Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Expert Analysis on H**x/False F**g

Dear Robert,

The word on the street from those who have viewed it is that the New Zealand shooting is an entirely f**e false f**g event and this is why people are prohibited from watching it.

Zero Hedge reports that the New Zealand authorities issued a chilling warning to its citizens that they face "Up to 10 years in prison for 'knowingly' possessing a copy of the New Zealand mosque shooting video - and up to 14 years in prison for sharing it. Corporations (such as web hosts) face an additional $200,000 ($137,000 US) fine under the same law."

I have not viewed it but you can download it from my article page HERE.

Finding any video on YouTube that advances this perspective was nearly impossible. It could almost be said that this event was a test of the ability of the g*******t police state and its attendant tech giants to control the spread of dissenting views with search algorithms.

Former Army Psychological Operations Officer and State Department Counterterrorism contractor, Scott Bennett has thoroughly examined the 17 minute video of the shooter frame-by-frame, and after applying deductive reasoning in the forensic analysis, he is convinced the New Zealand mosque shooting was a false f**g event due to the following:

No evidence of bullets impacting surfaces, no blood splatter, "Which means either blanks or paint or gas or other non-solid projectiles were fired from the guns. This means, essentially, nothing solid impacted the victims bodies, therefore no physical damage resulted, which means no living person was lethally wounded or k**led by an outside force."
The victims' physical reactions to being shot are not realistic. People being shot at close range react with animalistic panic, whereas the shooting victims in the video "fold up and fall to the ground like a sack of sand, and lie motionless."
"...as the shooter is driving down the street, several times he presses his shotgun muzzle against the windshield of his car and fires, but the windshield is not damaged or broken or penetrated by any bullet. Instead a smoky cloud bursts against the window and temporarily fills the cab of the car."
The music appears to be scripted and deliberate and "resembles some kind of hokey Pulp Fiction type soundtrack, as the perpetrator comments on the shooting thrills and challenges to his [livestream] audience."
The shooter's manifesto appears to have been written by a l*****t "inarticulately trying to channel or inhabit the language and ideas of conservatives, albeit deceptively."

Bennett, who worked in advertising prior to working in Psychological Operations has applied "the standard metrics of an advertising campaign to the New Zealand shooting to determine the ultimate goal of the campaign." It's his opinion that the event was staged to "Brand Right-Wing, Conservative Republican Christians as violent extremists threatening civilized society."

An end goal would be to cause the DOJ and all law enforcement agencies "to elevate white, Right-Wing, Conservative Republican Christians to top of list of domestic threats and terrorist list, and...expanded budgets, more powers, less limitations, and more license to control and abuse the civilian population.

Bennett then goes into a phenomenal rant: "The two years of needless agony the American people were put through during the Watergate hearings are nothing compared to what the media and democrats have intentionally put the American people through in their accusations of treasonous corruption and indeed spying they have made against President Trump...

"It is important to understand that this act by the media and democrats was more than acrimonious or even deceptive political debate. It was an act of the most grotesque and violent selfishness and hysterical arrogance and blind self-righteousness manipulation ever to t***spire in American politics...It is an attempt to o*******w the Republic and replace it with a police state Socialist Democracy, with the 'enlightened' political-academic-media elite at the top, the thuggish police-military industrial complex in the middle, and everyone else on the bottom."

Running Time: 7 mins

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/expert-analysis-on-h**xfalse-f**g/

woodguru

So now that it can't be readily seen the right can make up wh**ever i***tic things they want.

SkptkSumthin

Bummer.

"I have not viewed it but you can download it from my article page HERE."

No, you can't.

Rose42

And you can remain ignorant to the fact that false f**g operations are no fairy tale. They can be successful because people are pretty easily duped. I'm not saying this is a false f**g but its not outside the realm of possibility.

Operation Northwoods was one but it was nixed by JFK (a good thing). There are a lot of things that go on the general public has no clue about.

woodguru

Ignorant? I know things it doesn't do any good to talk about because people simply won't believe them, so I think I'm aware of how the t***h is so easily hidden.

