Are the Days of Roe vs. Wade Numbered?
Feb 10, 2019 11:35:05 #
kemmer wrote:
After 2020 there will be no more trumpish presidents for at least a decade. America has learned its lesson.
There will be a******ns if Roe v Wade is repealed just as there were a******ns before. They'll just go underground and many women will die. But Republicans are happy with that.
There will be a******ns if Roe v Wade is repealed just as there were a******ns before. They'll just go underground and many women will die. But Republicans are happy with that.
Now there's a strong argument. So typical pf the way the Left thinks. Pretty stupid. If you were smart you would buy a ton of stock in coat hangers. Maybe that will ease your guilty conscience. You people, AOC, and the rest of those running for the highest office are INSANE. Trump will win in a landslide, especially when you guys take on with an outlandish view on full term a******n. I'm actually glad you guys have taken on such a polarizing issue. Can't wait for the replacement for RBG and Roe vs. Wade to go down. Trump winning in 2020 is a no-brainer. If you don't think evangelicals will come out in droves with your stance on a******n, you're dumber than I thought. 85% will be a low estimate.
Feb 10, 2019 23:38:09 #
Crayons wrote:
We're more informed than you demons are...and as a matter of fact when Planned K**linhood
tried to sue "Project Veritas" over that film, Planned K**linHood lost every lawsuit,
Because it was proven in court that the film was legit and not doctored in any way.
tried to sue "Project Veritas" over that film, Planned K**linHood lost every lawsuit,
Because it was proven in court that the film was legit and not doctored in any way.
Feb 11, 2019 00:25:07 #
fullspinzoo wrote:
...Trump winning in 2020 is a no-brainer.
Yup. He won't even be on the b****t.
Feb 11, 2019 02:14:18 #
Feb 11, 2019 04:59:48 #
woodguru wrote:
Actually, there's no mention of a******n at all in the Constitution, anywhere.Dems won't load it,their idea of a good judge is a centrist like Garland, which is the way justices should be picked. They should have a long history of adhering to the law.
Hard right leaning judges is not adhering to the constitution when they think nothing of bringing conservative values in over the constitution. There is nothing in the constitution that would support overturning Roe V Wade
Hard right leaning judges is not adhering to the constitution when they think nothing of bringing conservative values in over the constitution. There is nothing in the constitution that would support overturning Roe V Wade
Don't you find it interesting that the 2nd specifically mentions arms and specifically says "shall not be infringed", yet the Dem.s and Left regulate the s**t out of gun ownership to the point that financial burdens make it almost impossible for poor people to own guns...and think it's constitutional? Yet a******n was NEVER mentioned in the C, and the ruling was based on privacy and said that while states can't make them illegal, they can regulate them as long as those regulations aren't prohibitive to the point of causing a (poor) woman an "undue burden" that prevents her from being able to have one...and they want it SO UNREGULATED that it can result in a newborn infant being left to die.
Medically, no infant is "viable" if it is not fed or cared for after birth...even healthy infants...that makes it murder. Are hospitals now a "sanctuary" for murderers, seeing that if a mother were to take that same baby HOME the next day and decide to make it comfortable but not feed it and it died, she would be going to prison for murder? How FAR are the Left going to take this...to the point where decent people on BOTH sides push it back to the SCOTUS and revisit it...because THIS, this k*****g of newborns, will do it.
Feb 11, 2019 08:55:24 #
Peewee wrote:
Interesting isn't it, how the Dem.s said Jane Doe shouldn't be made to wait 11 days to have an a******n (when she was about 10 weeks pregnant) because, as they argued, the closer she got to 24 weeks, the more dangerous it is for a woman to have an a******n. But now, when they want a******ns up to and AFTER birth, the risks to the woman (I won't call them "mothers") is almost 80% higher than at 24 weeks. The Left doesn't give a crap about women OR babies.…they just want to be "dead right".They'll die anyway if midwives and nurse practitioners do late-term a******ns if there are complications. Complications are much higher with late-term a******ns in the second and third trimester.
Feb 11, 2019 09:16:42 #
Peewee
Loc: San Antonio, TX
L8erToots wrote:
Interesting isn't it, how the Dem.s said Jane Doe ... (show quote)
Nothing the DEMs/LIBs do, ever surprise me.
Feb 11, 2019 09:25:45 #
Feb 11, 2019 09:29:38 #
woodguru wrote:
You can kiss the GOP goodbye then...numbers don't lie, the vast majority of americans support pro choice, it will be a defining cause that ends the GOP for good.
If that happens and the GOP disappears then we will end up with a totalitarian state. The democrat party doesn't have the integrity for sole party rule. No one party does.
That the vast majority approve of a******n does not bode well for our nation. Last year the #1 cause of death in the world was a******n. That should give everyone pause.
Feb 11, 2019 10:03:42 #
Peewee
Loc: San Antonio, TX
kemmer wrote:
Just wait till 2020!
If I don't get hit by a train I'll have to.
Can you guess who I will be v****g for?
Feb 11, 2019 12:14:49 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.