nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I made a comment on another thread. This is it: ""Like I said, you deny the t***h. All you have are CNN/MSNBC talking points and l*****t dribble. The message is exclusion of i******s. If that isn't understood by someone, then we don't want them here. You l*****ts are more appalled by a black face than infanticide, which is what a******ns of a full term baby is, period, no matter who thinks they have the right to decide. As for c*****e c****e, even IF CO2 contributes to it, talk to China and India, they account for 90% of it and have reduced their out put by zero percent. That's zero. In fact they cont to open coal fired plants daily.

Figure it out, l*****t!""

Here is the response: ""I am beginning to wonder if mommy dropped you on your head when you were a baby. It appears that because I will not agree with your rhetoric then, like your president, you continue to fire "assumptions and insults" as if that will bring me around to your delusional way of thinking. Give it up cause that's just not going to happen. Why should you and other (white) men get to decide what a woman does with her body? Do you want women telling you how much Viagra you can consume or whether or not its okay for you to smoke cigarettes? I doubt that you can understand any of this since you seem content to limit your thinking to that of the neanderthal. sad. Nevertheless, I continue to pray that God will one day open the hearts, eyes, and minds of those who are lost and think as you do to recognize that we are all 'children' in God's eyes, and He loves us all just the same. White is no better than black, or brown or yellow, and it will be a nice day when all of the peoples of the world realize this and rejoice in the diversity that God created. In the meantime, we just keep doing our best and pray for those inflicted with r****m, hatred, and evil to receive the love of Christ. Kirk out.
JediKnight ""

The entire conversation can be viewed at: http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-151596-5.html#2733743 Go to the end of the thread to pick up on my conversation with the jediknight.

Carol Kelly

I would say someone is sick and that someone is not you. Democrats are hell bent on taking in brown skinned babies and not saving our own babies. Share the wealth! Because someone worked hard, had great ideas and was willing to push them through thereby making millions and by the way, giving jobs to others, then we must take their money and distribute it to layabouts. That’s what Ocasio-Cortez and all the others are all about. When we’re all down and out and find ourselves in the position of Venezuelans, who will be the winner?

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

[quote=nwtk2007] (excerpt) "As for c*****e c****e, even IF CO2 contributes to it, talk to China and India, they account for 90% of it and have reduced their out put by zero percent. That's zero."

90%, huh? I read a little over 36%, and there's more:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions

Here's another link you might benefit from reading, since you so often claim to post only 'facts.'

https://www.redstate.com/diary/imppress/2013/03/06/no-one-is-entitled-to-their-own-facts/

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

If you can figure out any of that stuff where it actually makes sense, please share. I mean it. Everything they say or do is a contradiction of everything else they say or do. There is no obvious rhyme or reason to any of it, yet they seem to have this virulent faith in their own righteousness. Consider:

Saving immigrant babies / Expanding a******n across the country.
Confiscating earned wealth and handing it out to those who didn't earn it and don't deserve it.

Now, as you so presciently asked, who wins? I don't see a winner. The immigrant didn't win, he still has to survive regardless of the country he lives in. The welfare recipient didn't win, he's just as broke as he was before he received all the 'free' money and pissed it away.

There's the paradox of socialism. It sounds great on paper, until you ask how you're going to pay for it. Without free markets, socialism cannot survive, and yet socialists abhor free markets. Does that make any sense?

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

That seems to be fairly common among exchanges by many OPP'ers.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

None in the least!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

[quote=slatten49]

Typo. I meant 40% and increasing. There are some 1500 coal plants going on line in the near future, most in China. We are wasting resources trying to make a dent in CO2 emissions world wide. And given the weak nature of the science, to commit to spending huge amounts on c*****e c****e is irresponsible. And, I might add, stupid!

Carol Kelly

Not an ounce.

Carol Kelly

Agreed.

solarkin

Yup

wolffy

He was not dropped on his head, he was dribbled!

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

https://www.heritage.org/poverty-and-ine******y/report/the-war-poverty-after-50-years

22 trillion dollars and poverty is at the same level as 1965. And they want to give more of our money away.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Insanity!

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

Yep, that's the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over.

Carol Kelly

Precisely! They don’t care how it’ll be paid for. Just promise it and get STUPIDS v**es