One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
OPP Poll....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 next>>
Jan 11, 2019 10:31:27   #
Owl32
 
it is about returning to LAW based on our founding document not what some lawyer thinks.
alabuck wrote:
———————

Why is it that you want the next SCOTUS justice to, “...really change Supreme court in our favor.....?” Why is it that you want the citizenry to be divided? The SCOTUS should not be a partisan entity. It should look at the law through “blind eyes,” meaning that it shows NO favoritism. What you want is for the SCOTUS to rule only favorable to what you think.

Well, there are many of us who might want to challenge you and your position(s). We might believe that your position isn’t the best way for America to be going. We may believe your way is paved with lies, misogyny, narcissism, breaking of the “Emoluments Clause” of the Constitution, and other traitorous activities. We may know that your way is bankrolled by Trump laundering Russian mob money and/or Mafia mob money.

You guys “claim” you’re for stronger enforcement of our laws. Then, why don’t you want to investigate all of the possible illegal activities Trump is suspected to be involved in? You spent years and millions of dollars investigating the Clintons and came back with zero. Why not be willing to let Mueller do his investigation and see where it takes us? Why would an innocent person want to end the investigation? Why would an innocent person call the investigation a “witch hunt?” Why would an innocent person fire the head of the FBI, “over that Russia thing,” like Trump did?
——————— br br Why is it that you want the next SC... (show quote)

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 10:34:24   #
debeda (a regular here)
 
Owl32 wrote:
it is about returning to LAW based on our founding document not what some lawyer thinks.


AGREED

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 10:39:25   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
bdamage wrote:
I guess you prefer Democratic socialism/communism, eh Jimmy?

Next thing you know you'll be calling Cortez a genius...


Now that is on target!
https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/upload/2019/1/10/t1-651350-received_2070071366612310.jpg

BTW; Is Ginsberg well enough to return to her duties?

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 11:08:36   #
bdamage (a regular here)
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Now that is on target!
https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/upload/2019/1/10/t1-651350-received_2070071366612310.jpg

BTW; Is Ginsberg well enough to return to her duties?


I don't think she's been "well enough" for the last 10 years.

Guess when Ruth's birthday is....



| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 13:55:56   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
bdamage wrote:
I don't think she's been "well enough" for the last 10 years.

Guess when Ruth's birthday is....


I'm probably wrong, but isn't that the "Ides of March" ? Cool picture where'd you get it ?

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 14:26:23   #
Owl32
 
I pray this is fact?
bdamage wrote:
I don't think she's been "well enough" for the last 10 years.

Guess when Ruth's birthday is....



| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 14:58:30   #
maximus (a regular here)
 
zillaorange wrote:
I'm probably wrong, but isn't that the "Ides of March" ? Cool picture where'd you get it ?


No, it is the Ides of March and my birthday. It's actually the first new moon of a given month, usually between the 13th and 15th. Every month has Ides.




| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 15:18:42   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
maximus wrote:
No, it is the Ides of March and my birthday. It's actually the first new moon of a given month, usually between the 13th and 15th. Every month has Ides.





I didn't know there were ides for each month, thanks ! For myself I was born in march myself, Passion Sunday, in the Year of the Dragon (water). I thought it a curious juxtaposition, the Roman culture along side the Chinese ! but I dawdle, pardon me.

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 15:25:12   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
Kevyn wrote:
Yes as soon as she wants to and there is a Democrat in the White House. Hers is a lifetime appointment.


Unless she become physically or mentally unable to serve. Reminds me of the attempt on Trump !

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 15:29:30   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
That's what wrong in your favour they should interpret the constition the way it was written and not what one side or the other think it should be!!





quote=proud republican]It will happen during Trump's Presidency so he is able to appoint more conservative Judges and really change Supreme court in our favor.....
[/quote]

Good point Lonewolf, but we know how BASTARDIZED the WHOLE SYSTEM'S BECOME !!!

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 15:32:11   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
I don't think for a minute she will live through Trump's "third term". Actually her days are numbered and you know what that means one more conservative Justice and Bye-bye Roe. But just think we won't be able to look at you as just another supporter of unborn baby killings. How sad!



| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 15:35:05   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
woodguru wrote:
What would be wrong with a supreme court that didn't "favor" either side, but adhered to the law and constitution?

The only acceptable nominations need to have a solid history of centrist legal positions regardless of their party affiliation. The supreme court if done properly demands no bias, not an "our side" mentality.

The left would support any centrist judge, the right demands the full on hard right conservative that has a proven track record of being perfectly willing to bring their conservative political and religious beliefs and ideology to the court.
What would be wrong with a supreme court that didn... (show quote)


That's a presumption on your part woodguru ! That's part of the problem on OPP ! We argue opinions instead of FACTS !!! There can be NO VALID OUTCOME !!!

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 15:40:58   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
EN Submarine Qualified wrote:
Yes. She isn't the only one. 70 should be the cutoff point for any elected politician.


There's no age limit of term in the Court. Unless the jdge is deemed unable to carry out her/ his duties.

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 15:43:11   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
Nickolai wrote:
Yes she always votes the right way just as Anton Scalia always voted the wrong way. The brains of conservatives are wired bassakwards


You PROVE my point Nickolai, we argue opinions, NOT FACTS !!!

| Reply
Jan 11, 2019 15:46:45   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
kemmer wrote:
Whereas right wing hacks keep trying to turn back the clock to the 1950s.


May it's more like the Morality & Opine of the 50's !!!

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.