One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
One Reason Why the N**is were Satanic Their Soldiers Used Crystal Meth Every Day
Apr 20, 2019 10:49:11   #
ziggy88 Loc: quincy illinois 62301
 
One Reason Why the N**is were Satanic Their Soldiers Used Crystal Meth Every Day

by Geoffrey Grider April 19, 2019
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd


N**i bosses loved it. The SS loved it. Students loved it. Anyone working the night shift in this booming, rearming economy loved it. But nobody loved it like soldiers: "War was seen as a task that needed to be worked through," Ohler writes. Pervitin "helped the tank units not to worry too much about what they were doing in this foreign country, and instead let them get on with their job — even if the job meant k*****g."


Ever wondered what a powerful country in the midst of a meth epidemic might look like under f*****t leadership? Turns out there’s precedent, Pervitin, and it’s not pretty.

The Greek word in the King James Bible used for sorcery in the book of Revelation is also the same word that we get our term for prescription drugs from, pharmakeia. According to Strong’s Greek Lexicon, the word pharmakeia can be t***slated as 1). the use or the administering of drugs, 2). poisoning, 3). sorcery, magical arts, often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it, and 4). metaphor. the deceptions and seductions of idolatry. So is it any wonder that the world’s most evil army to date used a drug like crystal meth to get them in the proper frame of mind to seek, and k**l and destroy?

“And the rest of the men which were not k**led by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils, and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk: Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts.” Revelation 9:20,21 (KJV)

Adolf Hitler was a perfect type of the coming Antichrist in at least 7 particulars as you can see below, and in order for him to rise to the occasion to fulfill his destiny, mind-altering substances were absolutely needed. Prescription drugs are some of the most deadly substances you can put into your body, and Pervitin. otherwise known as crystal meth, led the list as a prescription drug made in a pharmaceutical laboratory under the strictest of conditions. Now that you know some of what fueled the N**is, their satanically-inspired murderous antics like the Holocaust make a lot more sense now.

N**is were actual meth heads and history makes so much more sense when we know this. According to an eye-opening book published in the U.S. this month, meth addiction quite literally gave us history’s greatest industrial menace: the N**i war machine. It even got the teetotal Hitler in its grip during World War II.

The book by German historian and journalist Norman Ohler is called Blitzed, and it’s as breezy and darkly humorous as its title. But don’t be fooled by the gallows humor of chapter names like “Sieg High” and “High Hitler”: This is a serious and original work of scholarship that dropped jaws around Europe when it was published there last year.

Ohler has dug into the global N**i records as never before (turns out a lot of them were taken back to an archive in Washington, D.C., after the war). What he’s come back with is the little-known biography of an over-the-counter drug called Pervitin — “National Socialism in pill form,” as Ohler calls it. (Except that it was marketed to German housewives in chocolate form.)

Ohler estimates that 100 million little white Pervitin pills were chugged by Germans just in the pre-wartime period. Meanwhile, a whopping 35 million doses were ordered up by the Wermacht and Luftwaffe to fuel the coming war.

And what was Pervitin? You might know it better as the star of Breaking Bad, though its purity and potency would drive Walter White to tears: Methamphetamine or as knowen today as crystal meth.

Suddenly, if you’ve ever witnessed the devastation wreaked by this drug — the overly aggressive, ego-boosting, hyper-paranoid, tragically soulless,, lacking empathy and ultimately self-defeating lives of meth heads — World War II makes so much more sense.

7 Ways That Adolf Hitler Was A Perfect Type Of The Coming Biblical Antichrist

In our day we have many talented and influential public speakers in the world of politics, but nothing even remotely approaching the verbal napalm of Adolf Hitler. Everything about him was dark and filled with foreboding. Millions of German households actually erected shrines that featured a photograph of what they thought of as their dictator’s divine countenance. They said prayers in his behalf — even directed prayers to him — throughout the day.

Hitler said he came to liberate the German people, but actually, he nearly destroyed them all. And that’s just what the Antichrist will do to all the people who follow him.

