One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Robert Mueller Is A Coward And A Liar
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 5, 2019 14:52:41   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
02/05/2019 Robert Mueller Is A Coward And A Liar

Raúl Ilargi Meijer
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2019/02/robert-mueller-is-a-coward-and-a-liar/

Tyler Durden
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-04/ilargi-meijer-robert-mueller-coward-and-liar

That statement is going to make me real popular, right?

Any criticism of Robert Mueller for many people equals support for President Trump. But it doesn’t, and Mueller really is a coward and a liar, and it’s not hard to make that case.

It’s even easier than how he makes his cases, because we can actually prove ours.

We also don’t have to pervert the law, but he does.

Robert Mueller is a coward because he again, in his indictment of Roger Stone last week, makes claims against people who can’t defend themselves.

And who moreover have in at least one case, that of Julian Assange, previously and repeatedly denied those claims.

And Robert Mueller’s a liar because many of his claims are evidently not true;

But though he will never be able to prove them, and he knows it, he still makes his ‘case’ based on them.

It’s also public knowledge that Mueller has lied since at least the WMD facade.

On February 11 2003, then FBI director Mueller testified before Congress: 
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4719428/mueller-testifies-iraqs-wmds


“..As Director Tenet has pointed out, Secretary Powell presented evidence last week that Baghdad has failed to disarm its weapons of mass destruction, willfully attempting to evade and deceive the international community.

Our particular concern is that Saddam Hussein may supply terrorists with biological, chemical, or radiological material.”

We know today he was lying, as was Colin Powell (and the entire Bush administration).

Which is also interesting because a number of Mueller’s accusations against various ‘suspects’ are basically just that: someone has lied to Congress and must be punished for it.

This is again the case in Roger Stone’s indictment, which would ring awfully hollow without it.

And we don’t have to know how true that accusation is to realize that it’s being brought by someone who himself lied to Congress, but was never indicted for it.

That is curious no matter how you look at it.

So what would happen if Mueller takes any of his present indictments into a courtroom?

Note: As long as he treats those he indicts the same way he treated Paul Manafort and others, he’ll probably never have to present anything in a court;

Every ‘suspect’ will sign a plea deal because he threatens to destroy them, their freedom, their finances, their families.


But what IF he did, purely hypothetically?

What proof - not allegations - could he present to a judge about Russians hacking US-based servers or computers?

And what evidence of Julian Assange working with Russians, or with the Trump campaign?
He has none.


All there is is US intelligence agencies making claims without providing evidence.

And they are a party to the whole story, they are not mere observers, so no judge worth his/her salt can accept their word on anything just because it’s them saying it.

Even the FBI has to present evidence.

In court, that is.

In the meantime, in the absence of a courtroom, Robert Mueller has been free to accuse people for 20 months now, without proof.

And what those 20 months have shown us culminates in the Roger Stone indictment, which makes clear - once more - that there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.


Given his legal status, Mueller should be invested with the power to demand he gets the opportunity to talk to Assange.

And in the unlikely event that he’s not provided with that opportunity by his superiors, at the very least he must stop talking about Assange.


Can’t talk TO him, then stop talking ABOUT him.

Sure, he never mentions his name, but that’s just more cowardice.

We all know who Organization 1 is in Mueller’s indictments.

And we all know who spoke for Organization 1 before he was muzzled.

Mueller could for instance travel to the Ecuadorian embassy in London, after negotiating, both with the man himself and with ‘authorities’ from Ecuador, UK and US, to have a meeting with Assange.

Considering his importance as head of an investigation into collusion that might topple a president and start a new cold war with Russia, that should be easy to do.

But Mueller hasn’t talked to Assange. Nor has he indicated that he tried.

Mueller accusing Assange without talking to him should raise suspicions that he is not interested in finding the t***h, but has other goals.

And that shines a dark light on his entire investigation.

Because of the fact itself, but also because Assange is a pivotal person in the entire Russia collusion narrative. 

Mueller can’t make his case without accusing, defaming Assange.

Assange is crucial in the Mueller indictment of 12 Russians issued conveniently three days before the Trump-Putin summit in Helsinki, he’s crucial in the case made against Paul Manafort.

And he’s again crucial in the indictment of Roger Stone.

Without Assange, Mueller’s hands are empty.

ulian is presented as the conduit between Trump and Russia.

No conduit, no connection.

And Assange has always denied the entire thing, all of it.



People who have been accused of, let alone indicted in, a crime, must be given their day in court, says American law, to be able to defend themselves against their accusers.

But Assange is not, which means Robert Mueller is no less than a grave threat to the entire American justice system.

Not Mueller alone, for sure, but he, along with the Attorney General and Deputy AG (and believe it or not, the President), are immediately responsible for the way the justice system is being perverted.

That is very serious business.

