One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Hatred for Christianity rears its ugly head AGAIN
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 13, 2019 20:58:52   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under attack in California, where otherwise “tolerant” “social justice warriors” are foaming at the mouth.

F**g And Cross


As you may have guessed, we are once again witnessing a financial attack on popular chicken restaurant Chick-fil-A over the religious views of the company’s President. This time, however, there are real concerns over exactly how this decision will impact our inalienable right to religious freedom.

Faculty at California Polytechnic State University recently v**ed to ban Chick-fil-A from campus, accusing the restaurant’s charity arm of being “in violation of our values” and suggesting that Chick-fil-A’s presence on campus is similar to having pornography or a Hooters establishment at the school. The university president, however, is expected to veto the faculty v**e.

Trending: [LISTEN CLOSELY] Rashida Tlaib Has ‘A Calming Feeling’ When Thinking of the Holocaust

Cal Poly’s Academic Senate v**ed overwhelmingly in favor of blacklisting a Chick-fil-A restaurant from the school’s San Luis Obispo campus, due to the company’s owner supposedly having a “perceived opposition to the L***Q community,” according to KCBX News.

One of the proponents of the ban made several incendiary statements regarding Chick-fil-A, including comparing the restaurant to pornography.

Thomas Gutierrez, the Academic Senate’s vice-chair who introduced the resolution, compared Chick-fil-A to pornography and Hooters in his attempt to explain why the fast-food restaurant was not welcomed on campus, according to a report by Mustang News.

“We don’t sell pornography in the bookstore and we don’t have a Hooters on campus,” said Gutierrez, “We already pre-select those kind of things based on our existing values — this is a similar thing. The difference is we’re actually profiting from this. So our money, every dollar a student is spending at Chick-fil-A, is going to these causes that are in violation of our values.”

In a strikingly oxymoronic bit of “logic”, Gutierrez went on to tout the university’s commitment to “diversity and inclusion”.

And while all of this anger and vitriol certainly gave Gutierrez something to rage about, it appears as though the v**e to ban Chick-fil-A will remain a symbolic one.

After the v**e to blacklist Chick-fil-A, the resolution was reportedly sent to Cal Poly president Jeffery Armstrong, who will then make the final decision.

“Nevertheless, I think it’s important to go into the public record that the faculty feel this way on this fairly timely issue,” said Gutierrez, acknowledging President Armstrong’s apparent decision to keep Chick-fil-A on campus.

Now, don't tell me that the "progressives" in particularly the L***Qandwh**ever crowd is not against Christians.

Reply
May 13, 2019 21:41:15   #
Radiance3
 
no propaganda please wrote:
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under attack in California, where otherwise “tolerant” “social justice warriors” are foaming at the mouth.

F**g And Cross


As you may have guessed, we are once again witnessing a financial attack on popular chicken restaurant Chick-fil-A over the religious views of the company’s President. This time, however, there are real concerns over exactly how this decision will impact our inalienable right to religious freedom.

Faculty at California Polytechnic State University recently v**ed to ban Chick-fil-A from campus, accusing the restaurant’s charity arm of being “in violation of our values” and suggesting that Chick-fil-A’s presence on campus is similar to having pornography or a Hooters establishment at the school. The university president, however, is expected to veto the faculty v**e.

Trending: [LISTEN CLOSELY] Rashida Tlaib Has ‘A Calming Feeling’ When Thinking of the Holocaust

Cal Poly’s Academic Senate v**ed overwhelmingly in favor of blacklisting a Chick-fil-A restaurant from the school’s San Luis Obispo campus, due to the company’s owner supposedly having a “perceived opposition to the L***Q community,” according to KCBX News.

One of the proponents of the ban made several incendiary statements regarding Chick-fil-A, including comparing the restaurant to pornography.

Thomas Gutierrez, the Academic Senate’s vice-chair who introduced the resolution, compared Chick-fil-A to pornography and Hooters in his attempt to explain why the fast-food restaurant was not welcomed on campus, according to a report by Mustang News.

“We don’t sell pornography in the bookstore and we don’t have a Hooters on campus,” said Gutierrez, “We already pre-select those kind of things based on our existing values — this is a similar thing. The difference is we’re actually profiting from this. So our money, every dollar a student is spending at Chick-fil-A, is going to these causes that are in violation of our values.”

