HonorNCourage57 Loc: Born in Louisiana!!!living in Burien, Washing

House Democrats V**e to Protect I*****l I*******ts V****g Rights in US E******ns

Democrats in the House of Representatives took advantage of their new power last Friday and v**ed to defend local municipalities that allow i*****l a***ns to and v**e in their local e******ns.

Texas Republican Dan Crenshaw said, “What kind of government would cancel the v**e of its own citizens and replace it with noncitizens?” Crenshaw showed his frustration by adding, “It sounds like I’m making this up.”

What makes the v**e more stunning is that six months ago, 49 Democrats crossed the aisle and joined Republicans in v****g against i*****l a***n v****g. Last week only six v**ed against the same measure.

This most recent action came as part of a broader debate on HR 1 or the ‘For the People Act.’ The measure which passed 223-197 includes unprecedented expansions of v***r r**********n and access to polls, in addition to a major rewrite of campaign finance laws.

The Washington Times reported, “The v**e marks a stunning reversal from just six months ago when the chamber — then under GOP control — v**ed to decry i*****l i*******t v****g.”

Lauren Fine who is a spokeswoman for House GOP Whip Steve Scalise told Fox News that Democrats who stood firmly against i*****l a***ns v****g in the past but support it now are going to have to explain their action to v**ers soon.

Fine said, “These 41 Democrats must now answer to v**ers why they were against i*****l i*******ts v****g in e******ns six months ago, but are suddenly in favor of it now.”

Scalice tweeted, “We’ve watched Democrats prioritize i*****l i*******ts over American citizens for a while now. But today they took it a step further by blocking our motion to prevent i*****l i*******ts from v****g in e******ns—effectively devaluing the v**e of legitimate v**ers.”

Interestingly, the change of mind about i******s v****g among many Democrat politicians comes at the same time they intensify their efforts to block President Trump’s request to funding the wall.

When the initial v**e was taken last September, Dan Stein applauded Republicans and Democrats for working together. The bill they passed, H.R. 1071, enounced local jurisdictions like San Francisco that actively encourage, i*****l a***ns to v**e in certain municipal e******ns.

Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), said, ”House Resolution 1071, which recognizes that allowing i*****l i*******ts the right to v**e devalues the franchise and diminishes the v****g power of United States citizens.”

Stein noted that Democrats who either v**ed against the resolution or abstained showed they were more concerned about their open borders agenda than the fabric of our democracy or their fellow citizens. He said, “FAIR applauds the Representatives who supported this resolution, albeit a non-binding one. They clearly recognize that our American community has the right to define standards of membership, and that includes the preservation of citizen-only v****g. Likewise, these Representatives must also recognize that is the right of our nation to secure our borders and their responsibility to do. By once again refusing to adequately fund the border wall, these lawmakers have abdicated that responsibility. It’s long past time for consistency and more tangible commitments to fix our immigration crisis.”

Democrats have been pushing for i*****l a***n v****g on several levels for at least the last four years. San Francisco opened v****g in local e******ns to non-citizens in 2016 and since then others have become more vocal on a national level.

Stacey Abrams, failed Georgia Democratic gubernatorial candidate 0f 2018, called for i*****l a***ns to take part in e******ns. Her near-win in the south shows the inroads progressives have made into radically changing the relationship between citizenship and v****g.

This January, PBS host Margaret Hoover asked Abrams if she saw a difference between allowing non-citizens to v**e in state and federal e******ns. Abrams responded that allowing non-citizens to v**e on a local level enables “people to be participants in the process without it somehow undermining our larger democratic ethic that says that you should be a citizen to be a part of the conversation.”

When pressed by Hoover to say she supported non-citizens v****g, Abrams answered, “I wouldn’t oppose it.”

Representative Crenshaw used Twitter to remind v**ers that he offered a non-binding motion in Congress to reaffirm “that only US citizens should have the right to v**e” and Democrats rejected it.

Crenshaw is right – the future of the Democrat Party is a country where i******s can v**e. As he tweeted, we need to let that “sink in.”

http://www.americanlibertyreport.com



OH!!!!Hell To Bells No!!!! These Loony Libs are violating our Rights to protect our V****g Rights!!!!in our Country. Y'all should be an American Citizen, not I*****l I*******ts. Democrats are trying to take control of our Country and totally have their way in the US E******ns, be it Legal or Not!!!! This is totally Insane and it should be Over thrown. Can y'all believe what the Dems are trying to do? The Dems are Law Breakers, and they want total control at what ever cost.....

