One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Another false flag and conjob to start another war
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
May 15, 2019 18:23:03   #
permafrost (a regular here)
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Wow, did ironiously credit you with the intelligence to look up which democrats voted for the Iraq war and based on what information?

Here the bible does not say "God helps those who help themselves", what it does say "God helps those who can't help themselves".

In spirit of helping the liberal helpless....


Democrats that voted for the Iraq war "Yes" votes.

84 total "yes" votes

Baucus (MT) Bayh (IN) Biden (DE) Breaux (LA)Cantwell (WA) Carnahan (MO) Carper (DE) Cleland (GA) Hillary Clinton (NY) Daschle (SD) Dodd (CT) Dorgan (ND) Edwards (NC) Feinstein (CA) Harkin (IA) Hollings (SC) Johnson (SD) Kerry (MA) Kohl (WI) Landrieu (LA) Lieberman (CT) Lincoln (AR) Miller (GA) Nelson (FL) Nelson (NE) Reid (NV) Rockefeller (WV) Schumer (NY) Torricelli (NJ)


I find it interesting that the Schumer, Reid, Kerry, HILLARY CLINTON, BIDEN, Feinstein have been the leaders in pushing the false narrative that Bush went to war for "The Oil" after they are the ones that voted for the Iraq war and where's the oil they claim Bush went to war for? The other lie they pushed was The war was so Cheney could make money from his stock in Haliburton since they were contracted to put out the oil rig fires, but the facts tell a different story. Haliburton was the only company on earth with Hugh equipment and man power resources. There were dozens of smaller companies called to put out the oil fires that burned for nearly two years and if you combine every oil company that puts out oil fires, combined they still are only a fraction of the size and resources of Haliburton. Even with the combined efforts the constant bomb attacks on the oil wells made it impossible for any company other than Haliburton to lead the rescue.

Why did congress vote yes for the Iraq War and Bush execute.

Both branches of our Government congress and President Bush were given false information and had it been factual, the war would have been justified. But Bush and the democrats were fooled. Factual history would not blame the Democrats, Republicans or Bush for starting the Iraq war but rightfully should blame the CIA.

Back when CNN was a little less fake news they lead the bombshell story how the CIA produced evidence of WMD
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.html
Also if you search you will find that under the Obama Administration the military did in fact find WMD but this time the media was crickets and by remaining crickets it helped fuel the false narratives.


Democrats are the party of war, but yet again its the media's false narratives brainwashing liberal protestors, protesting against the Republicans when if given the facts they should be protesting against the Democrats even more.
http://thebaffler.com/latest/democrats-are-the-real-party-of-war
Wow, did ironiously credit you with the intelligen... (show quote)





Seems no end to right wing twisting of facts...

Most dems opposed the Iraq action..

United States House of Representatives
Party Ayes Nays Not
Voting
Republican 215 6 2
Democratic 82 126 1
Independent 0 1 0
TOTALS 297 133 3
215 (96.4%) of 223 Republican Representatives voted for the resolution.
82 (39.2%) of 209 Democratic Representatives voted for the resolution.
6 (<2.7%) of 223 Republican Representatives voted against the resolution: Reps. Duncan (R-TN), Hostettler (R-IN), Houghton (R-NY), Leach (R-IA), Morella (R-MD), Paul (R-TX).
126 (~60.3%) of 209 Democratic Representatives voted against the resolution.
The only Independent Representative voted against the resolution: Rep. Sanders (I-VT)
Reps. Ortiz (D-TX), Roukema (R-NJ), and Stump (R-AZ) did not vote on the resolution.

| Reply
May 15, 2019 18:26:46   #
permafrost (a regular here)
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
I'll repeat,
Catch up on the latest Mueller comments, including his addendum 14 page added summary post Barrs four page summary and had you read the latest 14 page Mueller summary then you would not have these comments that ring of nedua talking points void of truth. Mueller’s point of writing the recent 14 page summary was to correct the media's false interpretation.




If you think Mueller exonerated the orange thing, you have been reading only trumps twitter feeds..

put up a link and we can match tit for tat..



| Reply
May 15, 2019 18:32:54   #
permafrost (a regular here)
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Of course it is to liberal know only talking points and never took the time to read the full report.
It's available in full on Fox and I'm sure CNN has it also
Instead of making statements that make you a fool, you will find the 14 page addendum on the report.

Damn I don't like to insult but in this case you deserve it for looking stupid.




You can not produce it..

so drop it...



| Reply
May 15, 2019 18:35:09   #
proud republican (a regular here)
 
permafrost wrote:
If you think Mueller exonerated the orange thing, you have been reading only trumps twitter feeds..

put up a link and we can match tit for tat..


Your black thing better lawyer up....New Sheriff in town is coming after him!!!

| Reply
May 15, 2019 18:43:33   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
proud republican wrote:
Your black thing better lawyer up....New Sheriff in town is coming after him!!!


your so funny

| Reply
May 15, 2019 20:24:43   #
permafrost (a regular here)
 
proud republican wrote:
Your black thing better lawyer up....New Sheriff in town is coming after him!!!




That is so dumb you must be joking, but I have been told that right wingers do not understand humor and you have shown none at all..

What do you imagine will be used as a charge?? what are you dreaming of?

After 8 investigation of lady Hillary, you seem a bit over confident..

and you can not even name a charge.. can you dream one???

