One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Devon Erickson Colorado shooting suspect shared anti-Trump,pro-Obama posts on Facebook...
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
May 14, 2019 18:24:24   #
JoyV
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Yeah, because Erickson is the most common last name south of the border. WND should be kept by every toilet as back up toilet paper.


Don't be a bigot. I******s who invade our southern border come from all over the globe. You assume they are Hispanics. We get plenty who are white, Arab, African, Hispanic, and even Asian.

But in any case, it wasn't Erickson who had the i*****l a***n father but the other shooter Alec McKinney. His last name was his mother's not father's. His father was Jose Evis Quintana. He was jailed twice for domestic violence, deported twice. Last time was in 2017.

Reply
May 14, 2019 18:26:30   #
JoyV
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Well, that is obvious but if you want the t***h, try better sources. WND is well known for NOT telling the t***h.

https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2017/01/24/conspiracy-outlet-wnd-still-pushing-its-anti-muslim-f**e-news-story-even-after-it-was-debunked/215107

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNetDaily

https://docs.google.com/document/d/10eA5-mCZLSS4MQY5QGb5ewC3VAL6pLkT53V_81ZyitM/preview (long list, probably has ALL your favorite news sources listed, have to get nearly to bottom to see WND)

Spoiler alert:

wnd.com

bias
clickbait
unreliable


WND is obviously NOT the only one putting out f**e news, but they are in fact purveyors of f**e news and therefore not to be relied upon.
Well, that is obvious but if you want the t***h, t... (show quote)


So if the story reported by WND is "f**e", what is the "true" story? Even WaPo gets it right sometimes.

Reply
May 14, 2019 18:29:24   #
JoyV
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Not to mention their repeated insinuations concerning conspiracy theories regarding the Seth Rich murder.

And of course you completely ignored the fact that WND published a f**e news story and even after it was debunked, continued to stand by their f**e news story, https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2017/01/24/conspiracy-outlet-wnd-still-pushing-its-anti-muslim-f**e-news-story-even-after-it-was-debunked/215107.

You would think that if they were at all concerned about putting out the t***h, they would have at least stopped standing by the f**e story and maybe, perhaps, printed a retraction, yeah, like WND will admit to their fascination with f**e news.


I tell you what, prove that any of the examples of WND's publishing f**e news to be a false claim, and then you can claim that they are a reliable news source. The hitch, it must be ACTUAL proof from a RELIABLE source. Only FACTS will be accepted as proof.
Not to mention their repeated insinuations concern... (show quote)


The point is you don't accept the details of the story because it was reported by WND. So what details did WND get wrong in this story, and what ARE the true details?

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2019 18:42:30   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
JoyV wrote:
The point is you don't accept the details of the story because it was reported by WND. So what details did WND get wrong in this story, and what ARE the true details?


I do not read WND because it is not reliable news, it doesn't matter what the story is about, I don't read WND PERIOD. As for the subject of the WND article in particular, since I don't read WND, I obvious don't know the specifics of the article, I would think that would be a no brainer but...WND has pushed conspiracy theories LONG after they have been debunked so there really is no need to read WND if you are interested in facts and real news. Those that continue to read WND obviously don't care that the news is f**e.

If you would like to read f**e news, by all means, read WND. Have fun with your f**e news.

Reply
May 14, 2019 22:16:30   #
JoyV
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
I do not read WND because it is not reliable news, it doesn't matter what the story is about, I don't read WND PERIOD. As for the subject of the WND article in particular, since I don't read WND, I obvious don't know the specifics of the article, I would think that would be a no brainer but...WND has pushed conspiracy theories LONG after they have been debunked so there really is no need to read WND if you are interested in facts and real news. Those that continue to read WND obviously don't care that the news is f**e.

If you would like to read f**e news, by all means, read WND. Have fun with your f**e news.
I do not read WND because it is not reliable news,... (show quote)


You assert a story is false because it was in WND. I don't read WND either so when the story was posted here on OPP I looked for the info elsewhere. I do not immediately assume a story is false or true based in who published it. But you asserted it was false. So either admit you lied and don't know the veracity of the story, or give evidence as to its falseness. Evidence on the reliability or lack thereof of WND is NOT proof of the veracity of any particular story.

Reply
May 14, 2019 22:38:59   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
JoyV wrote:
You assert a story is false because it was in WND. I don't read WND either so when the story was posted here on OPP I looked for the info elsewhere. I do not immediately assume a story is false or true based in who published it. But you asserted it was false. So either admit you lied and don't know the veracity of the story, or give evidence as to its falseness. Evidence on the reliability or lack thereof of WND is NOT proof of the veracity of any particular story.


I did not lie, I asserted that WND pushes f**e news and that statement IS true.



