One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump Jr.: What did the Democrats know and when did they know it?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 25, 2019 00:08:13   #
EmilyD
 
Trump Jr. wrote this in an op ed today. Interesting viewpoint from the president's son. Of course left will smirk at this and call it wh**ever. But from my viewpoint, its a son who is defending his father.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/24/exclusive-donald-trump-jr-what-did-the-democrats-know-and-when-did-they-know-it/

What did the Democrats know and when did they know it?

For the last two and half years, the vicious Trump h**ers in the Democratic Party and the media have been bending the t***h and outright lying to try and hang the Watergate hat on my father.

The natural takeaway from the 448 pages of Robert Mueller’s report is that the analogy fits them a lot better.

There was no collusion — none, not by anyone associated with the Trump Campaign. And, according to the report, Special Counsel Mueller appeared to know this as far back as 2017.

And yet, for another two years Democrats such as House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff continued to claim, bald-faced, that they had evidence of collusion.

So I’ll ask the question again: what did they know and when did they know it?

Every indication is that anyone who was in the know knew better. Even before the Mueller probe began, the Democrats’ own intelligence experts were telling them there was no collusion. That should have given them a pretty good indication that if their real concern was Russian e******n i**********e, then digging into my father, his family, and the Americans who helped us pull off the greatest e*******l upset in modern history was just a huge waste of time.

If you still have any lingering questions about the Russiagaters’ motives, they should all be answered in full by the left’s reaction to the Mueller report. The first volume of the report — you know, the one that conclusively shows there was absolutely no collusion — was met with universal disappointment from Democrats.

If America’s vulnerability to Russian hacking were really the Democrats’ concern, wouldn’t they be thrilled to have an independent investigator confirm what my father has been saying all along, that Russian intelligence had not c*********d one of America’s great political parties and co-opted the highest office in the land?

Yet there was nary a sigh of relief from the left, much less jubilation.

If understanding how Russia projects political influence in America were the Democrats’ real focus, wouldn’t they be just as concerned about how the Obama administration failed to stop Russian intelligence agencies from doing so? Ample evidence points to a complete systemic failure, both before and after Russia’s plan became clear.

Yet there was not a single call from Democrats to investigate those failures, even as Mueller’s own report draws renewed attention to them.

The mask slipped even further in the media wing of the Democratic Party, where some accused Mueller of not doing “his job.”

“The job,” as quickly becomes clear when reading these articles, was to nail my father for the crime of winning a p**********l e******n that liberals thought they were entitled to. “The job” was to punish me and my family — regardless of what we conclusively did not do with regard to Russia.

“The job,” in short, was to make a display of raw, naked power; to use scraps of inaccurate or misunderstood information as the basis for a two year independent investigation with no obvious purpose other than to undermine my father’s presidency.

Even though Mueller’s investigation debunked the liberal conspiracy theories about “collusion” and “obstruction,” it did accomplish a large part of what the Democrats were hoping for. The attempted c**p served as a constant distraction from the President’s policy agenda for nearly two years, cast a shadow over the 2018 midterm e******ns that helped Democrats take control of the House of Representatives and double-down on their obstructionist political strategy, and even took a few Republican scalps along the way

The overarching shame of Russiagate is that, egged on by a wildly irresponsible media, some people were actually hoping to find out that their President was a Russian agent. The second shame, nearly as important, is that Democrats were able to exploit those people’s delusions to justify a two year, taxpayer-funded opposition research team.

Just take hyper-liberal former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s word for it. As he saw it, Mueller did “his job” very well: he assembled the dirt Bloomberg thinks will help him defeat my dad next year.

That’s an awfully long way from protecting America’s e******ns from the Russians. It would be a terrible shame if that were the Russiagaters’ real intention the whole time, especially if they knew from the start that the collusion narrative was bogus.

So the big question remaining before us is, once again, what did the Democrats know and when did they know it?

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 00:23:06   #
EmilyD
 
EmilyD wrote:
Trump Jr. wrote this in an op ed today. Interesting viewpoint from the president's son. Of course left will smirk at this and call it wh**ever. But from my viewpoint, its a son who is defending his father.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/24/exclusive-donald-trump-jr-what-did-the-democrats-know-and-when-did-they-know-it/

What did the Democrats know and when did they know it?

