Airforceone

Here is just a few question for Republicans/Democrats and Trump supporters. Please identify what States or region of the country you are From. I am understanding taking some reseach and these question are a start. I spent 3 years traveling around the country I spent time in 46 states. One thing I learned was people in different parts of the country have a certain ideology of how our government funds are to be spent.


Do you agree with Tax payer Funded Sports stadiums around the country.

Do you agree with Tax payer funds to entice major corporations to move to your cities.

Do you agree with Tax payer funds being paid to our capitalist in the form of subsidies.

Do you believe in housing subsidies such as low rent housing.

Do you believe in SS system.

Do you agree with Medicare.

Do you agree with Welfare for the poor.

Do you agree in Corporate welfare.

Do you believe in Affordable healthcare for all.

No need to ask about common sense gun control or C*****e c****e.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

I live in California...When i used to drive i would go down this street and every other sign there would be in Spanish....At times i felt like i was driving through TJ.....At one point when i was looking for a job they needed Bilingual...Im bilingual..They need it Spanish only...I believe in welfare and affordable Healthcare, but only for American citizens.....We have ebough i******s here in US, we dont need anymore!!!!

archie bunker Loc: Texas

No to all. None of them are in the enumerated powers granted to the Federal Government by our Constitution.

PeterS

And the power of the purse is held by Congress but you didn't seem to object when the President took it upon himself to redirect funds.

old marine Loc: America home of the brave

YES, that is left up to the cities to fund.
NO, it is not the federal government's place.


Absolutely NO.



YES, for elderly or disabled American citizens.
NO, for illegal criminal aliens.

[quote=Airforceone]
Do you believe in SS system.
]/quote]
YES, it is a retirement fund American workers pay in for their old age or disability.


YES, only American citizens elegiable to draw Social Security benefits after a one year waiting period msy enroll and the premiums are deducted each month from their Social Security check. IT IS NOT FREE.


YES, in most cases as long as they are citizens working or looking for work according to the established rules in effecr. Illegal criminal aliens are not eligible.


ABSOLUTELY NO


YES, if they can afford the premiums.


Congress has enough laws restricting guns. The right to bear arms (own guns) should not be tampered with.

There is very little to add to exhisting laws on limiting air polution. Until man can replace the use of f****l f**ls. I don't see that happening in our lifetime.

Maybe the government can pay me for all the nice clean unpolluted air my trees produce.
😏😁😎👍👍👍

old marine Loc: America home of the brave

English is America's official language. Spanish was temporary added for the Cuban exiles. Every thing was printed for them in spanish until they learned the English language.

That was never done awsy with. Now it seems to be the norm. The government could ssve billions of dollars on printing alone if they only used the official English language.

I am suprised the Dim-O-Crats haven't passed a bill to make our money printed in both English and Spanish.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Go Flash Go!

He's an advocate for socialism and is so blatantly t***sparent.

DeNeece

I agree with the "no to all" response. These items are not enumerated in the Constitution. Rather, such things as are listed in the questionnaire are matters that need to reverted to the individual states. The Federal Government, and the funds appropriated, need to deal with matters that apply to all states and all of the citizenry, like defense, representing the United States internationally, and taxation, interstate t***sportation, etc. All social issues should be delegated to the states, medical, retirement plans, monetary assistance to individuals, EPA, etc. This country is too large and too diverse to be painting such subjects with the broad brush of the federal government. What's good for the Southeast may not be appropriate, needed nor desired by the Northwest. After paying for what the federal government, dictated by the Constitution, and establishing an annual percentage of taxation income to reduce debt, the balance should be divided by population count and granted to each state to support their own social needs. "Thus sayeth me."

archie bunker Loc: Texas

The Presidents job is to protect our country. Nuff said.

old marine Loc: America home of the brave

The President did not redirect any funds. Where did you get that dumb idea?

The funds that will be used is unesrmarked militsry funds that are svailable for the militsry to use for security ressons.

It is the job of the militsry to secure and protect America sovereignty. Building the wall/fence is securing our southern border with Mexico

Therefore the funds are being used for their intended use. Protecting the American citizens.

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer can file all the lawsuites they won't and they can't win. The funds are or will be used fot the earmarked purpose they were appropriated for.

Another little bit of information is the Dim-O-Crat 9th circuit judge can be removed by the President. The President has the authority to appoint or remove a federal judge at his discretion should he choose to do so.

