One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Kansas wants to resurrect v****g law requiring proof-of-citizenship: case being watched nationwide
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 19, 2019 18:12:29   #
HonorNCourage57 Loc: Born in Louisiana!!!living in Burien, Washing
 
Kansas wants to resurrect v****g law requiring proof-of-citizenship; case being watched nationwide
March 19, 2019 | Frieda Powers | Print Article

SHARE1.5K TWEET32 EMAIL

Report Advertisement

The constitutionality of a blocked Kansas law requiring proof of citizenship in order to be able to v**e is under scrutiny as the state looks to bring it back.

Arguments were set to be heard in a federal appeals court on Monday in a case that draws attention again to the efforts of Republicans to enact v**er ID laws in an attempt to stem in-person v***r f***d, according to an Associated Press report on Monday.
(Image: Wikimedia)



The Kansas v***r r**********n law required documents such as a birth certificate, U.S. passport or naturalization papers to be presented before people would be allowed to even r******r to v**e, taking another step further than 35 other states which already have some form of v**er identification, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Associated Press reported:

In a case with national implications for v****g rights, Kansas faces an uphill battle to resurrect the law once championed by former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach , who led President Donald Trump’s now-defunct v***r f***d commission.

A three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked Kobach in 2016 from fully enforcing the law, calling it “a mass denial of a fundamental constitutional right.” The issue is back before the appellate court after U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson struck it down last year and made permanent the earlier injunction.



Dale Ho, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s V****g Rights Project, called out the statute which was aimed at confronting a “nonexistent epidemic of noncitizen v****g.”
Report Advertisement

“Kansas was the tip of the spear of an effort to make it harder for people to register under the guise of protecting e******ns from a nonexistent epidemic of noncitizen v****g. Those efforts haven’t stopped as this case illustrates, and I think this case will be closely watched,” Ho said.

More than 30,732 people who could not submit proof of citizenship were unable to r******r to v**e between 2013 and 2016 when the law was in effect before being blocked by Robinson. The judge found that the law “disproportionately impacted duly qualified registration applicants, while only nominally preventing noncitizen v***r r**********n.”

“Kansas argued in court filings that it has a compelling interest in preventing v***r f***d. It contended its proof-of-citizenship requirement is not a significant burden and protects the integrity of e******ns and the accuracy of v**er rolls,” The AP report said.

Kobach, a conservative Republican who backed Trump’s assertion of v***r f***d, was the architect behind the strict Kansas v**er identification laws. The Democratic governor of the state, Laura Kelly, is opposed to the legislation but once supported it when she was a state senator.

“The Legislature is free to repeal the statute if it is no longer favored, but as long as the law requiring documentary proof of citizenship to r******r to v**e remains on the books, we think it, like other duly enacted state laws, deserves a full and vigorous legal defense,” Kansas’ Republican attorney general, Derek Schmidt, said.

Schmidt, who is defending the legislation as it is being appealed, noted that it had passed in the Legislature by large bipartisan majorities.
Report Advertisement

While critics are arguing that cases of v***r f***d are actually rare and that Republicans are seeking to suppress v**er turnout from those in demographics which usually support Democrats, Kansas has seen many convictions for v***r f***d since 2015.

But attempts to enforce v****g requirements have typically been denounced by the left and the latest move by the state of Kansas to resurrect its proof-of-citizenship requirements had critics crying oppression.
http://www.BPRbusiness&politics.com



I fully support Kansas, in what they want!!! 100% and the Dems want to give I*****l i*******ts the Right to V**e in the US E******ns!!! This is Sinful!!! and wrong.

Reply
Mar 19, 2019 18:33:56   #
Carol Kelly
 
HonorNCourage57 wrote:
Kansas wants to resurrect v****g law requiring proof-of-citizenship; case being watched nationwide
March 19, 2019 | Frieda Powers | Print Article

SHARE1.5K TWEET32 EMAIL

Report Advertisement

The constitutionality of a blocked Kansas law requiring proof of citizenship in order to be able to v**e is under scrutiny as the state looks to bring it back.