LOL



| Reply
May 15, 2019 20:27:47   #
proud republican (a regular here)
 
permafrost wrote:
That is so dumb you must be joking, but I have been told that right wingers do not understand humor and you have shown none at all..

What do you imagine will be used as a charge?? what are you dreaming of?

After 8 investigation of lady Hillary, you seem a bit over confident..

and you can not even name a charge.. can you dream one???

LOL


Lady Hillary.......Now that's hilarious!!!!

| Reply
May 15, 2019 20:52:09   #
jack sequim wa (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
I watched Barr say he never looked at the evidence but he wrote the summery anyway.
that tells me all that Barr wanted to is white wash it trumps favor.




No Baer said he read Mueller’s conclusions, then wrote the summary which is following protocol. Barr has followed protocol, it's only the media spinning it to something else.

| Reply
May 15, 2019 20:54:04   #
jack sequim wa (a regular here)
 
permafrost wrote:
You can not produce it..

so drop it...



. I can't help if you don't have the brain power to read the report for yourself.
Now your the third one to make an ass of your self

| Reply
May 15, 2019 20:56:02   #
jack sequim wa (a regular here)
 
permafrost wrote:
Seems no end to right wing twisting of facts...

Most dems opposed the Iraq action..

United States House of Representatives
Party Ayes Nays Not
Voting
Republican 215 6 2
Democratic 82 126 1
Independent 0 1 0
TOTALS 297 133 3
215 (96.4%) of 223 Republican Representatives voted for the resolution.
82 (39.2%) of 209 Democratic Representatives voted for the resolution.
6 (<2.7%) of 223 Republican Representatives voted against the resolution: Reps. Duncan (R-TN), Hostettler (R-IN), Houghton (R-NY), Leach (R-IA), Morella (R-MD), Paul (R-TX).
126 (~60.3%) of 209 Democratic Representatives voted against the resolution.
The only Independent Representative voted against the resolution: Rep. Sanders (I-VT)
Reps. Ortiz (D-TX), Roukema (R-NJ), and Stump (R-AZ) did not vote on the resolution.
Seems no end to right wing twisting of facts... br... (show quote)




84 voted yes out of 204 dem seats at the time.
It's just math... That's 40% voted yes to invade Iraq.

Just can't accept your queen agreed with Bush.

| Reply
May 15, 2019 21:01:36   #
jack sequim wa (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
can you give me a link to this i cant find it


This link is exactly what I said and where to find it.

Seems you, moldy and Perm are incapable of looking for the report posted all over the internet


From Fox News - Read the Robert Mueller report
Read the Robert Mueller report

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/read-the-robert-mueller-report


This is a download link

| Reply
May 15, 2019 22:07:02   #
moldyoldy (a regular here)
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
This link is exactly what I said and where to find it.

Seems you, moldy and Perm are incapable of looking for the report posted all over the internet


From Fox News - Read the Robert Mueller report
Read the Robert Mueller report

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/read-the-robert-mueller-report


This is a download link


The questions that trump was asked to write replies to, was added at the end. Nothing more.

| Reply
May 16, 2019 06:58:18   #
Morgan (a regular here)
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
They are now included in the 400 plus page report.
When first reported the report had something like 428 pages but is now 14 pages longer.
Just look for the most recent posting of the report and you will find it no problem.

I think there will be this BS unless Mueller does a public testamony. It's frustrating he hasn't.


Some things Mueller has done was questionable, there were other choices he could have chosen that would've helped the very needed clarification. One, for example, he stated he had a choice to bring in the president for questioning him, he chose not to but rathered sent him a questionnaire, a questionnaire? Really, come on now, why, of all people? Yes, it's all been very frustrating, just to find the truth.

I find him to be a man trying to walk the political balance beam and trying to clear with a stunning exalted jump off. LOL... Ta Da!

| Reply
May 16, 2019 07:02:09   #
Morgan (a regular here)
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
84 voted yes out of 204 dem seats at the time.
It's just math... That's 40% voted yes to invade Iraq.

Just can't accept your queen agreed with Bush.


I think a timeline would help, people agree to things, when later on new facts emerge, they reconsider, and change their minds, this happens very often in the land of politics. For a long time, it was said there were weapons of mass destruction, that turned out to not be true.

| Reply
May 16, 2019 08:35:55   #
permafrost (a regular here)
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
This link is exactly what I said and where to find it.

Seems you, moldy and Perm are incapable of looking for the report posted all over the internet


From Fox News - Read the Robert Mueller report
Read the Robert Mueller report

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/read-the-robert-mueller-report


This is a download link



You guys simply can not do a thing other then make up your own conclusiions, disregarding facts..



https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/19/mueller-report-unable-to-clear-trump-of-obstruction-of-justice

Robert Mueller’s much-awaited report details “multiple contacts” between the Trump campaign and Russian government officials, and sets out 10 “episodes” in which Donald Trump possibly obstructed justice.

Mueller says he did not make a “traditional prosecutorial judgement” on whether Trump did obstruct justice and adds that the evidence obtained about “the president’s actions and intent” threw up “difficult issues”.

However, the special counsel refused to exonerate Trump on the charge. “If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state,” Mueller wrote in his conclusion.

He added: “Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgement.”

Mueller’s 448-page report also reveals that Trump believed he was “fucked” and his presidency was over when Mueller was first appointed. The special counsel began his investigation into possible collusion in May 2017, soon after Trump unceremoniously fired FBI chief James Comey.

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.