One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
OPP Poll....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 next>>
Jan 13, 2019 19:07:53   #
Owl32
 
we need term limits. need repeal illegal amendments to constitution 16t.h & 17th
bggamers wrote:
What's wrong with term limits ????

| Reply
Jan 14, 2019 09:12:43   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
woodguru wrote:
"Another Trump hard right wing judge will trigger term limits, we would have a hopelessly biased court."

Holding strictly to the intent of the Constitution would be "a hopelessly biased court", woodguru.

If you want to rewrite the Constitution; pass an amendment to the Constitution.
That is how it is supposed to be done.

| Reply
Jan 14, 2019 10:38:27   #
Owl32
 
the other side always cheat, tell a lie that admendment passed when it did not, see 16th and 17th admendments.
eagleye13 wrote:
woodguru wrote:
"Another Trump hard right wing judge will trigger term limits, we would have a hopelessly biased court."

Holding strictly to the intent of the Constitution would be "a hopelessly biased court", woodguru.

If you want to rewrite the Constitution; pass an amendment to the Constitution.
That is how it is supposed to be done.

| Reply
Jan 14, 2019 10:44:21   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
Owl32 wrote:
the other side always cheat, tell a lie that admendment passed when it did not, see 16th and 17th admendments.


Ever read 'The Law that never was'?
Quite an expose of what you are referring to.
Improper/cheating of amendment ratification.

| Reply
Jan 14, 2019 10:45:55   #
Owl32
 
NO, but I am ordering it right now. Thanks.
eagleye13 wrote:
Ever read 'The Law that never was'?
Quite an expose of what you are referring to.

| Reply
Jan 14, 2019 10:49:16   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
Owl32 wrote:
NO, but I am ordering it right now. Thanks.


Good!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Law_that_Never_Was

The Law That Never Was: The Fraud of the 16th Amendment and Personal Income Tax is a 1985 book by William J. Benson and Martin J. "Red" Beckman which claims that the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, commonly known as the income tax amendment, was never properly ratified. In 2007, and again in 2009, **** Benson's contentions were ruled to be fraudulent.

Benson's contentions were ruled to be fraudulent.
The Fox guarding the Hen House?

| Reply
Jan 21, 2019 17:34:46   #
Smedley_buzkill (a regular here)
 
Owl32 wrote:
we need term limits. need repeal illegal amendments to constitution 16t.h & 17th


We HAVE term limits; they're called elections. The problem is an electorate that reelects Senators at 97% and Representatives at about 90% and then bitches that nothing ever changes.

| Reply
Jan 21, 2019 19:07:56   #
debeda (a regular here)
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
We HAVE term limits; they're called elections. The problem is an electorate that reelects Senators at 97% and Representatives at about 90% and then bitches that nothing ever changes.



| Reply
Jan 22, 2019 08:05:17   #
Owl32
 
remember House writes spending bills, Senate funds them, the way to control spending is go back to States selecting Senator that can be recalled by the States and dismissed. the Conserative states out number the Spending States. That way spending is controlled. No more BS.
debeda wrote:

| Reply
Jan 22, 2019 11:54:37   #
debeda (a regular here)
 
Owl32 wrote:
remember House writes spending bills, Senate funds them, the way to control spending is go back to States selecting Senator that can be recalled by the States and dismissed. the Conserative states out number the Spending States. That way spending is controlled. No more BS.


GOOD- and mostly forgotten - point!

| Reply
Jan 22, 2019 12:54:38   #
Smedley_buzkill (a regular here)
 
debeda wrote:
GOOD- and mostly forgotten - point!


That requires repeal of the 17th Amendment. Since the Amendment became law, Senators have their own little fiefdom in the Capitol Building. They get re-elected at a rate of 97%. You think they will willingly give that up and go back to being a peon?

| Reply
Jan 22, 2019 13:01:24   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
That requires repeal of the 17th Amendment. Since the Amendment became law, Senators have their own little fiefdom in the Capitol Building. They get re-elected at a rate of 97%. You think they will willingly give that up and go back to being a peon?


The lack of integrity among politicians should be no surprise.
Most of them are lawyers.

BTW; Is Ginsberg still trying to legislate from a bed?

| Reply
Jan 22, 2019 13:14:36   #
Smedley_buzkill (a regular here)
 
eagleye13 wrote:
The lack of integrity among politicians should be no surprise.
Most of them are lawyers.

BTW; Is Ginsberg still trying to legislate from a bed?


Bed or bench, she isn't supposed to legislate from either.

| Reply
Jan 22, 2019 13:18:36   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Bed or bench, she isn't supposed to legislate from either.


My point exactly.
That is why the Dems are determined to sit her up.

| Reply
Jan 23, 2019 13:40:01   #
Owl32
 
using the dead to do the devil's work.

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.