Arguments were set to be heard in a federal appeals court on Monday in a case that draws attention again to the efforts of Republicans to enact v**er ID laws in an attempt to stem in-person v***r f***d, according to an Associated Press report on Monday.
(Image: Wikimedia)



The Kansas v***r r**********n law required documents such as a birth certificate, U.S. passport or naturalization papers to be presented before people would be allowed to even r******r to v**e, taking another step further than 35 other states which already have some form of v**er identification, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Associated Press reported:

In a case with national implications for v****g rights, Kansas faces an uphill battle to resurrect the law once championed by former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach , who led President Donald Trump’s now-defunct v***r f***d commission.

A three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked Kobach in 2016 from fully enforcing the law, calling it “a mass denial of a fundamental constitutional right.” The issue is back before the appellate court after U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson struck it down last year and made permanent the earlier injunction.



Dale Ho, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s V****g Rights Project, called out the statute which was aimed at confronting a “nonexistent epidemic of noncitizen v****g.”
Report Advertisement

“Kansas was the tip of the spear of an effort to make it harder for people to register under the guise of protecting e******ns from a nonexistent epidemic of noncitizen v****g. Those efforts haven’t stopped as this case illustrates, and I think this case will be closely watched,” Ho said.

More than 30,732 people who could not submit proof of citizenship were unable to r******r to v**e between 2013 and 2016 when the law was in effect before being blocked by Robinson. The judge found that the law “disproportionately impacted duly qualified registration applicants, while only nominally preventing noncitizen v***r r**********n.”

“Kansas argued in court filings that it has a compelling interest in preventing v***r f***d. It contended its proof-of-citizenship requirement is not a significant burden and protects the integrity of e******ns and the accuracy of v**er rolls,” The AP report said.

Kobach, a conservative Republican who backed Trump’s assertion of v***r f***d, was the architect behind the strict Kansas v**er identification laws. The Democratic governor of the state, Laura Kelly, is opposed to the legislation but once supported it when she was a state senator.

“The Legislature is free to repeal the statute if it is no longer favored, but as long as the law requiring documentary proof of citizenship to r******r to v**e remains on the books, we think it, like other duly enacted state laws, deserves a full and vigorous legal defense,” Kansas’ Republican attorney general, Derek Schmidt, said.

Schmidt, who is defending the legislation as it is being appealed, noted that it had passed in the Legislature by large bipartisan majorities.
Report Advertisement

While critics are arguing that cases of v***r f***d are actually rare and that Republicans are seeking to suppress v**er turnout from those in demographics which usually support Democrats, Kansas has seen many convictions for v***r f***d since 2015.

But attempts to enforce v****g requirements have typically been denounced by the left and the latest move by the state of Kansas to resurrect its proof-of-citizenship requirements had critics crying oppression.
http://www.BPRbusiness&politics.com



I fully support Kansas, in what they want!!! 100% and the Dems want to give I*****l i*******ts the Right to V**e in the US E******ns!!! This is Sinful!!! and wrong.
Kansas wants to resurrect v****g law requiring pro... (show quote)


Good Luck to Kansas and the Attornet General. All states need to stick with this. If you aren’t a citizen, you don’t v**e period.

Reply
Mar 19, 2019 18:48:14   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
HonorNCourage57 wrote:
Kansas wants to resurrect v****g law requiring proof-of-citizenship; case being watched nationwide
March 19, 2019 | Frieda Powers | Print Article

SHARE1.5K TWEET32 EMAIL

Report Advertisement

The constitutionality of a blocked Kansas law requiring proof of citizenship in order to be able to v**e is under scrutiny as the state looks to bring it back.

Arguments were set to be heard in a federal appeals court on Monday in a case that draws attention again to the efforts of Republicans to enact v**er ID laws in an attempt to stem in-person v***r f***d, according to an Associated Press report on Monday.
(Image: Wikimedia)



The Kansas v***r r**********n law required documents such as a birth certificate, U.S. passport or naturalization papers to be presented before people would be allowed to even r******r to v**e, taking another step further than 35 other states which already have some form of v**er identification, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Associated Press reported:

In a case with national implications for v****g rights, Kansas faces an uphill battle to resurrect the law once championed by former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach , who led President Donald Trump’s now-defunct v***r f***d commission.

A three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked Kobach in 2016 from fully enforcing the law, calling it “a mass denial of a fundamental constitutional right.” The issue is back before the appellate court after U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson struck it down last year and made permanent the earlier injunction.