The President is trying to do it the easy way if he is allowed to but if forced he will do it the hard legal way.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Every time Obama wanted money to push his fundamentally t***sformation of America the Democrats couldn't give him enough. What ever happened to all that money for shovel ready jobs? Remind me one more time how much they added to the National Debt? Yea, right! We know the t***h.

maryjane

I live in South Georgia. Here are my answers. NO to taxpayer funds building sports stadiums. Yes to taxpayer funds used to entice new businesses, BUT within reason/not giving away everything AND only after putting it to a v**e of the citizens. Unsure of your meaning of next question, but, in general, I am against subsidizing anything/anyone because it never ends. As for low income housing subsidies, I am torn, because some few people do need such help temporarily at least, BUT THIS should be up to each state, not a federal program AND limited to the really, truly needy. Now, combining the next two, SS and medicare. I do not agree to these programs for myself but, as usual, the people never v**ed for either. I have worked hard, lived frugally, saved religiously, but I do grasp that we have many millions of elderly who, without these programs, would be in truly dire straits because they never saved a dime, never gave a thought to old age. So, because we as a nation have an obligation to take care of our own, for these type citizens SS/Medicare are probably the best solution, BUT ONLY for those who did, indeed, work throughout adulthood and paid into these programs. I am TOTALLY AGAINST any foreign noncitizen having any access EVER to these. The next question, I am against all federal welfare programs believing any such should be left to each state. Our federal welfare programs, every single one, are totally socialist, filled with fraud, are permanent/forever, and seem to have few restrictions, even allowing immediate access to all refugees/asylees AND to tens of millions of foreign noncitizens. End all federal programs and leave this to states and communities, but limit long-term assistance to the truly infirm, everyone else must work to eat, being a single parent, obese, mildly disabled, drug dependent, low income, etc, are not acceptable reasons for living off your neighbors. Next, no corporate welfare, period and no bailouts ever. As for healthcare, we already provide necessary medical care for all the non-payers through Medicaid, free clinics and no one turned away emergency rooms. The rest of us pay for all of them, and it is always a forever debt because the non-payers NEVER become payers. But what is truly insane, wrong and horrible is our congress/government deliberately allowing many, many tens of millions of foreign noncitizens total access to totally free medical care, costing us billions of dollars every year for people not our citizens and for medical procedures most of our citizens cannot afford. None of the foreign noncitizen s**mmers in our nation ever had free healthcare in THEIR countries unless it was provided by international organizations. Healthcare is not a human right to be provided by other people. Every human has the right to work toward a healthier life and toward having access to medical care when necessary but not at the expense of others forever and ever.

Seth

I grew up in New York, L.A. and San Francisco.

I've lived for long periods, as an adult, in New Orleans, New York, Charlotte NC, Reno and San Francisco, not in that order.

I've been to many of America's nooks and crannies, so to speak, from remote Midwestern farm country to the Aleutian Islands and maintain active friendships with friends and colleagues who live in those places.

I don't believe in any taxpayer funding for profit-making private sector enterprises, but I do believe in allowing tax write-offs for expenditures that lead to increased production with commensurate job creation.

I don't believe in welfare as a permanent means of support for anyone...

A healthy economy such as the present one is what our elected officials should strive to enable, one in which the job openings to candidates ratio is conducive to employers hiring and training at entry levels to multiply employees' sk**ls with an end toward their advancing themselves.

I do not believe in using the taxpayers' money to supply a free living to the lazy, nor do I think it's right for ANY elected federal politician to use government programs as a means to enriching themselves.

I believe in Medicare not as a permanent means of "free" healthcare, but as a measure to take care of medical problems for the poor WHILE they are demonstrably working toward personal/ financial independence. No American should ever be turned away from hospital care.

"Affordable" housing, like "affordable" health care, is another honey coated "liberal" label, an excuse to spend the taxpayer's hard earned money, since either concept involves layouts, usually on a permanent basis, of tax dollars rather than a road to personal independence on ones own dime.

Digressing a bit: perhaps, since the most expensive places to live are filled with the same "progressive" gentry that caused the inflation therein to begin with, these justice warriors themselves should be the ones paying for all the "affordable" goodies....

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

The National Emergency Act empowers the president to redirect funds already appropriated by congress for Executive operations. Since the NEA was passed in 1976, US presidents have exercised the authority granted them under the act 58 times. 31 are still in effect.

Carter called a national emergency twice (one is still in effect), Reagan six times, George H.W. Bush five times, Bill Clinton 17 times (six are still in effect), GW Bush 13 times (11 are still in effect), Obama 12 times (10 are still in effect), Trump 3 times (all still in effect).

So, what's your problem?

old marine Loc: America home of the brave

Most of that money ended up in the pickets of obama and his administration. All became suddenly multiple millionaires.

IRS should audit each one of them.

But that will never happen with the Dim-O-Crats in control of the House of Represenatives.