Trump's National Emergency...Pelosi Is Spanking Me...Whaaah: This national emergency is going to fly about as far as a brick can... There are cases of eminent domain still being fought...

woodguru

This national emergency is going to fly about as far as a brick can...

There are cases of eminent domain still being fought from years ago.

What dems are willing to look at and spend a whole lot more on is high tech electronic surveillance and deterrence.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

woodguru wrote:

This national emergency is going to fly about as far as a brick can...

There are cases of eminent domain still being fought from years ago.

What dems are willing to look at and spend a whole lot more on is high tech electronic surveillance and deterrence.

Obviously you never understood both the situation and the problem. The root cause of both is to prevent any i*****l a***n from getting one single toe on American soil. That toe changes the equation. That toe most likely gets them a day in a court with a backlog of over 700,000 cases and a huge percentage never show up for a hearing. Your fixation on high tech electronic surveillance can't stop a piss ant from crossing the border a wall can.

Fit2BTied Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

This national emergency is going to fly about as far as a brick can...

There are cases of eminent domain still being fought from years ago.

What dems are willing to look at and spend a whole lot more on is high tech electronic surveillance and deterrence.

Progressives keep up the "It's a 14th century fix to a current problem" mantra and they equate drones and sensors with "deterrence". With the manpower shortage due to so many resources being directed at housing and dealing with the massive influx of i******s, sensors and other electronics do nothing to deter. In fact the i******s depend on the electronics to notify the Border Patrol so they can surrender to them once they're on our side of the border. That's not deterrence, that's a doorbell - "Hi BP! We're here...please come gather us up". If a wall was added to the equation, there's a chance that the BP gets there before the border is breached. THAT'S DETERRENCE!

badbob85037

That's right, just ask wood glue. We need wide open borders. We need all of Mexico and Central America's population to come to America taking the jobs we are to busy sucking welfare to preform. Another plus, it will keep our police out of Dunkin Donuts. They will be way to busy investigating drug and violent crimes. I'm sure any American living with in 70 miles of our Southern border will also love all these friendly new comers entering our country and will not only leave their refrigerators outside their homes but move their freezers and daughters outside their homes to. These people will also suck up all our unused money we have just laying around. All democrats know a wall that cost billions is nothing to the trillions we can give our new friends. Another plus is all uneducated i***ts v**e democrat. Don't ya just love a president who isn't one of these typical low life pieces of crap politicians. The Constitution gives the nation's purse to Congress. So how many trillions must we owe to change that part of the document?

CALIFSAILOR

Maybe Strump needs to live up to his brag of the great deal maker!

Noraa Loc: Kansas

CALIFSAILOR wrote:

Maybe Strump needs to live up to his brag of the great deal maker!

So far he pretty much has been despite the Democrats! Welcome to OPP!!

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

woodguru wrote:

This national emergency is going to fly about as far as a brick can...

There are cases of eminent domain still being fought from years ago.

What dems are willing to look at and spend a whole lot more on is high tech electronic surveillance and deterrence.

In other words - real border security, not worthless campaign rhetoric.

woodguru

padremike wrote:

Obviously you never understood both the situation and the problem. The root cause of both is to prevent any i*****l a***n from getting one single toe on American soil. That toe changes the equation. That toe most likely gets them a day in a court with a backlog of over 700,000 cases and a huge percentage never show up for a hearing. Your fixation on high tech electronic surveillance can't stop a piss ant from crossing the border a wall can.

As soon as the work is done as far as policies are concerned they can come through the gates, the same place the bulk of drugs comes from, through border crossing stations.

woodguru

CALIFSAILOR wrote:

Maybe Strump needs to live up to his brag of the great deal maker!

Hey, he went from needing 35 billion to way less, he's the best.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

woodguru wrote:

As soon as the work is done as far as policies are concerned they can come through the gates, the same place the bulk of drugs comes from, through border crossing stations.

We don't them coming in; the people or the drugs. We want to send 25 million of them back the way they came. They broke our laws, they violated our sovereignty. There is more here you obviously fail to understand. What's wrong with you?

Smedley_buzkill

woodguru wrote:

This national emergency is going to fly about as far as a brick can...

There are cases of eminent domain still being fought from years ago.

What dems are willing to look at and spend a whole lot more on is high tech electronic surveillance and deterrence.

If Demodips were willing to look at deterrence, they would look at
1). Far more severe penalties for visa overstays. Make it hurt.
2). Ending chain migration.
3). Ending the quasi-legal practice of granting birth citizenship to the children of wetbacks.
4). Mandatory E verify.
5). Listening to the professionals of the Border Patrol and build or reinforce the wall in the areas they say it is necessary.
6). Fund more, rather than less beds for asylum seekers.
7)For asylum seekers released who don't show up for their hearing, automatic deportation when they are caught and stiff prison sentences if they try to come back.
8). A serious crackdown on the use of stolen and fraudulent ID's by wetbacks.
Given the fact that Liberals are mostly mouth, unless it involves wetback amnesties, raising taxes or banning guns, none of this will happen, of course.

Smedley_buzkill

padremike wrote:

We don't them coming in; the people or the drugs. We want to send 25 million of them back the way they came. They broke our laws, they violated our sovereignty. There is more here you obviously fail to understand. What's wrong with you?

This is an example of why Liberals and houseplants have a symbiotic relationship... each makes the other feel intelligent.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

woodguru wrote:

This national emergency is going to fly about as far as a brick can...

There are cases of eminent domain still being fought from years ago.

What dems are willing to look at and spend a whole lot more on is high tech electronic surveillance and deterrence.

What Dems are willing to do is allow more i******s and drugs and cheap labor and human trafficking into this country in exchange for v**es!

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

Smedley_buzk**l wrote:

If Demodips were willing to look at deterrence, th... (show quote)

Nail on the head!!

The only problem with your post is that it is "logical", well thought out, and pertinent....none of which Dems or liberals understand. You might as well be speaking Martian as far as they are concerned.

bahmer

padremike wrote:

Obviously you never understood both the situation and the problem. The root cause of both is to prevent any i*****l a***n from getting one single toe on American soil. That toe changes the equation. That toe most likely gets them a day in a court with a backlog of over 700,000 cases and a huge percentage never show up for a hearing. Your fixation on high tech electronic surveillance can't stop a piss ant from crossing the border a wall can.

Excellent rebuttal but I am afraid that it went through both ears and didn't even slow down in the middle most progressives lack any reasoning sk**ls whatsoever so I've noticed anyway. Better luck next time.