For the last two and half years, the vicious Trump h**ers in the Democratic Party and the media have been bending the t***h and outright lying to try and hang the Watergate hat on my father.

The natural takeaway from the 448 pages of Robert Mueller’s report is that the analogy fits them a lot better.

There was no collusion — none, not by anyone associated with the Trump Campaign. And, according to the report, Special Counsel Mueller appeared to know this as far back as 2017.

And yet, for another two years Democrats such as House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff continued to claim, bald-faced, that they had evidence of collusion.

So I’ll ask the question again: what did they know and when did they know it?

Every indication is that anyone who was in the know knew better. Even before the Mueller probe began, the Democrats’ own intelligence experts were telling them there was no collusion. That should have given them a pretty good indication that if their real concern was Russian e******n i**********e, then digging into my father, his family, and the Americans who helped us pull off the greatest e*******l upset in modern history was just a huge waste of time.

If you still have any lingering questions about the Russiagaters’ motives, they should all be answered in full by the left’s reaction to the Mueller report. The first volume of the report — you know, the one that conclusively shows there was absolutely no collusion — was met with universal disappointment from Democrats.

If America’s vulnerability to Russian hacking were really the Democrats’ concern, wouldn’t they be thrilled to have an independent investigator confirm what my father has been saying all along, that Russian intelligence had not c*********d one of America’s great political parties and co-opted the highest office in the land?

Yet there was nary a sigh of relief from the left, much less jubilation.

If understanding how Russia projects political influence in America were the Democrats’ real focus, wouldn’t they be just as concerned about how the Obama administration failed to stop Russian intelligence agencies from doing so? Ample evidence points to a complete systemic failure, both before and after Russia’s plan became clear.

Yet there was not a single call from Democrats to investigate those failures, even as Mueller’s own report draws renewed attention to them.

The mask slipped even further in the media wing of the Democratic Party, where some accused Mueller of not doing “his job.”

“The job,” as quickly becomes clear when reading these articles, was to nail my father for the crime of winning a p**********l e******n that liberals thought they were entitled to. “The job” was to punish me and my family — regardless of what we conclusively did not do with regard to Russia.

“The job,” in short, was to make a display of raw, naked power; to use scraps of inaccurate or misunderstood information as the basis for a two year independent investigation with no obvious purpose other than to undermine my father’s presidency.

Even though Mueller’s investigation debunked the liberal conspiracy theories about “collusion” and “obstruction,” it did accomplish a large part of what the Democrats were hoping for. The attempted c**p served as a constant distraction from the President’s policy agenda for nearly two years, cast a shadow over the 2018 midterm e******ns that helped Democrats take control of the House of Representatives and double-down on their obstructionist political strategy, and even took a few Republican scalps along the way

The overarching shame of Russiagate is that, egged on by a wildly irresponsible media, some people were actually hoping to find out that their President was a Russian agent. The second shame, nearly as important, is that Democrats were able to exploit those people’s delusions to justify a two year, taxpayer-funded opposition research team.

Just take hyper-liberal former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s word for it. As he saw it, Mueller did “his job” very well: he assembled the dirt Bloomberg thinks will help him defeat my dad next year.

That’s an awfully long way from protecting America’s e******ns from the Russians. It would be a terrible shame if that were the Russiagaters’ real intention the whole time, especially if they knew from the start that the collusion narrative was bogus.

So the big question remaining before us is, once again, what did the Democrats know and when did they know it?
Trump Jr. wrote this in an op ed today. Interestin... (show quote)


double post...how did I do that???

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 00:29:15   #
EmilyD
 
EmilyD wrote:
I want Don Jr. to run in 2024!

double post...oops again?

Reply
 
 
Apr 25, 2019 01:37:12   #
debeda
 
EmilyD wrote:
Trump Jr. wrote this in an op ed today. Interesting viewpoint from the president's son. Of course left will smirk at this and call it wh**ever. But from my viewpoint, its a son who is defending his father.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/24/exclusive-donald-trump-jr-what-did-the-democrats-know-and-when-did-they-know-it/

What did the Democrats know and when did they know it?

For the last two and half years, the vicious Trump h**ers in the Democratic Party and the media have been bending the t***h and outright lying to try and hang the Watergate hat on my father.

The natural takeaway from the 448 pages of Robert Mueller’s report is that the analogy fits them a lot better.

