bahmer

Over 1,000 Ph.D. Scientists Doubt Darwin
By Bryan Fischer - February 15, 2019

Most people have no idea where the theory of evolution came from. They think scientists made discoveries that led them to doubt the Bible’s view of origins. But it was the other way round. Men first began to doubt and then dismiss the Bible in the early part of the 19th century. So they needed to find some other explanation for, well, everything. And presto-change-o, Darwin popped out his theory of natural se******n in 1859.

But the best in science has always been a problem for the theory of evolution. The First Law of Thermodynamics says that neither energy nor matter can either be created or destroyed. In other words, science says there is no known process inside the cosmos that can explain the presence of matter and energy. The logical, scientific conclusion, then, is that some force outside the cosmos put them there. We know Who that outside force is.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics, the law of entropy, says that in every chemical reaction, there is a certain amount of energy that is lost and can never again be used in a heat reaction. This is why science tells us the universe is heading ultimately toward a heat death.

So science tells us that the universe is heading toward increasing randomness and decay and is winding down. But evolution tells us the exact opposite, that the universe is heading toward increasing complexity and order. So what does the Bible have to say (emphasis mine)? “Of old you laid the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands. They will perish, but you will remain; they will all wear out like a garment” (Psalm 102:25-26a). Sounds like the biblical record is perfectly consistent with the law of entropy, but the theory of evolution is not.

Genetic science tells us that “like begets like,” just as the Bible says in Genesis One where 11 times we read that animals reproduce “after their kind.” But evolution is built on the theory that one “kind” can change into another.

In order for that to happen, there must be a genetic change in the DNA of an organism. But mutations are very rare in nature, and almost invariably harmful to the organism. That’s why we call them “birth defects.” They don’t enhance the survivability of the organism, they threaten it. So evolution has to depend upon a process that is rare and almost invariably destructive. The score is now Bible 3, Evolution 0.

And finally the fossil record is powerful evidence for creationism. As Stephen Jay Gould said, “The extreme rarity of t***sitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology.” By “trade secret,” he meant that all paleontologists know there are no missing links but they are hoping that you never find that out.

Darwin knew that the absence of t***sitional forms was a major problem for his theory, but he believed that was just because we hadn’t found enough fossils. Well, now – 150 years and 250,000 fossils after Darwin – we not only do not have more t***sitional forms, we have fewer. Some of the ones scientists thought were t***sitional forms turned out to be nothing of the sort.

The Bible tells us that creatures appeared on the earth fully formed, and that’s exactly what the fossil record confirms. There is today not one single fossil that all paleontologists recognize as a t***sitional form. The score now is Bible 4, Evolution 0.

(It’s easy to remember this outline of the argument against evolution: First Law – Second Law – Fossils and Genes. Just kind of rolls off the tongue.)

With the fact that Darwinism has been a defective theory from jump street, it should not surprise that even scientists are finally beginning to realize it. The Discovery Center has a list of 1,043 Ph.D. scientists who have signed a statement that they have serious reservations about Darwinian evolution. They all have doctorate degrees in biology, chemistry, mathematics, engineering, computer science, medicine, or the natural sciences. They got their degrees from places like Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Princeton, Stanford, UCLA and Duke. These scientists specifically challenge the theory that random mutations and natural se******n can account for the complexity of life.

The Bible says, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1). Ladies and gentlemen, do not doubt this book.

Follow me on Twitter: @BryanJFischer, on Facebook at “Focal Point”

Host of “Focal Point” on American Family Radio, 1:05 pm CT, M-F www.afr.net

(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Barb Wire.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

That was a lot of faulty reasoning applied to a pointless cause...

Kazudy

Excellent!!! 👍👍👍👍👍 So in other words, it takes dummy to belive in evolution, I agree.

Sew_What

I definitely don't believe Bryan Fischer, so where is his evidence? Ya know, links, to 1000 PhD's that don't believe Darwin.

Kazudy

So YOU do belive that your gr gr gr grand parents were monkeys. Hmm maybe yours were.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Inability to understand even the most basic premises of evolutionary theory, combined with a complete lack of civility, resulting in a glorious display of ignorance...

Kazudy

So you agree that YOU come from monkeys?

Sew_What

If mine were, your were. End of debate.

emarine

Maybe buddy

Rose42

Not really. There are a lot of scientists who are also Christians. They know evolution has never been proven. I studied anthropology in college. Even the professor when pressed said science didn't know. Its a SWAG.

Kazudy

No, mIne were created by God. The debate goes on, next........

bahmer

Mine were created by God as was the earth and moon and all of our solar system.

Kazudy

WOW! I guess YOU do.

Kazudy

You know it.

bahmer

Amen and Amen