One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
OPP Poll....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 next>>
Jan 11, 2019 15:51:54   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
oldroy wrote:
Nikky is some kind of left leaner, a Communist, I think, and will never understand you talking about his statements. He just can't understand why the judges on the 9th Circuit Court shouldn't be appointed to the Supreme Court. They are far left leaners and could change our Constitutions fast if they made up the Supreme Court membership. I bet Nikky does understand that.


The Constitution is already in trouble ! Being a Constitutionalist & Patriotic are rapidly being thrown over for p.c. & "diversity " !!!

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 15:56:04   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
bdamage wrote:
I guess you prefer Democratic socialism/communism, eh Jimmy?

Next thing you know you'll be calling Cortez a genius...


LMAO !!!

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 16:01:51   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
alabuck wrote:
———————

Why is it that you want the next SCOTUS justice to, “...really change Supreme court in our favor.....?” Why is it that you want the citizenry to be divided? The SCOTUS should not be a partisan entity. It should look at the law through “blind eyes,” meaning that it shows NO favoritism. What you want is for the SCOTUS to rule only favorable to what you think.

Well, there are many of us who might want to challenge you and your position(s). We might believe that your position isn’t the best way for America to be going. We may believe your way is paved with lies, misogyny, narcissism, breaking of the “Emoluments Clause” of the Constitution, and other traitorous activities. We may know that your way is bankrolled by Trump laundering Russian mob money and/or Mafia mob money.

You guys “claim” you’re for stronger enforcement of our laws. Then, why don’t you want to investigate all of the possible illegal activities Trump is suspected to be involved in? You spent years and millions of dollars investigating the Clintons and came back with zero. Why not be willing to let Mueller do his investigation and see where it takes us? Why would an innocent person want to end the investigation? Why would an innocent person call the investigation a “witch hunt?” Why would an innocent person fire the head of the FBI, “over that Russia thing,” like Trump did?
——————— br br Why is it that you want the next SC... (show quote)


HELLO, WHERE ARE YOU ? The investigation started BEFORE THE ELECTION !!! They've come up with nothing so far. We'll have to wait for the results of the "investigation" are made public. That could last for years & cost the tax payers 10's if not 100's of millions of dollars !!!

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 19:56:26   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
Owl32 wrote:
it is about returning to LAW based on our founding document not what some lawyer thinks.


The Constitution was saved with the election of Trump.

Lets continue to celebrate that!!!!!

HOLY MELTDOWN, BATMAN! Watch Rachel Maddow get that SMIRK wiped off her face Election Night 2016
https://youtu.be/OVogLdbfOfQ

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 20:18:47   #
debeda (a regular here)
 
eagleye13 wrote:
The Constitution was saved with the election of Trump.

Lets continue to celebrate that!!!!!

HOLY MELTDOWN, BATMAN! Watch Rachel Maddow get that SMIRK wiped off her face Election Night 2016
https://youtu.be/OVogLdbfOfQ



| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 22:18:07   #
Betta
 
proud republican wrote:
Should Ruth Bader Ginsburg retire???


Out to pasture with her, yes.

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 22:55:06   #
Smedley_buzkill (a regular here)
 
Auntie Lulu wrote:
The answer is: Y E S

Where else in our country does an employer put up with an employee that sleeps on the job, is far to ill on a continuing basis to put 100% into their efforts to do the job??? Yes, SCOTUS justices do have a lifetime appointment--but we, the taxpayers, expect that we have individuals who can fulfill the demands of this job. It is a travesty when someone is starting to suffer with the attributes of old age, such as declining health, and mental acuity . . . and yet they cling to their employment position even though they are past the time of being able to fully do the job.
The answer is: Y E S br br Where else in our co... (show quote)

Sounds a lot like Congress. I personally will not vote for an incumbent more than once. If they need more than two terms to steal enough money to last them the rest of their lives they are not smart enough to be my elected representative.

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 00:16:29   #
debeda (a regular here)
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Sounds a lot like Congress. I personally will not vote for an incumbent more than once. If they need more than two terms to steal enough money to last them the rest of their lives they are not smart enough to be my elected representative.


Lolololololololhahahahahaha now THAT'S a unique litmus test

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 03:59:22   #
truthiness
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Sounds a lot like Congress. I personally will not vote for an incumbent more than once. If they need more than two terms to steal enough money to last them the rest of their lives they are not smart enough to be my elected representative.


....
For an incumbent president, you can't vote for him more than once.

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 07:34:52   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Sounds a lot like Congress. I personally will not vote for an incumbent more than once. If they need more than two terms to steal enough money to last them the rest of their lives they are not smart enough to be my elected representative.


That's a GREAT IDEA !!!

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 08:55:46   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Sounds a lot like Congress. I personally will not vote for an incumbent more than once. If they need more than two terms to steal enough money to last them the rest of their lives they are not smart enough to be my elected representative.


Very astute of you, Smedley

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 10:50:34   #
Owl32 (a regular here)
 
this is TRUE and too all who will LOOK will SEE the TRUTH before this month is over. I will add Roberts, appointed by GB43 is not a constitutionalist and can not be TRUSTED.
eagleye13 wrote:
The Constitution was saved with the election of Trump.

Lets continue to celebrate that!!!!!

HOLY MELTDOWN, BATMAN! Watch Rachel Maddow get that SMIRK wiped off her face Election Night 2016
https://youtu.be/OVogLdbfOfQ

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 11:03:58   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
Owl32 wrote:
this is TRUE and too all who will LOOK will SEE the TRUTH before this month is over. I will add Roberts, appointed by GB43 is not a constitutionalist and can not be TRUSTED.


Bush Senior was not a conservative.
He was a globalist NWO/CFR/CIA plant.
With the help of the MSM; Republicans were played.

Junior Bush was a stooge, surrounded by globalist CFR plants.

| Reply
Jan 12, 2019 13:56:29   #
Owl32 (a regular here)
 
THIS IS TRUE>
eagleye13 wrote:
Bush Senior was not a conservative.
He was a globalist NWO/CFR/CIA plant.
With the help of the MSM; Republicans were played.

Junior Bush was a stooge, surrounded by globalist CFR plants.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 18:54:36   #
bggamers (a regular here)
 
woodguru wrote:
Another Trump hard right wing judge will trigger term limits, we would have a hopelessly biased court.


What's wrong with term limits ????

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.