One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Giverment: what is wrong with helping our fellow Americans fallen on hard times?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
Apr 14, 2019 02:04:10   #
rumitoid
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
These are all simple examples...
What about lazy ingrates who just don't want to work?
How do you determine who is too crippled to work?
What if the crippling is due to one's own actions?
What if the elderly individual squandered their life savings at the casino?
What if the child is being used to obtain funds for a parent who is abusing the system?

I am not against welfare Rumi...
Just think the system is out of control...


You may be right. If those are the scenarios you have about those who need help, let 'em starve.

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 02:06:31   #
rumitoid
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Thought we were discussing welfare... No?


Yes, but you brought up state control as being all that is needed. I was showing it is clearly not capable.

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 03:00:02   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
rumitoid wrote:
Yes, but you brought up state control as being all that is needed. I was showing it is clearly not capable.


State control of welfare ...

Reply
 
 
Apr 14, 2019 05:11:59   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
rumitoid wrote:
Perfect indictment. As Reagan said, they are worthless bottom-feeders. End of story. Hungry children, elderly, Vets, and disabled should politely starve to death and save the taxpayers a few cents.

Nice to have backup for your existence, you probably worked hard for it. Congrats. Others are not that fortunate through no fault of their own. Blame an Octogenarian or a blind person for their plight? Those disabled by disease? L***hes all of them? Grow up and think!


Clang! oops.....CLANNGG!!!!

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 05:13:37   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
rumitoid wrote:
Perfect indictment. As Reagan said, they are worthless bottom-feeders. End of story. Hungry children, elderly, Vets, and disabled should politely starve to death and save the taxpayers a few cents.

Nice to have backup for your existence, you probably worked hard for it. Congrats. Others are not that fortunate through no fault of their own. Blame an Octogenarian or a blind person for their plight? Those disabled by disease? L***hes all of them? Grow up and think!


Tired of your self righteous sanctimonious garbage! Go lecture somewhere else before I nuke New Mexico!

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 06:06:58   #
waltmoreno
 
rumitoid wrote:
The Coal, Gas, Oil, and Agriculture Industries get subsidies, welfare, without any need for testing their CEOs or boards for drugs or other hoops to jump through. Not many on the Right complain, if any, about this bizarre action of granting such largess to corporations making billions in profit. But the GOP will not hesitate, instead seem to rush, to cut funds for S.N.A.P., housing assistance, SSI, Pell Grants, TANF, child nutrition, Head Start, and other programs for low income families. (Education is another area favored by Republicans to slash.) The elderly, disabled, and children that are without the means or any profits from shares in stock, are just chips in the game for so-called "fiscal-responsibility." Their base loves limiting entitlements. "Let them eat cake." Assured healthcare for them is considered a pox on our economy and wallets.

For me, a humane government like ours must--must!--help the disadvantaged. Our liberties mean nothing without the heart to extend a helping hand to the needy. If you want to say that America is a Christian Nation, then it should act like it and "care for the least of these." That is how each individual will eventually be judged by the Book of Life, and perhaps nations as well.

Yes, the system is not perfect. Some play the system and fraud in the millions happens. There are the Reagan-esque "Welfare Queens" and "Studs." Yet what system is perfect?
The Coal, Gas, Oil, and Agriculture Industries get... (show quote)


Ok rumi. If the common sense ideas of this 21 year old Texas girl catch on, help might be on the way. But I'm thinking the recipients of the government largess ain't gonna like it. So much so that they'll refuse to accept it. Good!
Here are her ideas.


A 21-year-old girl in Waco, Texas says “Put me in charge!”
by TIM CONDON
This, from a 21-year-old female, was in the Waco Tribune Herald in Waco, Texas.

"Put me in charge . . . "

Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza…

…then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks?
You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, wh**ever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."

Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND, while you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can V**E! Yes that is correct. For you to v**e would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from v****g while you are receiving a government welfare check. If you want to v**e, then get a job."

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 06:14:47   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
waltmoreno wrote:
Ok rumi. If the common sense ideas of this 21 year old Texas girl catch on, help might be on the way. But I'm thinking the recipients of the government largess ain't gonna like it. So much so that they'll refuse to accept it. Good!
Here are her ideas.


A 21-year-old girl in Waco, Texas says “Put me in charge!”
by TIM CONDON
This, from a 21-year-old female, was in the Waco Tribune Herald in Waco, Texas.

"Put me in charge . . . "

Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza…

…then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks?
You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, wh**ever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."

Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND, while you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can V**E! Yes that is correct. For you to v**e would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from v****g while you are receiving a government welfare check. If you want to v**e, then get a job."
Ok rumi. If the common sense ideas of this 21 year... (show quote)


Texans be smart...

Reply
 
 
Apr 14, 2019 06:46:43   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
archie bunker wrote:
Perfect topic for me right now you blubbering, bleeding heart.

Where to start....
OK...A couple live down the road, they are tweakers, and derilects mostly. They recently got out of jail, and moved back into their travel trailer on land they don't own. Archie was benevolent to them in the past, and they stole Archie's stuff in return.

True story, and not much more needs to be said.
Except that they aren't getting water at Archie's house anymore.
No work.
No eat.
That simple.
Perfect topic for me right now you blubbering, ble... (show quote)


How about someone who has worked and paid taxes for 39 years and gets disabled five years shy of retirement age? I mean disabled at the tender age of pushing 60?
Make it 49 years, because at least ten of those years I was working 2 jobs to pay off my damn mortgage early.

