Sici is neither crazy nor stupid, he is just further down the pathway toward action, and more willing to say so, than many others.

The fatal flaw in your assessment of Sici is specifically in thinking that spelling out where the red line lies in the sand for him indicates crazy. That’s because you cannot believe that anyone actually cares strongly enough to act. Be very self aware of “projection”, of thinking that because you wouldn’t act, that no one would.

The core theme of this particular thread is all about the left projecting....that they can push and push and push, and that people on the right don’t really have redlines they will act on.

Sici is neither crazy nor stupid, he is just further down the pathway toward action, and more willing to say so, than many others.

The fatal flaw in your assessment of Sici is specifically in thinking that spelling out where the red line lies in the sand for him indicates crazy. That’s because you cannot believe that anyone actually cares strongly enough to act. Be very self aware of “projection”, of thinking that because you wouldn’t act, that no one would.

The core theme of this particular thread is all about the left projecting....that they can push and push and push, and that people on the right don’t really have redlines they will act on.

Oh, it's possible, I just don't think it will go very far. First and foremost this isn't the 1800's where you can neatly draw a line between north and south. Conservatives and liberals live in every state of the union and most live side by side each other and get along just fine. If you want to start a war how are you going to do it for a people who don't have a natural angst for each other? Next, suppose you do mix up enough hatred for each other how are we going to identify who we are at war with? Are you going to attack ethnicities. If you do then there are a whole bunch of white liberals that you will miss. Or are you going to attack our schools and universities and round people up or shoot them based on how you THINK they believe? Again, so much for the constitution correct?

And then what of the police force and the military? How are you going to get everyone involved to support your i**********n? If you attack a mosque do you think the police will stand by and watch you do it?

No, I think you can try to start a civil war--I just think the people of this country love it enough that they won't let you get away with it...

I don’t think you have any inkling of what happened during the civil war in Missouri. Not only did neighbours take different sides, it split family members too. Don’t talk rubbish about ‘diversity’ Being the key element that will prevent division. ‘Diversity’ drives division. What unified American for much of the country’s history was not immigration per se, but immigrants coming to the US because they wanted to be Americans and wanted to integrate and set about integrating into the US melting pot culture.

Wow, nothing in what I wrote to suggest that I, personally, advocate for a civil war or that I support the idea or that I want a civil war or have any desire to start one. All I said was that such a thing is possible. You could have stopped typing after you said, "Oh, it's possible" and left it at that.

But you couldn't help yourself, could you? You just had to d**g out a truckload of wild guesses, assumptions, speculations and hyperbole tainted with a dose of racial bulls**t with which to paint a two-bit, incredibly stupid scenario of what a "civil war" in America today would look like? Who would fight and who wouldn't, battle lines neatly drawn, conservatives and liberals living side by side in harmony and peace, and all glossed over with bleeding heart feel good crap.

T***h is, you have no idea of what might trigger nationwide civil violence and what such an uprising would look like, and neither do I. Wouldn't be the first time in history that citizens of a nation revolted. There are many precedents for such a thing.

Basically, your reply to my post is an ideologically driven kneejerk reaction loaded with episodic and foolish questions, but with no evidence that you applied logic, reason, and discriminate or critical thought. You responded with a barrel of progressive mush and turned your response into a personal attack.

If you can show me a single place where I made a crazy guess or wild assumption than do so otherwise that is simply deflection on your part and nothing more?

As for conservatives and liberals living together in harmony and peace I live in North Dallas where the majority of my neighbors are conservatives and we very much live together in harmony and peace and have done so for over thirty years. If that's not enough to gaul you the majority of my wife's relatives are East Texas conservatives and my wife and I get along exceedingly well with each and every one of them. In fact, the only place I've ever had a cross word with a conservative is on a message board where for some odd reason the anonymity seems to turn you into demons and hellcats out to protect the devils spawn!

And I've gone back and reread my response to you...racial bulls**t? I'm asking you how you are going to identify who you are going to attack? That's not racial bulls**t but a legitimate question because if not ethnicity than are you going to shoot down white people in the hopes that you get some liberals in the mix too?

This is the problem you have with your war and why it's destined to fail--you don't have targets that you can readily identify where the repercussions don't far out weight your actions. If you attack a Mosque you will have hell to pay. If you attack a liberal university you will have hell to pay. If you attack minorities, even illegal ones--hell to pay. If you target random white people on the streets--hell to pay. There is no scenario where you can initiate an attack where you won't have hell to pay as the result.

That's not speculation but a simple statement of the facts. Now if you can suggest a means of how you can initiate an action against an ideology you detest and the people represented by that ideology and be able to prosecute it successfully then please tell me how you think that can happen?

The prospectus is a civil war and there isn't a possible scenario where it doesn't come back to blow up in your face. Now if I am wrong then indicate just how instead of being flippant trying to deflect all while being dead wrong!