You think that creep should be given parental rights? He rapes a 12 year old girl, threatens to kill her if she talks, gets her pregnant and now wants visitation rights? You gotta be out of your mind if you support that crap...
Sounds like you're overjoyed with the verdict !
I wonder why I'm not surprised !
Stupid people say stupid things and here we see no exception. How JW and 4430 come off with the idiocy to think that PeterS is condoning the stupidity of the judge in this case is beyond me, perhaps I need to get a major lobotomy or extremely drunk to the point to where my brain is barely functioning to quite understand the stupidity behind their assumptions.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
This is what we get from the pro life zealots--just sayin'
Dear Coos, you and I get long pretty well and it a... (
Excellent Post and Well said !
Again an example of some people with little reading comprehension. How does "This is what we get from the pro life zealots--just sayin'" mean anything other than a condemnation of a "pro life zealot" (being the moronic judge in this case) giving partial custody to the rapist is clearly wrong? I can see that clearly as I suspect anyone with even half a brain can easily see.
Why would ANY of you think that either PeterS or Coos Bay Tom would be advocating for a rapist getting custody of the product of his rape of a young girl? If either party is to be accused of favoring rapists, it would be the Republican party. They are the ones that most frequently stand behind their politicians accused of rape and rape like criminal behavior. Democrats usually try to distance themselves from other Democrats being accused of such crimes as rape and other rape like crimes. The Democrats may stand behind their politicians that may be somewhat sexually deviant but as long as it was consensual deviancy, many will still support, if it was non-consensual, they typically denounce that politician. Republicans tend to remain supportive of their politicians that forcibly rape women and they tend to be against abortions even in the case of rape so...
Keep that in mind when trying to determine whether someone is for or against such circumstances and you are less likely to say something so totally asinine.
P.S. In support of my claim about Republicans being so cavalier when dealing with rape...http://addictinginfo.com/2013/07/16/the-party-of-rape-culture-40-republican-rape-quotes-everyone-should-remember/
(article concerning actual quotes from Republicans concerning rape issues)http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/11/gop-cant-quite-bring-itself-to-back-an-alleged-child-rapist.html
(I applaud the Republicans in this case, provided in the interest of fairness)https://www.newsweek.com/why-are-republicans-enabling-child-sex-abusers-539059
(Ken Starr, the same guy that thought what Bill Clinton did was so wrong even if it WAS consensual, he has nothing against forcible rape or kiddie rape)
Not to mention Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump (didn't rape anyone we know of but sexual misconduct galore) and many more Republicans accused of serious sexual misconduct that Republicans continue to support while demonizing their accusers.