There was no collusion — none, not by anyone associated with the Trump Campaign. And, according to the report, Special Counsel Mueller appeared to know this as far back as 2017.

And yet, for another two years Democrats such as House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff continued to claim, bald-faced, that they had evidence of collusion.

So I’ll ask the question again: what did they know and when did they know it?

Every indication is that anyone who was in the know knew better. Even before the Mueller probe began, the Democrats’ own intelligence experts were telling them there was no collusion. That should have given them a pretty good indication that if their real concern was Russian e******n i**********e, then digging into my father, his family, and the Americans who helped us pull off the greatest e*******l upset in modern history was just a huge waste of time.

If you still have any lingering questions about the Russiagaters’ motives, they should all be answered in full by the left’s reaction to the Mueller report. The first volume of the report — you know, the one that conclusively shows there was absolutely no collusion — was met with universal disappointment from Democrats.

If America’s vulnerability to Russian hacking were really the Democrats’ concern, wouldn’t they be thrilled to have an independent investigator confirm what my father has been saying all along, that Russian intelligence had not c*********d one of America’s great political parties and co-opted the highest office in the land?

Yet there was nary a sigh of relief from the left, much less jubilation.

If understanding how Russia projects political influence in America were the Democrats’ real focus, wouldn’t they be just as concerned about how the Obama administration failed to stop Russian intelligence agencies from doing so? Ample evidence points to a complete systemic failure, both before and after Russia’s plan became clear.

Yet there was not a single call from Democrats to investigate those failures, even as Mueller’s own report draws renewed attention to them.

The mask slipped even further in the media wing of the Democratic Party, where some accused Mueller of not doing “his job.”

“The job,” as quickly becomes clear when reading these articles, was to nail my father for the crime of winning a p**********l e******n that liberals thought they were entitled to. “The job” was to punish me and my family — regardless of what we conclusively did not do with regard to Russia.

“The job,” in short, was to make a display of raw, naked power; to use scraps of inaccurate or misunderstood information as the basis for a two year independent investigation with no obvious purpose other than to undermine my father’s presidency.

Even though Mueller’s investigation debunked the liberal conspiracy theories about “collusion” and “obstruction,” it did accomplish a large part of what the Democrats were hoping for. The attempted c**p served as a constant distraction from the President’s policy agenda for nearly two years, cast a shadow over the 2018 midterm e******ns that helped Democrats take control of the House of Representatives and double-down on their obstructionist political strategy, and even took a few Republican scalps along the way

The overarching shame of Russiagate is that, egged on by a wildly irresponsible media, some people were actually hoping to find out that their President was a Russian agent. The second shame, nearly as important, is that Democrats were able to exploit those people’s delusions to justify a two year, taxpayer-funded opposition research team.

Just take hyper-liberal former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s word for it. As he saw it, Mueller did “his job” very well: he assembled the dirt Bloomberg thinks will help him defeat my dad next year.

That’s an awfully long way from protecting America’s e******ns from the Russians. It would be a terrible shame if that were the Russiagaters’ real intention the whole time, especially if they knew from the start that the collusion narrative was bogus.

So the big question remaining before us is, once again, what did the Democrats know and when did they know it?
Trump Jr. wrote this in an op ed today. Interestin... (show quote)


inquiring minds DO want to know

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 04:39:15   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
debeda wrote:
inquiring minds DO want to know
Yes, Inquiring Minds Do
But The Massive MSM Are Propaganda Thought Controllers

Their Effectiveness Shows In The Left On These Forums

Meanwhile:
Their Ratings Are Tanking
As Their Viewership Is
#WalkAway-ing Them

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 08:06:54   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
EmilyD wrote:
Trump Jr. wrote this in an op ed today. Interesting viewpoint from the president's son. Of course left will smirk at this and call it wh**ever. But from my viewpoint, its a son who is defending his father.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/24/exclusive-donald-trump-jr-what-did-the-democrats-know-and-when-did-they-know-it/

What did the Democrats know and when did they know it?

For the last two and half years, the vicious Trump h**ers in the Democratic Party and the media have been bending the t***h and outright lying to try and hang the Watergate hat on my father.

The natural takeaway from the 448 pages of Robert Mueller’s report is that the analogy fits them a lot better.

