One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
donaled trump ended his presidency last night
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 next>>
Jan 12, 2019 12:48:32   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
First we buy uranium from Russia second no uranium mined in the us can be exported unless approved by Congress!





byronglimish wrote:
Then why doesn't it concern you that the Obama administration's brokering the Uranium One Deal was bad dealing.

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 13:01:04   #
byronglimish (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
First we buy uranium from Russia second no uranium mined in the us can be exported unless approved by Congress!


So Uranium One is a fallacy? Who is Rosatom

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 13:14:18   #
slatten49 (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
So Uranium One is a fallacy? Who is Rosatom

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 13:19:03   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
I never said it was fallacy I said it was of no importance the actual uranium mine they wanted was in eurrope the mine in the us was just part of the package the Canadians wanted to sell. Rosatom is like the Russian counterpart of our NEC.
I'll say this once more we buy uranium from Russia so it would make little sense to sell it to them. They operate the mine in the us selling to nucular power plants in the US.





byronglimish wrote:
So Uranium One is a fallacy? Who is Rosatom

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 13:28:57   #
byronglimish (a regular here)
 
slatten49 wrote:
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/



Thanks Slat...my belief is..

It's like the versions of the now infamous dossier

Convoluted propaganda.

The truth isn't wholly available.

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 16:44:06   #
slatten49 (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
Thanks Slat...my belief is..

It's like the versions of the now infamous dossier

Convoluted propaganda.

The truth isn't wholly available.

Quite possibly so, my friend...but, your post brings to mind a favorite quote of mine...

"The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it."

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 16:49:16   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
here is something you might find interesting

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=2150



slatten49 wrote:
Quite possibly so, my friend...but, your post brings to mind a favorite quote of mine...

"The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it."

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 16:50:25   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
I believe the other mine in the sale the one Russia really wanted is in Kazakhstan

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 16:59:23   #
slatten49 (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
here is something you might find interesting

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=2150

Thanks.

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 17:24:59   #
Bcon (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
I never said it was fallacy I said it was of no importance the actual uranium mine they wanted was in eurrope the mine in the us was just part of the package the Canadians wanted to sell. Rosatom is like the Russian counterpart of our NEC.
I'll say this once more we buy uranium from Russia so it would make little sense to sell it to them. They operate the mine in the us selling to nucular power plants in the US.


If it was of no importance, then why did Hillary get $145;000;000.00 for her
Money laundering foundation, and Bill get $500,000.00 for a 45 minuted speech. No consequence, my ass.

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 17:25:50   #
byronglimish (a regular here)
 
slatten49 wrote:
Quite possibly so, my friend...but, your post brings to mind a favorite quote of mine...

"The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it."


Totally agree!

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 17:34:04   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
I don't know you investigated her for many years you tell me. what did trey Gowdy say he could find nothing. but feel free to investigate more but I fear WA is tired of it.
chump change Clintons worth every penny


Bcon wrote:
If it was of no importance, then why did Hillary get $145;000;000.00 for her
Money laundering foundation, and Bill get $500,000.00 for a 45 minuted speech. No consequence, my ass.

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 18:38:33   #
Louie27 (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
I'll tell you what you should is fact ck your post Mueller delivered eveidence that Russia could use to prosecute a case!
Are you aware we buy uranium from Russia and in fact import most of our uranium!


How on earth could Mueller deliver evidence that Russia could use to prosecute, what case? That doesn't make any sense at all.

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 19:06:29   #
Comment
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Slavery was once ruled Constitutional also... does that make it undebatable or necessarily a justifiable ruling?

Aboslutely, a correct analysis!

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 19:55:54   #
teabag09 (a regular here)
 
Islamists don't eat or do anything else that is hygienic with their left hand because it's the hand they use to wipe their butts. So in other words he was shitting on the Constitution. Mike
slatten49 wrote:
Oaths are traditionally sworn to with the right hand raised. That leaves the left hand for other use.

What is the implication of all congresspersons likely to have taken the oath of office with their left hands on the Bible, Constitution or Koran/Qu'ran

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.