One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
donaled trump ended his presidency last night
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 15 next>>
Jan 10, 2019 18:34:25   #
Sonny Magoo
 
Even Yogi knew better.."It ain't over till it's over". Now the election..that's over, and Trump IS president. So, your statements are really smart for a liberal.

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 18:42:46   #
TommyRadd
 
Pennylynn wrote:
There is nothing in the Constitution about abortion being a "right."
In the 1960s was a time of 'make love, not war' and sexual promiscuity was at such a level it make prostitution almost obsolete. With having many partners as often as possible produced an unwanted issue, other than STDs... unwanted children. From the end of WWII... until roe vs wade, live births in the US remained at about 23 to every 1,000 women (currently we are below 13 per 1,000). But, during WWII, women found themselves with careers... more important things to do that made them happy and having a baby was limiting. Many states had laws against abortion and this made some women unhappy. So they sued... the SCOUTS were under pressure... uphold the states' rights or bend to the very vocal, and tax paying, Democrats.

So, baring a specific Constitutional Right to kill an unborn child... the SCOUTS decided that it was a matter of "privacy." Although the Constitution does not guarantee anyone the right to privacy. But, they decided if they stood on their head, stuck out their tongue and crossed their eyes they could almost see privacy built into the Constitution. You see the "right" that Blackmun and the rest of the majority claimed to discover, right to privacy chief among them, was apparently unknown to the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment. At the time that Amendment was passed in 1868 there were laws against abortion in 36 states, including the very Texas law that the Court was now striking down. There apparently was no question concerning the validity of this provision or of any of the other state statutes when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted. The only conclusion possible from this history is that the drafters did not intend to have the Fourteenth Amendment withdraw from the States the power to legislate with respect to this matter.

In the end, Roe v Wade had many problems.... there was no plaintiff, the Constitution does not guarantee a right to privacy.... and the 14th Amendment did not/does not apply because abortion was not a consideration when it was framed. The SCOUTS in 1973 simply made up meaning and inserted their personal preferences when deciding Roe v. Wade. An interesting, Norma McCorvey, the roe portion of the case never had an abortion and regretted her part in having this law passed. Finally, the right to life, which is Constitutional, was never considered in favor of sparing a child's life. For all that think that an embryo is nothing more than cells... science has confirmed that group of cells is human and that group of cells as early as 6 weeks in gestation feels pain. It is science... not religion or man made law... it is a fact.

So Tommy, although we came to the same conclusions from opposite directions.... you are absolutely right. I challenge anyone to find in the Constitution the right to Privacy.... which was the foundation of the roe v. wade.

There is nothing in the Constitution about abortio... (show quote)


👍👍👍 amen, and well written Pennylynn.

It is unbelievable how people can be so blinded to the simple fact that human embryos are human beings! The only answer is that it is a spiritual kind of blindness.

Someone asked, “Ok, if they’re not human beings, what are they?”

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 19:02:20   #
padremike
 
TommyRadd wrote:
👍👍👍 amen, and well written Pennylynn.

It is unbelievable how people can be so blinded to the simple fact that human embryos are human beings! The only answer is that it is a spiritual kind of blindness.

Someone asked, “Ok, if they’re not human beings, what are they?”


Someone else said that science would be apoplectic if a single cell amoeba was discovered on another planet as "proof of life" but pro death advocates cannot apply the same thinking to the dreaded unborn child.

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 19:52:32   #
carlajones
 
You don't get it do you ? DEMONCRAPS ! If it's filthy they want to legalize it ! Are you really that dumb you don't see it

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 20:47:07   #
Bcon (a regular here)
 
padremike wrote:
Cyst

The leftist news media is now like an old fashioned tent revival meeting giving a new hysterical message every night to keep their glassy eyed masses all worked up and excitable while passing the collection baskets. "We're going to send Trump to hell" and all their children say "Amen."



| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 20:50:38   #
Bcon (a regular here)
 
Abel wrote:
You are dead wrong. You have put GOP where DNC should go in your sentence. The Republicans want the Constitution to be read and followed as written, not interpreted by a bunch of Democratic guardhouse lawyers. There are a few Amendments above Amendment X that should be rewritten or repealed to eliminate some of the Democratic bias toward their personal socialistic desires, but the first ten are pretty well written. We are a Republic, not a Democracy, and that's the way the USA was Founded by our Founders, simply read the Pledge of Allegiance to the USA; unless, of course, you don't wish to pledge allegiance to the USA, and if you don't that's OK - - - just leave the USA and don't let the exit door hit you in the ass!
You are dead wrong. You have put GOP where DNC sho... (show quote)


The constitution is a foreign document to the democrats. They think it lives and breathes and can be changed at will.

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 21:01:09   #
TommyRadd
 
padremike wrote:
Someone else said that science would be apoplectic if a single cell amoeba was discovered on another planet as "proof of life" but pro death advocates cannot apply the same thinking to the dreaded unborn child.


The irony and hypocrisy seems to have no bounds, does it?

The demons that had the ancients sacrifice their children are still around... but just as surely, their days are numbered, thank God!

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 06:14:06   #
jSmitty45 (a regular here)
 
Pennylynn wrote:
I disagree... the polls this morning showed his popularity among Republicans is still very high... and some Democrats are now seeing who the obstructionists are in DC.

I think we should start keeping a running number that Liberals on OPP lie... or in DC... How many 'misinformed' posts have you created?


👍👍👍👍

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 06:18:57   #
jSmitty45 (a regular here)
 
TommyRadd wrote:
I’ve got news for you: Row vs Wade isn’t part of the constitution.

A baby with a heartbeat isn’t a mere blob, it’s a life, and that’s a biological fact. Snuffing out a human life is called murder. Murdering an innocent life in order to remove responsibility from sex is not a guaranteed “right”, but, protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the foundation of our Constitutional Republic.

So for all your appearances of being pro-Constitutional, you’ve completely missed the whole point of it and set yourself in opposition to its core principles!

HYPOCRITE!!! MURDERER!!! Baby Killer!!! People who justify murder under the pretext of law are the worst, because they have no conscience!
I’ve got news for you: Row vs Wade isn’t part of t... (show quote)



Absolutely, you are spot on!!!!

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 08:20:34   #
lindajoy (a regular here)
 
carlajones wrote:
You don't get it do you ? DEMONCRAPS ! If it's filthy they want to legalize it ! Are you really that dumb you don't see it


Hi Carla, if you hit the quote button then it allows us to know to whom you are replying...

Thank You~~And welcome too..

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 14:34:56   #
cbpat1
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Your TDS is going to make you implode.


Sounds like it already has.🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 19:43:28   #
vernon (a regular here)
 
woodguru wrote:
Imagine a republican centrist like...Garland? How about putting real judges that don't bring any bias to the law?


watch it your ignorance is showing.

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 21:27:26   #
kankune (a regular here)
 
proud republican wrote:
GOP is following Constitution, you Rats on the other hand ...i have no idea what you follow....Maybe BS, thats why you people stink so much...


They let a Muslim senator get sworn in on the Koran, so we really cant expect too much from the lowlifes. If she didnt want to be sworn in on the Bible, she should have been sworn in with her hand on OUR CONSTITUTION!!!

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 22:36:59   #
Smedley_buzkill (a regular here)
 


I have a question.... Who the hell is donaled trump?

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 23:13:11   #
lindajoy (a regular here)
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
I have a question.... Who the hell is donaled trump?


Perhaps a DTS speaker?

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 15 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.