Dale Ho, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s V****g Rights Project, called out the statute which was aimed at confronting a “nonexistent epidemic of noncitizen v****g.”
Report Advertisement

“Kansas was the tip of the spear of an effort to make it harder for people to register under the guise of protecting e******ns from a nonexistent epidemic of noncitizen v****g. Those efforts haven’t stopped as this case illustrates, and I think this case will be closely watched,” Ho said.

More than 30,732 people who could not submit proof of citizenship were unable to r******r to v**e between 2013 and 2016 when the law was in effect before being blocked by Robinson. The judge found that the law “disproportionately impacted duly qualified registration applicants, while only nominally preventing noncitizen v***r r**********n.”

“Kansas argued in court filings that it has a compelling interest in preventing v***r f***d. It contended its proof-of-citizenship requirement is not a significant burden and protects the integrity of e******ns and the accuracy of v**er rolls,” The AP report said.

Kobach, a conservative Republican who backed Trump’s assertion of v***r f***d, was the architect behind the strict Kansas v**er identification laws. The Democratic governor of the state, Laura Kelly, is opposed to the legislation but once supported it when she was a state senator.

“The Legislature is free to repeal the statute if it is no longer favored, but as long as the law requiring documentary proof of citizenship to r******r to v**e remains on the books, we think it, like other duly enacted state laws, deserves a full and vigorous legal defense,” Kansas’ Republican attorney general, Derek Schmidt, said.

Schmidt, who is defending the legislation as it is being appealed, noted that it had passed in the Legislature by large bipartisan majorities.
Report Advertisement

While critics are arguing that cases of v***r f***d are actually rare and that Republicans are seeking to suppress v**er turnout from those in demographics which usually support Democrats, Kansas has seen many convictions for v***r f***d since 2015.

But attempts to enforce v****g requirements have typically been denounced by the left and the latest move by the state of Kansas to resurrect its proof-of-citizenship requirements had critics crying oppression.
http://www.BPRbusiness&politics.com



I fully support Kansas, in what they want!!! 100% and the Dems want to give I*****l i*******ts the Right to V**e in the US E******ns!!! This is Sinful!!! and wrong.
Kansas wants to resurrect v****g law requiring pro... (show quote)





Should be a no-brainer, but not in this upside down world!

Reply
 
 
Mar 19, 2019 19:04:27   #
PeterS
 
HonorNCourage57 wrote:
Kansas wants to resurrect v****g law requiring proof-of-citizenship; case being watched nationwide
March 19, 2019 | Frieda Powers | Print Article

SHARE1.5K TWEET32 EMAIL

Report Advertisement

The constitutionality of a blocked Kansas law requiring proof of citizenship in order to be able to v**e is under scrutiny as the state looks to bring it back.

Arguments were set to be heard in a federal appeals court on Monday in a case that draws attention again to the efforts of Republicans to enact v**er ID laws in an attempt to stem in-person v***r f***d, according to an Associated Press report on Monday.
(Image: Wikimedia)



The Kansas v***r r**********n law required documents such as a birth certificate, U.S. passport or naturalization papers to be presented before people would be allowed to even r******r to v**e, taking another step further than 35 other states which already have some form of v**er identification, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Associated Press reported:

In a case with national implications for v****g rights, Kansas faces an uphill battle to resurrect the law once championed by former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach , who led President Donald Trump’s now-defunct v***r f***d commission.

A three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked Kobach in 2016 from fully enforcing the law, calling it “a mass denial of a fundamental constitutional right.” The issue is back before the appellate court after U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson struck it down last year and made permanent the earlier injunction.



Dale Ho, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s V****g Rights Project, called out the statute which was aimed at confronting a “nonexistent epidemic of noncitizen v****g.”
Report Advertisement

“Kansas was the tip of the spear of an effort to make it harder for people to register under the guise of protecting e******ns from a nonexistent epidemic of noncitizen v****g. Those efforts haven’t stopped as this case illustrates, and I think this case will be closely watched,” Ho said.

More than 30,732 people who could not submit proof of citizenship were unable to r******r to v**e between 2013 and 2016 when the law was in effect before being blocked by Robinson. The judge found that the law “disproportionately impacted duly qualified registration applicants, while only nominally preventing noncitizen v***r r**********n.”

“Kansas argued in court filings that it has a compelling interest in preventing v***r f***d. It contended its proof-of-citizenship requirement is not a significant burden and protects the integrity of e******ns and the accuracy of v**er rolls,” The AP report said.

