One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Newest Pictures | Search | Login | Register | Help
Main
The right wing denial (PAY FOR PLAY)
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
Dec 6, 2018 23:16:35   #
proud republican (a regular here)
 
JFlorio wrote:
3rd bottle Otis? Not even the weekend yet. Dry out.


Jim dont you know that according to Senator Hirono Democrats are just "to smart".......You just cant make that shit up!!!1

| Reply
Dec 6, 2018 23:26:46   #
EmilyD (a regular here)
 
Airforceone wrote:
It’s become apparent that Trump has become compromised by the Saudis. The Saudis paid for 500 rooms at a Trumps hotel, and scammed our veterans to use our veterans to lobby for a bill that would benefit Saudi Arabia. These veterans that were given these rooms for free and paid for there meals the Saudis Paid the Trump hotel $275,000.

Let’s take a look at on air speeches by Trump I watched this today so none of you right wing Trump supporters can deny he said them because it was all shown on TV today coming out of Trumps mouth.
Trumps on air quotes:
We are with the Saudis

I have no business whatsoever with the Saudis

I like the Saudis there very nice to me

I make a lot of money with the Saudis

The Saudis buy all sorts of Trump stuff

The Saudis buy all sorts of toys from Trump

The Saudis pay me millions or hundreds of millions of dollars.

Then he says I don’t make deals with the Saudis

Then he said I don’t make any money from the Saudis

Then he said again I have nothing to do with the Saudis

Then he said the Saudis are very nice to me

Then he said the Saudis are very nice to me again they buy my condos, you just would not believe how nice they are to me and the millions I make from the Saudis

All of this from a guy that said all Muslims are terrorist. Saudi Arabia is a nation of 20 million Sunni Muslims. Trump wants to kick out all Muslims from the US.

Then he says the Saudis will pay anything amount of money they have nothing but Money.


Now during the Campaign Trump used Pay for play with the Clinton foundation. Even though a special investigation by the House, Senate and State Department Found no evidence of pay for play. But the right wing lunatics just hold onto anything that pathological liar says. All he has to say is fake news and that is the rally call of the right wing lunatics.

(SO WHICH TRUMP IS IT THE TRUMP THAT HAS NO DEALINGS OR BUSINESS WITH THE SAUDIS OR THE ONE THAT MAKES MILLIONS OR HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS FROM THE SAUDIS )

Can we all understand why Trump will not release his personal and corporate tax returns. Afterall Clinton released her last 20 years of tax returns and 5 years of foundation financials while she was Secretary of State. Trump has released nothing.
It’s become apparent that Trump has become comprom... (show quote)

Is this something you just made up in your drunken mind? Or do you have some kind of backup? Who gives a flying fluck what past presidents released their returns...it's not a requirement. Period. Trump does not want the MSM FAKE media all over his charitable contributions and income information...you would love to see how CNN will misconstrue Trump's taxes.

Trump has been a high profile real estate entrepreneur all his life. The IRS has audited him every single year that he has been in business. If they have found anything amiss, believe me, it would have been all over the news. When you leftists criticize Trump for utilizing our laws to reorganize his business via bankruptcy, which is LEGAL, then YOU NEED TO CHANGE BANKRUPTCY LAWS.......and NOT criticize Trump for using the laws of our country to conduct legitimate business.

Please provide a link to your accusations, pal. I bet you can't.

| Reply
Dec 6, 2018 23:50:44   #
Jakebrake (a regular here)
 
EmilyD wrote:
Is this something you just made up in your drunken mind? Or do you have some kind of backup? Who gives a flying fluck what past presidents released their returns...it's not a requirement. Period. Trump does not want the MSM FAKE media all over his charitable contributions and income information...you would love to see how CNN will misconstrue Trump's taxes.

Trump has been a high profile real estate entrepreneur all his life. The IRS has audited him every single year that he has been in business. If they have found anything amiss, believe me, it would have been all over the news. When you leftists criticize Trump for utilizing our laws to reorganize his business via bankruptcy, which is LEGAL, then YOU NEED TO CHANGE BANKRUPTCY LAWS.......and NOT criticize Trump for using the laws of our country to conduct legitimate business.

