Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I like you but I will tell you right now that planned parenthood is not an a******n mill. Seek the t***h and question every thing.
I wouldn't call them an "a******n mill". But I also wouldn't swallow the way they report statistics about how much of their effort is NOT a******n related. Or whether or not a******n is their cash cow. Between people who have left the organization and numerous undercover videos, it seems that behind closed doors, their bread and butter is a******n. And I'd question why they need well over $500 million taxpayer dollars every year when tens of millions of that goes toward Democrat candidates campaigns.
fullspinzoo wrote:
Not for long! Deal with that.
You want to change the law go ahead when we regain the power we will just change it back and so it goes Trump throws our s**t out we throw his s**t out
Nickolai wrote:
You want to change the law go ahead when we regain the power we will just change it back and so it goes Trump throws our s**t out we throw his s**t out
Changing the law is when a baby is born alive, whether through botched late term a******n or not; and not allowed to live. That is NOT an a******n but is and has legally been murder. Once the baby is no longer within the mother's womb, the argument that it is her body to do with as she wants cannot be applied by any stretch of the imagination.
As for laws being changed, yes laws which are obsolete are often changed. Once a baby was not viable if born before the 8th month. Now most babies born as early as 25 weeks are viable. Logic would indicate that if the baby is viable at 25 weeks, terminating its life after 25 weeks should definitely be considered murder.
A heartbeat can be detected at 5 and a half weeks. Science experiments have proven babies as early as the 8th week of gestation react to pain stimuli. When their is brain activity and heartbeat; you can't say it's just a mass of cells unless you say every person or animal is just a mass of cells.
As for the argument that a woman should have the right to choose, almost all pro-lifers would agree. But she shouldn't have the right to choose to make a baby, then change her mind and k**l the baby. Every woman who isn't raped had the choice whether or not to get pregnant. Choosing to ignore the consequences is also a choice. If you drink and drive drunk, and have an accident; you may not have intended to have the accident, but you chose to engage in activity where an accident was likely. That was your choice!!!!
JoyV wrote:
Changing the law is when a baby is born alive, whether through botched late term a******n or not; and not allowed to live. That is NOT an a******n but is and has legally been murder. Once the baby is no longer within the mother's womb, the argument that it is her body to do with as she wants cannot be applied by any stretch of the imagination.
As for laws being changed, yes laws which are obsolete are often changed. Once a baby was not viable if born before the 8th month. Now most babies born as early as 25 weeks are viable. Logic would indicate that if the baby is viable at 25 weeks, terminating its life after 25 weeks should definitely be considered murder.
A heartbeat can be detected at 5 and a half weeks. Science experiments have proven babies as early as the 8th week of gestation react to pain stimuli. When their is brain activity and heartbeat; you can't say it's just a mass of cells unless you say every person or animal is just a mass of cells.
As for the argument that a woman should have the right to choose, almost all pro-lifers would agree. But she shouldn't have the right to choose to make a baby, then change her mind and k**l the baby. Every woman who isn't raped had the choice whether or not to get pregnant. Choosing to ignore the consequences is also a choice. If you drink and drive drunk, and have an accident; you may not have intended to have the accident, but you chose to engage in activity where an accident was likely. That was your choice!!!!
Changing the law is when a baby is born alive, whe... (
show quote)
JoyV,
It is so sad, convicted criminals on death row have a better chance of living a full life with all their appeals than a fetus in a mother’s womb or a newborn. All those people on death row have committed heinous crimes against society, can these pro-a******n people tell me what these poor infants have done other than being conceived by some i***t.
MAGA
God Bless the USA and President Trump
Hadenough wrote:
JoyV,
It is so sad, convicted criminals on death row have a better chance of living a full life with all their appeals than a fetus in a mother’s womb or a newborn. All those people on death row have committed heinous crimes against society, can these pro-a******n people tell me what these poor infants have done other than being conceived by some i***t.
MAGA
God Bless the USA and President Trump
It bothers the heck out of me some, especially some on OPP, who have such a nonchalant attitude toward the unborn child. I think we're making great strides in protect THEIR right.
Kevyn wrote:
A******n on demand is the law of the land! Deal with it.
Shame your Mom didn't take advantage of that. Yep, damn shame.
Larry the Legend wrote:
Shame your Mom didn't take advantage of that. Yep, damn shame.
Go easy on poor Kevie. He’s so bitter, most people have a birth certificate, all he has is a letter of apology from the Trojan condom sent to his parents.
MAGA
God Bless the USA and President Trump
Hadenough wrote:
Go easy on poor Kevie. He’s so bitter, most people have a birth certificate, all he has is a letter of apology from the Trojan condom sent to his parents.
MAGA
God Bless the USA and President Trump
You mean the "resident c*******t"? You mean the guy who wants Judge Jeanine to "shut her pie hole", but has an opinion on everything from a******n to socialism, that Kevie? Pirro must be that good and that "spot on" that she hilariously gets under poor little Kevie's skin. How funny? Sure glad that we live in this great America where "freedom of speech" (Judge's opening monologue) is sill "the law of the land".
fullspinzoo wrote:
You mean the "resident c*******t"? You mean the guy who wants Judge Jeanine to "shut her pie hole", but has an opinion on everything from a******n to socialism, that Kevie? Pirro must be that good and that "spot on" that she hilariously gets under poor little Kevie's skin. How funny? Sure glad that we live in this great America where "freedom of speech" (Judge's opening monologue) is sill "the law of the land".
That be the one, he’s lucky he lives in the Great US of A, otherwise he would be in some socialist work camp.
MAGA
God Bless the USA and President Trump
fullspinzoo wrote:
Delusional.
Sorry you are Rabbi. When educated intelligent people such as yourself succomb to the rhetoric we are bombarded by daily in the attempt to exploit our nature and emotions and therby influence us and use us in the worst way to further their agenda we lose all reasonable dialog and solutions for our modern and unique human problems.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Sorry you are Rabbi. When educated intelligent people such as yourself succomb to the rhetoric we are bombarded by daily in the attempt to exploit our nature and emotions and therby influence us and use us in the worst way to further their agenda we lose all reasonable dialog and solutions for our modern and unique human problems.
Listen, anybody who thinks a candidate who is running for President and can't sign Ben Sasse's Bill involving medical help for an unborn baby where the a******n was botched is a complete asshole, piece of s**t. scumbag, wh**ever in my book. period. End of story. Ugly story. Rush said it best I guess today. Biden has best chance in the primary, but has very little in the general. I predict Roe will be overturned before Trump completes his third term.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.