As I said above, Mueller first, supposedly accidentally, d**gged Assange into his investigation three days before the July 16 2018 Trump/Putin meeting in Helsinki, when he indicted 12 Russians and ‘1’Organization.

That indictment is here. 
https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download


It was arguably the first tangible thing that came out of the investigation, and while it was heralded as gospel by everyone who wants Trump to hang, it was shot so full of holes by others in no time that the term ‘tangible’ perhaps needs to be replaced.

That first indictment was not based on facts, it was based on faith (in US intelligence).

12 Russians who can’t defend themselves were grouped together as Guccifer 2, whose Russian lineage was also shot to smithereens within hours, and then there was Assange.

Last week’s indictment, that of Roger Stone, perhaps - we can’t even be sure - alludes to Stone colluding with either Russians or Assange, but it carries no evidence of any collusion.

As WikiLeaks tweeted: 
“The indictment doesn’t have any reference to Stone talking to Assange, or Assange talking to Stone, or anyone at WikiLeaks telling him anything, whatsoever. 

It’s literally old men reading the news and wishing for things.

The job of a Special Counsel, his/her mandate, is to gather evidence of those crimes she has been tasked with investigating.

That mandate can be wide, but certainly not unlimited.

The job at hand is not to suggest that things MIGHT have happened.

It is not to blindly follow everything US intelligence may or may not claim is true, because all accusations will eventually have to be proven in a courtroom.

And it is not to point fingers at people for things the Special Counsel can’t prove they’ve done.

Or to accuse people who cannot defend themselves against wh**ever it is he or she might say (because then (s)he might say anything).

Mueller has never charged Assange with anything, despite the fact that Julian is all over all of his indictments.

Mueller also refuses to talk to Assange, ostensibly because that way he can continue to accuse him of all manner of unproven ‘crimes’.

(End Part 1)

Reply
Feb 5, 2019 14:56:15   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
02/05/2019 Robert Mueller Is A Coward And A Liar (Part 2)

Raúl Ilargi Meijer
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2019/02/robert-mueller-is-a-coward-and-a-liar/

Tyler Durden
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-04/ilargi-meijer-robert-mueller-coward-and-liar

And if he doesn’t have to prove what he accuses Assange of, he can accuse anyone of being in touch with Assange and conspiring to enact all sorts of collusion.


It’s a pity that America is so divided into a pro-Trump and anti-Trump side, and never the twain shall meet, because the perversion of the justice system exemplified by the Mueller investigation is very real; It’s rotting from the inside.

This has not about Trump, if anything it’s about the justice system granting someone the right to defend themselves, which is being violated by Robert Mueller on a daily basis.

In early 2017, the DOJ attempted to set up meetings with Assange.
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2018/07/the-true-meaning-of-collusion/


Who in the process offered evidence that there was no Russian involvement in the files WikiLeaks published in 2016.

Those attempts, when near completion, were halted by Mueller’s very good friend James Comey and Senator Mark Warner (D-Va.).


Warner last week in his capacity as Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman said about the Stone indictment: 

“It is clear from this indictment that those contacts [between Stone and WikiLeaks] happened at least with the full knowledge of, and appear to have been encouraged by, the highest levels of the Trump campaign.” 

No, Mr. Warner, that is sort of the exact point here.
It is not clear. Nor is it true. And you know that, sir.

A year and a half later, in July 2018.

Senator Rand Paul said that if Assange would agree to testify in the US. 

“I think that he should be given immunity from prosecution in exchange for coming to the United States and testifying” Nothing came from that either.

Where was Mueller?



Every single American should be alarmed by this perversion of justice. Nothing to do with what you think of Trump, or of Assange.

The very principles of the system are being perverted, including, but certainly not limited to, its deepest core, that of every individual’s right to defend themselves.

Just so Robert Mueller can continue his already failed investigation into collusion that has shown no such thing, and which wouldn’t have been started 20 months ago if we knew then what we know now.


Get off your Trump collusion hobby-horse, that quest has already died regardless, and start defending the legal system and the Constitution.

Because if you don’t, what’s to keep the next Robert Mueller from going after you, or someone you like or love?

It’s in everyone’s interest to demand that these proceedings – like all legal proceedings- are conducted according to the law, but in Mueller’s hands, they are not.

And that should be a much bigger worry than whether or not you like or dislike a former game-show host.

Reply
Feb 5, 2019 15:12:13   #
woodguru
 
Wh**ever...

Can't hold a candle to the bonespur coward in that regard...liar, when did lying ever matter to the right?