Germany had long been world leaders in drugged living through chemistry. Earlier in the century, one scientist at Merck managed to invent both aspirin and heroin in the same two-week period. Before the N**is came to power, the Weimar Republic had been hooked on the purest morphine and cocaine, plentiful and cheap as liquor back in the day.

The N**is, no surprise, were giant hypocrites when it came to drugs. They declared that the bodies of all good Germans belonged to the state and must be clean; they executed and imprisoned addicts and dealers. (Many, like the morphine junkie Herman Goring, were addicts regardless).

But then a company called Temmler started looking for a drug that might make German athletes. On what we should now remember as the most ominous Halloween ever, 1937, Temmler patented its new superdrug.

The rest is terrifying history. Temmler modeled its massive as campaign for Pervitin on one like Coca - Cola. The company sent 3 milligrams of Meth to every doctor in Berlin. Many becmae hooked. They recommended for their patients for any and everything. Housewives were given Pervitin chocolate with 14 milligrams in it.

N**i bosses loved it. The SS loved it. Students loved it. Anyone working the night shift in this booming, rearming economy loved it. But nobody loved it like soldiers: “War was seen as a task that needed to be worked through,” Ohler writes. Pervitin “helped the tank units not to worry too much about what they were doing in this foreign country, and instead let them get on with their job — even if the job meant k*****g.”

The invasion of Poland in 1939 was conducted by soldiers on meth who didn’t need sleep, and the partitioning of Poland with Russia was negotiated by officers on meth who felt supremely confident about everything, thus it was called the Blitzkrieg.

That’s when the war machine realized it was onto something.

Science and the Swastika : Hitler’s Biological Soldiers

Did you know that Planned Parenthood was founded on the N**i doctrine of Eugenics? It’s true.

The rising tide of darkness in the last days before the Rapture of the Church is partly due to this drug.
What's particularly chilling about this is the way everyone was in on it. With the exception of a few concerned medical officials who tried to close the stable door after the meth-fueled horse had bolted. (Pervitin became prescription-only in 1939, but was still supremely easy to get and production went up by 1.5 million units a year), the drug just suddenly seemed to be everywhere at once. The meth epidemic spread from the bottom up as much as from the pharma giant down.

There was a "stimulant directive" from the Reich's bureaucracy making sure all divisions were issued with massive quantities of the stuff, and that the soldiers were popping at least one pill a day and two if they had to stay up at night. But the soldiers were rapidly firing off stimulant directives of their own. Ohler offers letters from a future Nobel prize winner for literature, writing home to his family, his requests for PERVITIN filling the page in large block capitals.

Even the smart kids were meth heads in N**i Germany.

Oh, and the clean-living Fuhrer too, though he didn't really know it. His personal physician, a quack who made it big by jabbing famous people in the butt so smoothly they didn't feel it, started sneaking some of it (along with morphine) into Hitler's daily "vitamin" injections during the war.

The effect all this meth had? Ohler makes a pretty convincing case that we wouldn't have the word "blitzkrieg" without it; the Germans may not even have conquered Europe. They were outnumbered by the French and British armies in 1940. If anything, Hitler actually wanted them to go slow. He feared a bloody return to World War I-style gridlock, and he also feared a runaway army that didn't need him.

N**i tank drivers blitzed France at least in part because they were blitzed, popping up to four pills at a time. They didn't care for sleep. Lunch was a piece of chocolate or a biscuit. Commanders like Rommel literally drove over French divisions to get to the Atlantic, where one older officer insisted on going for a swim and died of a meth-induced heart attack.

The revelations in Blitzed, a relatively short book, are likely just the beginning of scholarship on the subject. For example, what part did Pervitin play in the N**i street violence of the late 1930s? How many of the antisemitic k**lers and window-smashers of Kristallnacht, which took place a year into the nationwide meth epidemic, were high at the time?

We may never know, just as we may never know in what ways the U.S. meth epidemic — 12 million Americans have used it — overlaps with the rise of white nationalism. But "Blitzed" is at least a timely reminder of the drug's terrifying power — and a decent argument against the Republican healthcare plan's removal of a provision that mandates Medicaid cover addiction treatment.

