One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Hey Julian Castro, PeterS, Kevyn and other progressives. A Solution to a Worker Shortage.
Page 1 of 9 next> last>>
Apr 24, 2019 06:57:00   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Hey Julian Castro, PeterS, Kevyn and other progressives. A Solution to a Worker Shortage.

Last evening, Julian Castro, former Sec'y of HUD, former Mayor of San Antonio and current candidate for Democratic nomination for President, was on Tucker Carlson bemoaning a current shortage of workers that should be filed by immigrants.
https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/julian-castro-we-a-young-workforce-and-thus-immigrants-1503476291656

Hey Julian, I have another suggestion. What about the million or so fetuses that have been ripped out of their mothers' wombs and thrown out with the garbage in a******ns every year? By now, about 40 million of them would have been citizens in their productive years.

Oh that's right. I forgot. They were 'choices,' not humans.

Rot, I say.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 07:17:34   #
Kevyn
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
Hey Julian Castro, PeterS, Kevyn and other progressives. A Solution to a Worker Shortage.

Last evening, Julian Castro, former Sec'y of HUD, former Mayor of San Antonio and current candidate for Democratic nomination for President, was on Tucker Carlson bemoaning a current shortage of workers that should be filed by immigrants.
https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/julian-castro-we-a-young-workforce-and-thus-immigrants-1503476291656

Hey Julian, I have another suggestion. What about the million or so fetuses that have been ripped out of their mothers' wombs and thrown out with the garbage in a******ns every year? By now, about 40 million of them would have been citizens in their productive years.

Oh that's right. I forgot. They were 'choices,' not humans.

Rot, I say.
Hey Julian Castro, PeterS, Kevyn and other progres... (show quote)


Forcing American women who do not in any way want to have children to carry unwanted pregnancy to term is pure evil, and unconstitutional.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 07:40:10   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
Forcing American women who do not in any way want to have children to carry unwanted pregnancy to term is pure evil, and unconstitutional.


That's a completely asinine statement .............. Goober.

If the women don't want to have children they should remain celibate.

Only pregnant women have a******ns.

So if they " do not in anyway want to have children " then why did they allow themselves to get pregnant ?

We absolutely should 'force' any woman who gets pregnant, to deliver a live healthy child.

Even a rape victims child can be raised to be a productive American.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2019 07:41:00   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Kevyn wrote:
Forcing American women who do not in any way want to have children to carry unwanted pregnancy to term is pure evil, and unconstitutional.


What choice did the woman exercise when she decided to have sexual intercourse? Answer that!

Show me where it mentions a******n in The Constitution.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 08:19:18   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
That's a completely asinine statement .............. Goober.

If the women don't want to have children they should remain celibate.

Only pregnant women have a******ns.

So if they " do not in anyway want to have children " then why did they allow themselves to get pregnant ?

We absolutely should 'force' any woman who gets pregnant, to deliver a live healthy child.

Even a rape victims child can be raised to be a productive American.


There are even injectable birth control products for those who do not want children yet. for those who do not want EVER to have children,having their tubes tied works great, one small operation, have as much sex as you want, no babies, and readily available surgery that most surgeons can do.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 08:21:39   #
Kevyn
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
That's a completely asinine statement .............. Goober.

If the women don't want to have children they should remain celibate.

Only pregnant women have a******ns.

So if they " do not in anyway want to have children " then why did they allow themselves to get pregnant ?

We absolutely should 'force' any woman who gets pregnant, to deliver a live healthy child.

Even a rape victims child can be raised to be a productive American.
Here is a solution for you, if you don’t want an a******n don’t have one. It is your choice not mine the governments or that of anyone else but you. Think about it like a tattoo, I do not like tattoos so I do not get one this does not give me the right to preclude you from getting one. You can have an image of a penis tattooed on your forehead and as stupid as that might be it is your choice not mine. The only role the government has is to make sure the tattoo parlor you go to operates in a safe sanitary manner. Carrying a pregnancy to term is many times greater a threat to a woman’s health and life than an first trimester a******n, to force a rape victim to go through an unwanted pregnancy is nothing short of monstrous. What kind of sick warped person thinks that women somehow should be forced to bear America children?