Edit: Reading WND in search of facts is about like reading National Enquirer for the same reason. You may read some real news but don't count on it.

Reply
May 14, 2019 22:50:35   #
JoyV
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
I did not lie, I asserted that WND pushes f**e news and that statement IS true.



Edit: Reading WND in search of facts is about like reading National Enquirer for the same reason. You may read some real news but don't count on it.


You are either missing the point or playing dumb. Whether or not WND is a reliable source or not is not what I have repeatedly asked you to answer. Whether the story they reported of the father of one of the shooters being an i*****l a***n is true is the question. You opined that it is f**e news because you don't trust WND as a reliable news source. I have repeatedly asked you to indicate what the true story is if the WND story is false. So again, what is false about the story and what is the true story???!!!!

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2019 23:03:12   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
JoyV wrote:
You are either missing the point or playing dumb. Whether or not WND is a reliable source or not is not what I have repeatedly asked you to answer. Whether the story they reported of the father of one of the shooters being an i*****l a***n is true is the question. You opined that it is f**e news because you don't trust WND as a reliable news source. I have repeatedly asked you to indicate what the true story is if the WND story is false. So again, what is false about the story and what is the true story???!!!!
You are either missing the point or playing dumb. ... (show quote)


Obviously too thick headed to understand that I have already answered that question. If only you had the intelligence to understand the answer.

I wrote:
As for the subject of the WND article in particular, since I don't read WND, I obvious don't know the specifics of the article, I would think that would be a no brainer but...


If you can't understand simple English, I am sorry, but I can't help you.





Edit: I have NEVER stated that I knew that particular article to be false, I have only been pointing out that I would not trust a word WND says since they have no aversion to publishing lies.

Reply
May 15, 2019 12:22:38   #
JoyV
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
If you can't understand simple English, I am sorry, but I can't help you.





Edit: I have NEVER stated that I knew that particular article to be false, I have only been pointing out that I would not trust a word WND says since they have no aversion to publishing lies.


If you will look back you will see that my question to you from the beginning to the end was in so many words, what is wrong about the story. You persisted in answering what is wrong with the source of the story. I asked after you responded to the story with, "Yeah, because Erickson is the most common last name south of the border. WND should be kept by every toilet as back up toilet paper." to another poster's "According to WND, the shooter's dad is an illegal felon from Mexico who was locked up for 15 months for beating his wife." So no, you did not specifically state that this WND story was f**e. But you implied it by answering the assertion that the shooter's dad was an illegal felon... This certainly implies you were at the very least dismissive of the story. I then asked you to give us the true story. You still have not!

So again, what IS the true story?

Reply
May 15, 2019 18:24:47   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
JoyV wrote:
If you will look back you will see that my question to you from the beginning to the end was in so many words, what is wrong about the story. You persisted in answering what is wrong with the source of the story. I asked after you responded to the story with, "Yeah, because Erickson is the most common last name south of the border. WND should be kept by every toilet as back up toilet paper." to another poster's "According to WND, the shooter's dad is an illegal felon from Mexico who was locked up for 15 months for beating his wife." So no, you did not specifically state that this WND story was f**e. But you implied it by answering the assertion that the shooter's dad was an illegal felon... This certainly implies you were at the very least dismissive of the story. I then asked you to give us the true story. You still have not!

So again, what IS the true story?
If you will look back you will see that my questio... (show quote)


Since I don't care to read f**e news websites, I WILL NOT be reading WND, get over it already.

Reply
May 16, 2019 06:39:49   #
JoyV
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Since I don't care to read f**e news websites, I WILL NOT be reading WND, get over it already.


Did I ask you to read WND? I asked you to tell us what the true story is since you don't believe the one written in WND. You do not need to read WND to do so?

Reply
 
 
May 16, 2019 14:07:25   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
JoyV wrote:
Did I ask you to read WND? I asked you to tell us what the true story is since you don't believe the one written in WND. You do not need to read WND to do so?


Gotta love the idiocy of some people, not even ONCE did I make ANY claim as to the legitimacy of the story itself, I only denounced the legitimacy of the source, and rightly so, along comes a moron with an overly inflated sense of self worth that gets pissy that I disparage the source of the article and expects that I will bend to their will and answer their question. One that I have shown time and again that I will not answer as I NEVER spoke about the article itself so therefore do not feel the need to defend my opinion of the article.

Sorry, but I do not feel the need to indulge you at this time, get over yourself.





Edit: Ah wait, I did make one comment about the article itself but then it didn't really matter as it really had nothing to do with the shooting. It wasn't the father that did the shooting, it was the child. The information about the Father being an i*****l i*******t is completely irrelevant.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.