Please provide a link to your accusations, pal. I bet you can't.
Is this something you just made up in your drunken... (show quote)


Ah yes Emily, including verifiable links to assertions made to support ones position is something AF1 never includes in his bloviating diatribes. I personally think he sits in front of his computer 24/7 reading tripe from left wing nut blogs like Politicus with either CNN or MessNBC on the tube dreaming up some Trump hating propaganda to spew here on OPP. This guy is hopeless as well as useless...

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 00:18:38   #
EmilyD (a regular here)
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Ah yes Emily, including verifiable links to assertions made to support ones position is something AF1 never includes in his bloviating diatribes. I personally think he sits in front of his computer 24/7 reading tripe from left wing nut blogs like Politicus with either CNN or MessNBC on the tube dreaming up some Trump hating propaganda to spew here on OPP. This guy is hopeless as well as useless...

Yes and the fact that he uses "AirforceOne" pisses me off. My son is active in the AF and represents everything against what Airforceone is about. It's personal.

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 00:25:55   #
Jakebrake (a regular here)
 
EmilyD wrote:
Yes and the fact that he uses "AirforceOne" pisses me off. My son is active in the AF and represents everything against what Airforceone is about. It's personal.


I don't blame you one bit, and what is really pathetic is this clown has probably never served in the Armed Forces.

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 00:26:25   #
EmilyD (a regular here)
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Ah yes Emily, including verifiable links to assertions made to support ones position is something AF1 never includes in his bloviating diatribes. I personally think he sits in front of his computer 24/7 reading tripe from left wing nut blogs like Politicus with either CNN or MessNBC on the tube dreaming up some Trump hating propaganda to spew here on OPP. This guy is hopeless as well as useless...

Pretty soon people are going to realize that SM is way more informative than MSM. Trump figured it out early.

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 03:15:35   #
JoyV (a regular here)
 
Airforceone wrote:
The Emoluments clause was written for the presidency or any federal office holder, what the hell is wrong with you people. You were screaming like children when the Obama’s took a plate out of the White when he left office because it was a gift from a foreign dignitary.

( WHY DO YOU CONTINUE TO JUSTIFY THIS GUY)

And yes he told you he hired a law firm stop the GD BS and look at what he is doing he never let go of his three major entities. He never filed the paperwork he never put any of his companies in a blind trust. All that piece of garbage did was scam you people again when he stood in front of the American and just told you his two idiot sons were running the company. Look at what he is doing and stop listening to a pathological lying POS.

Not only is his two idiot sons running the company, there jet setting around on the tax payer dime.

When Obama was in office the GD Republican Congress audited him every three months and the republicans screamed like children along with the rest of the right wing idiots. Go back a read there GD post. Well it’s estimated Trump and his crime family have spent more in one year than Obama family spent in 8 years.

The democrats have requested the same republicans that audited Obama every three months to Audit Trumps family but they refused. That will all change in January that POS in the White will have a lot of exposing to do.
The Emoluments clause was written for the presiden... (show quote)


Emoluments Clause.
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution,[1] that prohibits the federal government from granting titles of nobility, and restricts members of the government from receiving gifts, emoluments, offices or titles from foreign states and monarchies without the consent of the United States Congress. Also known as the Emoluments Clause, it was designed to shield the republican character of the United States against so-called "corrupting foreign influences."

This was NOT written for the President. It was written for members of the government.

As for Obama removing a gift, in order to comply with the Clause's prohibition on accepting presents from foreign governments, the President of the United States has traditionally sought permission from Congress to keep the present himself. Absent permission, the President will deposit the present with the Department of State. For example, Andrew Jackson sought permission from Congress to keep a gold medal presented by Simon Bolivar; Congress refused to grant consent, and so Jackson deposited the medal with the Department of State. Martin Van Buren and John Tyler received gifts from the Imam of Muscat, for which they received congressional authorization either to transfer them to the United States Government or to auction them with proceeds vesting to the United States Treasury.

A foreign official paying for a hotel room of a hotel owned by a United States President; is NOT a gift! Yet the profits from renting rooms to foreign dignitaries HAVE been donated to the United States
Treasury. So the question of whether or not profits are emoluments or not is moot!