In a strikingly oxymoronic bit of “logic”, Gutierrez went on to tout the university’s commitment to “diversity and inclusion”.

And while all of this anger and vitriol certainly gave Gutierrez something to rage about, it appears as though the v**e to ban Chick-fil-A will remain a symbolic one.

After the v**e to blacklist Chick-fil-A, the resolution was reportedly sent to Cal Poly president Jeffery Armstrong, who will then make the final decision.

“Nevertheless, I think it’s important to go into the public record that the faculty feel this way on this fairly timely issue,” said Gutierrez, acknowledging President Armstrong’s apparent decision to keep Chick-fil-A on campus.

Now, don't tell me that the "progressives" in particularly the L***Qandwh**ever crowd is not against Christians.
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under... (show quote)


================
Recognizing L**T, does not mean eliminating Christianity. The First Amendment Rights must prevail. We are not reconstructing the constitution. We must follow every letter of the constitution.

Kids in colleges and universities are so brainwashed by their liberal professors.

By all means Chick fil A has the right to do business anywhere like others do. Drive away Rashida Talib to her own Muslim land. She has a huge mouth with no shame. Muslims throw away gays on the windows like garbage.

L**T is just one sect of identity that populate our country. 80% are Christians. This country was founded by Christians, and inhabited by Christians during the early centuries of starting 1492 to 1496.

All the Founders are Christians except 1 Agnostic but eventually became a full-pledge Christians.
Our constitution was made up of the Christian-Judeo doctrine.
The early Christian settlers came here to escape persecution from Europe. From there they brought the most valuable asset they own "The Holy Bible".

They worked hard at the most adverse conditions, no home, nothing but they tilled the soil, and built homes to warm them up. Many died of the adverse conditions. They strived and worked hard for their own.

Now, new lifestyle came in. The L**T. They don't have the right to dictate, but must follow the constitution and respect the rights of others according to Amendment 1.

L**T must obey the law. The fact that most of them STINK, they have no shame if they impose their filthy lifestyle to others. I am compassionate if they only behave, and respect the rights of others. If not, I don't want them around me.

Reply
May 14, 2019 08:47:18   #
Singularity
 
no propaganda please wrote:
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under attack in California, where otherwise “tolerant” “social justice warriors” are foaming at the mouth.

F**g And Cross


As you may have guessed, we are once again witnessing a financial attack on popular chicken restaurant Chick-fil-A over the religious views of the company’s President. This time, however, there are real concerns over exactly how this decision will impact our inalienable right to religious freedom.

Faculty at California Polytechnic State University recently v**ed to ban Chick-fil-A from campus, accusing the restaurant’s charity arm of being “in violation of our values” and suggesting that Chick-fil-A’s presence on campus is similar to having pornography or a Hooters establishment at the school. The university president, however, is expected to veto the faculty v**e.

Trending: [LISTEN CLOSELY] Rashida Tlaib Has ‘A Calming Feeling’ When Thinking of the Holocaust

Cal Poly’s Academic Senate v**ed overwhelmingly in favor of blacklisting a Chick-fil-A restaurant from the school’s San Luis Obispo campus, due to the company’s owner supposedly having a “perceived opposition to the L***Q community,” according to KCBX News.

One of the proponents of the ban made several incendiary statements regarding Chick-fil-A, including comparing the restaurant to pornography.

Thomas Gutierrez, the Academic Senate’s vice-chair who introduced the resolution, compared Chick-fil-A to pornography and Hooters in his attempt to explain why the fast-food restaurant was not welcomed on campus, according to a report by Mustang News.

“We don’t sell pornography in the bookstore and we don’t have a Hooters on campus,” said Gutierrez, “We already pre-select those kind of things based on our existing values — this is a similar thing. The difference is we’re actually profiting from this. So our money, every dollar a student is spending at Chick-fil-A, is going to these causes that are in violation of our values.”

In a strikingly oxymoronic bit of “logic”, Gutierrez went on to tout the university’s commitment to “diversity and inclusion”.

And while all of this anger and vitriol certainly gave Gutierrez something to rage about, it appears as though the v**e to ban Chick-fil-A will remain a symbolic one.