There was no collusion — none, not by anyone associated with the Trump Campaign. And, according to the report, Special Counsel Mueller appeared to know this as far back as 2017.

And yet, for another two years Democrats such as House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff continued to claim, bald-faced, that they had evidence of collusion.

So I’ll ask the question again: what did they know and when did they know it?

Every indication is that anyone who was in the know knew better. Even before the Mueller probe began, the Democrats’ own intelligence experts were telling them there was no collusion. That should have given them a pretty good indication that if their real concern was Russian e******n i**********e, then digging into my father, his family, and the Americans who helped us pull off the greatest e*******l upset in modern history was just a huge waste of time.

If you still have any lingering questions about the Russiagaters’ motives, they should all be answered in full by the left’s reaction to the Mueller report. The first volume of the report — you know, the one that conclusively shows there was absolutely no collusion — was met with universal disappointment from Democrats.

If America’s vulnerability to Russian hacking were really the Democrats’ concern, wouldn’t they be thrilled to have an independent investigator confirm what my father has been saying all along, that Russian intelligence had not c*********d one of America’s great political parties and co-opted the highest office in the land?

Yet there was nary a sigh of relief from the left, much less jubilation.

If understanding how Russia projects political influence in America were the Democrats’ real focus, wouldn’t they be just as concerned about how the Obama administration failed to stop Russian intelligence agencies from doing so? Ample evidence points to a complete systemic failure, both before and after Russia’s plan became clear.

Yet there was not a single call from Democrats to investigate those failures, even as Mueller’s own report draws renewed attention to them.

The mask slipped even further in the media wing of the Democratic Party, where some accused Mueller of not doing “his job.”

“The job,” as quickly becomes clear when reading these articles, was to nail my father for the crime of winning a p**********l e******n that liberals thought they were entitled to. “The job” was to punish me and my family — regardless of what we conclusively did not do with regard to Russia.

“The job,” in short, was to make a display of raw, naked power; to use scraps of inaccurate or misunderstood information as the basis for a two year independent investigation with no obvious purpose other than to undermine my father’s presidency.

Even though Mueller’s investigation debunked the liberal conspiracy theories about “collusion” and “obstruction,” it did accomplish a large part of what the Democrats were hoping for. The attempted c**p served as a constant distraction from the President’s policy agenda for nearly two years, cast a shadow over the 2018 midterm e******ns that helped Democrats take control of the House of Representatives and double-down on their obstructionist political strategy, and even took a few Republican scalps along the way

The overarching shame of Russiagate is that, egged on by a wildly irresponsible media, some people were actually hoping to find out that their President was a Russian agent. The second shame, nearly as important, is that Democrats were able to exploit those people’s delusions to justify a two year, taxpayer-funded opposition research team.

Just take hyper-liberal former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s word for it. As he saw it, Mueller did “his job” very well: he assembled the dirt Bloomberg thinks will help him defeat my dad next year.

That’s an awfully long way from protecting America’s e******ns from the Russians. It would be a terrible shame if that were the Russiagaters’ real intention the whole time, especially if they knew from the start that the collusion narrative was bogus.

So the big question remaining before us is, once again, what did the Democrats know and when did they know it?
Trump Jr. wrote this in an op ed today. Interestin... (show quote)


There are only two points; 1. Mueller stated that no one KNOWINGLY cooperated/colluded with Russian operatives. 2. Mueller specifically stated that, had he been able to exonerate Trump, he would have.

The take away is; Trump and his people DID cooperate with Russian agents, they just didn't realize it, making him/them ignorant patsy's, and...................the report did NOT exonerate Trump...............throwing the question to the DOJ and Congress.

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 08:26:57   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
EmilyD wrote:
Trump Jr. wrote this in an op ed today. Interesting viewpoint from the president's son. Of course left will smirk at this and call it wh**ever. But from my viewpoint, its a son who is defending his father.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/24/exclusive-donald-trump-jr-what-did-the-democrats-know-and-when-did-they-know-it/

What did the Democrats know and when did they know it?

For the last two and half years, the vicious Trump h**ers in the Democratic Party and the media have been bending the t***h and outright lying to try and hang the Watergate hat on my father.

The natural takeaway from the 448 pages of Robert Mueller’s report is that the analogy fits them a lot better.