Reply
 
 
Feb 5, 2019 15:37:34   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
Doc110 wrote:
02/05/2019 Robert Mueller Is A Coward And A Liar (Part 2)

Raúl Ilargi Meijer
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2019/02/robert-mueller-is-a-coward-and-a-liar/

Tyler Durden
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-04/ilargi-meijer-robert-mueller-coward-and-liar

And if he doesn’t have to prove what he accuses Assange of, he can accuse anyone of being in touch with Assange and conspiring to enact all sorts of collusion.


It’s a pity that America is so divided into a pro-Trump and anti-Trump side, and never the twain shall meet, because the perversion of the justice system exemplified by the Mueller investigation is very real; It’s rotting from the inside.

This has not about Trump, if anything it’s about the justice system granting someone the right to defend themselves, which is being violated by Robert Mueller on a daily basis.

In early 2017, the DOJ attempted to set up meetings with Assange.
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2018/07/the-true-meaning-of-collusion/


Who in the process offered evidence that there was no Russian involvement in the files WikiLeaks published in 2016.

Those attempts, when near completion, were halted by Mueller’s very good friend James Comey and Senator Mark Warner (D-Va.).


Warner last week in his capacity as Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman said about the Stone indictment: 

“It is clear from this indictment that those contacts [between Stone and WikiLeaks] happened at least with the full knowledge of, and appear to have been encouraged by, the highest levels of the Trump campaign.” 

No, Mr. Warner, that is sort of the exact point here.
It is not clear. Nor is it true. And you know that, sir.

A year and a half later, in July 2018.

Senator Rand Paul said that if Assange would agree to testify in the US. 

“I think that he should be given immunity from prosecution in exchange for coming to the United States and testifying” Nothing came from that either.

Where was Mueller?



Every single American should be alarmed by this perversion of justice. Nothing to do with what you think of Trump, or of Assange.

The very principles of the system are being perverted, including, but certainly not limited to, its deepest core, that of every individual’s right to defend themselves.

Just so Robert Mueller can continue his already failed investigation into collusion that has shown no such thing, and which wouldn’t have been started 20 months ago if we knew then what we know now.


Get off your Trump collusion hobby-horse, that quest has already died regardless, and start defending the legal system and the Constitution.

Because if you don’t, what’s to keep the next Robert Mueller from going after you, or someone you like or love?

It’s in everyone’s interest to demand that these proceedings – like all legal proceedings- are conducted according to the law, but in Mueller’s hands, they are not.

And that should be a much bigger worry than whether or not you like or dislike a former game-show host.
02/05/2019 Robert Mueller Is A Coward And A Liar ... (show quote)

That's a lot to do with Assange, Wikileaks has a track record of publishing the t***h, nothing so far has been disproved just ignored, ignorance is stronger than proof, because no matter what surfaces the sea is full of flotsam and jettison past distress causes a new environment what didn't float is forgotten about, arrr !! I just disproved my own case t***h floats ignorance sinks because Reality is funded by lies that comes truely from the ancient Trial Of Ordeal, if the Witch comes up and breaths it's guilty if she stays under we made a grave error.

Julian Assange didn't help Trump win Hillary did.


Reply
Feb 5, 2019 15:53:26   #
Sicilianthing
 
Doc110 wrote:
02/05/2019 Robert Mueller Is A Coward And A Liar

Raúl Ilargi Meijer
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2019/02/robert-mueller-is-a-coward-and-a-liar/

Tyler Durden
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-04/ilargi-meijer-robert-mueller-coward-and-liar

That statement is going to make me real popular, right?

Any criticism of Robert Mueller for many people equals support for President Trump. But it doesn’t, and Mueller really is a coward and a liar, and it’s not hard to make that case.

It’s even easier than how he makes his cases, because we can actually prove ours.

We also don’t have to pervert the law, but he does.

Robert Mueller is a coward because he again, in his indictment of Roger Stone last week, makes claims against people who can’t defend themselves.

And who moreover have in at least one case, that of Julian Assange, previously and repeatedly denied those claims.

And Robert Mueller’s a liar because many of his claims are evidently not true;

But though he will never be able to prove them, and he knows it, he still makes his ‘case’ based on them.

It’s also public knowledge that Mueller has lied since at least the WMD facade.

On February 11 2003, then FBI director Mueller testified before Congress: 
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4719428/mueller-testifies-iraqs-wmds


“..As Director Tenet has pointed out, Secretary Powell presented evidence last week that Baghdad has failed to disarm its weapons of mass destruction, willfully attempting to evade and deceive the international community.

Our particular concern is that Saddam Hussein may supply terrorists with biological, chemical, or radiological material.”

We know today he was lying, as was Colin Powell (and the entire Bush administration).

Which is also interesting because a number of Mueller’s accusations against various ‘suspects’ are basically just that: someone has lied to Congress and must be punished for it.

This is again the case in Roger Stone’s indictment, which would ring awfully hollow without it.

And we don’t have to know how true that accusation is to realize that it’s being brought by someone who himself lied to Congress, but was never indicted for it.