Not everything inconvenient is a false f**g operation. The same people have assigned a false f**g to everything including Sandy Hook. You have first reports out, then distortions start coming into play. I personally did not want to see a video of dozens of people getting k**led.

False f**g or not the reality is dealing with a rising tide of white nationalism and hatred toward both Muslims and Jews, and that needs to be addressed, not hidden behind stories of false f**gs that deny the fact that the hatred is heading out of control.

rumitoid

This is crazy, like Alex Jones from Infowars claiming Sandy Hook never happened. Or it is a sick parody. But it is just nonsense in any form.

rumitoid

Alex Jones from Infowars said Sandy Hook never happened; they were paid actors, a false f**g operation by the Left to confiscate guns. I was easily duped by Sandy Hook. How about you?

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Forbidden Knowledge tv??? A conspiracy theory blog, are you serious???

Rose42

I don't listen to Alex Jones. Nor am I saying anything is a false f**g. However it is quite easy to fool people. The N**is were experts at it. If you think no one is capable of doing something like that read up on Operation Northwoods. It was axed by JFK. Human nature hasn't changed.

Rose42

I know there are those who attribute false f**gs to everything. I am not one of them.

You have no idea what needs to be addressed.

rumitoid

The question is, Rose, fool what people? Yes, some are easy to fool and some not so much and others barely, if at all. What separates them? We are not all equal in discernment, for numerous reasons. Take Inspector Clouseau and Sherlock Holmes. There are those that do not have the intellectual capacity, and that may be for numerous reasons as well, not just poorly developed formal reasoning or low IQ.

The N**is managed to dupe the majority of the German people how? Oh, and not all were duped: why not? What separated them? How were those not duped treated by their neighbors, and vice versa? Wild enthusiasm and loyalty facing dire warnings of great danger and condemnation: how do you think that went? Any examples you can name?

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

I never said I believed it, in fact I don't. This is a conspiracy site and you should see some of the crap they came up with. Anyone who has been in battle would know this. "The victims' physical reactions to being shot are not realistic. People being shot at close range react with animalistic panic, whereas the shooting victims in the video "fold up and fall to the ground like a sack of sand, and lie motionless." There is no uniform way people react to being shot or k**led. Some will fold, others will fight until they die. There was very little room. The best idea if being shot at and you have no gun is run in a zig-zag motion, never allow him/her to guess where you'll step next. These people couldn't-one example. I really can tear the entire post apart.

Rose42

Just about everyone is easy to fool depending on the sk**l of the propagandist. And pretty easily controlled. In college we had a professor who started out lecturing in the center front of the class. By the end of the semester he was in the lefthand corner. This was a highly educated man with a PhD in psychology. He had no idea that was deliberate. Point being, the vast majority only look at the surface and give no thought about what could be underneath. That includes the highly educated.

For the professor it may have gone differently if he'd had an aid or two that was observing in class. That would have been an interesting experiment.

For the US I would not be surprised to see legislation imposed that would regulate some more types of speech. People are being primed for it with political correctness and on many universities and campuses they have speech codes.

rumitoid

A while back, maybe twenty years ago, I realized people could use or take advantage of me only if I was not freely giving my time, energy, and money. My agenda was simple: to help. They were responsible for their agenda. When a friend around that time said I was just enabling some person, making me look foolish and possibly doing more harm than good for that person, I said, "That is up to him." Their "false f**g" of need only fooled themselves. What may they have gained if honest? A lesson they needed to see and learn for themselves.

I am not in charge of the miracle to change, but I am responsible to care for the least of these, however I am able. In that regard I have witnessed a number of t***sformations by God. "Wait on the Lord" was the primary instruction, and not my own understanding.

However, in other affairs, there is to be a discipline for the discernment of t***h. Though I may regrettably shoot from the hip sometimes or have a knee-jerk reaction, mostly I do my best to play Devil's Advocate, both with what I agree or disagree with, challenging my emotional attachments and pre-suppositions. Sure, I could be fooling myself, just playing at Devil's Advocate for wh**ever deep-seated reason, yet I feel the practice over time can be at least useful to uncovering the greater t***h.

Rose42

Thats great you try to be analytical. Its too easy to fall into self deception. There is one t***h though that will see us through anything - Christ.