Lena

Anyone who isn’t certain that Democrats are dev**ed to destroying America need only take a look at their despicable conduct in the Florida Senate. In a v**e that never should have had to be taken, every single Democrat v**ed to force Sharia Law on the people of Florida. By doing so, they placed women and children in very real danger. The v**e was 24 v**es for America and 14 v**es for al Qaeda and the Taliban cast by loathsome Democrats. They v**ed to deny Americans the Constitutional protections generations of American men and women fought for and died to protect. Democrats have revealed their desire to force Americans to live as s***es to a third world, foreign “justice system.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/florida-democrats-just-v**ed-impose-sharia-law-women/#OI8VO02FtVcTK4DP.99

skott Loc: Bama

I replied to this on another string. Please check some facts before you post. Check for real facts.

skott Loc: Bama

Also, I love the title because it is conservatives that are being lied to and swallowing it hook, line , and sinker!

Homestead

If your going to call someone out on some mistakes, then you need to list, at least some of, the mistakes.

Are you saying there was no such v**e in Florida?
Are you saying that it wasn't all Democrats v****g for it in Florida.
Are you saying Shari Law isn't that bad.

What are the facts that you know, that she missed?

Comment Loc: California

COME ON SKOTT, PONEY UP ARE SHUT UP.

skott Loc: Bama

No such v**e. If you can actually find a FL Law that is close, I would love to read it.

skott Loc: Bama

I can't prove a negative. Will someone that believes this story give me a bill number from the law. Prove you are right.

skott Loc: Bama

I would settle for the name of the proposed law.

Homestead

Fair enough, Ill see what I can do.

But, you said that her post was wrong.

You have no way of knowing whether it was wrong or not, yet.

You should have said, that you didn't buy it and took some time to search and refute it.

You didn't do that.

skott Loc: Bama

Here is the text of the bill being sited:

