeached, not for what goes on behind closed doors but because of his lunatic policies.
Kevyn wrote:
He is a combat veteran who speaks 7 languages and is incredibly popular in a red state, that likely gets him more coverage than anything else.
What did he do in combat? Rifleman or rear echelon cook? Any decorations? To whom does he converse with in his 7 languages? Who says he is incredibly popular? I'll believe it when I see it, kind of like hillary who was predetermined to win the e******n but lost the vast majority of the counties in the nation. Bravo sierra!
Jean Deaux wrote:
What did he do in combat? Rifleman or rear echelon cook?
Intelligence. What did Cadet Bone Spurs do for his country besides NOT paying his taxes?
Trump said his biggest accomplishment during the Vietnam war was not getting STDs.
kemmer wrote:
Intelligence. What did Cadet Bone Spurs do for his country besides NOT paying his taxes?
Trump said his biggest accomplishment during the Vietnam war was not getting STDs.
What did you do back then?
Jean Deaux wrote:
What did he do in combat? Rifleman or rear echelon cook? Any decorations? To whom does he converse with in his 7 languages? Who says he is incredibly popular? I'll believe it when I see it, kind of like hillary who was predetermined to win the e******n but lost the vast majority of the counties in the nation. Bravo sierra!
He's popular with homosexuals.
He was an intelligence analyst. He was never in combat but went into enemy territory. Many of us who've been non combatants in the military have done the same. Looks like he's trying to puff it up a bit. He claims he sought deployment.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/442082-documents-provide-glimpse-into-buttigiegs-military-service
kemmer wrote:
Intelligence. What did Cadet Bone Spurs do for his country besides NOT paying his taxes?
Trump said his biggest accomplishment during the Vietnam war was not getting STDs.
I suspect about as much as clinton or obama or even DaNang Dick, a reserve marine during the VietNam conflict that claimed combat in DaNang but apparently never left the states. Even LBJ who got a Silver Star for a ride on a recon plane that saw no combat, the only person on the plane to be awarded anything! I don't know nor care, I did my tour and was proud to have contributed. Where were you during the conflict? I was at Phan Rang, 69-70 with a special operations wing.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