After the v**e to blacklist Chick-fil-A, the resolution was reportedly sent to Cal Poly president Jeffery Armstrong, who will then make the final decision.

“Nevertheless, I think it’s important to go into the public record that the faculty feel this way on this fairly timely issue,” said Gutierrez, acknowledging President Armstrong’s apparent decision to keep Chick-fil-A on campus.

Now, don't tell me that the "progressives" in particularly the L***Qandwh**ever crowd is not against Christians.
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under... (show quote)

Christians and Christian branding are becoming more and more unpopular!

I believe the position of unpopularity and antipathy regarding this restuarant and its Christian branding began as a stand against the bigotry and persecution in the public sphere, not Christianity, per se, that many women and those in the L***Q community felt, in response to the chicken restuarant's desire to curtail or deny legally mandated medical/insurance benefits.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2019 11:14:23   #
kemmer
 
no propaganda please wrote:
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under attack in California, where otherwise “tolerant” “social justice warriors” are foaming at the mouth.

F**g And Cross


As you may have guessed, we are once again witnessing a financial attack on popular chicken restaurant Chick-fil-A over the religious views of the company’s President. This time, however, there are real concerns over exactly how this decision will impact our inalienable right to religious freedom.

Faculty at California Polytechnic State University recently v**ed to ban Chick-fil-A from campus, accusing the restaurant’s charity arm of being “in violation of our values” and suggesting that Chick-fil-A’s presence on campus is similar to having pornography or a Hooters establishment at the school. The university president, however, is expected to veto the faculty v**e.

Trending: [LISTEN CLOSELY] Rashida Tlaib Has ‘A Calming Feeling’ When Thinking of the Holocaust

Cal Poly’s Academic Senate v**ed overwhelmingly in favor of blacklisting a Chick-fil-A restaurant from the school’s San Luis Obispo campus, due to the company’s owner supposedly having a “perceived opposition to the L***Q community,” according to KCBX News.

One of the proponents of the ban made several incendiary statements regarding Chick-fil-A, including comparing the restaurant to pornography.

Thomas Gutierrez, the Academic Senate’s vice-chair who introduced the resolution, compared Chick-fil-A to pornography and Hooters in his attempt to explain why the fast-food restaurant was not welcomed on campus, according to a report by Mustang News.

“We don’t sell pornography in the bookstore and we don’t have a Hooters on campus,” said Gutierrez, “We already pre-select those kind of things based on our existing values — this is a similar thing. The difference is we’re actually profiting from this. So our money, every dollar a student is spending at Chick-fil-A, is going to these causes that are in violation of our values.”

In a strikingly oxymoronic bit of “logic”, Gutierrez went on to tout the university’s commitment to “diversity and inclusion”.

And while all of this anger and vitriol certainly gave Gutierrez something to rage about, it appears as though the v**e to ban Chick-fil-A will remain a symbolic one.

After the v**e to blacklist Chick-fil-A, the resolution was reportedly sent to Cal Poly president Jeffery Armstrong, who will then make the final decision.

“Nevertheless, I think it’s important to go into the public record that the faculty feel this way on this fairly timely issue,” said Gutierrez, acknowledging President Armstrong’s apparent decision to keep Chick-fil-A on campus.

Now, don't tell me that the "progressives" in particularly the L***Qandwh**ever crowd is not against Christians.
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under... (show quote)

Cal Poly isn't the only university to ban Chick-Fil-A--or however you spell it. And it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Christianity. It has to do with the business supporting discrimination against a sizable segment of American citizens.

Reply
May 14, 2019 11:41:45   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
kemmer wrote:
Cal Poly isn't the only university to ban Chick-Fil-A--or however you spell it. And it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Christianity. It has to do with the business supporting discrimination against a sizable segment of American citizens.


That is, at best, a mistatment, more likely an intentional lie. Chic Fil A hires competent workers, no mater which sex, or what is their sexual attraction. And they serve any well behaved customers with the money to buy their products. The owners donate to Christian groups, as is their right. I expect they would not serve anyone who misbehaved, was seriously obscene , or disturbed the other customers. What the progressives demand is that the owners never donate to Christian organizations. I am actually surprised surprised that they don't pressure the owners into donating to L***Q causes, perhaps even have a g****r mixed up person reading to the children at a number of sites.