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 08:27:22   #
Radiance3
 
Kevyn wrote:
Forcing American women who do not in any way want to have children to carry unwanted pregnancy to term is pure evil, and unconstitutional.


==================
If women don't want children, they must refrain from sexual activities. Simple solution. It does not cost taxpayers more money to pay for their a******ns, and their criminal behavior.

But these democrat women do it over and over again. Claimed it is their right. Okay their right, then they must pay for their a******ns. And then pay at the end when God punish them for their crimes.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2019 08:32:39   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
That's a completely asinine statement .............. Goober.

If the women don't want to have children they should remain celibate.

Only pregnant women have a******ns.

So if they " do not in anyway want to have children " then why did they allow themselves to get pregnant ?

We absolutely should 'force' any woman who gets pregnant, to deliver a live healthy child.

Even a rape victims child can be raised to be a productive American.



It is difficult to imagine people more committed to progressive cliches than Kevyn and PeterS.


I had a patient who'd had a child through rape. She told me that she loved that child, no matter what. Of course, things like that don't matter to people like Kevyn; no sense, no feeling.


As Sen Phil Gramm said, the fetus is the innocent party in things like rape & incest. And, of course, that doesn't matter to pro-choice low-lifes. They're more concerned about the g****l w*****g h**x's effects on polar bears.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 08:38:28   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Kevyn wrote:
Here is a solution for you, if you don’t want an a******n don’t have one. It is your choice not mine the governments or that of anyone else but you. Think about it like a tattoo, I do not like tattoos so I do not get one this does not give me the right to preclude you from getting one. You can have an image of a penis tattooed on your forehead and as stupid as that might be it is your choice not mine. The only role the government has is to make sure the tattoo parlor you go to operates in a safe sanitary manner. Carrying a pregnancy to term is many times greater a threat to a woman’s health and life than an first trimester a******n to force a rape victim to go through an unwanted pregnancy is nothing short of monstrous. What kind of sick warped person thinks that women somehow should be forced to bear America children?
Here is a solution for you, if you don’t want an a... (show quote)


It ain't a tattoo and you are a penis.

'Carrying a pregnancy to term is many times greater a threat to a woman’s health and life than an first trimester a******n' is a complete fabricated lie.

Monstrous? What the hell do you know about monstrous? Have you ever seen an abortus? I have. Have you EVER stood watch outside an abortuarium and watched the women coming out post-a******n? You'll NEVER see a woman smiling.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 08:46:06   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
Kevyn wrote:
Here is a solution for you, if you don’t want an a******n don’t have one. It is your choice not mine the governments or that of anyone else but you. Think about it like a tattoo, I do not like tattoos so I do not get one this does not give me the right to preclude you from getting one. You can have an image of a penis tattooed on your forehead and as stupid as that might be it is your choice not mine. The only role the government has is to make sure the tattoo parlor you go to operates in a safe sanitary manner. Carrying a pregnancy to term is many times greater a threat to a woman’s health and life than an first trimester a******n to force a rape victim to go through an unwanted pregnancy is nothing short of monstrous. What kind of sick warped person thinks that women somehow should be forced to bear America children?
Here is a solution for you, if you don’t want an a... (show quote)


What about the baby’s choice? How many of them have you actually consulted?

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 08:54:22   #
PeterS
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
Hey Julian Castro, PeterS, Kevyn and other progressives. A Solution to a Worker Shortage.

Last evening, Julian Castro, former Sec'y of HUD, former Mayor of San Antonio and current candidate for Democratic nomination for President, was on Tucker Carlson bemoaning a current shortage of workers that should be filed by immigrants.
https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/julian-castro-we-a-young-workforce-and-thus-immigrants-1503476291656

Hey Julian, I have another suggestion. What about the million or so fetuses that have been ripped out of their mothers' wombs and thrown out with the garbage in a******ns every year? By now, about 40 million of them would have been citizens in their productive years.

