How I hope you are correct. Do consider this. One constitutional right is to have a trial and judgement by a jury of your peers.
Can you even suggest where you might find 12 jurors that would convict Hillary. The best of lawyers, a hand picked judge and carefully selected jurors. Who is going to bring her to trial much less convict her?
Don't forget money talks. It is hard enough to get a conviction of even a minor Hollywood star much less a previous 1st lady and major cabinet secretary.
I sure would love to see my being wrong but I doubt it. Can you also imagine the se******n process for potential jurors?
Would you sit through days of torture to serve on a jury that 'might' convict Hillary?
Heck, I'd get blown out of the water in 2 minutes. All the attorney would have to do is come up with a few of my postings on OPP to show I couldn't be neutral.

But we know that she will never see justice while she is living. She knows too much, and would likely not go quietly, but would take some very powerful people with her. Thus, I doubt any of those thieves, the Obamas, Comey, Hillary, Bill, and please do not forget Biden and his family's fortune from dealing with the Chinese and the Ukrainians, the Russians, and Iran. Loretta Lynch, and as well as the IRS nonsense where Lois Lerner was allowed to retire with full pension and benefits. And then there are the Congressional criminals-none of them will be brought to justice in this life, since they have each others backs. Their due will come when they must stand before God and answer. And God cannot be lied to.

==================
E*******l v**es decides the winner of the e******n. All States Representative choose the e*****rs and all states participates. Framers decided the e*******l college because it includes all US State representing to participate in the e*******l process.

Amendment XII of the Constitution defines how the e*******l process was created.

There were already 5 incidents that the p**********l candidate with more e*******l college v**es, had won over the candidate with more popular v**es but lesser e*******l v**es.

Latest one was in 2000 when George W.H. Bush won the e*******l of 271 vs Gore of 266, though Gore had more popular v**e of 537,000.

The other e*******l-popular v**e mismatches came in 1876 and 1888; in all four instances the Democratic nominee ended up the loser. (In the 1824 e******n, which was contested between rival factions of the old Democratic-Republican Party, Andrew Jackson won a plurality of the popular and e*******l v**e, but because he was short of an E*******l College majority the e******n was thrown to the House of Representatives, which chose runner-up John Quincy Adams.)

Hillary Clinton is still wagging her mouth, despite that she only got 227 e*******l v**es compared to Trump of 304 e*******l v**es.

Fact: Her edge on the popular v**es of 2.3 million had so many questionable i*****l a***n and convicts who v**ed for her as found in California, New York, Hawaii, Chicago, and other blue states

I am sincerely hoping the people in this country were beginning to wake up and that's the reason they elected President Trump. I did my part but wife and I are only 2 v**es.
I shudder to think what this country would be like under Hillary. My spirit is bolstered by the fact he won in spite of the fix being in for years.
Hillary should take the hint. If the load is too much to bear, there is always your favorite booze. Just drink up until it is all over. Your goofy followers can still blame Mr. Trump.