One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
More democratic lies
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Feb 12, 2019 10:49:42   #
Bcon
 
New Evidence Proves DNC Was Not Hacked by Russia in 2016 – It Was an Inside Job
February 11, 2019Chief Editor
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

781
SHARES


New evidence shows that the DNC emails were not hacked by the Russians in 2016, but were more likely leaked by somebody working for the Democrat Party.

In their recent book suggesting the Russians are to blame of Hillary’s 2016 e******n loss, far-left trolls Michael Isikoff and David Corn, two people involved in releasing the f**e Trump dossier, attempt to tie the release of DNC emails to Russia.

Thegatewaypundit.com reports: In their book Russian Roulette, Isikoff and Corn share the following about the firm (CrowdStrike) the Democrats used to look into their data breach (p. 74) –

One of CrowdStrike’s first moves was to advise the DNC officials to do nothing. Don’t shut down the system. Don’t stop using it. The reason: Any dramatic action or change in routine could alert the hackers they had been spotted, and then the intruders might take steps to make it impossible to ferret them out of the system.” (Isikoff, p. 74)

But this is nonsense on many counts:

If the “intruders” could have “made it impossible to ferret them out of the system,” this is the first thing they would have done. Not even CrowdStrike would have given the DNC the advice “to do nothing“. The DNC and CrowdStrike coordinated and provided this false account in order to explain why the DNC did nothing when it discovered the breach.


Ads by Revcontent
“CrowdStrike and the lawyers warned the small circle of DNC officials in the know to keep their mouths shut. And this meant not telling anyone in the Clinton campaign.” (Isikoff, p. 74-75)

Instead of installing additional controls to prevent hacking, adding additional malware protection or other related preventative actions, the DNC decided to the keep everything secret and the same? This makes no sense at all.

The Democrats next held a gathering on June 10, 2016 per an AP report:

It was 4 p.m. on Friday June 10 when some 100 staffers filed into the Democratic National Committee’s main conference room for a mandatory, all-hands meeting.

“What I am about to tell you cannot leave this room,” DNC chief operating officer Lindsey Reynolds told the assembled crowd, according to two people there at the time.

Everyone needed to turn in their laptops immediately; there would be no last-minute emails; no downloading documents and no exceptions. Reynolds insisted on total secrecy.

CNN Refuses to Show This Video. Click Here to Watch
HSI Online
Ads by Revcontent
Find Out More >
47,732
“Don’t even talk to your dog about it,” she was quoted as saying.

Reynolds didn’t return messages seeking comment.

Two days later, as the cybersecurity firm that was brought in to clean out the DNC’s computers finished its work, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told a British Sunday television show that emails related to Clinton were “pending publication.”

“WikiLeaks has a very good year ahead,” he said.

On Tuesday, June 14, the Democrats went public with the allegation that their computers had been c*********d by Russian state-backed hackers, including Fancy Bear.

The DNC was never hacked by Russians. This was a tall tale developed by someone of the likes of Hillary’s creepy Campaign Manger John Podesta. If they were hacked they would have implemented aggressive controls to prevent future hacks. They wouldn’t have called a team meeting and asked the entire team to provide their laptops.

The actions taken by the DNC after the release of their emails were consistent with a loss of emails due to an insider job rather than a hacking from outsiders, let alone Russians. The DNC never let anyone but CrowdStrike look at their server. The FBI hasn’t even reviewed their server, but the entire fairy tale led to the Mueller Witchhunt and it’s all a lie.

Some say the insider who released the emails was Seth Rich. A Bernie Sanders supporter who was murdered in Washington DC in July of 2016 – God rest his soul. This makes more sense than Russia hacking the DNC.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 10:52:04   #
bahmer
 
Bcon wrote:
New Evidence Proves DNC Was Not Hacked by Russia in 2016 – It Was an Inside Job
February 11, 2019Chief Editor
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

781
SHARES


New evidence shows that the DNC emails were not hacked by the Russians in 2016, but were more likely leaked by somebody working for the Democrat Party.

In their recent book suggesting the Russians are to blame of Hillary’s 2016 e******n loss, far-left trolls Michael Isikoff and David Corn, two people involved in releasing the f**e Trump dossier, attempt to tie the release of DNC emails to Russia.

