One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
That is not rhetorical! Where do you stand???
Page <<first <prev 8 of 10 next> last>>
Jan 24, 2019 01:45:52   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Quote:
"I am contemplating whether or not I should walk you through it to show "YOU PEOPLE"are .... uh.....a might stupid ."

I think you mean 'mite'... "YOU PEOPLE" are.... uh... a mite stupid.


Quote:
"You were contending that the first syllable in Confederatcy,and the articles of confederation we're not prefixes and that they were some form meme or something like that."

I contended no such thing... So much for one's ability to read..


Quote:
"generally the dictionary gives the most broadly used understanding of what the words means- Con meaning succinctly against.con-vict,a convict is against the system,con-vert,a change in something that was the norm,con-descend,again note r*******n against a more preferable form of chacracter."

How about 'continue'... 'construe'... 'condescend' (here's an appropriate one)...

Quote:
"This prefix syllable repeatedly denotes something anti something.If you noted in the definition I downloaded it said that the definition of a Con-federate as being a entity that was generally against the law,in this case the established government ."

Maybe if you add the hyphon...
Yep... The Con-federate States... That does the trick...


Quote:
"Lastly I said it was used in a prefix context because the word federal establishes something to be against,and like wise in the phrase articles of confederation,con meaning anti magna charter, which was anti the Federallies,in this case the Brits."

Seriously...'Magna Charter'....
I'm on my fifth beer and that just tickles...



I really con-like you...
Keep them coming....

Reply
Jan 24, 2019 01:55:56   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Definitions

1. A league or compact for mutual support or
common action: Alliance.
2. A combination of persons for unlawful
purposes: Conspiracy.
3. The body formed by persons, states or
nations united by a league.

Now which of these would apply to a group of states?

Take your time.... Read carefully....

Where do we find the word 'state'?



Reply
Jan 24, 2019 01:58:40   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
The Critical Critic wrote:
I’m going to hold off replying to this directly. I can’t wait for, and hope that Canuckus takes the time to show you specifically just how wrong you are. In the meantime, could you define the word “might” in the sentence you wrote above? And, exactly how you intended to use it...

I absolutely love reading from people that were seemingly educated in the penal system, then, develop a patronizing superiority complex. Hysterical!!!


The penal system does a far better job than this... You would be surprised how many con-victs spend their time learning about the con-stitition while trying to figure out how to con-nive their way out of con-finement....


Reply
 
 
Jan 24, 2019 02:09:38   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
If one were to de-construct something what would happen?

Boom!

Mind blowing I know...

Hope your con-sciousness survived intact...

(I could do this all day )

Reply
Jan 24, 2019 02:12:38   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
[quote=]

I apologize...
Starting to feel bad...

I con-tend that you are correct....

You have con-vinced me...

I feel very con-trite....

(See what I did there... )

Reply
Jan 24, 2019 02:33:20   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
I should stop, but I can't con-trol myself...

How would one win a con-test?

If on con-tacts a disease, is one fine?

If one signs a con-tract, what are one's responsibilities?

If one con-fesses to a crime, will one walk free?

How many con-tainers does one need for a gallon of ice cream?

If one writes a con-clusion, where does it end?

If a monk con-templates nothingness, is it still zen?

Who are one's con-temporaries?

If the Lord con-demns one, where does one go?

If one con-nects all the dots, what will one see?

What qualifies as a meaningful con-versation?

How would one con-sumate a marriage?
(Perhaps you would care to venture an answer to this one)

If one con-sumes enough water will it result in death by dehydration?

If one lacks con-victions, is one a saint?

What is the purpose of a con-veyor belt?

Last one....

What is the purpose of con-gress?


Reply
Jan 24, 2019 05:25:02   #
The Critical Critic Loc: Turtle Island
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I should stop, but I can't con-trol myself...

How would one win a con-test?

If on con-tacts a disease, is one fine?

If one signs a con-tract, what are one's responsibilities?

If one con-fesses to a crime, will one walk free?

How many con-tainers does one need for a gallon of ice cream?

If one writes a con-clusion, where does it end?

If a monk con-templates nothingness, is it still zen?

Who are one's con-temporaries?

If the Lord con-demns one, where does one go?

If one con-nects all the dots, what will one see?

What qualifies as a meaningful con-versation?

How would one con-sumate a marriage?
(Perhaps you would care to venture an answer to this one)

If one con-sumes enough water will it result in death by dehydration?

If one lacks con-victions, is one a saint?

What is the purpose of a con-veyor belt?

Last one....

What is the purpose of con-gress?

