Pro Choice Question
Apr 22, 2013 11:07:17 #
Dave
Loc: Upstate New York
Kermit Gosnell, and avid pro choice advocate, is probably very confused by the lack of support from his pro choice allies. Not many people have heard of Dr. Kermit Gosnell because his pro choice cohorts, which constitutes the bulk of the press, would rather discussions regarding the conflict between Gosnell's practice of what they advocate and the law brings stark reality.
For those who aren't living in Philadelphia, PA you may not know who Dr. Kermit Gosnell is. He is currenlty on trial for multiple deaths in a manner that almost any civilized person would find disturbing. What he's charged with, actually what he's done, has been known for years but it doesn't seem to be something of interest to the national media.
Gosnell, it seems, has been an aggressive a******nist. So aggressive that it seems those inconvenient things some call fetuses were living after the procedure - so the wonderful woman's advocate simply practiced post partum a******n - in a manner not attractive to many. Now, we are left wondering - those of us who think things through - why the Pro Choicers aren't rising in unison to support this wonderful humanitarian. What is the big difference between k*****g that thing - fetus or wh**ever - in utero or post partem - seems like a technicality.
As this good doctor had been doing this for years, as he caused deaths to more than one woman and many of those inconvenient things, there is probably another reason it hasn't gotten much media attention - he's performed his pro-choice medicene with impunity almost exclusively on racial minorities.
Perhaps those wonderful, caring pro-women liberals just aren't as into, really, those racial minorities that they would have us believe.
For those who aren't living in Philadelphia, PA you may not know who Dr. Kermit Gosnell is. He is currenlty on trial for multiple deaths in a manner that almost any civilized person would find disturbing. What he's charged with, actually what he's done, has been known for years but it doesn't seem to be something of interest to the national media.
Gosnell, it seems, has been an aggressive a******nist. So aggressive that it seems those inconvenient things some call fetuses were living after the procedure - so the wonderful woman's advocate simply practiced post partum a******n - in a manner not attractive to many. Now, we are left wondering - those of us who think things through - why the Pro Choicers aren't rising in unison to support this wonderful humanitarian. What is the big difference between k*****g that thing - fetus or wh**ever - in utero or post partem - seems like a technicality.
As this good doctor had been doing this for years, as he caused deaths to more than one woman and many of those inconvenient things, there is probably another reason it hasn't gotten much media attention - he's performed his pro-choice medicene with impunity almost exclusively on racial minorities.
Perhaps those wonderful, caring pro-women liberals just aren't as into, really, those racial minorities that they would have us believe.
Apr 23, 2013 07:52:21 #
As this good doctor had been doing this for years, as he caused deaths to more than one woman and many of those inconvenient things, there is probably another reason it hasn't gotten much media attention - he's performed his pro-choice medicene with impunity almost exclusively on racial minorities.
Perhaps those wonderful, caring pro-women liberals just aren't as into, really, those racial minorities that they would have us believe.
Dave
"Pro-Choice," should be written "Pro-Murder," in order that anyone reading anything on the topic understands what it is that is being chosen.
Instead, the refrain, "Reproductive Rights" has become an anthem to those who goose step with the broad-minded.
The baby is merely an inconvenient by-product, the results of a moment of carelessness, and as such to be disposed of without fanfare or further thought or mention.
This trial is an embarrassment to all those who would prefer to applaud the good Doctor for the services he renders, whether those services are to the low income, poorly educated, or the elite, upperly mobile, career-minded women.
One of the greatest horrors a liberal minded individual in this country can encounter is seeing any woman's reproductive rights denied her.
This is what I've encountered in our contemporary society, and the realization that the most innocent and helpless among us are being cruelly disposed of in this manner, with, in large part, no thought of it being a a crime, or even immoral is heart breaking.
Perhaps those wonderful, caring pro-women liberals just aren't as into, really, those racial minorities that they would have us believe.
Dave
"Pro-Choice," should be written "Pro-Murder," in order that anyone reading anything on the topic understands what it is that is being chosen.
Instead, the refrain, "Reproductive Rights" has become an anthem to those who goose step with the broad-minded.
The baby is merely an inconvenient by-product, the results of a moment of carelessness, and as such to be disposed of without fanfare or further thought or mention.
This trial is an embarrassment to all those who would prefer to applaud the good Doctor for the services he renders, whether those services are to the low income, poorly educated, or the elite, upperly mobile, career-minded women.
One of the greatest horrors a liberal minded individual in this country can encounter is seeing any woman's reproductive rights denied her.
This is what I've encountered in our contemporary society, and the realization that the most innocent and helpless among us are being cruelly disposed of in this manner, with, in large part, no thought of it being a a crime, or even immoral is heart breaking.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.