What Obama audits? If you mean all the audits Obama had the IRS do on conservative groups, then are you wanting Trump to usurp the same authority to have left wing groups audited?

As for how much the Obama's spent in travels; they have never been audited for them. In fact the figures were only released after Judicial Watch freedom of information request was granted less than a year ago. His tab came to $99,714,527.82. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/final-obama-travel-tab-100-million
The MSM usually counted Obama's travel expenses as just the actual costs for the family and leave out security costs, secret service food and rooms, costs of closing landmarks to the public, costs of rerouting traffic, and other peripheral expenses; while including all of the above for Trump.

BTW, Trump has been audited by the IRS several times. Whether his outspoken criticism of the Obama and G W Bush administrations, or his questioning of Obama's birthplace had anything to do with the audits I will leave for others to investigate. But that he WAS audited multiple times is not in question.

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 05:12:05   #
wolffy
 
JFlorio wrote:
3rd bottle Otis? Not even the weekend yet. Dry out.


LSD? Opiates? I think he is the reason doctors tell everyone not to mix drugs and alcohol!

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 07:01:50   #
buffalo (a regular here)
 
Airforceone wrote:
It’s become apparent that Trump has become compromised by the Saudis. The Saudis paid for 500 rooms at a Trumps hotel, and scammed our veterans to use our veterans to lobby for a bill that would benefit Saudi Arabia. These veterans that were given these rooms for free and paid for there meals the Saudis Paid the Trump hotel $275,000.

Let’s take a look at on air speeches by Trump I watched this today so none of you right wing Trump supporters can deny he said them because it was all shown on TV today coming out of Trumps mouth.
Trumps on air quotes:
We are with the Saudis

I have no business whatsoever with the Saudis

I like the Saudis there very nice to me

I make a lot of money with the Saudis

The Saudis buy all sorts of Trump stuff

The Saudis buy all sorts of toys from Trump

The Saudis pay me millions or hundreds of millions of dollars.

Then he says I don’t make deals with the Saudis

Then he said I don’t make any money from the Saudis

Then he said again I have nothing to do with the Saudis

Then he said the Saudis are very nice to me

Then he said the Saudis are very nice to me again they buy my condos, you just would not believe how nice they are to me and the millions I make from the Saudis

All of this from a guy that said all Muslims are terrorist. Saudi Arabia is a nation of 20 million Sunni Muslims. Trump wants to kick out all Muslims from the US.

Then he says the Saudis will pay anything amount of money they have nothing but Money.


Now during the Campaign Trump used Pay for play with the Clinton foundation. Even though a special investigation by the House, Senate and State Department Found no evidence of pay for play. But the right wing lunatics just hold onto anything that pathological liar says. All he has to say is fake news and that is the rally call of the right wing lunatics.

(SO WHICH TRUMP IS IT THE TRUMP THAT HAS NO DEALINGS OR BUSINESS WITH THE SAUDIS OR THE ONE THAT MAKES MILLIONS OR HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS FROM THE SAUDIS )

Can we all understand why Trump will not release his personal and corporate tax returns. Afterall Clinton released her last 20 years of tax returns and 5 years of foundation financials while she was Secretary of State. Trump has released nothing.
It’s become apparent that Trump has become comprom... (show quote)


You know, coolio, you are pathetic. PAT FOR PLAY...really?

So the saudis rented some rooms from trumpy's hotel. Tell me, what did the saudis get when they "donated" MILLIONS to the clinton family tax dodging slush fund...er...trust. The invasion of Libya and Qaddafi's murder? Tell me what the ruskies got for donating MILLIONS to the clinton family tax dodging slush fund...er...trust. 20% of US uranium? How about oman or qatar?

"Among all the rivers of money that have flowed to the Clinton family, one seems to raise the biggest national security questions of all: the stream of cash that came from 20 foreign governments who relied on weapons export approvals from Hillary Clinton's State Department.

Federal law designates the secretary of state as "responsible for the continuous supervision and general direction of sales" of arms, military hardware and services to foreign countries. In practice, that meant that Clinton was charged with rejecting or approving weapons deals -- and when it came to Clinton Foundation donors, Hillary Clinton's State Department did a whole lot of approving.