I should stop, but I can't con-trol myself... img... (show quote)

So glad I held off, you certainly didn’t disappoint, quite the con-trary, many un-con-trollable belly laughs for a con-stant ten minuets, it was con-tagious and con-tinuous, totally un-con-tainable. Can’t wait for Mr. Green to con-tradict himself.

Thank you, Canuckus!


Reply
 
 
Jan 24, 2019 07:45:54   #
dongreen76
 
The Critical Critic wrote:
I’m going to hold off replying to this directly. I can’t wait for, and hope that Canuckus takes the time to show you specifically just how wrong you are. In the meantime, could you define the word “might” in the sentence you wrote above? And, exactly how you intended to use it...

I absolutely love reading from people that were seemingly educated in the penal system, then, develop a patronizing superiority complex. Hysterical!!!

I'm not only going to hold off not responding to "YOU PEOPLE"in this topic anymore; I'm not going to comment on this topic any more; it's a waist of time-I have learn not to do this with some of "YOU PEOPLE"; due to your deep seated psycological sexual ambiguity of self you are in a perpetual state of cantankerisim,there isn't room in your conflicted souls for the literal logical reasoning as to the right or wrong of an issue."YOU PEOPLE "must in your mind maintain your- as you see it, status quo superiorty statute.Not once can you deviate from it.Just as the nig.. negro has its problem so do a good portion of "YOU PEOPLE".I'm going on to other topics .
P.S. : I just have a bigger penis and can jump a little higher than you can that's all.

Reply
Jan 24, 2019 08:12:28   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
The Critical Critic wrote:
So glad I held off, you certainly didn’t disappoint, quite the con-trary, many un-con-trollable belly laughs for a con-stant ten minuets, it was con-tagious and con-tinuous, totally un-con-tainable. Can’t wait for Mr. Green to con-tradict himself.

Thank you, Canuckus!

So glad I held off, you certainly didn’t disappoin... (show quote)


I loved his response...

What can I say... Boom!

I propose we change his forum name to con-green76...

Reply
Jan 24, 2019 08:16:15   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Quote:
"P.S. : I just have a bigger penis and can jump a little higher than you can that's all."

It's not the size of the ship it's the motion of the ocean... And the quality of the port...

Rabbits, frogs and crickets ate jumpers... Not really known for the size of their reproductive organs though... Just saying....

Reply
Jan 24, 2019 10:33:26   #
The Critical Critic Loc: Turtle Island
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I loved his response...

Yeah, sadly it lacked any kind of surprise.
Quote:
What can I say... Boom!

Lol... mic drop.
Quote:
I propose we change his forum name to con-green76...

I agree with your proposal, easily done, I’ll demonstrate.

Reply
 
 
Jan 24, 2019 10:37:45   #
The Critical Critic Loc: Turtle Island
 
Con green76 wrote:
I'm not only going to hold off not responding to "YOU PEOPLE"in this topic anymore; I'm not going to comment on this topic any more; it's a waist of time-I have learn not to do this with some of "YOU PEOPLE"; due to your deep seated psycological sexual ambiguity of self you are in a perpetual state of cantankerisim,there isn't room in your conflicted souls for the literal logical reasoning as to the right or wrong of an issue."YOU PEOPLE "must in your mind maintain your- as you see it, status quo superiorty statute.Not once can you deviate from it.Just as the nig.. negro has its problem so do a good portion of "YOU PEOPLE".I'm going on to other topics .
P.S. : I just have a bigger penis and can jump a little higher than you can that's all.
I'm not only going to hold off not responding to &... (show quote)

Con Green76 wrote:
I'm not only going to hold off not responding to "YOU PEOPLE"in this topic anymore; I'm not going to comment on this topic any more;

Your abuse of the English language here has me rather befuddled, too many double negatives, are you or are you not going to respond?
Con Green76 wrote:
it's a waist of time-I have learn not to do this with some of "YOU PEOPLE";

The word you’re looking for is “learned”, it is the past tense of “learn”, you may be more familiar with how you probably pronounce it, “learnt”.
Con Green76 wrote:
due to your deep seated psycological sexual ambiguity of self you are in a perpetual state of cantankerisim,there isn't room in your conflicted souls for the literal logical reasoning as to the right or wrong of an issue.

It’s very simple, Con. If the majority in a group discussion point out your errors, and explain where you erred, logical reasoning suggests that you are most likely, in the wrong. There’s an old saying you would be wise to keep in mind, when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging. I’m still at a loss how you made the leap to “deep seated sexual ambiguity”, I’ll assume you read it in your dictionary and thought it sounded profound. Aside from that, I’ll leave it alone, for now.
Con Green76 wrote:
"YOU PEOPLE "must in your mind maintain your- as you see it, status quo superiorty statute.

