One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Rachel Maddow’s Epic Interview With Jerry Nadler Terrifies Trump
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 5, 2019 07:19:48   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/03/04/rachel-maddow-jerry-nadler.html

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) interview with Rachel Maddow made it clear that Democrats know what they are doing and they are setting up for a long investigation of Trump.
Nadler said that these are requests to help the investigation get going fast,

” In the initial Bach of requests we sent to the 81 people, we limited the requests to material they had submitted to other agencies to the special prosecutor, southern district so that they could respond quickly and there could be no question of privilege. We will follow up with some of them, maybe many of them with other document requests for documents they haven’t submitted but to get speedy compliance to start the work quickly, the initial document request was for documents they turned over to other people.”-----MORE-----



Rachel Maddow’s interview showed why Trump should be worried

The Judiciary Committee investigation is well planned and thought out. It is not a fishing expedition. The committee has clear areas of investigation and thanks to Michael Cohen, a path to follow.
Rep. Nadler said that the committee’s investigation is not in conflict with the Mueller investigation or any other investigations.

While all of the attention has been on Robert Mueller, the investigation with a bigger scope and the potential for political devastation was just rolled out by Rep. Jerry Nadler.
The Judiciary Committee investigation is big, and it isn’t going away any time soon.
For more discussion about this story join our Rachel Maddow and MSNBC group.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 08:30:34   #
badbob85037
 
Is this the same Rachel Maddow who released Trumps tax return? I bet Trump is shaking in his boots.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 08:46:28   #
Kevyn
 
badbob85037 wrote:
Is this the same Rachel Maddow who released Trumps tax return? I bet Trump is shaking in his boots.

You can tell how worried he is by seeing how much he whines about being held accountable. What the democrats need to do is turn up the heat the more he squeals. He is not too sharp but he might learn to keep his sphincter of a pie hole shut and let the investigations run their course.

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2019 08:54:18   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
Bad Boob Job wrote:
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/03/04/rachel-maddow-jerry-nadler.html

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) interview with Rachel Maddow made it clear that Democrats know what they are doing and they are setting up for a long investigation of Trump.
Nadler said that these are requests to help the investigation get going fast,

” In the initial Bach of requests we sent to the 81 people, we limited the requests to material they had submitted to other agencies to the special prosecutor, southern district so that they could respond quickly and there could be no question of privilege. We will follow up with some of them, maybe many of them with other document requests for documents they haven’t submitted but to get speedy compliance to start the work quickly, the initial document request was for documents they turned over to other people.”-----MORE-----



Rachel Maddow’s interview showed why Trump should be worried

The Judiciary Committee investigation is well planned and thought out. It is not a fishing expedition. The committee has clear areas of investigation and thanks to Michael Cohen, a path to follow.
Rep. Nadler said that the committee’s investigation is not in conflict with the Mueller investigation or any other investigations.

While all of the attention has been on Robert Mueller, the investigation with a bigger scope and the potential for political devastation was just rolled out by Rep. Jerry Nadler.
The Judiciary Committee investigation is big, and it isn’t going away any time soon.
For more discussion about this story join our Rachel Maddow and MSNBC group.
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/03/04/rachel-mad... (show quote)


Another dud...................Boob .



Reply
Mar 5, 2019 09:19:23   #
trucksterbud
 
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/03/04/rachel-maddow-jerry-nadler.html

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) interview with Rachel Maddow made it clear that Democrats know what they are doing and they are setting up for a long investigation of Trump.
Nadler said that these are requests to help the investigation get going fast,

” In the initial Bach of requests we sent to the 81 people, we limited the requests to material they had submitted to other agencies to the special prosecutor, southern district so that they could respond quickly and there could be no question of privilege. We will follow up with some of them, maybe many of them with other document requests for documents they haven’t submitted but to get speedy compliance to start the work quickly, the initial document request was for documents they turned over to other people.”-----MORE-----



Rachel Maddow’s interview showed why Trump should be worried

The Judiciary Committee investigation is well planned and thought out. It is not a fishing expedition. The committee has clear areas of investigation and thanks to Michael Cohen, a path to follow.
Rep. Nadler said that the committee’s investigation is not in conflict with the Mueller investigation or any other investigations.

While all of the attention has been on Robert Mueller, the investigation with a bigger scope and the potential for political devastation was just rolled out by Rep. Jerry Nadler.
The Judiciary Committee investigation is big, and it isn’t going away any time soon.
For more discussion about this story join our Rachel Maddow and MSNBC group.
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/03/04/rachel-mad... (show quote)


Gettin' all revved up on the MadCow and the f**e news dumpster already Bob...???

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 09:33:39   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Another dud...................Boob .



What would you expect? He has only one source and it is very suspect. Very l*****t.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 10:47:36   #
PeterS
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
What would you expect? He has only one source and it is very suspect. Very l*****t.

Well, one source soon to be 81...very l*****t indeed...

BTW. Since 1965 there have been 120 indictments from Republican Administrations and 3 from Democrat Administrations. Is that because we are "very l*****t" or because you Republicans are ultra corrupt? My money is on the latter and we haven't even started counting Trump yet!

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2019 11:08:44   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
PeterS wrote:
Well, one source soon to be 81...very l*****t indeed...

BTW. Since 1965 there have been 120 indictments from Republican Administrations and 3 from Democrat Administrations. Is that because we are "very l*****t" or because you Republicans are ultra corrupt? My money is on the latter and we haven't even started counting Trump yet!



