it is about returning to LAW based on our founding document not what some lawyer thinks.
Why is it that you want the next SCOTUS justice to, “...really change Supreme court in our favor.....?” Why is it that you want the citizenry to be divided? The SCOTUS should not be a partisan entity. It should look at the law through “blind eyes,” meaning that it shows NO favoritism. What you want is for the SCOTUS to rule only favorable to what you think.
Well, there are many of us who might want to challenge you and your position(s). We might believe that your position isn’t the best way for America to be going. We may believe your way is paved with lies, misogyny, narcissism, breaking of the “Emoluments Clause” of the Constitution, and other traitorous activities. We may know that your way is bankrolled by Trump laundering Russian mob money and/or Mafia mob money.
You guys “claim” you’re for stronger enforcement of our laws. Then, why don’t you want to investigate all of the possible illegal activities Trump is suspected to be involved in? You spent years and millions of dollars investigating the Clintons and came back with zero. Why not be willing to let Mueller do his investigation and see where it takes us? Why would an innocent person want to end the investigation? Why would an innocent person call the investigation a “witch hunt?” Why would an innocent person fire the head of the FBI, “over that Russia thing,” like Trump did?
——————— br br Why is it that you want the next SC... (show quote)
No, it is the Ides of March and my birthday. It's actually the first new moon of a given month, usually between the 13th and 15th. Every month has Ides.
I didn't know there were ides for each month, thanks ! For myself I was born in march myself, Passion Sunday, in the Year of the Dragon (water). I thought it a curious juxtaposition, the Roman culture along side the Chinese ! but I dawdle, pardon me.
I don't think for a minute she will live through Trump's "third term". Actually her days are numbered and you know what that means one more conservative Justice and Bye-bye Roe. But just think we won't be able to look at you as just another supporter of unborn baby killings. How sad!
What would be wrong with a supreme court that didn't "favor" either side, but adhered to the law and constitution?
The only acceptable nominations need to have a solid history of centrist legal positions regardless of their party affiliation. The supreme court if done properly demands no bias, not an "our side" mentality.
The left would support any centrist judge, the right demands the full on hard right conservative that has a proven track record of being perfectly willing to bring their conservative political and religious beliefs and ideology to the court.
What would be wrong with a supreme court that didn... (show quote)
That's a presumption on your part woodguru ! That's part of the problem on OPP ! We argue opinions instead of FACTS !!! There can be NO VALID OUTCOME !!!