That is curious no matter how you look at it.

So what would happen if Mueller takes any of his present indictments into a courtroom?

Note: As long as he treats those he indicts the same way he treated Paul Manafort and others, he’ll probably never have to present anything in a court;

Every ‘suspect’ will sign a plea deal because he threatens to destroy them, their freedom, their finances, their families.


But what IF he did, purely hypothetically?

What proof - not allegations - could he present to a judge about Russians hacking US-based servers or computers?

And what evidence of Julian Assange working with Russians, or with the Trump campaign?
He has none.


All there is is US intelligence agencies making claims without providing evidence.

And they are a party to the whole story, they are not mere observers, so no judge worth his/her salt can accept their word on anything just because it’s them saying it.

Even the FBI has to present evidence.

In court, that is.

In the meantime, in the absence of a courtroom, Robert Mueller has been free to accuse people for 20 months now, without proof.

And what those 20 months have shown us culminates in the Roger Stone indictment, which makes clear - once more - that there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.


Given his legal status, Mueller should be invested with the power to demand he gets the opportunity to talk to Assange.

And in the unlikely event that he’s not provided with that opportunity by his superiors, at the very least he must stop talking about Assange.


Can’t talk TO him, then stop talking ABOUT him.

Sure, he never mentions his name, but that’s just more cowardice.

We all know who Organization 1 is in Mueller’s indictments.

And we all know who spoke for Organization 1 before he was muzzled.

Mueller could for instance travel to the Ecuadorian embassy in London, after negotiating, both with the man himself and with ‘authorities’ from Ecuador, UK and US, to have a meeting with Assange.

Considering his importance as head of an investigation into collusion that might topple a president and start a new cold war with Russia, that should be easy to do.

But Mueller hasn’t talked to Assange. Nor has he indicated that he tried.

Mueller accusing Assange without talking to him should raise suspicions that he is not interested in finding the t***h, but has other goals.

And that shines a dark light on his entire investigation.

Because of the fact itself, but also because Assange is a pivotal person in the entire Russia collusion narrative. 

Mueller can’t make his case without accusing, defaming Assange.

Assange is crucial in the Mueller indictment of 12 Russians issued conveniently three days before the Trump-Putin summit in Helsinki, he’s crucial in the case made against Paul Manafort.

And he’s again crucial in the indictment of Roger Stone.

Without Assange, Mueller’s hands are empty.

ulian is presented as the conduit between Trump and Russia.

No conduit, no connection.

And Assange has always denied the entire thing, all of it.



People who have been accused of, let alone indicted in, a crime, must be given their day in court, says American law, to be able to defend themselves against their accusers.

But Assange is not, which means Robert Mueller is no less than a grave threat to the entire American justice system.

Not Mueller alone, for sure, but he, along with the Attorney General and Deputy AG (and believe it or not, the President), are immediately responsible for the way the justice system is being perverted.

That is very serious business.

As I said above, Mueller first, supposedly accidentally, d**gged Assange into his investigation three days before the July 16 2018 Trump/Putin meeting in Helsinki, when he indicted 12 Russians and ‘1’Organization.

That indictment is here. 
https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download


It was arguably the first tangible thing that came out of the investigation, and while it was heralded as gospel by everyone who wants Trump to hang, it was shot so full of holes by others in no time that the term ‘tangible’ perhaps needs to be replaced.

That first indictment was not based on facts, it was based on faith (in US intelligence).

12 Russians who can’t defend themselves were grouped together as Guccifer 2, whose Russian lineage was also shot to smithereens within hours, and then there was Assange.

Last week’s indictment, that of Roger Stone, perhaps - we can’t even be sure - alludes to Stone colluding with either Russians or Assange, but it carries no evidence of any collusion.

As WikiLeaks tweeted: 
“The indictment doesn’t have any reference to Stone talking to Assange, or Assange talking to Stone, or anyone at WikiLeaks telling him anything, whatsoever. 

It’s literally old men reading the news and wishing for things.

The job of a Special Counsel, his/her mandate, is to gather evidence of those crimes she has been tasked with investigating.

That mandate can be wide, but certainly not unlimited.

The job at hand is not to suggest that things MIGHT have happened.

It is not to blindly follow everything US intelligence may or may not claim is true, because all accusations will eventually have to be proven in a courtroom.

And it is not to point fingers at people for things the Special Counsel can’t prove they’ve done.

Or to accuse people who cannot defend themselves against wh**ever it is he or she might say (because then (s)he might say anything).

Mueller has never charged Assange with anything, despite the fact that Julian is all over all of his indictments.

Mueller also refuses to talk to Assange, ostensibly because that way he can continue to accuse him of all manner of unproven ‘crimes’.