Oh that's right. I forgot. They were 'choices,' not humans.

Rot, I say.
Hey Julian Castro, PeterS, Kevyn and other progres... (show quote)

Yes, once born 'rot you say!' That's always been the conservative choice, hasn't it? Once born you will have nothing to do with them? So why all the tears before they are born? Go figure...

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2019 08:59:40   #
Kevyn
 
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
If women don't want children, they must refrain from sexual activities. Simple solution. It does not cost taxpayers more money to pay for their a******ns, and their criminal behavior.

But these democrat women do it over and over again. Claimed it is their right. Okay their right, then they must pay for their a******ns. And then pay at the end when God punish them for their crimes.


Adults having sex is a criminal activity in your mind? Fortunately that has not been the case in the US for decades. Taxpayers do not pay a dime for a******n procedures although they should as part of any health coverage. Women do not use a******n as a form of birth control they use it to end an unwanted pregnancy when birth control fails.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 09:11:32   #
bahmer
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
That's a completely asinine statement .............. Goober.

If the women don't want to have children they should remain celibate.

Only pregnant women have a******ns.

So if they " do not in anyway want to have children " then why did they allow themselves to get pregnant ?

We absolutely should 'force' any woman who gets pregnant, to deliver a live healthy child.

Even a rape victims child can be raised to be a productive American.


That is right they have birth control pills for fairly reasonable prices as well as the morning after pills so there should be no reason for a woman to get and remain pregnant in today's society. Especially if she doesn't want to get pregnant.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 09:22:25   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
PeterS wrote:
Yes, once born 'rot you say!' That's always been the conservative choice, hasn't it? Once born you will have nothing to do with them? So why all the tears before they are born? Go figure...


Yes rot is my term

Once more you hoist a non-existent blame on us. We have all manner of support for the poor. Please refrain from projecting your own non-caring upon us.

Go figure yourself.

And PLEASE, for both Kevyn & you, for once invoke scientific facts, not your own fantasies. They're stale.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 09:56:29   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
Hey Julian Castro, PeterS, Kevyn and other progressives. A Solution to a Worker Shortage.

Last evening, Julian Castro, former Sec'y of HUD, former Mayor of San Antonio and current candidate for Democratic nomination for President, was on Tucker Carlson bemoaning a current shortage of workers that should be filed by immigrants.
https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/julian-castro-we-a-young-workforce-and-thus-immigrants-1503476291656

Hey Julian, I have another suggestion. What about the million or so fetuses that have been ripped out of their mothers' wombs and thrown out with the garbage in a******ns every year? By now, about 40 million of them would have been citizens in their productive years.

Oh that's right. I forgot. They were 'choices,' not humans.

Rot, I say.
Hey Julian Castro, PeterS, Kevyn and other progres... (show quote)


I don't think women will accept arbitrary decisions being made about disallowing early term a******ns, but most reasonable people accept an independent human life begins somewhere between three to four months after conception.

Ideals don't blend in well with biological constraints ideals are a demand for perfection, and biology is practical demand for recognition of perfect in one way is a detriment for another.

Best practice, procedures and processes are hard won concessions over ignorance and malpractice, we all accept invasive medical treatment if necessary and that acceptance comes with trust and belief in the procedures and processes we undergo to remain healthy.

Having a term limit of gestation after which a******n becomes a criminal procedure is just one such biological constraint.

Which must mean that life as was understood by precedential ideals which contributed to our understanding of family rights including individual members rights within the family are and should be protected by legal statutes and enforcement so hard won established demands that became commonly accepted should still be considered socially proper by individuals the same as invasive medical procedures are accepted.

Having a baby is an invasive medical procedure.



Reply
Page 1 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.