The battle to mitigate the effects of meth, currently the world's most popular psycho stimulant, may be one of the most important fights there is.



Reply
Apr 21, 2019 11:57:38   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
ziggy88 wrote:
Did you know that Planned Parenthood was founded on the N**i doctrine of Eugenics? It’s true.

No, it is not true. In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which later became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. After World War I, Sanger increasingly appealed to the societal need to limit births by those least able to afford children. The origin of eugenics. The N**is simply took Sanger's thoughts and made them into a 'reality'. Without eugenics, the holocaust would likely never have happened. Without Margaret Sanger, there would likely never have been a thing called eugenics. Josef Mengele was engrossed in the theory of eugenics, hence his fascination with biological twins.

While Planned Parenthood is indeed founded on the doctrine of eugenics, they didn't get it from the N**is, quite the opposite.

Reply
Apr 21, 2019 19:26:42   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
No, it is not true. In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which later became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. After World War I, Sanger increasingly appealed to the societal need to limit births by those least able to afford children. The origin of eugenics. The N**is simply took Sanger's thoughts and made them into a 'reality'. Without eugenics, the holocaust would likely never have happened. Without Margaret Sanger, there would likely never have been a thing called eugenics. Josef Mengele was engrossed in the theory of eugenics, hence his fascination with biological twins.

While Planned Parenthood is indeed founded on the doctrine of eugenics, they didn't get it from the N**is, quite the opposite.
No, it is not true. In 1921, Margaret Sanger foun... (show quote)



as usual, the right wing is filled with lies and report a never ending variety of these lies..

You post this lie because it would fit what you wish was true..

However, it is simply one more lie to put in the right wing basket..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3884362

Was Margaret Sanger a r****t?
Valenza C.
Abstract
PIP:
Margaret Sanger, as a young public health nurse, witnessed the sickness, disease and poverty caused by unwanted pregnancies. She spent the rest of her life trying to alleviate these conditions by bringing birth control to America. During the early 20th century, the idea of making contraceptives generally available was revolutionary. Contraceptive usage was considered a distinguishing feature of the 'haves.' In recent years, some revisionist biographers have portrayed Sanger as a eugenicist and a r****t. This view has been widely publicized by critics of reproductive rights who have attempted to discredit Sanger's work by discrediting her personally. The basic concept of the eugenics movement in the 1920s and 1930s was that a better breed of humans would be created if the 'fit' had more children and the 'unfit' had fewer. This concept influenced a broad spectrum of thought, but there was little consensus on the definitions of fit and unfit. In theory, the movement was not r****t--its message intended to cross race barriers for the overall advancement of mankind. Most eugenicists agreed that birth control would be a detriment to the human race and were opposed to it. Charges that Sanger's motives for promoting birth control were eugenic are not supported. In part of her most important work, "Pivot of Civilization," Sanger's dissent from eugenics was made clear. By examining extracts from her books, the author refutes the notion that Sanger was a eugenicist. Another unsupported argument raised by the anti-Sanger group was that Sanger, in her position as editor of "Birth Contol Review," published eugenicists' views. It would be more accurate to say that the review covered a wide range of opinions and research; the eugenicists views were included because they conferred respectability. David Kennedy, author of "Birth Control in America," does Sanger a grave injustice by falsely attributing to her the quotation: 'More children from the fit, less from the unfit--that is the chief issue of birth control.' This quotation should be attributed to the editors of "American Medicine." The only area Sanger is in agreement with the eugenicists is in her belief that severely r****ded people should not bear children. Several authors, including Linda Gordon, argued that Sanger's interest in providing contraceptives to b***k A******ns was motivated by r****m. This notion is entirely misconstrued by distortions of language quoted by Sanger. Rather than wanting to exterminate the Negro population, Sanger wanted to cope with the fear of some b****s that birth control was the white man's way of reducing the black population.

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2019 06:57:39   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
permafrost wrote:
Was Margaret Sanger a r****t?