Kobach, a conservative Republican who backed Trump’s assertion of v***r f***d, was the architect behind the strict Kansas v**er identification laws. The Democratic governor of the state, Laura Kelly, is opposed to the legislation but once supported it when she was a state senator.

“The Legislature is free to repeal the statute if it is no longer favored, but as long as the law requiring documentary proof of citizenship to r******r to v**e remains on the books, we think it, like other duly enacted state laws, deserves a full and vigorous legal defense,” Kansas’ Republican attorney general, Derek Schmidt, said.

Schmidt, who is defending the legislation as it is being appealed, noted that it had passed in the Legislature by large bipartisan majorities.
Report Advertisement

While critics are arguing that cases of v***r f***d are actually rare and that Republicans are seeking to suppress v**er turnout from those in demographics which usually support Democrats, Kansas has seen many convictions for v***r f***d since 2015.

But attempts to enforce v****g requirements have typically been denounced by the left and the latest move by the state of Kansas to resurrect its proof-of-citizenship requirements had critics crying oppression.
http://www.BPRbusiness&politics.com



I fully support Kansas, in what they want!!! 100% and the Dems want to give I*****l i*******ts the Right to V**e in the US E******ns!!! This is Sinful!!! and wrong.
Kansas wants to resurrect v****g law requiring pro... (show quote)

Soon Conservatives will require everyone to be microchipped. It's a hell of a thing when you know your white skin will soon be a minority...SAD...

Reply
Mar 19, 2019 19:08:02   #
Iliamna1
 
I'll bet this ends up in the Supreme Court ! !
In Mexico, you have to have a v**er I.D. card to v**e. Americans can't, nor should be able to, v**e in their e******ns.
Personally, I think an American v**er I.D. cards should have a photograph, a thumbprint AND a hologram to prevent falsification.

Reply
Mar 19, 2019 19:17:51   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
PeterS wrote:
Soon Conservatives will require everyone to be microchipped. It's a hell of a thing when you know your white skin will soon be a minority...SAD...


Don't you mean "#SAD!"?



Reply
Mar 19, 2019 19:38:24   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
PeterS wrote:
Soon Conservatives will require everyone to be microchipped. It's a hell of a thing when you know your white skin will soon be a minority...SAD...


We’ll soon be minorities? Does that mean we’ll get special privileges then?

Reply
 
 
Mar 19, 2019 22:21:33   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
PeterS wrote:
Soon Conservatives will require everyone to be microchipped. It's a hell of a thing when you know your white skin will soon be a minority...SAD...


I am all for micro-chipping people...

Start with the criminals and asylum seekers..

Then it is easy to keep track of them...

Also.. Parents should be able to microchip their children... Would be so much more convenient and safe...

All sorts of benefits for monitering health as well....

Sign me up

Reply
Mar 19, 2019 22:24:32   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
TommyRadd wrote:
We’ll soon be minorities? Does that mean we’ll get special privileges then?


White people have always been in the minority.. Globally speaking Asians, East Indians, Africans and Latinos (not sure about that last one) out number us considerably...

Reply
Mar 19, 2019 22:25:33   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Don't you mean "#SAD!"?


C'mon CSM... This is not conducive to discussion in any way.... You are better than this

Reply
Mar 19, 2019 22:28:38   #
PeterS
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Don't you mean "#SAD!"?


That's exactly what I meant...

Reply
 
 
Mar 19, 2019 22:30:06   #
PeterS
 
TommyRadd wrote:
We’ll soon be minorities? Does that mean we’ll get special privileges then?

Not conservatives. After all, they would rather die than take a government handout--at least not one that their fellow cons might find out about...

Reply
Mar 19, 2019 22:31:27   #
PeterS
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
White people have always been in the minority.. Globally speaking Asians, East Indians, Africans and Latinos (not sure about that last one) out number us considerably...

Not in the United States and that day is approaching faster than the white cons here are willing to admit.

Reply
Mar 19, 2019 22:33:26   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
PeterS wrote:
Not in the United States and that day is approaching faster than the white cons here are willing to admit.


Ah... Good point...

Not an issue for me...

Don't particularly like Punjabis (personal reasons) but no issues with other races...

Reply
Mar 19, 2019 22:36:32   #
PeterS
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Ah... Good point...

Not an issue for me...

Don't particularly like Punjabis (personal reasons) but no issues with other races...

I'm half white and half Hispanic so as one side goes down the other goes up so either way I still win...

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.