One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What Do Patriots Think Of The Security Clearance Process?
Feb 15, 2019 12:29:00   #
woodguru
 
I'm curious as a patriot who does care about the security of our nation, what patriotic oriented people think of what should happen if through the security clearance vetting process white house personnel are found to have the security risk warning f**gs?

To me there is no bias to security and risks to it of people who do not check out to normal standards.

Kushner filed false security clearance information 40 times, which is how many times he went back and made additions and modifications to what he'd disclosed after information was coming out. This alone would disqualify someone from having access to highly sensitive information, and we know he attempted to set up a secret back channel with Russia. You only do that if you intend to use it to pass information and questions that are not okay. It also looks like Kushner shared intelligence on the crown prince's opposition that facilitated a palace c**p...not okay to use intelligence like that.

My point here is that the Trump administration apparently subverted the normal process and approved over 30 people who were not going to get clearances. These are people who for reasons should not have that access.

Reply
Feb 15, 2019 13:04:00   #
Kevyn
 
woodguru wrote:
I'm curious as a patriot who does care about the security of our nation, what patriotic oriented people think of what should happen if through the security clearance vetting process white house personnel are found to have the security risk warning f**gs?

To me there is no bias to security and risks to it of people who do not check out to normal standards.

Kushner filed false security clearance information 40 times, which is how many times he went back and made additions and modifications to what he'd disclosed after information was coming out. This alone would disqualify someone from having access to highly sensitive information, and we know he attempted to set up a secret back channel with Russia. You only do that if you intend to use it to pass information and questions that are not okay. It also looks like Kushner shared intelligence on the crown prince's opposition that facilitated a palace c**p...not okay to use intelligence like that.

My point here is that the Trump administration apparently subverted the normal process and approved over 30 people who were not going to get clearances. These are people who for reasons should not have that access.
I'm curious as a patriot who does care about the s... (show quote)
At this juncture what does it matter? The i***t Pumpkinfuhrer gave Putin the keys to the henhouse days after his shameful c****ation.

Reply
Feb 16, 2019 17:46:59   #
woodguru
 
In the world of sensitive information I saw with a Top Secret clearance, you waited for a clearance and if you couldn't get one you couldn't do the job, it's that simple, an i***t like Trump can't wave people who are security risks into highly sensitive positions like his administration has done.

Trump should have been impeached for the breach of security he made when he refused to respond to Flynn for weeks after being told intelligence had grave concerns about him and Russian ties. And the FBI and intelligence had their concerns about Trump as well.

Reply
 
 
Feb 20, 2019 17:57:57   #
woodguru
 
And what is it patriots have to say about security clearances?

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.