There was no collusion — none, not by anyone associated with the Trump Campaign. And, according to the report, Special Counsel Mueller appeared to know this as far back as 2017.

And yet, for another two years Democrats such as House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff continued to claim, bald-faced, that they had evidence of collusion.

So I’ll ask the question again: what did they know and when did they know it?

Every indication is that anyone who was in the know knew better. Even before the Mueller probe began, the Democrats’ own intelligence experts were telling them there was no collusion. That should have given them a pretty good indication that if their real concern was Russian e******n i**********e, then digging into my father, his family, and the Americans who helped us pull off the greatest e*******l upset in modern history was just a huge waste of time.

If you still have any lingering questions about the Russiagaters’ motives, they should all be answered in full by the left’s reaction to the Mueller report. The first volume of the report — you know, the one that conclusively shows there was absolutely no collusion — was met with universal disappointment from Democrats.

If America’s vulnerability to Russian hacking were really the Democrats’ concern, wouldn’t they be thrilled to have an independent investigator confirm what my father has been saying all along, that Russian intelligence had not c*********d one of America’s great political parties and co-opted the highest office in the land?

Yet there was nary a sigh of relief from the left, much less jubilation.

If understanding how Russia projects political influence in America were the Democrats’ real focus, wouldn’t they be just as concerned about how the Obama administration failed to stop Russian intelligence agencies from doing so? Ample evidence points to a complete systemic failure, both before and after Russia’s plan became clear.

Yet there was not a single call from Democrats to investigate those failures, even as Mueller’s own report draws renewed attention to them.

The mask slipped even further in the media wing of the Democratic Party, where some accused Mueller of not doing “his job.”

“The job,” as quickly becomes clear when reading these articles, was to nail my father for the crime of winning a p**********l e******n that liberals thought they were entitled to. “The job” was to punish me and my family — regardless of what we conclusively did not do with regard to Russia.

“The job,” in short, was to make a display of raw, naked power; to use scraps of inaccurate or misunderstood information as the basis for a two year independent investigation with no obvious purpose other than to undermine my father’s presidency.

Even though Mueller’s investigation debunked the liberal conspiracy theories about “collusion” and “obstruction,” it did accomplish a large part of what the Democrats were hoping for. The attempted c**p served as a constant distraction from the President’s policy agenda for nearly two years, cast a shadow over the 2018 midterm e******ns that helped Democrats take control of the House of Representatives and double-down on their obstructionist political strategy, and even took a few Republican scalps along the way

The overarching shame of Russiagate is that, egged on by a wildly irresponsible media, some people were actually hoping to find out that their President was a Russian agent. The second shame, nearly as important, is that Democrats were able to exploit those people’s delusions to justify a two year, taxpayer-funded opposition research team.

Just take hyper-liberal former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s word for it. As he saw it, Mueller did “his job” very well: he assembled the dirt Bloomberg thinks will help him defeat my dad next year.

That’s an awfully long way from protecting America’s e******ns from the Russians. It would be a terrible shame if that were the Russiagaters’ real intention the whole time, especially if they knew from the start that the collusion narrative was bogus.

So the big question remaining before us is, once again, what did the Democrats know and when did they know it?
Trump Jr. wrote this in an op ed today. Interestin... (show quote)


The “ job” was to perfect a c**p against President Trump and they knew exactly what they were trying to do..

Not getting Mueller's blessing they are now back to deflection trying to once again remove what they really did...

This will simply continue as they only have one mission, removing Trump..Ad nauseam infinite at this point and with each new investigation they dream up it is yet another large nail hammered into their own coffin..I say go for it!!!

Reply
 
 
Apr 25, 2019 09:57:58   #
Forkbassman Loc: Missouri
 
lindajoy wrote:
The “ job” was to perfect a c**p against President Trump and they knew exactly what they were trying to do..

Not getting Mueller's blessing they are now back to deflection trying to once again remove what they really did...

This will simply continue as they only have one mission, removing Trump..Ad nauseam infinite at this point and with each new investigation they dream up it is yet another large nail hammered into their own coffin..I say go for it!!!


Yes! Go for it! I’ve said for two years now, if he’s done impeachable things, impeach him! Guess who will be POTUS? PENCE! What will Dems do then? Do you want three guesses? They will try to impeach him too. Dems have ONE AGENDA: They want to be in power & it will not happen.

