One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Think about it.
Dec 9, 2018 10:00:46   #
Capt-jack Loc: Home
 
449,000 Californians received a jury summons last year, to which they replied

"I am not a citizen, therefore I cannot sit on a jury"

The number one source for jury summons candidates is the v***r r**********n list.

Think about it.

Reply
Dec 9, 2018 10:13:15   #
debeda
 
Capt-jack wrote:
449,000 Californians received a jury summons last year, to which they replied

"I am not a citizen, therefore I cannot sit on a jury"

The number one source for jury summons candidates is the v***r r**********n list.

Think about it.


Yep. Bye bye California and any other state that has their stupido rules. Like illinois.....

Reply
Dec 9, 2018 10:32:46   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Capt-jack wrote:
449,000 Californians received a jury summons last year, to which they replied

"I am not a citizen, therefore I cannot sit on a jury"

The number one source for jury summons candidates is the v***r r**********n list.

Think about it.


They can v**e for politicians to destroy our country but they cannot sit on a jury. Sounds like something the"progressive" will celebrate, doesn't it?

Reply
 
 
Dec 9, 2018 10:39:19   #
Kevyn
 
Capt-jack wrote:
449,000 Californians received a jury summons last year, to which they replied

"I am not a citizen, therefore I cannot sit on a jury"

The number one source for jury summons candidates is the v***r r**********n list.

Think about it.
The source for prospective jurists is motor vehicle licenses and state ID applications not the v***r r**********n list. This was changed years ago because many people did not r******r to v**e to avoid jury duty.

Reply
Dec 9, 2018 11:12:34   #
Capt-jack Loc: Home
 
Kevyn wrote:
The source for prospective jurists is motor vehicle licenses and state ID applications not the v***r r**********n list. This was changed years ago because many people did not r******r to v**e to avoid jury duty.


Says a Left winger from the failing state of California.

Reply
Dec 9, 2018 11:49:21   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
Capt-jack wrote:
Says a Left winger from the failing state of California.


No, it is the Superior Court of California that says so.

I'm wondering where you found your information that v**ers' registration records are the major source of jury summons.
California has over 29 Million registered drivers and abut 18 million registered v**ers., so the likelihood of a DMV record being the source of a summons is pretty high.
If you want to explore whether or not non-residents are v****g illegally then it seems wiser to do so directly with evidence of fraud rather than through your spurious implication.

https://www.ppic.org/publication/californias-likely-v**ers/





Reply
Dec 9, 2018 13:27:54   #
Kevyn
 
PaulPisces wrote:
No, it is the Superior Court of California that says so.

I'm wondering where you found your information that v**ers' registration records are the major source of jury summons.
California has over 29 Million registered drivers and abut 18 million registered v**ers., so the likelihood of a DMV record being the source of a summons is pretty high.
If you want to explore whether or not non-residents are v****g illegally then it seems wiser to do so directly with evidence of fraud rather than through your spurious implication.

https://www.ppic.org/publication/californias-likely-v**ers/
No, it is the Superior Court of California that sa... (show quote)

Yes, but why would he ever let the t***h interrupt a lie that fit his world view?

Reply
 
 
Dec 10, 2018 09:29:23   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Hellloooo in the republic of cally the dmv is the source for v***r r**********n!!! 153000 mistakes just this year! Why do u think demonrats won? Fraud!!!!!! We need v**er Id!!!!! Before 2020!! Or ocassio could b president!

Reply
Dec 10, 2018 09:30:17   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Let’s start the petition to the Supreme Court!!!

Reply
Dec 10, 2018 10:35:36   #
debeda
 
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
Hellloooo in the republic of cally the dmv is the source for v***r r**********n!!! 153000 mistakes just this year! Why do u think demonrats won? Fraud!!!!!! We need v**er Id!!!!! Before 2020!! Or ocassio could b president!


Illinois is the same despite most counties in the state being red we're now stuck with blue everything.....

Reply
Dec 10, 2018 14:16:19   #
Bcon
 
Did you expect anything less from that liberal stronghold?

Reply
 
 
Dec 10, 2018 18:01:27   #
debeda
 
Bcon wrote:
Did you expect anything less from that liberal stronghold?


Nope. But no v***r f***d would help the situation

Reply
Dec 12, 2018 23:06:12   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
Hellloooo in the republic of cally the dmv is the source for v***r r**********n!!! 153000 mistakes just this year! Why do u think demonrats won? Fraud!!!!!! We need v**er Id!!!!! Before 2020!! Or ocassio could b president!


Oh lordy!
The CA DMV is hardly the source of v***r r**********n.
It is just an option:

https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/about/v**erregistrationoptions

Further, California's addition of the option is a late-adoption of a Federal law that was enacted in 1993.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/about-national-v**er-registration-act

I won't even comment on your ridiculous fear that increased v***r r**********n could lead to Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez becoming president any time soon.
She is 29 years old and The Constitution requires that our president be at least 35 years old.
If you can manage the math, she will not be eligible to run for president in 2020.

Reply
Dec 13, 2018 08:42:16   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
PaulPisces wrote:
Oh lordy!
The CA DMV is hardly the source of v***r r**********n.
It is just an option:

https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/about/v**erregistrationoptions

Further, California's addition of the option is a late-adoption of a Federal law that was enacted in 1993.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/about-national-v**er-registration-act

I won't even comment on your ridiculous fear that increased v***r r**********n could lead to Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez becoming president any time soon.
She is 29 years old and The Constitution requires that our president be at least 35 years old.
If you can manage the math, she will not be eligible to run for president in 2020.
Oh lordy! br The CA DMV is hardly the source of v*... (show quote)


She has already stated that the 35 year minimum is for men only, it doesn't pertain to women because women mature more quickly than men do. Absurd isn't it, but then she is a true socialist really believing that the laws pertain to lesser people, for Socialists there is no right or wrong, a concept that both Marx and Engles believed and promoted.

Reply
Dec 13, 2018 12:19:36   #
Bcon
 
no propaganda please wrote:
She has already stated that the 35 year minimum is for men only, it doesn't pertain to women because women mature more quickly than men do. Absurd isn't it, but then she is a true socialist really believing that the laws pertain to lesser people, for Socialists there is no right or wrong, a concept that both Marx and Engles believed and promoted.


Can you put into words the differences between the democrat, socialist, and c*******ts?

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.