Reply
May 14, 2019 12:00:17   #
kemmer
 
no propaganda please wrote:
What the progressives demand is that the owners never donate to Christian organizations.

As you well know, some “Christian” organizations are little more than h**e groups hiding behind the cross.

Reply
May 14, 2019 12:22:03   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
kemmer wrote:
As you well know, some “Christian” organizations are little more than h**e groups hiding behind the cross.


I would expect there are a few churches that preach h**e. The Liberation theology for Rev Wright where Obama went for years is certainly one of them. I did encounter a church in Louisiana that was a KKK front, it had 35 members last I heard, a bunch of old men more interested in drinking than anything else according to people I knew in the area.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2019 12:31:57   #
woodguru
 
Singularity wrote:
Christians and Christian branding are becoming more and more unpopular!

I believe the position of unpopularity and antipathy regarding this restuarant and its Christian branding began as a stand against the bigotry and persecution in the public sphere, not Christianity, per se, that many women and those in the L***Q community felt, in response to the chicken restuarant's desire to curtail or deny legally mandated medical/insurance benefits.


Christians are associated with unconstitutional anti a******n actions in red states, the extreme side of this is against birth control as well, which is purely i***tic.

Reply
May 14, 2019 12:34:45   #
woodguru
 
kemmer wrote:
As you well know, some “Christian” organizations are little more than h**e groups hiding behind the cross.


It is dangerous to associate the "some" extremists that are tied to any group, that is what the right does as far as muslim terrorists...the terrorist element does not represent the majority of muslims.

Reply
May 14, 2019 12:40:41   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
kemmer wrote:
As you well know, some “Christian” organizations are little more than h**e groups hiding behind the cross.
Given that one third (1/3) of the world population are Christians, whoever or wh**ever these Christian h**e groups may be, they are a minor nuisance, like a toxic weed in a giant forest.

Groups like the Westboro Baptists (40 members) and the Army of God (10 dissociated leaders) and all other Christian extremist groups combined represent far less than 1% of the total Christian population.

And, what about L**T activists? Are they not h**e groups?

Reply
May 14, 2019 12:40:44   #
Radiance3
 
no propaganda please wrote:
I would expect there are a few churches that preach h**e. The Liberation theology for Rev Wright where Obama went for years is certainly one of them. I did encounter a church in Louisiana that was a KKK front, it had 35 members last I heard, a bunch of old men more interested in drinking than anything else according to people I knew in the area.


==================
Talk about Obama's friend Farrakhan. He does not talk about God. He talks about violence against God and His people. That is why Islam is not a religion. It is a theology of hatred and violence. Get them out of here please.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2019 12:48:26   #
Radiance3
 
woodguru wrote:
It is dangerous to associate the "some" extremists that are tied to any group, that is what the right does as far as muslim terrorists...the terrorist element does not represent the majority of muslims.


=================
All Muslims have one common goal. Follow the command of their god to k**l all infidels unless they submit to him. When their fellow Islam do that, the left few keep quiet. They allow them to happen.

95% of them celebrated and rejoiced over their victory of the 9/11 terror bombings. It was over the world.

No one among them, you called non-violent dared to condemn their violent behavior. They tolerate that all the time.

Reply
May 14, 2019 13:13:19   #
kemmer
 
Blade_Runner wrote:

And, what about L**T activists? Are they not h**e groups?

Hardly!

Reply
May 14, 2019 13:16:15   #
kemmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
That is why Islam is not a religion. It is a theology of hatred and violence.

Some would say Christianity is also all about hatred an violence, considering all the burnings at the stake and genocidal religious wars fought in its name.

Reply
May 14, 2019 13:18:00   #
kemmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
All Muslims have one common goal. Follow the command of their god to k**l all infidels unless they submit to him. When their fellow Islam do that, the left few keep quiet. They allow them to happen.

95% of them celebrated and rejoiced over their victory of the 9/11 terror bombings. It was over the world.

No one among them, you called non-violent dared to condemn their violent behavior. They tolerate that all the time.

Hahahahaha..... You yourself might qualify as a h**e group!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.