While Clinton was secretary of state, her department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors. That figure from Clinton's three full fiscal years in office is almost double the value of arms sales to those countries during the same period of President George W. Bush's second term.

The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that gave to the Clinton Foundation. That was a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period.

American military contractors and their affiliates that donated to the Clinton Foundation -- and in some cases, helped finance speaking fees to Bill Clinton -- also got in on the action. Those firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth of arms deals authorized by the Clinton State Department.

Under a directive signed by President Clinton in 1995, the State Department is supposed to take foreign governments' human rights records into account when reviewing arms deals. Yet, Hillary Clinton's State Department increased approvals of such deals to Clinton Foundation donors that her own agency was sharply criticizing for systematic human rights abuses.

As just one of many examples, in its 2011 Human Rights Report, Clinton's State Department slammed Algeria's government for imposing "restrictions on freedom of assembly and association," tolerating "arbitrary killing," "widespread corruption" and a "lack of judicial independence."

That year, the Algerian government donated $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation and the next year Clinton's State Department approved a one-year 70 percent increase in military export authorizations to the country. The jump included authorizations for almost 50,000 items classified as "toxicological agents, including chemical agents, biological agents and associated equipment." The State Department had not authorized the export of any of such items to Algeria the year before.

During Hillary Clinton's 2009 Senate confirmation hearings, Republican Sen. Richard Lugar said the Clinton Foundation should stop accepting foreign government money. He warned that if it didn't, "foreign governments and entities may perceive the Clinton Foundation as a means to gain favor with the secretary of state."

The Clintons did not take his advice. Advocates for limits on the political influence of money now say that Lugar was prescient.

"The word was out to these groups that one of the best ways to gain access and influence with the Clintons was to give to this foundation," said Meredith McGehee, policy director at the Campaign Legal Center.

While these arms deals may seem like ancient history, Lawrence Lessig, the director of Harvard University's Safra Center for Ethics, says they "raise a fundamental question of judgment" -- one that is relevant to the 2016 presidential campaign.

"Can it really be that the Clintons didn't recognize the questions these transactions would raise?" he said. "And if they did, what does that say about their sense of the appropriate relationship between private gain and public good?"

http://www.salon.com/2015/05/31/the_cash_donations_hillary_simply_has_no_answer_for_partner/

Tellme, coolio, when are bitch clinton and her slick willie going to be executed for TREASON?

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 07:13:35   #
Seth (a regular here)
 
buffalo wrote:
You know, coolio, you are pathetic.

So the saudis rented some rooms from trumpy's hotel. Tell me, what did the saudis get when they "donated" MILLIONS to the clinton family tax dodging slush fund...er...trust. Tell me what the ruskies got for donating MILLIONS to the clinton family tax dodging slush fund...er...trust. How about oman or qatar?


Those don't count.

It was the Clintons.

It only counts when something can be fabricated against Trump.

Now kindly leave the Clinton's alone so they can make their corruption money in peace.

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 07:16:50   #
buffalo (a regular here)
 
Seth wrote:
Those don't count.

It was the Clintons.

It only counts when something can be fabricated against Trump.

Now kindly leave the Clinton's alone so they can make their corruption money in peace.


It may be "fabricated" against trumpy but it is a REALITY that bitch clinton and her slick willie are the pay for play champions and are traitors.

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 07:41:34   #
nwtk2007 (a regular here)
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Are you aware that President Trump resigned as CEO of the companies (over 400) that included the Washington Hotel? This happened the day before he was sworn into office.
So the Saudis rented rooms in a hotel that bears the name of Trump, but he (the President) does not have holding in any company. So, the President was not lying.... you may have just forgotten that he signed over all his holdings. However, up until the day he signed over his positions... the Saudi often stayed in his hotels and bought condos...
Are you aware that President Trump resigned as CEO... (show quote)


Dern factual thinking!!!

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 07:42:27   #
nwtk2007 (a regular here)
 
buffalo wrote:
It may be "fabricated" against trumpy but it is a REALITY that bitch clinton and her slick willie are the pay for play champions and are traitors.


