One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump contributed to his campaign, not Cohen
Mar 11, 2019 13:29:40   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Cohen testified that Trump wrote checks to him to pay the whore, Daniels. What is the limit Trump can contribute to his own campaign?

Yep, none.

Reply
Mar 11, 2019 13:57:54   #
tommsteyer
 
Cohen and Stormy's lawyer cooked the whole con up. Avenatti owed money right left and center.

Reply
Mar 11, 2019 15:48:15   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Cohen testified that Trump wrote checks to him to pay the whore, Daniels. What is the limit Trump can contribute to his own campaign?

Yep, none.


In the first place paying a porn star to shut up right before an e******n is not a legitimate campaign expense.

But timing wise hiding something that would possibly affect an e******n is.

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2019 15:49:23   #
Kevyn
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Cohen testified that Trump wrote checks to him to pay the whore, Daniels. What is the limit Trump can contribute to his own campaign?

Yep, none.

You are right but miss the point. Trump laundered the money through his bag man and failed to report it which is a serious campaign finance law violation. They conspired to do this in order to get around exactly what the law was designed to prevent which is hiding campaign money sources and expenditures from v**ers so v**ers don’t have the information to make an informed choice. In this instance they felt it was necessary because had the v**ers found out about the affair andhush money payments it would have without question cost Trump the e******n. They were caught red handed and should pay the price.

Reply
Mar 12, 2019 13:10:10   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
In the first place paying a porn star to shut up right before an e******n is not a legitimate campaign expense.

But timing wise hiding something that would possibly affect an e******n is.


What exactly is a legitimate campaign expense? Where are the rules for that so we can all judge for ourselves?

Reply
Mar 12, 2019 13:13:15   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
You are right but miss the point. Trump laundered the money through his bag man and failed to report it which is a serious campaign finance law violation. They conspired to do this in order to get around exactly what the law was designed to prevent which is hiding campaign money sources and expenditures from v**ers so v**ers don’t have the information to make an informed choice. In this instance they felt it was necessary because had the v**ers found out about the affair andhush money payments it would have without question cost Trump the e******n. They were caught red handed and should pay the price.
You are right but miss the point. Trump laundered ... (show quote)


So desperate. LOL!

It's actually only a campaign expense to those who wan to get Trump. LOL!

No matter what was said or recorded, Trump had more than one reason to shut this lying whore up. It's over Kevy and Trump has won again. LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! With Cohen's admission that Trump paid him back, it leaves the realm of campaign finance/donations.

Reply
Mar 12, 2019 13:15:27   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
You are right but miss the point. Trump laundered the money through his bag man and failed to report it which is a serious campaign finance law violation. They conspired to do this in order to get around exactly what the law was designed to prevent which is hiding campaign money sources and expenditures from v**ers so v**ers don’t have the information to make an informed choice. In this instance they felt it was necessary because had the v**ers found out about the affair andhush money payments it would have without question cost Trump the e******n. They were caught red handed and should pay the price.
You are right but miss the point. Trump laundered ... (show quote)


By the way, the only laundering of money in campaigns I know of was how the Clinton campaign was able to use the excess campaign donations from the state's democratic campaign funds. Donations to state campaigns are not limited by an amount the way national e******n campaigns limit donors. These democrats could donate huge sums to the states who would default that money to Clinton. THAT, is money laundering.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.