I think you meant superiority stature.
Con Green76 wrote:
Not once can you deviate from it.Just as the nig.. negro has its problem so do a good portion of "YOU PEOPLE".

Ahh I detect a slight ghetto slip there, Con.
Con Green76 wrote:
I'm going on to other topics.

Wise choice, you were schooled on this one. Would you invite me to the next one you participate in?
Con Green76 wrote:
P.S. : I just have a bigger penis and can jump a little higher than you can that's all.

Sadly, I believe the former size likely equals your I.Q. and the latter was a sk**l developed from years of running from the Po-Po. Seriously though, the only thing you likely have that’s bigger than mine is a front stoop where you and your homies pass the blunt and pound 40’s of O.E.

Reply
Jan 24, 2019 11:50:40   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
The Critical Critic wrote:
Sadly, I believe the former size likely equals your I.Q. and the latter was a sk**l developed from years of running from the Po-Po. Seriously though, the only thing you likely have that’s bigger than mine is a front stoop where you and your homies pass the blunt and pound 40’s of O.E.


That is fun...

Will have to remember it for the future....


Reply
Jan 24, 2019 13:16:48   #
dongreen76
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Quote:
"I am contemplating whether or not I should walk you through it to show "YOU PEOPLE"are .... uh.....a might stupid ."

I think you mean 'mite'... "YOU PEOPLE" are.... uh... a mite stupid.
I didn't mean mite as in a dust mite,I didn't want to minimize your stupidity,I wanted to grandiosize it.In dialectual use;
I meant might in the sense of power.as mighty. Let me see what else have "YOU dumb ass PEOPLE" shot off your big ass mouths about in your never ending quest to try to demean,degrade ,demoralize and subject the world to massage your massive ass psychological insecurities of your selves.
Youre contending that the first syllable in Confederatcy,and the articles of confederation we're not prefixes and that they were some form meme or something like that."
By the way brilliants,note that I have an apostrophe in the word we're,which makes it the contraction we are.Why didn't you superior intellects catch that,or didn't you know.
I contended no such thing... So much for one's ability to read..
You didn't, know that you were contending it.Theres a definition that involves the word meme.look it up.This is the only thing you could have based your argument on.All it tells me is that you spew out toxic jargin with malicious intent off the top of your head and you don't know what the fuck you're talking about ,as I suspected.

Quote:
"generally the dictionary gives the most broadly used understanding of what the words means- Con meaning succinctly against.con-vict,a convict is against the system,con-vert,a change in something that was the norm,con-descend,again note r*******n against a more preferable form of chacracter."
The reason why I put hyphon in between the con and the descend is to put an emphasis on the word we were talking about.If you had reading ability you would have known that.A sincerely educated person would have known that.I was going under the assumption that I was conversing with intelligent educated people that you don't have to stop and explain everything.Evidently not..whew. !!
I'm tired.
.
How about 'continue'... 'construe'... 'condescend' (here's an appropriate one)...I don't what you are trying to imply,but at this point any intelligent man would stop taking "YOU PEOPLE"seriously .The most you are about is playing Facist games in the so called great Democracy due to your own I'll wills

Quote:
"This prefix syllable repeatedly denotes something anti something.If you noted in the definition I downloaded it said that the definition of a Con-federate as being a entity that was generally against the law,in this case the established government ."

Maybe if you add the hyphon...
Yep... The Con-federate States... That does the trick...
What ever that means,but know where when I've seen the word Confederate used is a hyphon inserted.

Quote:
"Lastly I said it was used in a prefix context because the word federal establishes something to be against,and like wise in the phrase articles of confederation,con meaning anti magna charter, which was anti the Federallies,in this case the Brits."

Seriously...'Magna Charter'....
I'm on my fifth beer and that just tickles...
Well ,that is an error on my part but- if you had of been following the forum with any kind of due diligence you would have noticed I was spelling it as Magna Carter,as opposed to Magna Carta,of course you didn't notice.


I really con-like you...
Keep them coming....
Quote: br "I am contemplating whether or not ... (show quote)


Need I go on, actually I have only began
but I'm tired of laughing at "YOU PEOPLES"self proclaimed superiorty.

Reply
Jan 24, 2019 13:26:17   #
Mikeyavelli
 
dongreen76 wrote:
Need I go on, actually I have only began
but I'm tired of laughing at "YOU PEOPLES"self proclaimed superiorty.


Dong reen, one thing you got is moxie.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.