woodguru

The lie that torpedoed him was his answer to the question under oath, "did Bob Mueller support your conclusion"?

He answered, "I don't know whether he supports my conclusion".

Wrong answer, Mueller took a rather radical approach and sent Barr a letter letting him know exactly what he thought of his conclusions, and it was very clear he was pissed off and clearly in disagreement. This was two weeks before this hearing.

We're dealing with intelligent men here who are attorneys, Barr knows when he's lying.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Hey,Wood!!!Read the letter,dude!!!...Mueller wrote that the letter WAS ACCURATE,but that he had the problem with Media coverage!!!

https://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/04/30/mueller-frustrated-with-barr-over-portrayal-of-findings/

READ THE WHOLE DAMN LETTER!!!!!!!

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

In 1989, at the beginning of his administration, President George H. W. Bush appointed William Barr to the U.S. Department of Justice as Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), an office which functions as the legal advisor for the President and executive agencies.

In May 1990, Barr was appointed Deputy Attorney General, the official responsible for day-to-day management of the Department. According to media reports, Barr was generally praised for his professional management of the Department.

In 1991, Barr was nominated for Attorney General of the United States. Barr's two-day confirmation hearing was "unusually placid", and he received a good reception from both Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Upon leaving the DOJ in 1993, Barr was appointed by Virginia Governor George Allen to co-chair a commission to reform the criminal justice system and abolish parole in the state.

Later in 1994, Barr became Executive Vice President and General Counsel of GTE Corporation, where he served for 14 years. During his corporate tenure, Barr directed a successful litigation campaign by the local telephone industry to achieve deregulation by scuttling a series of FCC rules, personally arguing several cases in the federal courts of appeals and the Supreme Court.

On December 7, 2018, President Donald Trump announced his nomination of Barr for Attorney General to succeed Jeff Sessions. Barr was confirmed as Attorney General on February 14, 2019, by a 54–45 near party-line v**e, with Sen. Doug Jones (D-AL), Joe Manchin (D-WV), and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) as the three Democrats to v**e Yea.

And you think William Barr is a neophyte legal hack without a lick of sense? Even a thimble full of Barr's intelligence and experience would do wonders for bottom feeders like you.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

This one is even better

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-30/about-letter-mueller-wrote-barr

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Thanks.

Best post that rather than link it. In my experience on forums like this, many people will skip over links. It's in-your-face stuff that is most effective.

About That Letter That Mueller Wrote To Barr...

Another deep state "leak" has hit the tape, and as usual it has gone to the WaPo and NYT almost at the exact same time... but this it's even more laughable than usual.

In what the WaPo breathlessly reports late on Tuesday was a rebuke and "complaint" to Attorney General William Barr, special counsel Robert Mueller sent a letter to the AG in late March, just days after Barr sent out his summary to Congress, in which Mueller stated that Barr's 4-page summary to Congress on the sweeping Russia investigation failed to "fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of Mueller’s work and conclusions, citing a copy of the letter it had obtained using its trusted deep intel sources.

This is what Mueller said to Barr, according to the leaked NSA intercept:

"There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations."

And if one reads just that, it certainly does not look good for Attorney General Barr, especially just one day before his first official Congressional hearing on the topic of the Mueller report: so bad that even the absolute lunatic fringe of conspiracygate - which had mercifully shut up for the past month with its daily predictions that this member of the Trump clan is going to jail, or that website will be shut down - has roared back into life with the sage assessment that "this is bad."

Pouring more fuel on the fire, the always pithy Axios adds that "this revelation about Mueller's dissatisfaction with the characterization of his report will likely escalate the growing rift over Barr's handling of the special counsel's investigation. House Democrats, who have expressed distrust in the attorney general, are set to v**e on Wednesday to allow House Judiciary Committee lawyers to question Barr at Thursday's hearing."

Or maybe not, and perhaps the WaPo/NYT report is not "so bad" if one actually reads it, because once the breathless WaPo finally does come up for air, we get to paragraph 13 - a point by which most readers have turned out - to read the following real punchline in the WaPo report:

When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not...

So, Mueller felt there was confusion... but he did not think the memo was inaccurate. Wait, what's going on here and how is this even a story? Well, if we read the rest of the above sentence, we find the true object of Mueller's "complaint":

Mueller felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.

Which means that, as the WaPo itself reports, what Mueller was really angry with was the coverage of his report by media such as... the WaPo and the NYT?? The irony, it burns.

But wait, because if one reads even further - and yes, we know most Russiagaters have troubles getting beyond sentence one so they are excused - we find that throughout a subsequent 15 minutes telephone conversation between the special counsel and the attorney general, Mueller’s main worry was "that the public was not getting an accurate understanding of the obstruction investigation."

This goes back to what Mueller's letter requested: "that Barr release the 448-page report’s introductions and executive summaries, and made some initial suggested redactions for doing so, according to Justice Department officials," the WaPo writes.

What happened then? A few weeks later Barr did just that, and absent occasional redactions - some of which apparently revealed that Russia had taped Bill Clinton having phone sex with Monica Lewinsky - he did just that.

So if Mueller thought Barr's memo was not inaccurate, and his ire was instead targeted at the media for "misinterpreting the investigation" - although it remains unclear just how they did this, after all Mueller does not dispute that there was no collusion (yes, Russiagaters, that means you) and did not dispute Barr's conclusion of no obstruction - then what is the point of these two rather confused pieces? Well, as noted above, tomorrow Barr is scheduled to testify on Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee about the investigation, and the entire article is meant to focus on the headlines of the WaPo (and NYT) article, and certainly not on paragraph 13 which, not only refutes the prevailing tone that Barr did something wrong, but in fact exonerates him. But that won't have any impact on tomorrow's hearing which is now assured to be a complete kangaroo court.