(End Part 1)
02/05/2019 Robert Mueller Is A Coward And A Liar b... (show quote)


>>>

King Rat Minion:



Reply
Feb 5, 2019 16:14:55   #
Noraa Loc: Kansas
 
Doc110 wrote:
02/05/2019 Robert Mueller Is A Coward And A Liar

Raúl Ilargi Meijer
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2019/02/robert-mueller-is-a-coward-and-a-liar/

Tyler Durden
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-04/ilargi-meijer-robert-mueller-coward-and-liar

That statement is going to make me real popular, right?

Any criticism of Robert Mueller for many people equals support for President Trump. But it doesn’t, and Mueller really is a coward and a liar, and it’s not hard to make that case.

It’s even easier than how he makes his cases, because we can actually prove ours.

We also don’t have to pervert the law, but he does.

Robert Mueller is a coward because he again, in his indictment of Roger Stone last week, makes claims against people who can’t defend themselves.

And who moreover have in at least one case, that of Julian Assange, previously and repeatedly denied those claims.

And Robert Mueller’s a liar because many of his claims are evidently not true;

But though he will never be able to prove them, and he knows it, he still makes his ‘case’ based on them.

It’s also public knowledge that Mueller has lied since at least the WMD facade.

On February 11 2003, then FBI director Mueller testified before Congress: 
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4719428/mueller-testifies-iraqs-wmds


“..As Director Tenet has pointed out, Secretary Powell presented evidence last week that Baghdad has failed to disarm its weapons of mass destruction, willfully attempting to evade and deceive the international community.

Our particular concern is that Saddam Hussein may supply terrorists with biological, chemical, or radiological material.”

We know today he was lying, as was Colin Powell (and the entire Bush administration).

Which is also interesting because a number of Mueller’s accusations against various ‘suspects’ are basically just that: someone has lied to Congress and must be punished for it.

This is again the case in Roger Stone’s indictment, which would ring awfully hollow without it.

And we don’t have to know how true that accusation is to realize that it’s being brought by someone who himself lied to Congress, but was never indicted for it.

That is curious no matter how you look at it.

So what would happen if Mueller takes any of his present indictments into a courtroom?

Note: As long as he treats those he indicts the same way he treated Paul Manafort and others, he’ll probably never have to present anything in a court;

Every ‘suspect’ will sign a plea deal because he threatens to destroy them, their freedom, their finances, their families.


But what IF he did, purely hypothetically?

What proof - not allegations - could he present to a judge about Russians hacking US-based servers or computers?

And what evidence of Julian Assange working with Russians, or with the Trump campaign?
He has none.


All there is is US intelligence agencies making claims without providing evidence.

And they are a party to the whole story, they are not mere observers, so no judge worth his/her salt can accept their word on anything just because it’s them saying it.

Even the FBI has to present evidence.

In court, that is.

In the meantime, in the absence of a courtroom, Robert Mueller has been free to accuse people for 20 months now, without proof.

And what those 20 months have shown us culminates in the Roger Stone indictment, which makes clear - once more - that there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.


Given his legal status, Mueller should be invested with the power to demand he gets the opportunity to talk to Assange.

And in the unlikely event that he’s not provided with that opportunity by his superiors, at the very least he must stop talking about Assange.


Can’t talk TO him, then stop talking ABOUT him.

Sure, he never mentions his name, but that’s just more cowardice.

We all know who Organization 1 is in Mueller’s indictments.

And we all know who spoke for Organization 1 before he was muzzled.

Mueller could for instance travel to the Ecuadorian embassy in London, after negotiating, both with the man himself and with ‘authorities’ from Ecuador, UK and US, to have a meeting with Assange.

Considering his importance as head of an investigation into collusion that might topple a president and start a new cold war with Russia, that should be easy to do.

But Mueller hasn’t talked to Assange. Nor has he indicated that he tried.

Mueller accusing Assange without talking to him should raise suspicions that he is not interested in finding the t***h, but has other goals.

And that shines a dark light on his entire investigation.

Because of the fact itself, but also because Assange is a pivotal person in the entire Russia collusion narrative. 

Mueller can’t make his case without accusing, defaming Assange.

Assange is crucial in the Mueller indictment of 12 Russians issued conveniently three days before the Trump-Putin summit in Helsinki, he’s crucial in the case made against Paul Manafort.

And he’s again crucial in the indictment of Roger Stone.

Without Assange, Mueller’s hands are empty.

ulian is presented as the conduit between Trump and Russia.

No conduit, no connection.

And Assange has always denied the entire thing, all of it.



People who have been accused of, let alone indicted in, a crime, must be given their day in court, says American law, to be able to defend themselves against their accusers.

But Assange is not, which means Robert Mueller is no less than a grave threat to the entire American justice system.

