Fox News “strongly condemns” comments made by Jeanine Pirro linking Rep. Ilhan Omar’s practice of wearing a hijab to Sharia law: do you?
Mar 12, 2019 20:59:31 #
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
There should be one unified dress code for congress...
It is perfectly fine for a woman to go out in public without the hijab, Muslim women in many countries do...
She was aware of the regulations befote shevran for office...
End of story... (in my opinion)
It is perfectly fine for a woman to go out in public without the hijab, Muslim women in many countries do...
She was aware of the regulations befote shevran for office...
End of story... (in my opinion)
Okay, if that is the end of the story, no comment.
Mar 12, 2019 21:03:22 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
AOC loves her Muslim sisters and all they stand for. I thought everyone knew that.
.
.
gosh, that is unholy.... love to a Muslim.. the horror.. LOL
Mar 12, 2019 21:04:33 #
rumitoid wrote:
It wouldn't matter if Omar went to her office naked with a crucifix up her ass, she is a hard core Muslim. Her devotion to radical Islam binds her to Sharia and supersedes our laws and our constitution. Muslims are theocrats, their religion controls their politics and every aspect of their lives. The question I feel is complex and not easily reached by mandating some rules. I have no clear answer. It seems both right and wrong to me to allow religiously affiliated clothing in Congress. The members are representing we the people, which can be a pro and con argument against these show of faith. How they are able to function as representing and defending the Constitution seems the only point. Maybe. What they wear can cause alarm or questions in the halls. More thought is needed.
Never judge a book by its cover.
Mar 12, 2019 21:15:02 #
permafrost wrote:
It is unholy, it is not the love of one human being for another that brought AOC's "squad" together and binds them, it is lust for the power and control inherent in their anti-American ideologies and religion.gosh, that is unholy.... love to a Muslim.. the horror.. LOL
Mar 12, 2019 21:19:47 #
permafrost wrote:
gosh, that is unholy.... love to a Muslim.. the horror.. LOL
Cute pic...
And I agree concerning the love...
Only love defeats h**e...
Mar 12, 2019 21:52:46 #
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Only love defeats h**e...
Explain that to AOC and Omar.Only love defeats h**e...
Mar 12, 2019 21:57:49 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Explain that to AOC and Omar.
It is meant for all...
H**e is an all-inclusive emotion...
Knows no party lines or other distinctions...
The flip side of love...
And never to be tolerated...
Much love brother
Mar 12, 2019 22:03:51 #
Boo_Boo
Loc: Jellystone
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Cute pic...
And I agree concerning the love...
Only love defeats h**e...
And I agree concerning the love...
Only love defeats h**e...
I disagree. The words love and friend have been redacted to mere sentiment and betrays their very nature. I do not believe in h**e, the opposite of love is not h**e. H**e is just love gone bad. The actual opposite of love is apathy. When you don't care a damn as to what happens to the other person.
Mar 12, 2019 22:11:01 #
rumitoid wrote:
The question I feel is complex and not easily reached by mandating some rules. I have no clear answer. It seems both right and wrong to me to allow religiously affiliated clothing in Congress. The members are representing we the people, which can be a pro and con argument against these show of faith. How they are able to function as representing and defending the Constitution seems the only point. Maybe. What they wear can cause alarm or questions in the halls. More thought is needed.
To me its a simple thing. Allow it for everyone or allow it for no one. No exceptions.
Mar 12, 2019 22:29:28 #
Pennylynn wrote:
I disagree. The words love and friend have been redacted to mere sentiment and betrays their very nature. I do not believe in h**e, the opposite of love is not h**e. H**e is just love gone bad. The actual opposite of love is apathy. When you don't care a damn as to what happens to the other person.
Good point... This would make an excellent thread... Hint hint
Mar 12, 2019 22:31:09 #
Rose42 wrote:
To me its a simple thing. Allow it for everyone or allow it for no one. No exceptions.
Agreed...
(and wouldn't you love to see more signs of faith in congress
)Mar 12, 2019 22:48:28 #
Dont forget everyone if you already didn't know, that OCCASIONAL CORTEX WAS CHOSEN BY A CASTING COUCH!!!. Her brother answered an Ad which she didn't even know about for those PROGRESSIVE BORG MINDED BUFFOONS to try and find an ACTRESS to become a Congress person. It is so damn obvious she is no where capable of holding office in an educated adult world. Heck even the head of Greenpeace called HER A Twit and that her thoughts about c*****e c****e was plain old stupid!
Mar 13, 2019 01:01:10 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
It wouldn't matter if Omar went to her office naked with a crucifix up her ass, she is a hard core Muslim. Her devotion to radical Islam binds her to Sharia and supersedes our laws and our constitution. Muslims are theocrats, their religion controls their politics and every aspect of their lives.
Never judge a book by its cover.
Never judge a book by its cover.
You are judging a book by its cover, namely a hijab.
Mar 13, 2019 01:04:08 #
Pennylynn wrote:
I disagree. The words love and friend have been redacted to mere sentiment and betrays their very nature. I do not believe in h**e, the opposite of love is not h**e. H**e is just love gone bad. The actual opposite of love is apathy. When you don't care a damn as to what happens to the other person.
Apathy is the opposite of love to me. And a lot of apathy can be found in partisanship and patriotism.
Mar 13, 2019 01:04:47 #
Rose42 wrote:
To me its a simple thing. Allow it for everyone or allow it for no one. No exceptions.
On that I thoroughly agree.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.