As for tonight's really big, if unspoken, story - if this is the best leak Mueller has to defy Barr and the president, then Trump has indeed won.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Thanks Blade...

This was great...

The irony is not lost on, and muchly appreciated by, this Canuckistanian

Radiance3

======================
DOJ Barr is currently the best qualified to hold the DOJ Office. His integrity, honesty, and exceedingly performed prior duties with all his dedications. He is the best that epitomizes him in that position. He was confirmed 54 to 45.

Now that he is in the process of cleaning up the system, particularly the prior events run by the Deep State, the Democrats in Congress are again harassing him to prevent him from cleaning them up. The radical DEMS wanted him out. Rosenstein was involved with the Deep State, and now resigning.

The Democrat party is the obstacle in cleaning up the swamp run by them. They wanted to continue the fraudulent activities run by DOJ Lynch, and Holder. Lynch made her own laws changing their crimes to a simple "matter" to evade the law. Holder's Fast and Furious has been forgotten under the Obama administration. All these crimes now have been covered-up and forgotten.

While DOJ Barr is trying to do the clean-ups of their frauds and corruptions, these democrats in Congress, the perpetrators, are doing all kinds of harassments, similar to the schemes they are doing against president Trump.

America, please be vigilant. Please stop these corrupt democrats continue their crimes against us. We are the victims. Please v**e them out in the 2020 e******n.

Mueller and Comey are best friends, and powerful members of the Deep State run by Obama, with his Muslim CIA Brennan. The radical Dems in Congress are preventing DOJ Bar to investigate them.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

Thanks Blade!

And will the l*****ts apologize or even correct themselves? Of course not. Which tells me their self-proclaimed mission to get to the t***h is the real h**x.

I’m beginning to think many of the l*****t posters here are the disinformists. Why else would they resist all reason with such passion.

Or else (and this is what I truly believe they all have in common) they so despise Judeo-Christian morals, values and ideas, that they are willing to believe, support, defend and cohort with, anything aligned against such, no matter the source.

With so much evidence against the Obama/Clinton cabal being the actual collusionists and obstructionists, in my mind, especially considering the big picture of all the combined issues, this is the only explanation that makes sense: it’s a spiritual blindness and an open r*******n against our Creator God.

Those who claim that religion has no place in politics are the most willingly ignorant; because it is impossible to separate a person’s moral beliefs and responsibilities to society from their convictions of where those morals come from.

“When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
“We hold these t***hs to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and t***sient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

This Bill of Rights proves, and clearly states that, our nation was established on the fundamental principles that there is a Creator who “makes” all, and that our rights come from that Creator, not a government of elites, or from mob rule.

This statement explains why conservatives seem so patient with l*****t over-reaches: “accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.”

But here’s the place where the dividing line of intentions is clearly drawn and stated:

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

The l*****ts, and l*****t-sympathizing RINOs, clearly and consistently are the ones to openly pursue governmental abuses and usurpations because they believe our rights and liberties come from people in government and not from God.

I really appreciate your reasoning and research sk**ls, Blade! Thanks again!

America 1 Loc: South Miami

Most of us know the lie starts when the post begins with woodguru.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

... or any other l*****t!

Hug

Great conversation. Thanks to all of you.

rebob14

And this pointless round robin of adolescent “debate” is exactly the point of all this drama; declare personality defects in your opponents to maintain a v****g base.

Radiance3

============================
Currently, DOJ Barr is the most qualified to run the DOJ Office. His qualification, wisdom, integrity, honesty and excellent prior performances epitomizes him to hold the DOJ position.

He was confirmed at the Senate 54 to 45. A solid affirmation because of his excellent qualifications and integrity could not be denied. DOJ Barr also has the highest morals and ethics embedded within our constitution. He follows the constitution up to the last letter.

At present DOJ Barr is in the process of cleaning up the swampy system run by the prior radical democrats. But the Democrats in Congress now want him out and has been harassing him.

Frauds and corruptions run so prevalent, and in fact the standards of performance among the Democrat Party. One of that is the DOJ office run by Lynch and Holder under Barack Obama. It was so dishonest and corrupt, that in order to maintain their corrupt powers, they created their own laws regardless of what was on the books.

Under Obama, they weaponized against the political opponents, or anybody against their dark schemes, the DOJ Office, the CIA, FBI, National Intelligence, the IRS. The purpose is to destroy the enemies that hinder their fraudulent activities.

Currently fraudulent officials who run that system are being identified by witnesses. DOJ Barr wants to clean them up to restore integrity and justice to his office where it must belong.

But democrats in Congress target to removed him from his position to stop the clean ups.

America, we are all victims of these frauds and corruptions under the democrat party.
We spent $35 million, our money, investigating these fabricated Russia Collusion they set up against the president Trump. He was duly elected by the people. Sixty million v**ers elected him.

Please DO NOT V**E for democrats in the 2020 e******n. This is the only way to clean our government and to protect the rights of the American people.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Mueller played ball for the dems by flipping the law upside down. No body EVER found NO evidence that something WASN'T done. And certainly he didn't find evidence of collusion and stated such.

Radiance3

===============
I think Mueller was one of the members of the Deep. Him and Comey are good friends.