Morgan wrote:
That's not true, there are answers and that's just what regulations are for, for industries to be responsible for their own waste. Since the Trump deregulations, we've already have seen negatives impacts to our environmental improvements.
See images for yourself, each picture has a different time span so be sure to check it, some are only short term damages of storms and what not.
http://climate.nasa.gov/images-of-change?id=672#672-sierra-nevada-snowpack-increasesPerhaps we are looking at the coin from different angles as we discuss the topic of C*****e C****e. The coin goes from a line to a circle as you rotate your perspective. I make a distinction between protecting the environment from harmful practices and assuming the world will end if we do not invoke NWO IPCC regulations. The two are infinitely different.
The answers I was asking for are about HOW will any IPCC plans save the world from destruction. I know how limiting polluting gases makes for cleaner air. Hurray for some of those regulations. How any prudent, practical, economical, sustainable...ie sane, C*****e C****e action will work. I think it is better to spend US money on US problems and not redistribute it to other countries.
I get enraged when the elites; ie the Bernie Sanders with three mansions, the AOCs that get $170K/yr and won't walk 10 minutes to ride her cherished trains, the Gores that made millions scare mongering while using more electricity than a small city; the list is nearly endless;.. when the elites want to "save the planet" while doing nothing themselves. They are so much smarter than us poor delusional peons. They must take over everything because they know better. The gall they have is beyond the pale.
However, the works of man have been (and still needs to continue) cleaning up our world. It should be as livable as possible. Even though man cannot modify the natural events that shape our world, we can provide clean air, clean water, end pollution of our seas, etc.
So I look at the coin from the edge. There are thin lines that we do have control of (Environment). Looking at it on the face, the coin surface is beyond the capabilities of man to change (C*****e C****e).
Your link... It was hard to understand the slide bar. A few seemed to indicate that sliding to the left showed the past while sliding to the right showed the present. The glacier calving seemed to be the opposite. No where did it explain how to interpret the slides. But I assume the point was that C*****e C****e was causing wh**ever problem they were trying to show. I don't buy it, duh. The flooding...was supposedly due to rising sea levels? Some slides looked to me that it was more probably due to the monsoon season. Those flooding slides reminded me of the stupid claim of beach loss when two pictures were shown side by side. The i***t did not know about tide level changes. The link only made my regard those interpreting NASA's pictures as proof of anything cataclysmic as being fear mongers.
If I may be so bold, you seem to have a strong concern for the environment, the health of the planet. Bravo. However, please consider that we who disagree about the death of the planet due to "C*****e C****e" are in the boat with you. We possibly only disagree in what should be done. I would ask all that we stop calling each other i***ts for our views. (lol of course, I will not stop calling the hypocrite elites evil morons, unless they join this forum and explain why they are not)