Not Mueller alone, for sure, but he, along with the Attorney General and Deputy AG (and believe it or not, the President), are immediately responsible for the way the justice system is being perverted.

That is very serious business.

As I said above, Mueller first, supposedly accidentally, d**gged Assange into his investigation three days before the July 16 2018 Trump/Putin meeting in Helsinki, when he indicted 12 Russians and ‘1’Organization.

That indictment is here. 
https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download


It was arguably the first tangible thing that came out of the investigation, and while it was heralded as gospel by everyone who wants Trump to hang, it was shot so full of holes by others in no time that the term ‘tangible’ perhaps needs to be replaced.

That first indictment was not based on facts, it was based on faith (in US intelligence).

12 Russians who can’t defend themselves were grouped together as Guccifer 2, whose Russian lineage was also shot to smithereens within hours, and then there was Assange.

Last week’s indictment, that of Roger Stone, perhaps - we can’t even be sure - alludes to Stone colluding with either Russians or Assange, but it carries no evidence of any collusion.

As WikiLeaks tweeted: 
“The indictment doesn’t have any reference to Stone talking to Assange, or Assange talking to Stone, or anyone at WikiLeaks telling him anything, whatsoever. 

It’s literally old men reading the news and wishing for things.

The job of a Special Counsel, his/her mandate, is to gather evidence of those crimes she has been tasked with investigating.

That mandate can be wide, but certainly not unlimited.

The job at hand is not to suggest that things MIGHT have happened.

It is not to blindly follow everything US intelligence may or may not claim is true, because all accusations will eventually have to be proven in a courtroom.

And it is not to point fingers at people for things the Special Counsel can’t prove they’ve done.

Or to accuse people who cannot defend themselves against wh**ever it is he or she might say (because then (s)he might say anything).

Mueller has never charged Assange with anything, despite the fact that Julian is all over all of his indictments.

Mueller also refuses to talk to Assange, ostensibly because that way he can continue to accuse him of all manner of unproven ‘crimes’.

(End Part 1)
02/05/2019 Robert Mueller Is A Coward And A Liar b... (show quote)


Mueller needs to be investigated back to his high school days. I bet he couldn't pass.

Reply
Feb 5, 2019 16:33:49   #
Liberty Tree
 
woodguru wrote:
Wh**ever...

Can't hold a candle to the bonespur coward in that regard...liar, when did lying ever matter to the right?


It matters all the time the left does it, which is all the time.

Reply
 
 
Feb 5, 2019 16:45:30   #
Noraa Loc: Kansas
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
It matters all the time the left does it, which is all the time.


Liberty! Don't respond to him!

Reply
Feb 5, 2019 16:57:28   #
Liberty Tree
 
Noraa wrote:
Liberty! Don't respond to him!


You are right. It is hopeless.

Reply
Feb 5, 2019 17:10:24   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
woodguru,

Wh**ever...

Wh**ever...
Tell me something, are you always this ambiguous, in you're reply to a serious article post ?

Is this a setup or something, or "Wh**ever ... ... ...

It must be a possibly non-verbal bleeding brain hemorrhage reply... ? "Wh**ever ... ... ...

Yes, No, or Indifferent ? "Wh**ever ... ... ...

You probably got caught up in the moment... Right !!! "Wh**ever ... ... ...


woodguru,
Could you Respond with facts, Facts, FACTs,
No Supposition's,
No Innuendo's,
No Exaggeration's of your own Personal Emotional Belief's,
No Hypocritical T***h's,
No Empty Rhetoric devoid of Real Factual Substance which is full of Regurgitated Dendrite Compost Opinions...



Your motto, I believe woodguru is,

You Can't argue or debate with a person's religious beliefs,
When you can no longer argue politics they are in fact based on beliefs, not fact.


So obviously, your comment... "Wh**ever..." means exactly that... Right !!! "Wh**ever ... ... ...

Its's a not an argument, nor is it a debate, "Wh**ever ... ... ...
Neither is it a religious belief, "Wh**ever ... ... ...
Nor is it, facts based on belief's, and are not actual facts."Wh**ever ... ... ...
Just a single response word... "Wh**ever..."



So in the future, would you, or should you, please provide a more communicative dingbat reply comment, and do it to someone else, that could care less on what you comment on... Wh**ever...

woodguru,
Just, who do you think I represent; The Right, The Left, The Independent or The Constitutionalist's?

Seriously, try and put a complete sentence together, give an opinion, or just don't comment at all in the future. "Wh**ever ... ... ...

Please don't make me laugh, after I viewed your, 586 article postings, and 6221 comment replies, there is really nothing very remarkable about you, and what I've read. "Wh**ever ... ... ...