$200,000 donation to the Clinton foundation would get you time with the president himself!

| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 08:32:27   #
Jakebrake (a regular here)
 
buffalo wrote:
You know, coolio, you are pathetic. PAT FOR PLAY...really?

So the saudis rented some rooms from trumpy's hotel. Tell me, what did the saudis get when they "donated" MILLIONS to the clinton family tax dodging slush fund...er...trust. The invasion of Libya and Qaddafi's murder? Tell me what the ruskies got for donating MILLIONS to the clinton family tax dodging slush fund...er...trust. 20% of US uranium? How about oman or qatar?

"Among all the rivers of money that have flowed to the Clinton family, one seems to raise the biggest national security questions of all: the stream of cash that came from 20 foreign governments who relied on weapons export approvals from Hillary Clinton's State Department.

Federal law designates the secretary of state as "responsible for the continuous supervision and general direction of sales" of arms, military hardware and services to foreign countries. In practice, that meant that Clinton was charged with rejecting or approving weapons deals -- and when it came to Clinton Foundation donors, Hillary Clinton's State Department did a whole lot of approving.

While Clinton was secretary of state, her department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors. That figure from Clinton's three full fiscal years in office is almost double the value of arms sales to those countries during the same period of President George W. Bush's second term.

The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that gave to the Clinton Foundation. That was a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period.

American military contractors and their affiliates that donated to the Clinton Foundation -- and in some cases, helped finance speaking fees to Bill Clinton -- also got in on the action. Those firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth of arms deals authorized by the Clinton State Department.

Under a directive signed by President Clinton in 1995, the State Department is supposed to take foreign governments' human rights records into account when reviewing arms deals. Yet, Hillary Clinton's State Department increased approvals of such deals to Clinton Foundation donors that her own agency was sharply criticizing for systematic human rights abuses.

As just one of many examples, in its 2011 Human Rights Report, Clinton's State Department slammed Algeria's government for imposing "restrictions on freedom of assembly and association," tolerating "arbitrary killing," "widespread corruption" and a "lack of judicial independence."

That year, the Algerian government donated $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation and the next year Clinton's State Department approved a one-year 70 percent increase in military export authorizations to the country. The jump included authorizations for almost 50,000 items classified as "toxicological agents, including chemical agents, biological agents and associated equipment." The State Department had not authorized the export of any of such items to Algeria the year before.

During Hillary Clinton's 2009 Senate confirmation hearings, Republican Sen. Richard Lugar said the Clinton Foundation should stop accepting foreign government money. He warned that if it didn't, "foreign governments and entities may perceive the Clinton Foundation as a means to gain favor with the secretary of state."

The Clintons did not take his advice. Advocates for limits on the political influence of money now say that Lugar was prescient.

"The word was out to these groups that one of the best ways to gain access and influence with the Clintons was to give to this foundation," said Meredith McGehee, policy director at the Campaign Legal Center.

While these arms deals may seem like ancient history, Lawrence Lessig, the director of Harvard University's Safra Center for Ethics, says they "raise a fundamental question of judgment" -- one that is relevant to the 2016 presidential campaign.

"Can it really be that the Clintons didn't recognize the questions these transactions would raise?" he said. "And if they did, what does that say about their sense of the appropriate relationship between private gain and public good?"

http://www.salon.com/2015/05/31/the_cash_donations_hillary_simply_has_no_answer_for_partner/

Tellme, coolio, when are bitch clinton and her slick willie going to be executed for TREASON?
You know, coolio, you are pathetic. PAT FOR PLAY..... (show quote)



| Reply
Dec 7, 2018 08:39:49   #
Seth (a regular here)
 
buffalo wrote:
It may be "fabricated" against trumpy but it is a REALITY that bitch clinton and her slick willie are the pay for play champions and are traitors.


I'm pretty sure that Trump, who's a hell of a lot smarter than those folks realize, has something cooked up for them.

Democrat House and all, watch what happens in the next few months. If I'm right, Hillary and the rest of the Obama Corruption Club© will be in for some unpleasant surprises, and they'll finally get the justice they so richly deserve.


| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2018 IDF International Technologies, Inc.