Carol Kelly

Quite simply i*****l i*******ts don’t have v****g rights or any other rights in this country. If they want rights, let them go home. This is getting completely out of control and I’m furious as we all should be.

woodguru

Calm down and try to understand the reality, it's hard to use your brain when you are angry and reactive.

Carol Kelly

You’re absolutely right. I just h**e feeling so helpless.

HonorNCourage57 Loc: Born in Louisiana!!!living in Burien, Washing

I totally agree with your statement Carol Kelly!! but try and tell the Dems that!!!! it will go in one ear and out the other. They are trying to take over the American Ship!! and throw us over board!!! That's just how they work. They don't are about the American Law as long as they get what they want at what ever Cost to our Country.

Carol Kelly

We are on the same slippery slope. I have grandchildren and great grandchildren and I want all future generations of citizens to have the same rights I was born with. We cannot allow the Eastand West Coasts to run the country.

Iliamna1

There is another similar topic on OPP, "kansas Resurrecting Old V**er I.D law" that I jsut posted the following comment on:
I'll bet this ends up in the Supreme Court ! !
In Mexico, you have to have a v**er I.D. card to v**e. Americans can't, nor should be able to, v**e in their e******ns.
Personally, I think an American v**er I.D. cards should have a photograph, a thumb print AND a hologram to prevent falsification.

F.D.R.

This should be dead on arrival but should it be instituted anywhere then that states v**es should not be counted period !

Wonttakeitanymore

If they do this they will not have to go to the trouble of c***ting anymore!

Smedley_buzkill

What reality? That wetback criminals can come into this country and v**e?

Jean Deaux

Absolutely correct! They have no rights to be here unless they have had their occupational trades or specialties pre-approved, have gone through extensive medical exams to we know they are not bringing in disease, have a place to live and can live with NO welfare benefits nor educational or medical benefits. Our country is not a permanent home for those that can't support themselves. They have absolutely NO v****g rights until they have received their citizenship papers. To even show their faces at a polling place should be a crime and NO one should be able to v**e without a photo ID. Don't give me any of the garbage that it is disenfranchising. There are numerous requirements to show a picture ID in our society; not having one to v**e is ridiculous and must not be allowed to occur for anyone!

Carol Kelly

I totally agree. They enforce a number of laws in Mexico that we should be enforcing here. Another is the right to own outright a place of business unless you partner with a Mexican. Ever ask yourself why they opened their southern border when in the past they held fast against immigrants coming through on their way here?

promilitary

These dolts, Democrats, never give up.
THey can't win on their own ideas and merits so they
have to resort to this and hope there are enough other
dolts out there who will lap it up and v**e for them.

Iliamna1

You are really naive. I*****l a***ns are entering like a tidal wave and the Democrats do everything in their power to allow them to stay, even though most are illiterate and many are bring diseases, like T.B., measles, cholera etc., with them. This is fact, not fiction. Once they surrender to border patrol agents, many have to go to hospitals for treatment for injuries, dehydration and other traumas suffered. The border hospitals are going bankrupt trying to keep up. Many over the last few years are turned loose with a court date, but the vast majority never show up. . . they just stay here in the United States and sort of blend in the populace. Many v**e, especially where it's LEGAL for an i*****l a***n to get a driver's license, which registers drivers to v**e. It has been shown there are over 1.5 million i*****l a***ns on the California v**er roles, and over half v**ed in the last e******n. We're spending billions of dollars each year to house, clothe, educate and feed and provide medical care for approximately 11 MILLION i*****l a***ns. Some estimate the number double that. You are living in some sort of fantasy land! Another big fraud being foisted off on Americans is the large-scale theft of social security numbers. Social security cards are easily falsified by professionals and sold. Having lived in Texas for the last 40+ years, I knew several people whose identities were stolen. Once a person obtains that sacred SSN, they can get insurance, a job, steal someone's social security checks and tax refunds. Ruin their credit. It's a real disaster!
What you described above are LEGAL immigrants. I have absolutely no problem with them.