It seems to me, you are politically "neutral" and lean "Right" most of the time on most political and social subjects. "Wh**ever ... ... ...


woodguru,

What I posted, a most important topic on the current evils of the Federal Government, in this so-called "Witch-hunt" by Special Council Mueller's FBI probe investigation, which has gone... terribly amuck.

Mueller has spent and wasted millions of taxpayers dollars on President Donald Trump and our Country's time and understanding of the distorted l*****t political machinations facts.


Here is the current present danger and warning...

"Because if you don’t concern yourself, with the Bill of Rights and the Constitution it will be thrown out the door and you will have no freedoms and or national rights."

So what’s to keep the next Robert Mueller from going after you, or someone you like or someone you love?

It’s in everyone’s interest to demand that these proceedings – like all legal proceedings - are conducted according to the Rule of Law, but in Mueller’s hands, they are not.


Ever read George Orwells Book, 1984 ?


So tell me how many FBI "G" men have been fired ? or retired with their tails between their legs...

For 2 years now, the Muller Probe has continued to no avail...

And with Hillary Clinton losing two p**********l e******ns cycles now, and potentially a third time.

The Clintons paid and provided the f**e Trump Russian papers, from a former British spy, paid by the Obama's, Clinton's, and Democratic political operatives, and the compounding of the non-factual continual salacious reporting of L*****t Swamp "F**e-News" Main-stream Left Media.

The Clintons and the Democrats are sore losers...

And the result is that Trump has reversed the 8 years of the l*****t Obama Administration.

It's all Trump, because the Republicans can't step up, and have a Two $Trillion spending Continuing Resolution budget.

Let alone, the so called "Resistance-Snowflakes" e.g. John Q public, the radicalized Democrat i***t's and socialist left minded sycophants on the OPP Political forum.

Oh...

And lets not forget about the malicious criminal FBI Democratic hacks and the Justice Department Democratic hacks trying to bring down the President of the United States, Donald Trump and our American country down to ruin's.

woodguru,
There was NO Russian Collusion. Ever...

All this Special Council investigation is political theatre, all "Smoke and Mirrors", the cesspool politics of the Democratic Left-wing swamp from Washington D.C..


woodguru,
Wh**ever... is a great response, and or a non-response reply.

Keep up the thinking hard work, and keep repeating the same old regurgitated "Dendrite" compost opinions...

The difficult hard words... Wh**ever...

Stand up and take a bow, for everyone... "Wh**ever...

Doc110

Reply
Feb 5, 2019 17:46:40   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
RT friend,

Hillary was her own worst enemy. . . in both e******n cycles in 08, and 16.

Assange, Wikileaks just helped put the nails in the Clinton's coffin. RIP...

And who do you think hacked the Democratic National Party, and posted it on the Wikileaks website ?

And who do you think hacked Hillary's Campaign Chairman John Podesta and posted it on the Wikileaks website ?

Hillary Clintons campaign was hacked, the FBI never did an investigation, they the DNC hired an outside Democratic IT firm, they never conclusively could still not stick it on the Russians.

1. Hillary Clinton compares Russian interference in 2016 to 9/11 attacks
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hillary-clinton-compares-russian-interference-in-2016-to-911-attacks/2018/10/02/6197a226-c674-11e8-9b1c-a90f1daae309_story.html?noredirect=on

2. DNC Seth Rich Murder, Many have speculated that DNC IT staffer Seth Rich, whose murder is still unsolved, was the source of the emails provided to WikiLeaks. New Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 DNC Files Were Copied Locally, Not Hacked
https://disobedientmedia.com/2017/07/new-research-shows-guccifer-2-0-files-were-copied-locally-not-hacked/

And BuzzFeed Suing DNC For Proof They Were Hacked
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-14/buzzfeed-suing-dnc-proof-they-were-hacked

3. Sen.Chuck Grassley Connects Dossier Dots, Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, lobbyist, Adam Waldman and Russian aluminum oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/26/chuck-grassley-dossier-interview/

4. Why Isn't Mueller Probing Clinton, DNC Collusion With Russia?
www.newsmax.com/politics/pat-buchanan-robert-mueller-investigate-hillary-clinton/2018/02/21/id/844712/

5. Still Lacking Evidence Of Collusion, Democrats Move The Goalposts
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/20/collusion-democrats-move-goalposts/

6. With Indictments of Russians on Facebook, the Groundwork Is in Place to Criminally Charge Hillary
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/02/16/watch_live_deputy_ag_rod_rosenstein_announcement.html

7. The US-UK Deep State Empire Strikes Back: ‘It’s Russia! Russia! Russia!’
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/02/18/us-uk-deep-state-empire-strikes-back-its-russia-russia-russia.html

8. Obama DOJ Official Actively Hid Fusion GPS Payments
https://conservativetribune.com/doj-official-hid-fusion-payments/

9.Here are the 8 dirtiest scandals of Robert Mueller that no one is talking about. 'He actively participated in the plot'
http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/the-8-dirtiest-scandals-of-robert-mueller-no-one-is-talking-about/




RT friend wrote:


That's a lot to do with Assange, Wikileaks has a track record of publishing the t***h, nothing so far has been disproved just ignored, ignorance is stronger than proof, because no matter what surfaces the sea is full of flotsam and jettison past distress causes a new environment what didn't float is forgotten about, arrr !!

