One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Will incoming AG William Barr be Just?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Feb 20, 2019 11:31:53   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
As even the left knows, there has been a injustice to the President and a cover-up of Hillary Clinton's conspiring with Russia during the 2016 campaign.

Will Barr seek justice?


What is seeking justice? Does that mean that if Mueller's report outlines evidence indicating the need for indictments that would suggest an impeachment first he withholds that information from congress and the people?

Does it mean he tries to narrow the scope of Mueller's investigation, which is wide enough that even if there is no collusion it touched on an array of other crimes related to Trump people before, during, and after the election?

For example misuse if inauguration funds, tax fraud, money laundering, conflicts of interest with Russia, to name but a few?

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:32:46   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
Let justice prevail!


Truer words were never spoken, let it be.

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:34:09   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
Auntie Lulu wrote:
What about the crimes committed by Clinton's allies. What about all the texts having been destroyed. I am 100% in favor of prosecuting EACH AND EVERY person who committed crimes--including those working for the DOJ and the FBI who stepped over the line, both before and after the last election.


Same goes for Trump and his partners in crime...no pardons for convictions?

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:35:57   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:

Everything that Mueller has concocted or omitted needs a "honest" going over.


We'll be seeing facts soon, and actually already are for those paying attention to what's been coming out all along.

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:38:11   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
Indeed! If Barr does his job, like he said that he would...a bunch of dishonest Progs will be whining and screaming at the sky again.


And if he actually does his job the right will be calling him a traitor, his job has no sides, only applying the law equally to Trump as the other side.

Barr will be looking at the work that was done with Hillary and concluding the same thing that already has been.

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:40:35   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
Can you count the many times that you have spewed "this is it, he's finished this time"?


The camel's back is about to break, each thing get's harder and harder to dismiss

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:40:38   #
byronglimish (a regular here)
 
woodguru wrote:
And if he actually does his job the right will be calling him a traitor, his job has no sides, only applying the law equally to Trump as the other side.

Barr will be looking at the work that was done with Hillary and concluding the same thing that already has been.


We will see.

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:45:44   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
A scholar of history? No one would have ever guessed!

It doesn't take much of a historian to know about "tricky dick".


There's knowing that he basically resigned under the threat of impeachment...but the details recently released under FOI suits show that he was indicted and it was left to congress to decide whether to prosecute or impeach.

Mueller can release a report to congress that outlines a dozen violations that indicate the need for indictments and prosecution, and let congress decide whether to bring prosecution or impeach then prosecute. Here is where Barr comes in, would he support indicting a sitting president, word is he would not.

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:47:15   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
old marine wrote:

To my sorrow I actually voted for Obama when he first ran, but I quickly realized I made a big mistake. Never again will I make that mistake again.


DUH! Lol

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:51:25   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
This is what is troubling to me.

Barr has worked with Mueller in the past.


What should trouble people is that Trump expects the AG to run interference for him, protect him...

That is not the AG's job.

Trump actively gets in and tries to get these people he appoints to do the things that rerail and end investigations, otherwise known as obstructing justice.

It would seem that he did that with Whittaker right off the bat and tried to get him to appoint a recused judge to oversee the Cohen investigation and prosecution. Fake news...we'll see won't we?

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:53:00   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
elledee wrote:
once again the problem is obvious who's watching the watchers?


That is a circular exercise in tail chasing. The watchers operate under a proof beyond any doubt mode.

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:54:03   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
teabag09 wrote:
I hope this guy is honest as the day is long but hard as granite to uncovering all crimes. Trumps if there are any, both Clintons and we know there are crimes, McCabe, Pelosi, Waters, Mueller and all of the rest. Clean all of the bad apples out of the barrel. Mike


You don't mention the bad apples on the other side, are there none, they are all righteous angels?

All we can hope for is honesty and integrity, that cuts both sides.

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:57:13   #
woodguru (a regular here)
 
old marine wrote:
How many millions of dollars has Nancy Pelosi unauthorized dollars has she spent on Government aircraft, food and liquor for herself and friends on private vacations for her friends and weekend trips home to San Francisco while the Senate was in session?

That needs to be investigated.


Come on, Pelosi doesn't own the franchise on that, Trump heads have been cut under that sword

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 15:53:11   #
old marine
 
woodguru wrote:

What is seeking justice?

Seeking justice is when it appears a crime has been committed and is investigated to see if there is evidence of a crime. Then the evidence is presented to a grand jury. The grand jury weighes the evidence and will either indict or dismiss rhe allugations.


woodguru wrote:

Does that mean that if Mueller's report outlines evidence indicating the need for indictments that would suggest an impeachment

That is correcr, go to the head of the class woodguru.😁😎


woodguru wrote:

first he withholds that information from congress and the people?

Of course the investigation is being witheld from Congress and the people. It is a serious crime if he allows the information of an ongoing criminal investigation to be made public. If that happened the presiding judge would be forced to throw the evidence out and possiable having to dismiss the whole case. Mueller will present his investigation findings to the AG and he will present the findings to Congress


woodguru wrote:

Does it mean he tries to narrow the scope of Mueller's investigation, which is wide enough that even

Who is this mysterious "he" you are referring to? Only the Attorney General can narrow the scope or enlarge the scope of the investigation.Robert Mueller illegally widened the scope by going outside of the "Russian alledged conspiring with Canidate Donald Trump and using old IRS information to blackmail Trump's staff and campaign help.


woodguru wrote:

if there is no collusion it touched on an array of other crimes related to Trump people before, during, and after the election?

Robert Mueller has already said he has found no evidence of coilusion between the Russians and canidate or President Trump. Any other crimes or charged will have to be brought by where they allegedly took place. That really throws cold water on the Democrats lies and hopes.


woodguru wrote:

For example misuse if inauguration funds,

All funds for the inauguration were never in the President posession. Nothing there. The fish aren't bighting there either.


woodguru wrote:

tax fraud,

How much tax is on his salery of one cent salary per year? No fish bighting rhere either.


woodguru wrote:

money laundering,

Nothing here either. Check with Bill and Hillary Clinton and their money laundering program.


woodguru wrote:

conflicts of interest with Russia, to name but a few?

There are no conflicts of intrest with Russia. President Trump has issued severe sanctions against Russia. His only conflicts of intrest is with the Socialist Dim-O-Crats over protecting the safety of American citizens.


Have a nice day tomorrow and find a better fishing spot.

πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜ŽπŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ God bless America and President Trump.

| Reply
Feb 20, 2019 15:55:58   #
old marine
 
woodguru wrote:
And if he actually does his job the right will be calling him a traitor, his job has no sides, only applying the law equally to Trump as the other side.

Barr will be looking at the work that was done with Hillary and concluding the same thing that already has been.


You wish.

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.