Thegatewaypundit.com reports: In their book Russian Roulette, Isikoff and Corn share the following about the firm (CrowdStrike) the Democrats used to look into their data breach (p. 74) –

One of CrowdStrike’s first moves was to advise the DNC officials to do nothing. Don’t shut down the system. Don’t stop using it. The reason: Any dramatic action or change in routine could alert the hackers they had been spotted, and then the intruders might take steps to make it impossible to ferret them out of the system.” (Isikoff, p. 74)

But this is nonsense on many counts:

If the “intruders” could have “made it impossible to ferret them out of the system,” this is the first thing they would have done. Not even CrowdStrike would have given the DNC the advice “to do nothing“. The DNC and CrowdStrike coordinated and provided this false account in order to explain why the DNC did nothing when it discovered the breach.


Ads by Revcontent
“CrowdStrike and the lawyers warned the small circle of DNC officials in the know to keep their mouths shut. And this meant not telling anyone in the Clinton campaign.” (Isikoff, p. 74-75)

Instead of installing additional controls to prevent hacking, adding additional malware protection or other related preventative actions, the DNC decided to the keep everything secret and the same? This makes no sense at all.

The Democrats next held a gathering on June 10, 2016 per an AP report:

It was 4 p.m. on Friday June 10 when some 100 staffers filed into the Democratic National Committee’s main conference room for a mandatory, all-hands meeting.

“What I am about to tell you cannot leave this room,” DNC chief operating officer Lindsey Reynolds told the assembled crowd, according to two people there at the time.

Everyone needed to turn in their laptops immediately; there would be no last-minute emails; no downloading documents and no exceptions. Reynolds insisted on total secrecy.

CNN Refuses to Show This Video. Click Here to Watch
HSI Online
Ads by Revcontent
Find Out More >
47,732
“Don’t even talk to your dog about it,” she was quoted as saying.

Reynolds didn’t return messages seeking comment.

Two days later, as the cybersecurity firm that was brought in to clean out the DNC’s computers finished its work, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told a British Sunday television show that emails related to Clinton were “pending publication.”

“WikiLeaks has a very good year ahead,” he said.

On Tuesday, June 14, the Democrats went public with the allegation that their computers had been c*********d by Russian state-backed hackers, including Fancy Bear.

The DNC was never hacked by Russians. This was a tall tale developed by someone of the likes of Hillary’s creepy Campaign Manger John Podesta. If they were hacked they would have implemented aggressive controls to prevent future hacks. They wouldn’t have called a team meeting and asked the entire team to provide their laptops.

The actions taken by the DNC after the release of their emails were consistent with a loss of emails due to an insider job rather than a hacking from outsiders, let alone Russians. The DNC never let anyone but CrowdStrike look at their server. The FBI hasn’t even reviewed their server, but the entire fairy tale led to the Mueller Witchhunt and it’s all a lie.

Some say the insider who released the emails was Seth Rich. A Bernie Sanders supporter who was murdered in Washington DC in July of 2016 – God rest his soul. This makes more sense than Russia hacking the DNC.
New Evidence Proves DNC Was Not Hacked by Russia i... (show quote)


Amen and Amen

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 10:53:37   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Bcon wrote:
New Evidence Proves DNC Was Not Hacked by Russia in 2016 – It Was an Inside Job
February 11, 2019Chief Editor
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

781
SHARES


New evidence shows that the DNC emails were not hacked by the Russians in 2016, but were more likely leaked by somebody working for the Democrat Party.

In their recent book suggesting the Russians are to blame of Hillary’s 2016 e******n loss, far-left trolls Michael Isikoff and David Corn, two people involved in releasing the f**e Trump dossier, attempt to tie the release of DNC emails to Russia.

Thegatewaypundit.com reports: In their book Russian Roulette, Isikoff and Corn share the following about the firm (CrowdStrike) the Democrats used to look into their data breach (p. 74) –

One of CrowdStrike’s first moves was to advise the DNC officials to do nothing. Don’t shut down the system. Don’t stop using it. The reason: Any dramatic action or change in routine could alert the hackers they had been spotted, and then the intruders might take steps to make it impossible to ferret them out of the system.” (Isikoff, p. 74)

But this is nonsense on many counts:

If the “intruders” could have “made it impossible to ferret them out of the system,” this is the first thing they would have done. Not even CrowdStrike would have given the DNC the advice “to do nothing“. The DNC and CrowdStrike coordinated and provided this false account in order to explain why the DNC did nothing when it discovered the breach.


Ads by Revcontent
“CrowdStrike and the lawyers warned the small circle of DNC officials in the know to keep their mouths shut. And this meant not telling anyone in the Clinton campaign.” (Isikoff, p. 74-75)

Instead of installing additional controls to prevent hacking, adding additional malware protection or other related preventative actions, the DNC decided to the keep everything secret and the same? This makes no sense at all.