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 11:11:02   #
debeda
 
karpenter wrote:
Yes, Inquiring Minds Do
But The Massive MSM Are Propaganda Thought Controllers

Their Effectiveness Shows In The Left On These Forums

Meanwhile:
Their Ratings Are Tanking
As Their Viewership Is
#WalkAway-ing Them


As it should be. Thank heaven enough Americans are still aware enough to recognize propaganda

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 11:12:03   #
debeda
 
Forkbassman wrote:
Yes! Go for it! I’ve said for two years now, if he’s done impeachable things, impeach him! Guess who will be POTUS? PENCE! What will Dems do then? Do you want three guesses? They will try to impeach him too. Dems have ONE AGENDA: They want to be in power & it will not happen.



Reply
Apr 25, 2019 22:30:47   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Forkbassman wrote:
Yes! Go for it! I’ve said for two years now, if he’s done impeachable things, impeach him! Guess who will be POTUS? PENCE! What will Dems do then? Do you want three guesses? They will try to impeach him too. Dems have ONE AGENDA: They want to be in power & it will not happen.


Agree, Forkbassman. They know nothing but h**e, devision, obstruction and because of it just look at the DNC .. They have not one viable candidate in the 21 now claimed, they have no agenda, they have nothing but division in their socialistic dreams sponsored by the rebels bought by the “ oldie goldie” of same ole same ole..They attack the Constitution every opportunity they can, first, second, the E*******l process..etcetcetc..?

What will they campaign about, infantile genocide, obstructing so i*****l a***ns are allowed in, taking our weapons, not having achieved one accomplishment this 4year term by 2020?? ohh I know their internal war between them with no game plan of unity even within them and promoted h**e and lies.. There ya go.. Knew I’d find something... pppfffttt

Reply
 
 
Apr 25, 2019 23:12:22   #
debeda
 
lindajoy wrote:
Agree, Forkbassman. They know nothing but h**e, devision, obstruction and because of it just look at the DNC .. They have not one viable candidate in the 21 now claimed, they have no agenda, they have nothing but division in their socialistic dreams sponsored by the rebels bought by the “ oldie goldie” of same ole same ole..They attack the Constitution every opportunity they can, first, second, the E*******l process..etcetcetc..?

What will they campaign about, infantile genocide, obstructing so i*****l a***ns are allowed in, taking our weapons, not having achieved one accomplishment this 4year term by 2020?? ohh I know their internal war between them with no game plan of unity even within them and promoted h**e and lies.. There ya go.. Knew I’d find something... pppfffttt
Agree, Forkbassman. They know nothing but h**e, de... (show quote)


Well said, Lindajoy, and Agreed!!! At this point, any v**e for Democrats is sheer stupidity IMO

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 23:18:18   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
debeda wrote:
Well said, Lindajoy, and Agreed!!! At this point, any v**e for Democrats is sheer stupidity IMO


Any v**e for a dem is quicken death of our country as it has always been and the Resurrection of s***ery they will bring back once they have established their true elitism of socialistic devide and we their peasants!! ! No thank you ma’am and aren’t you just the two adorable in your picture, your avi.. I just want to hug you!!! ❤️🌹😘

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 23:23:31   #
debeda
 
lindajoy wrote:
Any v**e for a dem is quicken death of our country as it has always been and the Resurrection of s***ery they will bring back once they have established their true elitism of socialistic devide and we their peasants!! ! No thank you ma’am and aren’t you just the two adorable in your picture, your avi.. I just want to hug you!!! ❤️🌹😘


Why thank you!! I was happy as a clam in it. In Clearwater last fall, on the pirate ship on the open seas, watching my grandsons "search for treasure" with the other kids, hair tied back, not a care. I had thought about putting up a pic and your trip to Florida reminded me about that one😊💖

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 23:28:14   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
debeda wrote:
Why thank you!! I was happy as a clam in it. In Clearwater last fall, on the pirate ship on the open seas, watching my grandsons "search for treasure" with the other kids, hair tied back, not a care. I had thought about putting up a pic and your trip to Florida reminded me about that one😊💖


Too cool, I love the whole vision seen as you expressed and felt the immense love of your special trip with them!!!! Truly did...Thats a memory that lives forever not only with you MS Lovely but for them too...❤️❤️⭐️⭐️🌹😘

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.