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 06:52:50   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
waltmoreno wrote:
Ok rumi. If the common sense ideas of this 21 year old Texas girl catch on, help might be on the way. But I'm thinking the recipients of the government largess ain't gonna like it. So much so that they'll refuse to accept it. Good!
Here are her ideas.


A 21-year-old girl in Waco, Texas says “Put me in charge!”
by TIM CONDON
This, from a 21-year-old female, was in the Waco Tribune Herald in Waco, Texas.

"Put me in charge . . . "

Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza…

…then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks?
You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, wh**ever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."

Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND, while you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can V**E! Yes that is correct. For you to v**e would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from v****g while you are receiving a government welfare check. If you want to v**e, then get a job."
Ok rumi. If the common sense ideas of this 21 year... (show quote)


Up to a point, I agree. As I pointed out in another reply, I became disabled five years shy of retirement. Are you saying that the 39 years I worked and paid taxes, (about ten years of it 2 jobs) doesn't earn me the right to v**e? How about the time I spent in the Army? Does that make me less eligible than a non veteran who isn't disabled? I paid in a lot and didn't get much back. I see healthy young people getting all sorts of government handouts and this is wrong. Hell, I was sixty before I had to get food stamps temporarily.. I see whole and healthy people in their twenties getting them.

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 07:44:08   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
rumitoid wrote:
Why? We subsidize many industries. Do you object this is a waste of your taxpayer money? Hungry children, Vets, the elderly, and disabled should be left in the gutter? That's tyranny!




Subsidizing industries is wrong too. Hungry children? We always took care of them through private charity quite well. Ditto the disabled. The elderly were always take care of by their children.

Your solution? Insanity & tyranny.

As usual, like all liberals, you resort to the old left wing hysterical lie that if government didn't provide it. it wouldn't get done.

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 07:50:18   #
fullspinzoo
 
Lonewolf wrote:
We can buy an f35 fighter for 1.5 trillion and need to cut school lunches Medicare and socially security.


The cost of a F-35 fighter jet is 89.5 MILLION $$$$ not $1.5 trillion, but we're used to you pulling numbers so far fetched out of your ass. So once again, you're full of s**t. That's why nobody takes anything you say as credible or serious. At least I provide a link. You don't know what a link is. (your math is almost as bad as your spelling!!!).

Reply
 
 
Apr 14, 2019 08:27:18   #
SkptkSumthin
 
rumitoid wrote:
Is each state better equipped to handle interstate highways and dams and toxic industries and discrimination than the federal government, to name a few likely exceptions to what a state can do, or more importantly, not do. The Constitution was not tasked with enumerating the Bill of Rights or making them law. Full rights for women, Native Americans, and s***es was not on the agenda of the Constitution.

"Each state is better equipped to handle the disadvantaged of their state." You mean like the Southern States for nearly a century with Jim Crow Laws and outright segregation after emancipation? Let them handle it?
Is each state better equipped to handle interstate... (show quote)


Rumi, let's not forget which party it was that fought to keep the s***es, passed the Jim Crow laws, fought to keep segregation, and helped Margaret Sanger in her efforts to commit genocide against black people.
Native Americans were included in the Constitution until Jackson's democrats passed the Indian Removal Acts, found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, which ruling was ignored by the democrats. The founders recognized that future generations would find imperfections in the original body, and wisely included the provisions for amending it.
Thus we have the 14th Amendment for former s***es, and the 19th Amendment for women. Todays conservatives seek to preserve the good that went before, while the progressives seek to mock and belittle by conflating the good with the bad that went before as an excuse to ignore the Constitution that was meant to preserve the God-given rights of all of us. If you can temper your anger (and hatred?), it will do wonders for the conversation.

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 08:29:29   #
SkptkSumthin
 
And the Interstate Highway System is authorized by the Commerce clause.

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 08:36:32   #
The Critical Critic Loc: Turtle Island
 
rumitoid wrote:
Is each state better equipped to handle interstate highways and dams

Infrastructure is covered in the Constitution. But yes, states would be better equipped to handle such things, when a dispute arises the feds and SCOTUS can settle it.
Quote:
and toxic industries and discrimination than the federal government, to name a few likely exceptions to what a state can do, or more importantly, not do.

Again, covered. The limitations are set upon the general government, not the state, like most, you seem to have it backwards.
Quote:
The Constitution was not tasked with enumerating the Bill of Rights or making them law. Full rights for women, Native Americans, and s***es was not on the agenda of the Constitution.

What does this have to do with your original post? Do you often time travel from century to century... btw, amended. Welcome back to the 21st century.
Quote:
"Each state is better equipped to handle the disadvantaged of their state." You mean like the Southern States for nearly a century with Jim Crow Laws and outright segregation after emancipation? Let them handle it?

When you’re done time traveling, bring this up to democrats, they own it. But once again, nothing to do with the original post. You may be intellectually frustrated and just want to yell .... R****T!!! (Yawn)

For someone with heart issues, you should be careful about how much it bleeds.

Reply
Apr 14, 2019 08:36:36   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
When it's private, it's charity. When it's compelled by government, it's tyranny.


You have gotten that right. Keep posting the t***h maybe some of the socialists might someday actually understand the t***h.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.