The Democrats next held a gathering on June 10, 2016 per an AP report:

It was 4 p.m. on Friday June 10 when some 100 staffers filed into the Democratic National Committee’s main conference room for a mandatory, all-hands meeting.

“What I am about to tell you cannot leave this room,” DNC chief operating officer Lindsey Reynolds told the assembled crowd, according to two people there at the time.

Everyone needed to turn in their laptops immediately; there would be no last-minute emails; no downloading documents and no exceptions. Reynolds insisted on total secrecy.

CNN Refuses to Show This Video. Click Here to Watch
HSI Online
Ads by Revcontent
Find Out More >
47,732
“Don’t even talk to your dog about it,” she was quoted as saying.

Reynolds didn’t return messages seeking comment.

Two days later, as the cybersecurity firm that was brought in to clean out the DNC’s computers finished its work, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told a British Sunday television show that emails related to Clinton were “pending publication.”

“WikiLeaks has a very good year ahead,” he said.

On Tuesday, June 14, the Democrats went public with the allegation that their computers had been c*********d by Russian state-backed hackers, including Fancy Bear.

The DNC was never hacked by Russians. This was a tall tale developed by someone of the likes of Hillary’s creepy Campaign Manger John Podesta. If they were hacked they would have implemented aggressive controls to prevent future hacks. They wouldn’t have called a team meeting and asked the entire team to provide their laptops.

The actions taken by the DNC after the release of their emails were consistent with a loss of emails due to an insider job rather than a hacking from outsiders, let alone Russians. The DNC never let anyone but CrowdStrike look at their server. The FBI hasn’t even reviewed their server, but the entire fairy tale led to the Mueller Witchhunt and it’s all a lie.

Some say the insider who released the emails was Seth Rich. A Bernie Sanders supporter who was murdered in Washington DC in July of 2016 – God rest his soul. This makes more sense than Russia hacking the DNC.
New Evidence Proves DNC Was Not Hacked by Russia i... (show quote)


MacAfee of anti-v***l fame pointed out that the evidence was clear that they weren't hacked from the very beginning. Him being a bit of a nutt made him not credible in the eyes of virtually all. But, some times, nutts are as right as rain. And I have always thought the murder of Seth Rich was a direct result of something he was involved in at the DNC.

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2019 11:07:33   #
Airforceone
 
Bcon wrote:
New Evidence Proves DNC Was Not Hacked by Russia in 2016 – It Was an Inside Job
February 11, 2019Chief Editor
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

781
SHARES


New evidence shows that the DNC emails were not hacked by the Russians in 2016, but were more likely leaked by somebody working for the Democrat Party.

In their recent book suggesting the Russians are to blame of Hillary’s 2016 e******n loss, far-left trolls Michael Isikoff and David Corn, two people involved in releasing the f**e Trump dossier, attempt to tie the release of DNC emails to Russia.

Thegatewaypundit.com reports: In their book Russian Roulette, Isikoff and Corn share the following about the firm (CrowdStrike) the Democrats used to look into their data breach (p. 74) –

One of CrowdStrike’s first moves was to advise the DNC officials to do nothing. Don’t shut down the system. Don’t stop using it. The reason: Any dramatic action or change in routine could alert the hackers they had been spotted, and then the intruders might take steps to make it impossible to ferret them out of the system.” (Isikoff, p. 74)

But this is nonsense on many counts:

If the “intruders” could have “made it impossible to ferret them out of the system,” this is the first thing they would have done. Not even CrowdStrike would have given the DNC the advice “to do nothing“. The DNC and CrowdStrike coordinated and provided this false account in order to explain why the DNC did nothing when it discovered the breach.


Ads by Revcontent
“CrowdStrike and the lawyers warned the small circle of DNC officials in the know to keep their mouths shut. And this meant not telling anyone in the Clinton campaign.” (Isikoff, p. 74-75)

Instead of installing additional controls to prevent hacking, adding additional malware protection or other related preventative actions, the DNC decided to the keep everything secret and the same? This makes no sense at all.

The Democrats next held a gathering on June 10, 2016 per an AP report:

It was 4 p.m. on Friday June 10 when some 100 staffers filed into the Democratic National Committee’s main conference room for a mandatory, all-hands meeting.

“What I am about to tell you cannot leave this room,” DNC chief operating officer Lindsey Reynolds told the assembled crowd, according to two people there at the time.