I just disproved my own case t***h floats ignorance sinks because Reality is funded by lies that comes truely from the ancient Trial Of Ordeal, if the Witch comes up and breaths it's guilty if she stays under we made a grave error.

Julian Assange didn't help Trump win, Hillary did.

br br That's a lot to do with Assange, Wikileaks... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Feb 5, 2019 19:10:03   #
Sicilianthing
 
Doc110 wrote:
RT friend,

Hillary was her own worst enemy. . . in both e******n cycles in 08, and 16.

Assange, Wikileaks just helped put the nails in the Clinton's coffin. RIP...

And who do you think hacked the Democratic National Party, and posted it on the Wikileaks website ?

And who do you think hacked Hillary's Campaign Chairman John Podesta and posted it on the Wikileaks website ?

Hillary Clintons campaign was hacked, the FBI never did an investigation, they the DNC hired an outside Democratic IT firm, they never conclusively could still not stick it on the Russians.

1. Hillary Clinton compares Russian interference in 2016 to 9/11 attacks
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hillary-clinton-compares-russian-interference-in-2016-to-911-attacks/2018/10/02/6197a226-c674-11e8-9b1c-a90f1daae309_story.html?noredirect=on

2. DNC Seth Rich Murder, Many have speculated that DNC IT staffer Seth Rich, whose murder is still unsolved, was the source of the emails provided to WikiLeaks. New Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 DNC Files Were Copied Locally, Not Hacked
https://disobedientmedia.com/2017/07/new-research-shows-guccifer-2-0-files-were-copied-locally-not-hacked/

And BuzzFeed Suing DNC For Proof They Were Hacked
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-14/buzzfeed-suing-dnc-proof-they-were-hacked

3. Sen.Chuck Grassley Connects Dossier Dots, Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, lobbyist, Adam Waldman and Russian aluminum oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/26/chuck-grassley-dossier-interview/

4. Why Isn't Mueller Probing Clinton, DNC Collusion With Russia?
www.newsmax.com/politics/pat-buchanan-robert-mueller-investigate-hillary-clinton/2018/02/21/id/844712/

5. Still Lacking Evidence Of Collusion, Democrats Move The Goalposts
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/20/collusion-democrats-move-goalposts/

6. With Indictments of Russians on Facebook, the Groundwork Is in Place to Criminally Charge Hillary
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/02/16/watch_live_deputy_ag_rod_rosenstein_announcement.html

7. The US-UK Deep State Empire Strikes Back: ‘It’s Russia! Russia! Russia!’
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/02/18/us-uk-deep-state-empire-strikes-back-its-russia-russia-russia.html

8. Obama DOJ Official Actively Hid Fusion GPS Payments
https://conservativetribune.com/doj-official-hid-fusion-payments/

9.Here are the 8 dirtiest scandals of Robert Mueller that no one is talking about. 'He actively participated in the plot'
http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/the-8-dirtiest-scandals-of-robert-mueller-no-one-is-talking-about/
RT friend, br br Hillary was her own worst enemy.... (show quote)


>>>

Still no arrests and the Beat Goes ON !

Reply
Feb 5, 2019 19:18:40   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
Sicilianthing,

Here is the most important thing. . . to remember.

She Hillary lost two P**********l e******ns. . . . RIP.

And all of Trumps 2017-2019 successes, has trumped Obama's, Clinton's and the Left's democratic swamp agenda, there advancements are for not.

MAGA, Make America Great Again !

Doc110

Reply
Feb 5, 2019 20:07:33   #
Sicilianthing
 
Doc110 wrote:
Sicilianthing,

Here is the most important thing. . . to remember.

She Hillary lost two P**********l e******ns. . . . RIP.

And all of Trumps 2017-2019 successes, has trumped Obama's, Clinton's and the Left's democratic swamp agenda, there advancements are for not.

MAGA, Make America Great Again !

Doc110


>>>

I need to see someone arrested
Prosecuted and sentenced to H*****G !



Reply
Feb 6, 2019 01:24:18   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
The Democrat socialist l*****t, always cower and hide from political reality and constantly push their progressive agenda.

Look at the Governor of Virginia and all the want-a-bees P**********l lying hopefuls, they are all Coward And Liars, whats changed since Andrew Jackson's presidency, the Civil war Hypocrisy to our present day.

Spending, and out of control spending and more and more taxes...

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.