I have no idea, I wasn't there. As usual, you accuse where there is no crime. I do know that without her input, there would have been no eugenics and no Planned Parenthood k*****g millions of babies every year. Black babies, to be precise. But, yeah, no r****m here, move on people...

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 07:09:53   #
Rose42
 
permafrost wrote:
as usual, the right wing is filled with lies and report a never ending variety of these lies..

You post this lie because it would fit what you wish was true..

However, it is simply one more lie to put in the right wing basket..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3884362

Was Margaret Sanger a r****t?
Valenza C.
Abstract
PIP:
Margaret Sanger, as a young public health nurse, witnessed the sickness, disease and poverty caused by unwanted pregnancies. She spent the rest of her life trying to alleviate these conditions by bringing birth control to America. During the early 20th century, the idea of making contraceptives generally available was revolutionary. Contraceptive usage was considered a distinguishing feature of the 'haves.' In recent years, some revisionist biographers have portrayed Sanger as a eugenicist and a r****t. This view has been widely publicized by critics of reproductive rights who have attempted to discredit Sanger's work by discrediting her personally. The basic concept of the eugenics movement in the 1920s and 1930s was that a better breed of humans would be created if the 'fit' had more children and the 'unfit' had fewer. This concept influenced a broad spectrum of thought, but there was little consensus on the definitions of fit and unfit. In theory, the movement was not r****t--its message intended to cross race barriers for the overall advancement of mankind. Most eugenicists agreed that birth control would be a detriment to the human race and were opposed to it. Charges that Sanger's motives for promoting birth control were eugenic are not supported. In part of her most important work, "Pivot of Civilization," Sanger's dissent from eugenics was made clear. By examining extracts from her books, the author refutes the notion that Sanger was a eugenicist. Another unsupported argument raised by the anti-Sanger group was that Sanger, in her position as editor of "Birth Contol Review," published eugenicists' views. It would be more accurate to say that the review covered a wide range of opinions and research; the eugenicists views were included because they conferred respectability. David Kennedy, author of "Birth Control in America," does Sanger a grave injustice by falsely attributing to her the quotation: 'More children from the fit, less from the unfit--that is the chief issue of birth control.' This quotation should be attributed to the editors of "American Medicine." The only area Sanger is in agreement with the eugenicists is in her belief that severely r****ded people should not bear children. Several authors, including Linda Gordon, argued that Sanger's interest in providing contraceptives to b***k A******ns was motivated by r****m. This notion is entirely misconstrued by distortions of language quoted by Sanger. Rather than wanting to exterminate the Negro population, Sanger wanted to cope with the fear of some b****s that birth control was the white man's way of reducing the black population.
as usual, the right wing is filled with lies and r... (show quote)


Thats just another in a long list of opinion pieces on Sanger. The t***h about her is most likely neither extreme.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 07:13:13   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
Rose42 wrote:
Thats just another in a long list of opinion pieces on Sanger.

She has a fairly common story. She started out with the best of intentions but lost sight of her moral compass along the way and ended up advocating for sterilization of potential mothers and murder of the unborn. Her legacy lives on to this day and there are many who refuse to look and see the t***h. For shame.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 07:15:51   #
Rose42
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
She has a fairly common story. She started out with the best of intentions but lost sight of her moral compass along the way and ended up advocating for sterilization of potential mothers and murder of the unborn. Her legacy lives on to this day and there are many who refuse to look and see the t***h. For shame.


You’re right. People try to rewrite history in their favor. Thats whats happened with Sanger to some extent.

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2019 07:28:47   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
Rose42 wrote:
You’re right. People try to rewrite history in their favor. Thats whats happened with Sanger to some extent.

It's called 'revisionism'. Makes me sick how they try to hide the t***h. Tell them that the N**i system of eugenics was based on Sanger's writing and you will be attacked, virulently. Just like anything else, there are certain people who will attach undue significance to the use of ideas or information, tarnishing the originator who has no control over the people who misuse and abuse these thoughts.