Everyone needed to turn in their laptops immediately; there would be no last-minute emails; no downloading documents and no exceptions. Reynolds insisted on total secrecy.

CNN Refuses to Show This Video. Click Here to Watch
HSI Online
Ads by Revcontent
Find Out More >
47,732
“Don’t even talk to your dog about it,” she was quoted as saying.

Reynolds didn’t return messages seeking comment.

Two days later, as the cybersecurity firm that was brought in to clean out the DNC’s computers finished its work, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told a British Sunday television show that emails related to Clinton were “pending publication.”

“WikiLeaks has a very good year ahead,” he said.

On Tuesday, June 14, the Democrats went public with the allegation that their computers had been c*********d by Russian state-backed hackers, including Fancy Bear.

The DNC was never hacked by Russians. This was a tall tale developed by someone of the likes of Hillary’s creepy Campaign Manger John Podesta. If they were hacked they would have implemented aggressive controls to prevent future hacks. They wouldn’t have called a team meeting and asked the entire team to provide their laptops.

The actions taken by the DNC after the release of their emails were consistent with a loss of emails due to an insider job rather than a hacking from outsiders, let alone Russians. The DNC never let anyone but CrowdStrike look at their server. The FBI hasn’t even reviewed their server, but the entire fairy tale led to the Mueller Witchhunt and it’s all a lie.

Some say the insider who released the emails was Seth Rich. A Bernie Sanders supporter who was murdered in Washington DC in July of 2016 – God rest his soul. This makes more sense than Russia hacking the DNC.
New Evidence Proves DNC Was Not Hacked by Russia i... (show quote)



Great conspiracy theory good job. I was waiting for this kind of BS.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 11:12:00   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
MacAfee of anti-v***l fame pointed out that the evidence was clear that they weren't hacked from the very beginning. Him being a bit of a nutt made him not credible in the eyes of virtually all. But, some times, nutts are as right as rain. And I have always thought the murder of Seth Rich was a direct result of something he was involved in at the DNC.




Absolutely Seth Rich was murdered for downloading from The DNC "Hillarys" computers.

The Murderess struck again!

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 11:14:03   #
bahmer
 
byronglimish wrote:
Absolutely Seth Rich was murdered for downloading from The DNC "Hillarys" computers.

The Murderess struck again!


Amen and Amen

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 11:14:41   #
Airforceone
 
byronglimish wrote:
Absolutely Seth Rich was murdered for downloading from The DNC "Hillarys" computers.

The Murderess struck again!


That’s a lie

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2019 11:15:47   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Airforceone wrote:
Great conspiracy theory good job. I was waiting for this kind of BS.


You are addicted to bullbiden and, as you constantly spew, are ignorant to the facts.

Are you too much of a coward to "honestly" search this out?...my quess is yes.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 11:16:28   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Airforceone wrote:
That’s a lie


You are a low budget troll!

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 11:20:52   #
Bcon
 
Airforceone wrote:
Great conspiracy theory good job. I was waiting for this kind of BS.


Just because it does not fit your far left narrative, you call it BS. Prove it wrong.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 11:21:40   #
Bcon
 
Airforceone wrote:
That’s a lie


Prove it.

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2019 11:22:33   #
Airforceone
 
byronglimish wrote:
You are addicted to bullbiden and, as you constantly spew, are ignorant to the facts.

Are you too much of a coward to "honestly" search this out?...my quess is yes.


No I believe in reading legislation and have no use for this kind of BS. I can go on line a find all kinds of this garbage you people post ( FOR AND AGAINST MY IDEOLOGY) I choose to get facts you live in an alternative universe of h**e and r****m for everything that made this country great.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 11:25:11   #
Bcon
 
Airforceone wrote:
No I believe in reading legislation and have no use for this kind of BS. I can go on line a find all kinds of this garbage you people post ( FOR AND AGAINST MY IDEOLOGY) I choose to get facts you live in an alternative universe of h**e and r****m for everything that made this country great.


But you haven’t posted any yet. Why is that. Can’t you find anything to exonerate
Hillary. We are waiting.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 11:26:29   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Bcon wrote:
Prove it.



why do you not post some proof of you silly plots???

Should we all read the foolish right wing fish wrap that you echo and then call for others to prove the opposite?

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 11:30:26   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Bcon wrote:
Just because it does not fit your far left narrative, you call it BS. Prove it wrong.


Exactly, trollboy will not address the post directly.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.