PeterS wrote:
What a crock. The suit says that poor little Jason was singled out because he was white. Not true, he was singled out because he was a prick. I am sure the Post isn't losing any sleep over this one...
Who is the “Jason” you are referring to?
Your comment is more revealing about you than anything (as in like adding something meaningful to the discussion).
From the lawsuit:
“Nicholas stood quietly and respectfully for several minutes after being targeted and bullied by Phillips and Nicholas’ body language remained non-aggressive and passive throughout the incident.
”Nicholas is 16-years of age, is 5’9” in height and weighs 115 pounds...
“Nicholas did not confront Phillips.
”Nicholas did not move toward Phillips.
”Nicholas did not make any movement to block Phillips’ path or prevent Phillips from physically moving wherever he wished.
”Nicholas was startled and confused by the actions of Phillips in singling him out and confronting him.
”During the confrontation instigated by Phillips, Nicholas stood still as he was concerned that turning away from Phillips might be considered a sign of disrespect.
”While he stood there with Phillips beating a drum near his face and singing loudly, Nicholas remained silent and did not utter a single word to Phillips.
”Nicholas did not make any gestures by hand or otherwise toward Phillips.
”Nicholas made only one gesture while being confronted by Phillips – he quietly signaled a classmate to refrain from responding to profanity-laced insults being directed at the student by one of Phillips’ companions.
”At all times, Nicholas acted respectfully, responsibly, appropriately, and in a manner consistent with the values instilled upon him by his family and his religious faith.
”The confrontation ended when Nicholas and his fellow CovCath students were instructed to board the buses.”
If you had read and understood the suit (as you implied), you would have known the name of the defendant. Which shows that you, like f**e news WaPo, are more interested in defending your false ideology than t***h and facts.
The person named Nicholas (Nick) Sandmann, described above, can be seen in the full-version videos to have been approached by Philips, not the other way around, and Sandman acted respectfully and appeared only to want to diffuse the situation. Since you claim (imply, since you got the name wrong) that he was the “pr..k” in this situation, you are showing that it is you that justifies bullying innocent youths by adults if they aren’t supporters of your ideology.
I guess, by your comments, Sandmann was guilty of inciting an incident, and thus worthy of derogatory name-calling by you for no other reason than merely being white and being in public. This makes you a r****t, to boot.
But those of us who have read your past posts already knew all this about you. It’s called “typical”.