2014386er
1
2 An act relating to the application of foreign law in
3 courts; creating s. 61.040, F.S.; defining the term
4 “strong public policy”; prohibiting a court from
5 enforcing certain choice of law or forum se******n
6 contractual provisions; requiring a court to review
7 judgments and orders of foreign courts for comity
8 before enforcing such orders or judgments; specifying
9 judgments and orders of foreign courts that are not
10 entitled to comity; providing that the attempt to
11 apply the law of a foreign country is void under
12 certain circumstances; prohibiting a trial court from
13 dismissing an action on the grounds that a
14 satisfactory remedy may be more conveniently sought in
15 a foreign country; providing an exception; providing
16 applicability; providing an effective date.
17
18 WHEREAS, the purpose of the courts of this state is to
19 fairly and justly adjudicate disputes, and
20 WHEREAS, the common law and other court interpreted law of
21 this state protects litigants from the application of unfair and
22 unjust laws of foreign countries, and
23 WHEREAS, with respect to the enforceability of choice of
24 law provisions, this act codifies the holdings of Mintz & Fraade
25 P.C., v. Beta Drywall Acquisition, LLC, 59 So.3d 1173, 1176
26 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Walls v. Quick & Reilly, Inc., 824 So.2d
27 1016, 1018 (Fla. 5th DCA); and
28 WHEREAS, with respect to the enforceability of forum
29 se******n clauses, this act codifies the holdings of Manrique v.
30 Fabbri, 493 So.2d 437, 440 (Fla. 1986) and Illinois Union
31 Insurance Co. v. Co-Free, Inc., 128 So.3d 820 (Fla. 1st DCA
32 2013); and
33 WHEREAS, with respect to the enforceability of a judgment
34 or order of a court of a foreign country, this act codifies the
35 holding of Nahar v. Nahar, 656 So.2d 225, 229 (Fla. 3d DCA
36 1995); and
37 WHEREAS, with respect to the application of the law of a
38 foreign state, this act codifies McNamara v. McNamara, 40 So.3d
39 78, 80 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); and
40 WHEREAS, with respect to the dismissal of a case on the
41 grounds that a satisfactory remedy may be more conveniently
42 sought in a foreign country, this act codifies the result of
43 Rule 1.061(a)(1), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, NOW,
44 THEREFORE,
45
46 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
47
48 Section 1. Section 61.040, Florida Statutes, is created to
49 read:
50 61.040 Application of the law of a foreign country in
51 courts relating to matters arising out of or relating to
52 chapters 61 and 88.—
53 (1) As used in this section, the term “strong public
54 policy” means public policy of sufficient importance to outweigh
55 the policy of protecting freedom of contract.
56 (2) A court may not enforce:
57 (a) A choice of law provision in a contract selecting the
58 law of a foreign country which contravenes the strong public
59 policy of this state or that is unjust or unreasonable.
60 (b) A forum se******n clause in a contract that selects a
61 forum in a foreign country if the clause is shown to be
62 unreasonable or unjust or if strong public policy would prohibit
63 the enforceability of the clause under the specific facts of the
64 case.
65 (3) Before enforcing a judgment or order of a court of a
66 foreign country, a court must review the judgment or order to
67 ensure that it complies with the rule of comity. A judgment or
68 order of a court of a foreign country is not entitled to comity
69 if the parties were not given adequate notice and the
70 opportunity to be heard, the foreign court did not have
71 jurisdiction, or the judgment or order of the foreign court
72 offends the public policy of this state. As used in this
73 subsection, a “foreign court” or “court of a foreign country”
74 includes any court or tribunal that has jurisdiction under the
75 laws of that nation over the subject of matters governed by
76 chapter 61 or chapter 88.
77 (4) Any attempt to apply the law of a foreign country is
78 void if it contravenes the strong public policy of this state or
79 if the law is unjust or unreasonable.
80 (5) A trial court may not dismiss an action on the grounds
81 that a satisfactory remedy may be more conveniently sought in a
82 foreign country unless the trial court finds in accordance with
83 all the applicable rules of civil procedure and this section
84 that an adequate alternate forum exists.
85 (6) This section applies only to matters governed by or
86 relating to chapter 61 or chapter 88.
87
88 The purpose of this section is to codify existing case law, and
89 that intent should guide the interpretation of this section.
90 Section 2. This act shall take effect on October 1, 2014.

1.) It never mentions Shari law.
2.) It was not brought by the Dems, who opposed it.
3.) It is about foreign court rulings. Not foreign law.
What part of this matches the story in the link?

skott Loc: Bama

Here is the title of her link: Florida Democrats Just V**ed To Impose Sharia Law On Women

Did they? Maybe, possibly, sort of, in extreme instances, such as being married in Saudi Arabia would still mean you are married here. The title infers that American women will be wearing berkas(don't know how to spell the robes) and be beaten in the streets. It was certainly meant to send a not true message.

Inyourface Loc: East Coast

Working class ,w****s who carry water for the GOP are an enigma. The GOP, in cahoots with the greedy rich have suppressed their wages, exported their jobs, and are allowing the nation's infrastructure to rot and decay. Yet ,these w****s stubbornly v**e for the GOP and against their own best interests. There is a type of insanity afflicting these folks and it's all pretty pathetic.

Kevyn

This article is planted by political oppertives who want to enrage people like Lena who are so gullible they will buy anything that reinforces their obviously clueless political opinions. The hope is that folks will buy into and spread this nonsense to fellow zealots as Lena has here. I would hope after the originator of this crap was successful in leading Lena into making a fool of herself to everyone she turned on to this nugget of nonsense that she would be outraged at being deceived and call out the original poster as a liar and fraud, learn from her embarrassing mistake and more carefully read and select sources she can trust when forming her opinions. I don't think we should hold our breath waiting for that to happen.

skott Loc: Bama

No they swallow it hook, line , and sinker. I do worry about their thoughts of their fellow man. They must live in a real hell to believe so badly of so many.

Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way

I am being chastised by my wife for reading headlines and not reading the text or collaborating with t***h from multiple sites.

I think this maybe one of those instances where I looked beyond the headline and found only partial t***h.