I imagine Margaret Sanger would not have approved of the N**is using her ideas the way they did, but then, like I said, I wasn't there.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 07:35:16   #
Rose42
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
It's called 'revisionism'. Makes me sick how they try to hide the t***h. Tell them that the N**i system of eugenics was based on Sanger's writing and you will be attacked, virulently. Just like anything else, there are certain people who will attach undue significance to the use of ideas or information, tarnishing the originator who has no control over the people who misuse and abuse these thoughts.

I imagine Margaret Sanger would not have approved of the N**is using her ideas the way they did, but then, like I said, I wasn't there.
It's called 'revisionism'. Makes me sick how they... (show quote)


I wasn’t there either and I think she’d have been horrified at their implementation.

History is written by the victors and rewritten by those with the means to do so.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 09:02:19   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
It's called 'revisionism'. Makes me sick how they try to hide the t***h. Tell them that the N**i system of eugenics was based on Sanger's writing and you will be attacked, virulently. Just like anything else, there are certain people who will attach undue significance to the use of ideas or information, tarnishing the originator who has no control over the people who misuse and abuse these thoughts.

I imagine Margaret Sanger would not have approved of the N**is using her ideas the way they did, but then, like I said, I wasn't there.
It's called 'revisionism'. Makes me sick how they... (show quote)


http://exhibits.hsl.virginia.edu/eugenics/2-origins/

Origins of Eugenics: From Sir Francis Galton to Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act of 1924
Photograph of Sir Francis Galton. Courtesy of the American Philosophical Society.
Sir Francis Galton. Courtesy of the American Philosophical Society. [2.1]

Faces and Races Illustration. Courtesy of Special Collections, Pickler Memorial Library, Truman State University.
ENLARGE
[2.2] Faces and Races, illustration from a eugenical text, Racial History of Mankind. Courtesy of Special Collections, Pickler Memorial Library, Truman State University.

Photograph of Harry H. Laughlin and Charles Davenport at the Eugenics Records Office. Courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Archives.
[2.3] Harry H. Laughlin and Charles Davenport at the Eugenics Record Office. Courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Archives.

Positive and Negative Eugenics
Sir Francis Galton first coined the term “eugenics” in 1883. Put simply, eugenics means “well-born.” Initially Galton focused on positive eugenics, encouraging healthy, capable people of above-average intelligence to bear more children, with the idea of building an “improved” human race. Some followers of Galton combined his emphasis on ancestral traits with Gregor Mendel’s research on patterns of inheritance, in an attempt to explain the generational t***smission of genetic traits in human beings.

Negative eugenics, as developed in the United States and Germany, played on fears of “race degeneration.” At a time when the working-class poor were reproducing at a greater rate than successful middle- and upper-class members of society, these ideas garnered considerable interest. One of the most famous proponents in the United States was President Theodore Roosevelt, who warned that the failure of couples of Anglo-Saxon heritage to produce large families would lead to “race suicide.”

Eugenics Record Office
The center of the eugenics movement in the United States was the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor, New York. Biologist Charles Davenport established the ERO, and was joined in his work by Director Harry H. Laughlin. Both men were members of the American Breeders Association. Their view of eugenics, as applied to human populations, drew from the agricultural model of breeding the strongest and most capable members of a species while making certain that the weakest members do not reproduce.

Reply
Apr 22, 2019 16:58:35   #
ziggy88 Loc: quincy illinois 62301
 
Ben Carson was asked about Democrats' criticism that Republicans who want to defund Planned Parenthood are waging a "war on women." He responded:

"Maybe I am not objective when it comes to Planned Parenthood, but, you know, I know who Margaret Sanger is, and I know that she believed in eugenics, and that she was not particularly enamored with black people.

"And one of the reasons you find most of their clinics in black neighborhoods is so that you can find a way to control that population. I think people should go back and read about Margaret Sanger who founded this place — a woman Hillary Clinton by the way says that she admires. Look and see what many people in N**i Germany thought about her."

It's not the first time Planned Parenthood has faced criticism about its founder and the placement of its clinics — former p**********l candidate Herman Cain made a similar statement in 2011.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.