I don't completely follow your logic here, Pete, but I'm sure you know what you're talking about. The Democrats in Congress are, and always have been attack dogs so it is surprising that there haven't been more indictments. You seem to usually have the wrong take or a misguided cause and effect anyway. The usual avenue taken by the Dems is to sue, sue, sue, and then sue some more. I don't expect that tack to change anytime soon. Maybe never.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 15:25:03   #
PeterS
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
I don't completely follow your logic here, Pete, but I'm sure you know what you're talking about. The Democrats in Congress are, and always have been attack dogs so it is surprising that there haven't been more indictments. You seem to usually have the wrong take or a misguided cause and effect anyway. The usual avenue taken by the Dems is to sue, sue, sue, and then sue some more. I don't expect that tack to change anytime soon. Maybe never.

My logic is simple--since 1965 there have been 120 indictments against Republicans and only three against Democrats. As for tactics, under Clinton and Obama we looked at 16 years of persecution by conservatives for a grand total of 2 indictments and one conviction yet you say it's the Democrats who all they can do is sue, sue, sue??? I don't think so and do we need to talk about the millions you conservatives wasted to get that one conviction? No, I didn't think so.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 15:33:39   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
PeterS wrote:
My logic is simple--since 1965 there have been 120 indictments against Republicans and only three against Democrats. As for tactics, under Clinton and Obama we looked at 16 years of persecution by conservatives for a grand total of 2 indictments and one conviction yet you say it's the Democrats who all they can do is sue, sue, sue??? I don't think so and do we need to talk about the millions you conservatives wasted to get that one conviction? No, I didn't think so.



Of course you don't think so. Why would anyone think otherwise. You can only see it one way. Dems are attack dogs. They like to go after their opponents with both barrels. Evidence? How about the last two years with the Mueller investigation and, in general, the attacks on Trump from the media, the late nite comics, academia, Hollywood, the Dems in Congress and almost every low IQ Democrat (is there any other kind?) And after all this, what do they have? Nothing!

Reply
Mar 6, 2019 06:28:26   #
tophat
 
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/03/04/rachel-maddow-jerry-nadler.html

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) interview with Rachel Maddow made it clear that Democrats know what they are doing and they are setting up for a long investigation of Trump.
Nadler said that these are requests to help the investigation get going fast,

” In the initial Bach of requests we sent to the 81 people, we limited the requests to material they had submitted to other agencies to the special prosecutor, southern district so that they could respond quickly and there could be no question of privilege. We will follow up with some of them, maybe many of them with other document requests for documents they haven’t submitted but to get speedy compliance to start the work quickly, the initial document request was for documents they turned over to other people.”-----MORE-----



Rachel Maddow’s interview showed why Trump should be worried

The Judiciary Committee investigation is well planned and thought out. It is not a fishing expedition. The committee has clear areas of investigation and thanks to Michael Cohen, a path to follow.
Rep. Nadler said that the committee’s investigation is not in conflict with the Mueller investigation or any other investigations.

While all of the attention has been on Robert Mueller, the investigation with a bigger scope and the potential for political devastation was just rolled out by Rep. Jerry Nadler.
The Judiciary Committee investigation is big, and it isn’t going away any time soon.
For more discussion about this story join our Rachel Maddow and MSNBC group.
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/03/04/rachel-mad... (show quote)


mad cow and noodle? serious?

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2019 06:31:46   #
tophat
 
PeterS wrote:
Well, one source soon to be 81...very l*****t indeed...

BTW. Since 1965 there have been 120 indictments from Republican Administrations and 3 from Democrat Administrations. Is that because we are "very l*****t" or because you Republicans are ultra corrupt? My money is on the latter and we haven't even started counting Trump yet!


82000 and counting!!

Reply
Mar 6, 2019 09:40:16   #
waltmoreno
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Of course you don't think so. Why would anyone think otherwise. You can only see it one way. Dems are attack dogs. They like to go after their opponents with both barrels. Evidence? How about the last two years with the Mueller investigation and, in general, the attacks on Trump from the media, the late nite comics, academia, Hollywood, the Dems in Congress and almost every low IQ Democrat (is there any other kind?) And after all this, what do they have? Nothing!


Whaddya mean the Dems have nothing? Of course they do. Lets see, they have 'resist', free Meidcare and college for all, fighting c*****e c****e to save the world, 70% tax on the rich, elimination of air travel to save the world, infanticide for a woman's health, open borders to show our compassion, elimination of f****l f**ls w/i 10 years, and on and on. All they need is to select their leader to lead the charge against Trump and all will be well.
As for Trump being terrified about Nadler, it's more like a big yawn.

Reply
Mar 6, 2019 10:30:56   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
badbob85037 wrote:
Is this the same Rachel Maddow who released Trumps tax return? I bet Trump is shaking in his boots.


You mean Racial Madcow.

Reply
Mar 6, 2019 11:00:01   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
waltmoreno wrote:
Whaddya mean the Dems have nothing? Of course they do. Lets see, they have 'resist', free Meidcare and college for all, fighting c*****e c****e to save the world, 70% tax on the rich, elimination of air travel to save the world, infanticide for a woman's health, open borders to show our compassion, elimination of f****l f**ls w/i 10 years, and on and on. All they need is to select their leader to lead the charge against Trump and all will be well.
As for Trump being terrified about Nadler, it's more like a big yawn.
Whaddya mean the Dems have nothing? Of course they... (show quote)


Oh, I forgot! I guess those are the things that are most important to the Dems. I'm sure Trump is not losing any sleep over Nadler.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.